Guest guest Posted March 5, 2009 Report Share Posted March 5, 2009 I wanted to write about our third visit (which is really our second with the helmet). I was late and we actually got a different person so the measuring styles I'm sure differ because the numbers pretty much stayed the same or got worse on paper although visually his plagio is better, I'm happy to say. I'll recap the measurements 2/5/09: plastic surgeon measures cranial vault index of 8 mm orthotist 2/5/09: circumference=45.8 cm, width=13.4, length=13.9, right front to left back=14.5, left front to right back=14 (cranial vault index of 5 mm, cephalic ratio 96.5%) orthotist 2/18/09: circ.=45.8, width=13.5, length=13.9, right front to left=14.6, left front to right=14 (cranial vault index of 4 mm, CI 95.8%) different orthotist 3/4/09 circ 45.5 cm M/L 13.4 A/P 14.1 R>L 14.6 L>R 14.1 cvi of 7mm? this is due to measurement error obviously... Every single person we met has been fantastic and patient and has answered all our questions at Boston NOPCO butt this is my problem: I don't like what I'm hearing. During the appointment we got our Boston Band the orthotist hollowed out the part that covered the side plagio flat spot which seemed to make sense. Since then a million questions have popped into my head which I asked during this week's adjustment. In my opinion there are three things wrong 1. the plagio. Flatness on the right back 2. brachy. severe 96% flatness on the back of the head 3. asymmetry in his face which can be seen from above where the right side of his forehead and entire face sticks out more than his left. Looking right at him you can't tell because it's a depth thing. Well it seems that they can really address #1 and maybe #2 and it's done serially. First the asymmetry is addressed and then the orthotist said that she could hollow out the back in general to address the brachy if I really wanted. Well, YES that is what I want. I had assumed all along that, we are doing this. The really disappointing part is supposedly they can't address #3 because I was told the front forehead bones are much more rigid and they can't be altered. I really don't believe this and I would like some opinions on this especially since there are tons of posts on evening out assymetric ears etc.. Then I was also told that heads are really flat in the back and they don't protrude out as much as we think they should but I pointed out that the area between the top of his head and the top of the spinal neck bone (I don't know the name) is slightly concave and I don't believe that is normal. I even asked the orthotist what she thought and she said that it's not flat at all. I disagree. It's my impression from reading the posts that the ortho places use the terms brachy and plagio etc but I feel like my orthotist does not really. I understand that yes it's relative, and every time we are at NOPCO there are young teens in wheel chairs but fundamentally I want to give my child the best and make him the best he can be esthetically and otherwise and I can't feel bad as a mother for that. But I do feel like they think the case is so mild that it's probably overkill and not necessary and he'll grow into it. But the plastic surgeon did explain that the head will grow in concentric circles (obviously) and that the overall shape/asymmetry will just get better but not completely dissappear. I also find this hard to accept. So along with your thoughts on the 'un-treatability' of #3 I posted some pics of Octavian V's first scan and some pictures of his head and I would love feedback from you. It's under Our Plagio Babies O - P. Thanks! Ana- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 5, 2009 Report Share Posted March 5, 2009 sorry, I think I just lost my reply to the internet (ugh)... I don't think you're getting great answers. The plagio is mild, but the brachy isn't. What about a consult at CT in connecticut? My daughter has been out of her band for over 2 years and I think her brachy is the same as when she graduated, so now is definitely the time to do something. Facial asymmetry should correct with the head shape. If there is tort PT will be needed too since it can contribute to facial asymmetry. Sydney's forehead bossing resolved while in the band. Our ortho also told us that sometimes improves on its own since the forehead gets longer as babies grow older, and it improves from that growth. -christine sydney, 3 yrs, starband grad > > I wanted to write about our third visit (which is really our second with the helmet). > I was late and we actually got a different person so the measuring styles I'm sure differ because the numbers pretty much stayed the same or got worse on paper although visually his plagio is better, I'm happy to say. I'll recap the measurements > > 2/5/09: plastic surgeon measures cranial vault index of 8 mm > > orthotist > 2/5/09: circumference=45.8 cm, width=13.4, length=13.9, right front to left back=14.5, left front to right back=14 > (cranial vault index of 5 mm, cephalic ratio 96.5%) > > orthotist > 2/18/09: circ.=45.8, width=13.5, length=13.9, right front to left=14.6, left front to right=14 > (cranial vault index of 4 mm, CI 95.8%) > > different orthotist > 3/4/09 > circ 45.5 cm > M/L 13.4 > A/P 14.1 > R>L 14.6 > L>R 14.1 > > cvi of 7mm? this is due to measurement error obviously... > > > Every single person we met has been fantastic and patient and has answered all our questions at Boston NOPCO butt this is my problem: I don't like what I'm hearing. During the appointment we got our Boston Band the orthotist hollowed out the part that covered the side plagio flat spot which seemed to make sense. Since then a million questions have popped into my head which I asked during this week's adjustment. In my opinion there are three things wrong > 1. the plagio. Flatness on the right back > 2. brachy. severe 96% flatness on the back of the head > 3. asymmetry in his face which can be seen from above where the right side of his forehead and entire face sticks out more than his left. Looking right at him you can't tell because it's a depth thing. > > Well it seems that they can really address #1 and maybe #2 and it's done serially. First the asymmetry is addressed and then the orthotist said that she could hollow out the back in general to address the brachy if I really wanted. Well, YES that is what I want. I had assumed all along that, we are doing this. The really disappointing part is supposedly they can't address #3 because I was told the front forehead bones are much more rigid and they can't be altered. I really don't believe this and I would like some opinions on this especially since there are tons of posts on evening out assymetric ears etc.. > > Then I was also told that heads are really flat in the back and they don't protrude out as much as we think they should but I pointed out that the area between the top of his head and the top of the spinal neck bone (I don't know the name) is slightly concave and I don't believe that is normal. I even asked the orthotist what she thought and she said that it's not flat at all. I disagree. > > It's my impression from reading the posts that the ortho places use the terms brachy and plagio etc but I feel like my orthotist does not really. I understand that yes it's relative, and every time we are at NOPCO there are young teens in wheel chairs but fundamentally I want to give my child the best and make him the best he can be esthetically and otherwise and I can't feel bad as a mother for that. > > But I do feel like they think the case is so mild that it's probably overkill and not necessary and he'll grow into it. But the plastic surgeon did explain that the head will grow in concentric circles (obviously) and that the overall shape/asymmetry will just get better but not completely dissappear. I also find this hard to accept. > > So along with your thoughts on the 'un-treatability' of #3 I posted some pics of Octavian V's first scan and some pictures of his head and I would love feedback from you. It's under Our Plagio Babies O - P. > > Thanks! > Ana- > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 5, 2009 Report Share Posted March 5, 2009 I can understand how they would have to treat the plagio first and then focus on the brachy, because once they shave the foam out, they can't put it back. So I assume they are shaving out the right side a little at a time, and then once the right side of his head catches up with the left, they'll start shaving out all across the back evenly to promote growth there. However, the " if you want " comment bothers me because of course, that's why you're there. I can't see how the brachy is untreatable. Yes, you might not get mega-roundness back there, but you should definitely see a decent improvement (assuming the ortho is doing their job). As far as the forehead, that concerns me too, because the forehead can definitely be corrected. It's the skull base and ear asymmetry that are the hardest to correct because the bones are set up differently and harder to move down there. But the forehead is usually pretty easy (especially in your son's case, because I can see it, but I'd put it in the mild to low moderate category, so I don't see how it couldn't be fixed). As for the facial asymmetry, again that can be harder to correct because the ears need to move to correct the puffy cheek. Improvement to the forehead bossing should help even out any eye asymmetry though. I've learned that at least some facial asymmetry (i.e. puffy cheek) can be due to residual effects of torticollis due to low muscle tone (I don't believe you mentioned tort, but just for anyone else out there reading). My son was banded late, so we did not see a ton of improvement in his facial asymmetry while he wore the band (though we did see some), but in the almost 6 months since he graduated and with speech therapy exercises to build up his face muscles on his weak side, I can see a gradual natural improvement. It's like his puffy cheek is toning up and becoming more even with his other side. And I've also learned that once they get older and become more expressive and talk more and mature, etc., you (or at least I) don't notice the asymmetry as much anymore. It really seems to blend in to their maturing features and growing personalities more. At least that's been my experience. I can kind of understand where the plastic surgeon explained the concentric circles making the shape better but not correcting it completely. Basically as the head gets bigger, the plagio is kind of stretching out a little (I can't think of any other way to describe it) and the edges get softer, so the flat spot might appear smaller as the head grows bigger, or it might not seem as dramatic. I don't know if I'm explaining it well, but I do think I understand where the plastic surgeon was going with that. Anyway, I would definitely try to see the same ortho again the next time you go, just to be consistent with the measurements. Although, as long as you're seeing visual improvement, that's all that really matters. Please keep us posted. Good luck! Jake-2.5 (DOCBand Grad 9/08) Jordan-5 > > I wanted to write about our third visit (which is really our second with the helmet). > I was late and we actually got a different person so the measuring styles I'm sure differ because the numbers pretty much stayed the same or got worse on paper although visually his plagio is better, I'm happy to say. I'll recap the measurements > > 2/5/09: plastic surgeon measures cranial vault index of 8 mm > > orthotist > 2/5/09: circumference=45.8 cm, width=13.4, length=13.9, right front to left back=14.5, left front to right back=14 > (cranial vault index of 5 mm, cephalic ratio 96.5%) > > orthotist > 2/18/09: circ.=45.8, width=13.5, length=13.9, right front to left=14.6, left front to right=14 > (cranial vault index of 4 mm, CI 95.8%) > > different orthotist > 3/4/09 > circ 45.5 cm > M/L 13.4 > A/P 14.1 > R>L 14.6 > L>R 14.1 > > cvi of 7mm? this is due to measurement error obviously... > > > Every single person we met has been fantastic and patient and has answered all our questions at Boston NOPCO butt this is my problem: I don't like what I'm hearing. During the appointment we got our Boston Band the orthotist hollowed out the part that covered the side plagio flat spot which seemed to make sense. Since then a million questions have popped into my head which I asked during this week's adjustment. In my opinion there are three things wrong > 1. the plagio. Flatness on the right back > 2. brachy. severe 96% flatness on the back of the head > 3. asymmetry in his face which can be seen from above where the right side of his forehead and entire face sticks out more than his left. Looking right at him you can't tell because it's a depth thing. > > Well it seems that they can really address #1 and maybe #2 and it's done serially. First the asymmetry is addressed and then the orthotist said that she could hollow out the back in general to address the brachy if I really wanted. Well, YES that is what I want. I had assumed all along that, we are doing this. The really disappointing part is supposedly they can't address #3 because I was told the front forehead bones are much more rigid and they can't be altered. I really don't believe this and I would like some opinions on this especially since there are tons of posts on evening out assymetric ears etc.. > > Then I was also told that heads are really flat in the back and they don't protrude out as much as we think they should but I pointed out that the area between the top of his head and the top of the spinal neck bone (I don't know the name) is slightly concave and I don't believe that is normal. I even asked the orthotist what she thought and she said that it's not flat at all. I disagree. > > It's my impression from reading the posts that the ortho places use the terms brachy and plagio etc but I feel like my orthotist does not really. I understand that yes it's relative, and every time we are at NOPCO there are young teens in wheel chairs but fundamentally I want to give my child the best and make him the best he can be esthetically and otherwise and I can't feel bad as a mother for that. > > But I do feel like they think the case is so mild that it's probably overkill and not necessary and he'll grow into it. But the plastic surgeon did explain that the head will grow in concentric circles (obviously) and that the overall shape/asymmetry will just get better but not completely dissappear. I also find this hard to accept. > > So along with your thoughts on the 'un-treatability' of #3 I posted some pics of Octavian V's first scan and some pictures of his head and I would love feedback from you. It's under Our Plagio Babies O - P. > > Thanks! > Ana- > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 13, 2009 Report Share Posted March 13, 2009 Hummm.....I was able to get my 2.5 month old's forehead bossing down quite a bit by using my arms for pressure. (Don't know how old you child is.) BUT now (at 7 months old) the orthotist isn't sure the rest of it will go down that quickly, although he thinks that it will even up so that both side are a little forward of typical. Hopefully that gives you more information to be able to ask better questions. Annie > > I wanted to write about our third visit (which is really our second with the helmet). > I was late and we actually got a different person so the measuring styles I'm sure differ because the numbers pretty much stayed the same or got worse on paper although visually his plagio is better, I'm happy to say. I'll recap the measurements > > 2/5/09: plastic surgeon measures cranial vault index of 8 mm > > orthotist > 2/5/09: circumference=45.8 cm, width=13.4, length=13.9, right front to left back=14.5, left front to right back=14 > (cranial vault index of 5 mm, cephalic ratio 96.5%) > > orthotist > 2/18/09: circ.=45.8, width=13.5, length=13.9, right front to left=14.6, left front to right=14 > (cranial vault index of 4 mm, CI 95.8%) > > different orthotist > 3/4/09 > circ 45.5 cm > M/L 13.4 > A/P 14.1 > R>L 14.6 > L>R 14.1 > > cvi of 7mm? this is due to measurement error obviously... > > > Every single person we met has been fantastic and patient and has answered all our questions at Boston NOPCO butt this is my problem: I don't like what I'm hearing. During the appointment we got our Boston Band the orthotist hollowed out the part that covered the side plagio flat spot which seemed to make sense. Since then a million questions have popped into my head which I asked during this week's adjustment. In my opinion there are three things wrong > 1. the plagio. Flatness on the right back > 2. brachy. severe 96% flatness on the back of the head > 3. asymmetry in his face which can be seen from above where the right side of his forehead and entire face sticks out more than his left. Looking right at him you can't tell because it's a depth thing. > > Well it seems that they can really address #1 and maybe #2 and it's done serially. First the asymmetry is addressed and then the orthotist said that she could hollow out the back in general to address the brachy if I really wanted. Well, YES that is what I want. I had assumed all along that, we are doing this. The really disappointing part is supposedly they can't address #3 because I was told the front forehead bones are much more rigid and they can't be altered. I really don't believe this and I would like some opinions on this especially since there are tons of posts on evening out assymetric ears etc.. > > Then I was also told that heads are really flat in the back and they don't protrude out as much as we think they should but I pointed out that the area between the top of his head and the top of the spinal neck bone (I don't know the name) is slightly concave and I don't believe that is normal. I even asked the orthotist what she thought and she said that it's not flat at all. I disagree. > > It's my impression from reading the posts that the ortho places use the terms brachy and plagio etc but I feel like my orthotist does not really. I understand that yes it's relative, and every time we are at NOPCO there are young teens in wheel chairs but fundamentally I want to give my child the best and make him the best he can be esthetically and otherwise and I can't feel bad as a mother for that. > > But I do feel like they think the case is so mild that it's probably overkill and not necessary and he'll grow into it. But the plastic surgeon did explain that the head will grow in concentric circles (obviously) and that the overall shape/asymmetry will just get better but not completely dissappear. I also find this hard to accept. > > So along with your thoughts on the 'un-treatability' of #3 I posted some pics of Octavian V's first scan and some pictures of his head and I would love feedback from you. It's under Our Plagio Babies O - P. > > Thanks! > Ana- > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 My son is 7 months now. Do you mean that you used massage or what kind of pressure? Can you send me more specific details? ThanksFrom: "ambloved" Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 05:15:43 -0000<Plagiocephaly >Subject: Re: brachy and assymetry "untreatable"? I don't like that Picture feedback please Hummm.....I was able to get my 2.5 month old's forehead bossing down quite a bit by using my arms for pressure. (Don't know how old you child is.) BUT now (at 7 months old) the orthotist isn't sure the rest of it will go down that quickly, although he thinks that it will even up so that both side are a little forward of typical. Hopefully that gives you more information to be able to ask better questions. Annie > > I wanted to write about our third visit (which is really our second with the helmet). > I was late and we actually got a different person so the measuring styles I'm sure differ because the numbers pretty much stayed the same or got worse on paper although visually his plagio is better, I'm happy to say. I'll recap the measurements > > 2/5/09: plastic surgeon measures cranial vault index of 8 mm > > orthotist > 2/5/09: circumference=45.8 cm, width=13.4, length=13.9, right front to left back=14.5, left front to right back=14 > (cranial vault index of 5 mm, cephalic ratio 96.5%) > > orthotist > 2/18/09: circ.=45.8, width=13.5, length=13.9, right front to left=14.6, left front to right=14 > (cranial vault index of 4 mm, CI 95.8%) > > different orthotist > 3/4/09 > circ 45.5 cm > M/L 13.4 > A/P 14.1 > R>L 14.6 > L>R 14.1 > > cvi of 7mm? this is due to measurement error obviously... > > > Every single person we met has been fantastic and patient and has answered all our questions at Boston NOPCO butt this is my problem: I don't like what I'm hearing. During the appointment we got our Boston Band the orthotist hollowed out the part that covered the side plagio flat spot which seemed to make sense. Since then a million questions have popped into my head which I asked during this week's adjustment. In my opinion there are three things wrong > 1. the plagio. Flatness on the right back > 2. brachy. severe 96% flatness on the back of the head > 3. asymmetry in his face which can be seen from above where the right side of his forehead and entire face sticks out more than his left. Looking right at him you can't tell because it's a depth thing. > > Well it seems that they can really address #1 and maybe #2 and it's done serially. First the asymmetry is addressed and then the orthotist said that she could hollow out the back in general to address the brachy if I really wanted. Well, YES that is what I want. I had assumed all along that, we are doing this. The really disappointing part is supposedly they can't address #3 because I was told the front forehead bones are much more rigid and they can't be altered. I really don't believe this and I would like some opinions on this especially since there are tons of posts on evening out assymetric ears etc.. > > Then I was also told that heads are really flat in the back and they don't protrude out as much as we think they should but I pointed out that the area between the top of his head and the top of the spinal neck bone (I don't know the name) is slightly concave and I don't believe that is normal. I even asked the orthotist what she thought and she said that it's not flat at all. I disagree. > > It's my impression from reading the posts that the ortho places use the terms brachy and plagio etc but I feel like my orthotist does not really. I understand that yes it's relative, and every time we are at NOPCO there are young teens in wheel chairs but fundamentally I want to give my child the best and make him the best he can be esthetically and otherwise and I can't feel bad as a mother for that. > > But I do feel like they think the case is so mild that it's probably overkill and not necessary and he'll grow into it. But the plastic surgeon did explain that the head will grow in concentric circles (obviously) and that the overall shape/asymmetry will just get better but not completely dissappear. I also find this hard to accept. > > So along with your thoughts on the 'un-treatability' of #3 I posted some pics of Octavian V's first scan and some pictures of his head and I would love feedback from you. It's under Our Plagio Babies O - P. > > Thanks! > Ana- > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.