Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: 's Eligiblity Meeting

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

I'm happy that is doing so well.

Maggie

________________________________________________________________

The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!

Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!

Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Sounds like good progress, . I'm so glad to hear people reporting

good news on the education front. Way to go !

(SAHM in GA)

MSN elizabethloht@...

n 33, mo, no formal dx

Phoebe, 11 wks

's Eligiblity Meeting

> As expected he has expressive and receptive delays with expressive

> being significantly more impacted. His receptive language has shown

> some nice gains lately which is a very nice thing to see. He

> continues to have oral motor issues. He has no tongue tip elevation

> and limited lateral movement with stimulation. His bite is reduced

> strength, but he has made progress with other oral motor skills.

> When we have the IEP I expect 1:1 speech will continue to address the

> apraxia and artic issues. The good news is that even though he does

> not have hardly any language to speak of, he is functionally

> communicating. YAY! The ground work is paying off and he is using

> the concepts of communication with various sounds and posturing so

> even though speech itself is very delayed we have covered alot of

> ground.

>

> His social skills are developing nicely with the class he is in and

> we are seeing generalization of some of those skills at home and at

> the church nursery. He is attending to story books more and not just

> looking at reference manuals, although he maintains a preference for

> certain themes. At least he is enjoying picture books to some

> degree now.

>

> Sensory issues, particularly vestibular are being addressed. The

> class has sensory-motor built into it which is working nicely for him

> and there are OTs present a good portion of the time, so while he

> will be receiving indirect services here with consultation this is

> still going to covered nicely.

>

> The recommendation for elegibility was developmental delay at this

> point to give us more options to work with. Sandy did not want to

> confine him to a school age category yet as she felt that could box

> them in and limit options at this time.

>

> Overall I continue to be very pleased with the services is

> receiving and the progress he is making. Now if we could just figure

> out what to do with Chris....

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...