Guest guest Posted September 11, 2009 Report Share Posted September 11, 2009 Ken You are right, I did. To summarize briefly for others, the article was about the placebo effect and the increasing impact. It focused partially on psychiatric meds but then included meds of all types. People want to believe they're on the real med and advertising and promotion is increasing everywhere. So, the improvements being reported even by those on placebo has increased. Understanding this pushes pharmaceuticals to trying to design the tests better. But it also serves as a warning that until all trials are complete and a true comparison can be made any conclusions reached are greatly subject to question. I guess if its a psychiatric med and my anxiety or depression is reduced from just thinking the med is working, I'm happy anyway. But if its a treatment for cancer and I think I'm benefiting when I'm not truly its of more concern. There is another side to this too, the nocebo effect. That is that we anticipate side effects and may have them to a significant degree even on the placebo. I researched a few years ago a treatment for depression which was being pushed hard by UTSW. It was VNS, Vagus Nerve Simulation. Well, the initial report of helping 25% of the patients seemed good. But then you saw the placebo helped 15%. So, this meant that the true impact of the med was probably around 10%. But then you look at the small size of the research group and find that all the conclusions were reached on the basis of difference of 2 patients. Thats right, only a total of 2 more patients seemed helped by the procedure than the placebo. Now, in talking to counselors and psychiatrists who observed use of this procedure in the real world afterwords, the ones I talked to had known several to try it but did not have a single success story. In fact most patients were more depressed because of the side effects. I've read studies published and opinions formed by reputable doctors and posted even here when once you looked at the underlying study you found it only had a total of 4 patients involved. Thanks for the article, Ken. > > I think Bruce would enjoy reading this article. > http://www.wired.com/medtech/drugs/magazine/17-09/ff_placebo_effect?curr\ entPage=all > " Placebos Are Getting More Effective. Drugmakers Are Desperate to Know Why. " > Ken Baker UIP/IPF 12/05 New Hampshire > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.