Guest guest Posted May 24, 2008 Report Share Posted May 24, 2008 Dana - 9 outside the green zone. 2 red, one borderline. 8 low, 4 more borderline. I don't see a counting rule here. Mercury is .36, not excessively low. No other toxic elements elevated. Co is red low ==> B12 <<might>> be useful. K/Ca = .029 a bit low. You <<might>> want to consider testing thyroid. .... Ah, now I'm looking at your email. Yes, do test thyroid. It seems you've already discovered B12, so keep up with that. I would suggest an elimination diet, since he seems to have some allergy symptoms. Otherwise, all I could say is that this test is by no means screaming mercury. You are giving a lot of supplements, and that will have the tendency to improve things. Also, old toxicity will be less present in hair - but still this doesn't look really skewed to me at all. I'm not seeing any confirmation of mercury issues in the hair. On the other hand... all of the symptoms you describe _could_ have something to do with mercury. As a result, it is certainly possible that if your husband was feeling like he wanted to go through mercury removal and detox then some of this stuff might abate; but that's a big job and you have no real confirmation that it will in fact have an effect. If you want to explore this further, I notice that he has some photo-sensitivity. You might consider a porphyrin test (porphyria is associated with photophobia, and mercury causes porphyria). The test is very sensitive to handling though, and often shows false negative. Still, if you wanted to go through the work of doing the test, perhaps you might find something. That's the best I can do right now. Good luck, Dave. ------------------- Posted by: " Dana Black " danablack@... danaclaire1945 Fri May 23, 2008 10:44 am (PDT) Hi- We've just gotten the results of my husband's hair test and would appreciate any comments. He's 64 and in reasonably good health, though his TSH was above 4 and he's cold much of the time. He also has moderately severe hay fever allergies, digestive issues, moderate light sensitivity, and has lower energy than I would expect for his age (has slowed down in the past 3 or 4 years). He's had a mouth full of amalgams since childhood, though some have been replaced with composite as the old ones fail. We both take " tons " of supplements (including mentylcobalamin) and have for many years. Thanks so much, Dana B Adult Male... >>Toxic Elements (all no bar or green) Aluminum 2.4 (ref < 7.0) green Antimony 0.041 (ref < 0.066) green Arsenic 0.071 (ref < 0.080) green Beryllium < 0.01 (ref < 0.020) no bar Bismuth 0.040 (ref < 2.0) green Cadmium 0.010 (ref < 0.15) green Lead 0.08 (ref < 2.0) green Mercury 0.36 (ref < 1.1) green Platinum < 0.003 (ref < 0.005) no bar Thallium < 0.0001 (ref < 0.010) no bar Thorium < 0.001 (ref < 0.005) no bar Uranium 0.015 (ref < 0.060) green Nickel 0.08 (ref < 0.40) green Silver 0.03 (ref < 0.12) green Tin 0.24 (ref < 0.30) green Titanium 0.42 (ref < 1.0) green >>Essential and other elements Calcium 903 (200 - 750) high yellow Magnesium 52 (25 - 75) high green Sodium 120 (12 - 90) high yellow Potassium 26 (9 - 40) high green Copper 8.7 (10 - 28) low yellow Zinc 200 (130 - 200) high green Manganese 0.08 (0.15 - 0.65) low yellow (almost red) Chromium 0.34 (0.20 - 0.40) high green Vanadium 0.024 (0.018 - 0.065) low green Molybdenum 0.036 (0.025 - 0.064) low green Boron 1.2 (0.40 - 3.0) white Iodine 5.0 (0.25 - 1.3) high red Lithium 0.045 (0.007 - 0.023) high yellow Phosphorus 189 (160 - 250) low green Selenium 1.2 (0.95 - 1.7) white Strontium 4.9 (0.30 - 3.5) high yellow Sulfur 47400 (44500 - 52000) low green Barium 0.74 (0.16 - 1.6) high green Cobalt 0.003 (0.013 - 0.035) low red Iron 9.2 (5.4 - 13) high green Germanium 0.041 (0.045 - 0.065) low yellow Rubidium 0.031 (0.011 - 0.12) white Zirconium 0.081 (0.020 - 0.44) white >>Ratios Ca/Mg 17.4 (4 - 30) Ca/P 4.78 (0.8 - 8) Na/K 4.62 (0.5 - 10) Zn/Cu 23 (4 - 20) Zn/Cd > 999 (>800) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 26, 2008 Report Share Posted May 26, 2008 Dana. Sure thing. There is a great deal of evidence with regard to the efficacy of elimination diets though, and it is certainly a much easier thing to do than getting filling out and chelating. All he has to do is eat a restricted diet for 1 week, and then start putting in foods one by one to test their reaction. As for getting the fillings out - hey, I'm all for that. I mean, all I had to do was hear the word " mercury " associated with " fillings " , and mine were out of there. It was only 15 years later that I started having really serious symptoms. Before that, I had some stuff going on, but nothing really identifiable. Dave. --------------- Posted by: " Dana Black " danablack@... danaclaire1945 Sun May 25, 2008 1:12 pm (PDT) Hi Dave- Thanks so much for analyzing my husband's hair test. Even though the test doesn't look too bad, I'm hoping he will get his amalgams removed. He's still got quite a few, and in the interest of maintaining good health into the future, I think it would be of benefit. ordered an allergy (IgG) blood test, so maybe that will show something. Getting him to do an elimination diet is not an option without some evidence. I see him going downhill somewhat, but he's not sick enough to be motivated to do difficult stuff. Anyway, time will tell. Maybe after I improve from chelation, he'll see it as valuable. I've done so many things in the past 20 years that haven't panned out - he's pretty skeptical (I guess with good reason). Thanks again for your help. Dana B Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.