Guest guest Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 > > > > > > <snip> > > >and considering that my menstrual cycles are now so short (only > > 22 days) that my bleeding begins before conception and implantation could occur, > > You don't understand the dynamics AT ALL. > > You can get pregnant just fine. The fertile period is about 14 days before your menstrual > flow starts. The problem is in the FIRST half of the cycle being short, not the second half. > The second half of the cycle is almost like clockwork in all women, it is the first half that > varies a lot. > -------------------Actually, Andy, I do understand the dynamics. The fertile period begins with the end of the dry period ( no cervical mucus or dry cervical mucus) that immediately follows the end of bleeding. As soon as there is fertile cervical mucus, which occurs from 5-7 days before ovulation, that is the fertile period of the cycle. The most fertile period of the cylce is PRIOR to ovulation, since the fertile cervical mucus is the optimal mode for keeping sperm alive for up to 3-5 days while it stays there waiting for the arrival of the egg (which lives 24 hours at the longest). After ovulation, there is generally only one day of fertile cervical mucus, but usually there is no more fertile cervical mucus after ovulation--a woman's secretions become dry right after ovulation, usually. This is the case with me. Right after the end of bleeding, the dry period lasts about 7 days. Then cervical mucus is cottage-cheese in consistancy (this is not fertile mucus), then it becomes wet and slightly creamy, but breaking easily (not very fertile) , and then it becomes clear and egg-white in consistency, dangling very long (several inches) without breaking--and THIS is fertile cervical mucus. This is the stuff that lasts for 3-5 days. This is the stuff that, for me has been blood-red for the past year or more since regaining my cylces after weaning my daughter, while before having my daughter, it was always clear, as it normally should be. > >it is > > quite apparent to me that pregnancy is pretty much impossible for a women like me > with > > no hormones, > > I know ones with very similar situations who got pregnant just fine the first time they tried. ---------------Don't you think I've " been there, done that? " I mentioned this in my emails from February that you responded to this week. Before buying your book, my husband and I had already been trying to conceive for over a year without success. We always timed " intimacy " optimally--going for it the most during my most fertile times. By taking my basal body temperature religiously every morning for most months in the past year and a half, I have alwasy known WHEN I ovulated and IF I ovulated. Therefore, I can tell you down to the day, for pretty much any month in 2007 and 2008, exactly when I ovulated. If I ovulate, then get my period only 5 or 6 days later, that means my Luteal phase (the second half of my cycle) is too short. This is how it is with me--always. I ovulate on day 14 or day 15, like clockwork. But after that, my period comes far too soon. > > >and being hypoadrenal is probably the most effective form of birth control, > > Nope. > > Adrenal hormones aren't what regulate pregnancy, the female sex hormones do. Since > you cycle regularly those are working adequately to let you get pregnant. ----------------I know that. But Progesterone is the precursor to Cortisol. I surmise that I am very, very low in Progesterone, judging by my very sort luteal phase, as recent anovulation. If I'm deficient in progesterone, then doesn't it make sense that I'm also deficient in Cortisol? In fact, Dr. says in his book that using Natural Progesterone Cream can help the body produce a little more cortisol. My hypoadrenal symptoms are coinciding with all this. I'm infertile (low progesterone), and hypoadrenal (low cortisol, which is definitely not helped at all by being low progesterone). ---------------Please tell me whether Dr. Lam (drlam.com--sorry, I mistakenly said " Dr. Lee " in the last message) is correct in the following quote from his extensive article on Adrenal Fatigue. This article is linked on Dean's adreanal page that I got from this webgroup. Dr. Lam says: " The adrenal cortex is also responsible for producing all sex hormones, although in small amounts. One exception is DHEA, a weak androgenic hormone that is made in large amounts in both sexes. DHEA, together with testosterone and estrogen, are made from pregnenolone, which in turn comes from cholesterol . .. . . in Adrenal Exhaustion, Despite rising ACTH, the adrenals are no longer able to keep up the increased demand for cortisol production. .. . . Total cortisol output is therefore reduced, and DHEA falls far below average. The nighttime cortisol level is usually reduced as the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis " crash " and the body is unable to maintain homeostasis. SEVERE SEX HORMONE IMBALANCES (ESTROGEN, PROGESTERONE, AND ANDROGENS) ARE COMMON AND A PRECURSOR TO ADRENAL FAILURE. " ----------------My period has been AS SHORT AS 22 days long, but it is by no means regular. It has never been the same number of days long as the previous cycle. I'd say average, it is 25 days, though. But again, it varies every month. What does NOT vary is that I ovulate on day 14 or 15, usually day 14 (except for the last 2 cycles, wherein my temperatures did not have the thermal shift followed by a sustained higher temperature above the coverline, indicating I did NOT ovulate at all during the last two cycles, which is a totally new development). Trust me--I've studied fertility obsessively for a long time now, trying to get to the bottom of my menstrual irregularities and the reason we are infertile. > > > since it is basically rendering me about as reproductive as I was before puberty! > > No, they're rendering you as libidinous as you were before puberty, but you are still having > menstrual flow and thus very likely are still as fertile as other adult women. ------------------Sorry, but if I were as fertile as other adult women, then why have my husband and I been trying vigorously since January 2007 (when my ovulatory cylces returned post-weaning), with no conception?! Yes, it could be him, but considering my luteal phase defect I described above, I don't appear to be making enought Progesterone to sustain a luteal phase of the proper length (Progesterone is the predominant and required hormone of the Luteal Phase of the cycle--post ovulation, which keeps the uterine lining intact supposedly 10-14 days to allow time for conception and implantation). Again, my luteal phase has always been too short, and I know this because I always know exactly when I ovulate, if I ovulate. > > > But from > > your book I surmise that this is ultimately due to pituitary insufficiency, right? > ___-------------------On page 114 of AI, you said that one of the clues that something is wrong with the pituitary is " women having menstrual cycles without ovulation " (that's me for the past 2 cycles) " and low-end LH and FSH surges. Irregular menstrual cycles or cycles of unusual length or shortness " (that's me since January 2007). > No, that is not correct. Especially since your cycle is regular, if short. ________________I addressed the matter of regularity above. Since my > > > I couldn't get my endocrinologist to do an ACTH stress test on me. We'll see this > > Thursday if my Osteopathic Doctor will do an ACTH stress test on me. I'm convinced > that, > > as long as my adrenals are out of whack, which is reallly my pituitary out of whack (my > > endo. DID do a corisol stimulation test on me, and that came back fine, just like your > book > > said it would), I probably can't get pregnant any more than my 8 year old neice could > get > > pregnant. > > Many women in your situation do become pregnant. It is quite possible and not unlikely. > > > In addition to the fact that my cycles have been impossibly short for a long time > > now, I stopped ovulating last month. > > How do you know that? -----------------Every woman who has ever had some difficulty conceiving sooner or later educates herself on what it takes to learn the optimaly timing for intercourse, thus the most fertile time. AS I said above, I know this because of taking my basal body temperatures--a very clear indicator, when done correctly, and I have done it correctly, of the hormone shift from Estrogen dominance pre-ovulation to Progesterone dominance, and thus a large and sustained increase in temperature once ovulation has occured. This way, a woman who is either trying to conceive, or trying to avoid, my know if she's ovulated, and about when it occurred. So since my cycles showed now thermal shift for the past two cycles, just a continual zig-zag without going above the coverline, I DO know that I did not ovulate. Go on some " trying to conceive " websites to learn more about this. > > > So do you see what I'm saying? Why bother with > > birth control when my body thinks I'm pre-pubescent? > > Your body does NOT think you're prepubescent. If it did you would have no menstrual > cycles and all your pubic and underarm hair would fall out. ------------The " pre-pubescent " comment was not meant to be taken literally. It was meant tongue-in-cheek. It was my facetious way of reinforcing the point that I can read all my body's signals and recognize that I don't have enough Progesterone to conceive. So, you see, I'm saying that my pituitary is the problem, and my hypoadrenal symptoms are one result, and my lack of sufficient progesterone to sustain a full-length menstrual cycle or conceive, are also other results of the problem in the pituitary (and, I guess, the hypothalamus, as well). > > > I'm telling you this not as a > > hypothetical, or a theory I have like some scientist making up hypotheses--I know my > > cycles are no longer fertile, as evidenced by the changes I described above. > > > > I do expect to regain my fertility through completing your protocol, though. In fact, my > > infertility is the thing that lead me to look into amalgam illness in the first place. What I > > do think is important for me to consider is that my hypopituitarism, hypoadrenalism, > and > > therefore, my > > not so sure about this. > > fertility, are bound to get straightened out after a certain amount of mercury > > has been chelated out --and I have no way of knowing exactly at what stage in the > > chelation process that will occur. > > THIS is correct. > > > For that reason, I appreciate your warnings; because it is irrelevant to me in my girlish > > state right now, but it will certainly be relevant after a certain amount of chelation. I > must > > take that seriously, I know, because I certainly want my future children to have every > > opportunity to live in a toxin-free womb (which, again, is my very reason for embarking > > on this chelation journey). I will definitely be paying close attention to how my cycles > may > > change as I go through the DMSA/ALA rounds. That is a matter for me to pray about > and > > discuss with my husband. > > Yes. Please do that. You have to make your decision your way, I hope the information > above helps you make a good one. > > > I am curious to read any thoughts you may have about my reply above. Thanks again! > > > > Abrenica > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 Andy-- One other thing. You said: " Adrenal hormones aren't what regulate pregnancy, the female sex hormones do. " However, on page 34 of AI, you indicate in the diagram with the dotted line that there ARE female sex hormones that are made by the adrenal gland: Progesterone, which is basically THE pregnancy hormone. Without sufficient Progesterone, a woman cannot acheive pregnancy, because her luteal phase will be cut short before implantation. I am almost certain this is happening with me. You indicate on that page that Pregnenolone is made in the adrenal gland. Pregnenolone leads to DHEA, which leads to other sex hormones. So it appears from page 34 of your book, that the adrenal glands do make pregnancy possible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 23, 2008 Report Share Posted April 23, 2008 Andy-- I was looking for this quote earlier and couldn't find it, so that's why it's trailing in another reply. Sorry. Dr. Lam said in his adrenal fatigue article: " The adrenal glands contribute about 35 percent of female hormones pre-menopausal and almost 50 percent post-menopausally. Furthermore, without the proper functioning of the adrenal glands, pregnancy cannot occur. " Please take not of that last sentence. Without proper functioning of the adrenal glands, pregnancy cannot occur. I believe this is the ultimate cause of my infertility from January 2007 up until now. Abrenica From a previous post: Often with adrenal impairment androgens go UP while other things go down. > Pregnancy will probably be impossible for me as long > as I am hypoadrenal. Don't count on it. >Dr. Lee's website says that (where he describes hypoadrenalism), and > your book implies that, They imply a PROBABILITY which is far less than 100%. There is some fairly significant probability you can conceive just fine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.