Guest guest Posted September 2, 2008 Report Share Posted September 2, 2008 > --------------This is an interesting question? Anyone know the answer? > > I have done 21 rounds of dmsa only and I just increased my dose from > 5mg dmsa to 6mg dmsa which was too much and i need to stay at 5mg's. I > have not tried ALA...should I try it? > Sunshine Hi Sunshine, At some point you HAVE to try ALA if you are mercury toxic. It is essential to chelation, while DMSA/DMPS are optional. ALA crosses the cell walls, while the others only clear up extra-cellular mercury. It is the stuff inside the cells that usually keeps us sick. Thanks, Dean Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2008 Report Share Posted September 2, 2008 In frequent-dose-chelation sunshinep1969 wrote: > > Might someone react poorly to DMSA but not to ALA? I would hate to > postpone ALA waiting in vain to enjoy DMSA? > --------------This is an interesting question? Anyone know the answer? -----------From what I have gathered from reading these boards for a few years now, is that everyone is different, and some people tolerate or do better on different chelators than others. Some do report doing better on ALA alone. Some feel they need the combination and do better that way. Some don't tolerate DMSA and do better on DMPS or ALA. We're all different, and I don't think anybody can predict who will tolerate what. You just have to try the different chelators and find out what works best for yourself.----------Jackie I have done 21 rounds of dmsa only and I just increased my dose from 5mg dmsa to 6mg dmsa which was too much and i need to stay at 5mg's. I have not tried ALA...should I try it? ----------As Dean said, you will have to try it at some point. I am a little surprised that after that long of chelating, that you noticed and couldn't tolerate that small of an increase. So you evidentally are a very sensitive person. But I agree with , that you should try ALA at some point, but do so at a very small dose, like 5mg or less, and see how you feel. I wouldn't add it to the DMSA, since you tolerate such a small dose of that. You don't want to take too much chelator in total, since you are so sensitive.--------Jackie I am 10 months amalgam free, dosing every 2.5 hours in the day and 3 hours at night, 3 days on tops. Sunshine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2008 Report Share Posted September 3, 2008 > > Might someone react poorly to DMSA but not to ALA? I would hate to > > postpone ALA waiting in vain to enjoy DMSA? > > > --------------This is an interesting question? Anyone know the answer?-----------Sunshine > --------------Hi Dean/Jackie/ I kinda set myself a target of not trying ALA until I could increase my DMSA dosage. I just tried going up from 5mg to 6mg DMSA this weekend and that's not possible as I got too many symptoms on and especially off round at the end. At 5mg's DMSA every 2.5 hours and 3 hours at night I have a smooth and easy round with only minor minor symptoms. 6mg's was too much…afterwards I spent two days in a fog gazing at the walls. I am a sensitive soul! LOL. It passed and I'm fine now. Do you think its wise/prudent for me to do a trial run of ALA now. I am 10 months amalgam free and I only have symptoms when I chelate. When I break from chelation, for like a month to do other detoxes, I am back to being a normal person. I am not in perfect health but I am regaining it now, I'm pain free and symptoms free and life is good again. I have been considering not chelating at all now that I am better, but I know the mercury is still in me from the symptoms I get when I chelate…I know it will bite me in the future if I ignore it now, so I will continue chelation. My gut feeling says ALA on its own. I would try it at a similar low dose too and the same timings. I must say I figured my low tolerance to only low doses of DMSA meant that I still had a high body burden which meant that I needed to be patient and chill out and not rush things. But, things have changed for me, because the chronic pain is gone…I guess the mercury is locked away in safe-ish storage somewhere(everywhere) ………..so maybe it is time for a trial of ALA? Just having this conversation has made me think …… I think its time for an ALA trial. Do you think it's prudent? Sunshine Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2008 Report Share Posted September 3, 2008 I would give a trial of ALA at 5 mg or lower. You can always stop if you need to... I do remember some people saying that they had trouble with DMSA and less so with ALA only. J > > > > Might someone react poorly to DMSA but not to ALA? I would hate > to > > > postpone ALA waiting in vain to enjoy DMSA? > > > > > --------------This is an interesting question? Anyone know the > answer?-----------Sunshine > > > > --------------Hi Dean/Jackie/ > I kinda set myself a target of not trying ALA until I could increase > my DMSA dosage. I just tried going up from 5mg to 6mg DMSA this > weekend and that's not possible as I got too many symptoms on and > especially off round at the end. At 5mg's DMSA every 2.5 hours and 3 > hours at night I have a smooth and easy round with only minor minor > symptoms. 6mg's was too much…afterwards I spent two days in a fog > gazing at the walls. I am a sensitive soul! LOL. It passed and I'm > fine now. > > Do you think its wise/prudent for me to do a trial run of ALA now. I > am 10 months amalgam free and I only have symptoms when I chelate. > When I break from chelation, for like a month to do other detoxes, I > am back to being a normal person. I am not in perfect health but I am > regaining it now, I'm pain free and symptoms free and life is good > again. > > I have been considering not chelating at all now that I am better, > but I know the mercury is still in me from the symptoms I get when I > chelate…I know it will bite me in the future if I ignore it now, so I > will continue chelation. > > My gut feeling says ALA on its own. I would try it at a similar low > dose too and the same timings. > > I must say I figured my low tolerance to only low doses of DMSA meant > that I still had a high body burden which meant that I needed to be > patient and chill out and not rush things. But, things have changed > for me, because the chronic pain is gone…I guess the mercury is > locked away in safe-ish storage somewhere(everywhere) ………..so maybe > it is time for a trial of ALA? > > Just having this conversation has made me think …… I think its time > for an ALA trial. Do you think it's prudent? > > Sunshine > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.