OT. Re: Still toxic? Yet chelation proves fruitless.

October 16, 2008

Please note that in this group we do not promote Hulda 's methods.

Anything that she says has either not been evaluated by Andy Cutler, or he has

not commented on it, so it is suggested that each individual investigate on

their own before following her recommendations.

(a moderator)

message below:

-----------------------------------------------------------

Please research Hulda . It is her belief that the newest

porcelain and ceramics have lanthanide metals, among other things.

This might explain why the chelation may not be working as you expect.

>

> Hi Nanci,

>

> Yes I did follow the frequent dose method. I follow it everytime I

> do chelation. I followed it when my amalgams were removed 12 years

> ago and got well. I have followed it whenever I've been re-exposed

> and have always responded well.

>

> If you read my post, you will see that because of viral infection

> (persistent) and later other possible exposures to mercury from

> dental office visits, I once again used chelation. I used it again

> according to Andy Cutler's protocol and improved.....yet this time

> it's not working. I got no effects (good or bad). Even on very high

> doses, yet I am very toxic again. I have had recent dental office

> visits (unrelated to amalgam) for replacement of plastic composites

> with cerec porcelain. Again, I felt repoisoned from metals. Yet the

> chelation has not worked.

>

> I am trying to find out why it does not help me now? There is

> NOTHING happening when I try rounds of chelation. No matter WHAT

> dose I'm using it at. All I get is a worse case of candida and

> nothing more.

>

> I'm well aware of the dangers of redistribution. But that is not

> what this is about. I have not had ANY reaction good or bad from

> even the right method of chelation.

>

> >

>

Recommended Posts