Redistribution if Missed Dose....Picked Up By Next Dose?

[Guest guest]

So I was wondering about this and would welcome your thoughts. I

could be totally wrong about anything here, so please point it out if

I am.

To the best of my knowledge, free-floating mercury in the blood does

not immediately settle. My doctor said it takes 72 hours to settle

and bind somewhere. Within that time frame it is still in

circulation, can be measured in the blood, and is not yet permanently

bound to anything.

So if you miss a 4-hour dose, say maybe the night dose, would not the

first dose of the morning pick up the leftover mercury before it had

a chance to permanently bind somewhere? As the fresh dose of DMSA

enters the system, would not the most recent mercury from missed-dose-

redistribution be the most vulnerable to being picked up, versus the

old mercury which is still deeply buried?

I do believe that regardless of this possibility, any mercury...free-

floating or bound...is not going to feel good. But in terms of

redistribution danger, I wonder if a missed dose is really as

catastrophic as is claimed? Won't that freshly redistributed mercury

be easily picked up by the next dose in a few hours?

And kind of along the same lines, would it not be possible to take

the 4 hour doses of DMSA but only a single dose of ALA per day? The

ALA would loosen some mercury into the path of DMSA, but not

overwhelm the patient with a continuous dump? A single daily dose of

ALA against a backdrop of continuous DMSA?

Your thoughts on the above two topics?

[Guest guest]

--------------------------------------------------

Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 6:47 PM

To: <frequent-dose-chelation >

Subject: Redistribution if Missed Dose....Picked

Up By Next Dose?

> I do believe that regardless of this possibility, any mercury...free-

> floating or bound...is not going to feel good. But in terms of

> redistribution danger, I wonder if a missed dose is really as

> catastrophic as is claimed?

======Be assured, you'll only need to experience it once, and will forever

avoid skipping a dose and carrying on with the round.

I think it has happened to a few of us before. it is not worth it.

======You did however make two interesting points although not Andy's

protocol at all.. I wonder what others' response

to it will be.

Kai

>

[Guest guest]

> As the fresh dose of DMSA

> enters the system, would not the most recent mercury from missed-

dose-

> redistribution be the most vulnerable to being picked up, versus

the

> old mercury which is still deeply buried?

It seems like the chelator will grab whichever molecules of mercury

have the best physical location and electrical orientation (position

of the relevant electrons, which are always moving), and may also

depend on dynamic electrical charges in the vicinity, so the most

recently deposited mercury would not necessarily be grabbed first.

> would it not be possible to take

> the 4 hour doses of DMSA but only a single dose of ALA per day? The

> ALA would loosen some mercury into the path of DMSA, but not

> overwhelm the patient with a continuous dump? A single daily dose

of

> ALA against a backdrop of continuous DMSA?

You can't be sure this single dose of ALA will get the mercury out of

the fat and into the blood for clearance by DMSA.