Guest guest Posted April 24, 2008 Report Share Posted April 24, 2008 The way I understand muscle testing and mercury is that your body has no idea what the mercury lodged in the body will do with whatever you eat. Your body may like the, for example cilantro, but your body has no idea how the mercury will react to the cilantro…hence a reading that is misleading/false/irrelevant. Kinesiology is also very dependant on the skill of the practitioner too. I don't approve of the waving over the stomach testing, I think a much better way is to put a little on your tongue…..your tongue is much more sensitive than waving anything over the tummy. That is the purpose of the tongue after all, to prepare/alert your body for what is being ingested. I do find muscle testing useful as a " tool " for food intolerances, but for mercury I do not think it is reliable. (note the word " tool " , muscle testing shoule be used as a guide only.) I muscle tested fine for cysteine, so I took it and it made me very sick for 1 month. Hurt like hell that did. re dmsa and muscle testing: as said, everything depends on the dose anyway. Sunshine > > kinesiology works but the answer is correct only if the person asking > is neutral and has no preference. If the person is not neutral his or > her own opinion is what you get. I have used it myself, read several > books on it and talked to people that use it, neutrality is the key. > Alot of people think they are neutral, kinda hard if you are selling a > product in my opinion. > Vivian > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.