Guest guest Posted June 30, 2006 Report Share Posted June 30, 2006 > > Dear SCD pals who are having oxylate, phenol and salicylate problems, > > Many of these strange sensitivities to Phenols, Salicylates, Oxylates, > and more VANISH eating SCDiet as guide lined in the book. SCDiet > brings the gut dysbiosis to an end that causes all organs in the body > plus immune system to not function properly. Also being a part of > causing many of these strange imbalances, food sensitivities, > intolerances and allergies. > > The gut heals rather quickly when SCD is done correctly and by the > book. Therefore improvement in all areas of intolerance to foods is > seen in the first six months. Some see improvement in just a few > months to first 30 days. Gee, I missed the boat on that one > > > Carol F. Celiac, MCS, Latex Allergy, EMS SCD 6 years Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 30, 2006 Report Share Posted June 30, 2006 I have heard of many children who lose their phenol and salycilate intolerance after being on SCD for several months. However,there are exceptions. It is not difficult to combine SCD with a phenol or a salycilate free diet. How about oxalates.? This is a very new concept so we do not have as much data. However,we have a lot of hope that SCD would resolve this problem for many of our ASD children. The best version for solving this problem would be SCD with goat yogurt. But there is a hint that we might even have success with dairy free SCD. I read about a child whose oxalate levels dropped dramatically after doing SCD for 3 months. The amazing thing was that the child's family was not even trying to lower the oxalate levels. Owens asked parents on her list for the level of oxalates in ASD children. The father of that child was the only one to respond to 's query. The post(#6395 ) appeared on Owens' sulfurstories Yahoo list. That child was doing the dairy free version of SCD. I wish we had more oxalate test results for children who did dairy free SCD. There is scientific proof that dairy lowers oxalate values.and the risk of kidney stones. The SCD yogurt is a wonderful source of calcium and most of the children with autism can tolerate it after several months of SCD. I will write a seperate post about the goat yogurt and its safety for autistic children in a few days. I am posting two articles about dairy and oxalates. The first research study reports that a high intake of dairy foods is more effective than calcium supplements to lower your risk for getting kidney stones. The other research paper reports that if your diet contains enough calcium rich foods then you do not need to worry about consuming high oxalate foods. (However,to be safe one should avoid spinach and beets if one has an oxalate problem. Nuts and beans should be used carefully because they are difficult to digest. ). Mimi http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi ?cmd=Retrieve & db=pubmed & dopt=Abstract & list_uids=9092314 & query_hl=13 1: Ann Intern Med. 1997 Apr 1;126(7):497-504. Comparison of dietary calcium with supplemental calcium and other nutrients as factors affecting the risk for kidney stones in women. Curhan GC, Willett WC, Speizer FE, Spiegelman D, Stampfer MJ. Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA. BACKGROUND: Calcium intake is believed to play an important role in the formation of kidney stones, but data on the risk factors for stone formation in women are limited. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between intake of dietary and supplemental calcium and the risk for kidney stones in women. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study with 12-year follow-up. SETTING: Several U.S. states. PARTICIPANTS: 91,731 women participating in the Nurses' Health Study I who were 34 to 59 years of age in 1980 and had no history of kidney stones. MEASUREMENTS: Self-administered food-frequency questionnaires were used to assess diet in 1980, 1984, 1986, and 1990. The main outcome measure was incident symptomatic kidney stones. RESULTS: During 903,849 person-years of follow-up, 864 cases of kidney stones were documented. After adjustment for potential risk factors, intake of dietary calcium was inversely associated with risk for kidney stones and intake of supplemental calcium was positively associated with risk. The relative risk for stone formation in women in the highest quintile of dietary calcium intake compared with women in the lowest quintile was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.50 to 0.83). The relative risk in women who took supplemental calcium compared with women who did not was 1.20 (CI, 1.02 to 1.41). In 67% of women who took supplemental calcium, the calcium either was not consumed with a meal or was consumed with meals whose oxalate content was probably low. Other dietary factors showed the following relative risks among women in the highest quintile of intake compared with those in the lowest quintile: sucrose, 1.52 (CI, 1.18 to 1.96); sodium, 1.30 (CI, 1.05 to 1.62); fluid, 0.61 (CI, 0.48 to 0.78); and potassium, 0.65 (CI, 0.51 to 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: High intake of dietary calcium appears to decrease risk for symptomatic kidney stones, whereas intake of supplemental calcium may increase risk. Because dietary calcium reduces the absorption of oxalate, the apparently different effects caused by the type of calcium may be associated with the timing of calcium ingestion relative to the amount of oxalate consumed. However, other factors present in dairy products (the major source of dietary calcium) could be responsible for the decreased risk seen with dietary calcium. PMID: 9092314 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] [2] http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi ?cmd=Retrieve & db=pubmed & dopt=Abstract & list_uids=9761503 & query_hl=13 1: Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1998 Sep;13(9):2241-7 .. High-calcium intake abolishes hyperoxaluria and reduces urinary crystallization during a 20-fold normal oxalate load in humans. Hess B, Jost C, Zipperle L, Takkinen R, Jaeger P. Department of Medicine, University Hospital, Berne, Switzerland. BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to test whether increasing dietary calcium intake lowers intestinal oxalate absorption and thereby prevents hyperoxaluria and urinary crystallization during a 20-fold normal oxalate load in healthy subjects. METHODS: Fourteen healthy male volunteers (age 23-44 years, BMI 21.5-27.7 kg/m2) collected 24-h urines while on free-choice diet as well as on two standardized diets. The latter contained 2545 kcal, 2500 ml of mineral water, 102 g of protein, 13.6 g of sodium chloride and 2220 mg of oxalate (approximately 20-fold content of an average diet). Subjects were studied twice while on the standardized diet, once while eating a normal amount of calcium (1211 mg/day, oxalate-rich diet), and once while eating 3858 mg of calcium/day (calcium and oxalate-rich diet). RESULTS: Compared with the free-choice diet (322+/-36 micromol/d), UOx x V increased to 780+/-72 micromol/d on the oxalate-rich diet (P=0.001) and fell again to 326+/-31 micromol/d on calcium and oxalate-rich diet (P=0.001 vs oxalate-rich diet). Urinary glycolate (a metabolic precursor of Ox) always remained below the upper limit of the normal range and did not change between different diets, indicating that changes in UOX x V reflect respective variations in intestinal absorption of Ox. Uca x V was 4.60+/-0.45 mmol/d on the free-choice diet and 3.20+/-0.32 mmol/d on the oxalate-rich diet (P=0.011 vs free-choice diet); it increased to 7.28+/-0.74 mmol/d on the calcium- and oxalate-rich diet (P=0.001 vs free-choice and oxalate-rich diets). As indicated by the AP (CaOx) index (Tiselius), urinary supersaturation did not vary significantly between the three diets. In freshly voided morning urines (studied in 8/14 subjects) on the oxalate-rich diet, CaOx crystals or crystal aggregates of up to 80 microm diameter were found in 5/8 urines, whereas this never occurred on the free-choice diet and only t once on the calcium- and oxalate-rich diet. CONCLUSION: Increasing calcium intake while eating Ox-rich food prevents dietary hyperoxaluria and reduces CaOx crystallization in healthy subjects. This further illustrates that dietary counseling to idiopathic calcium-stone formers should ensure sufficient calcium intake, especially during oxalate-rich meals. PMID: 9761503 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 30, 2006 Report Share Posted June 30, 2006 Wow, that explains my son's experience. The times that he had the painful lips (what I am intepreting as oxalate symptom) after eating an orange he had also had a no-calcium dinner because it was too close to his antibiotic (calcium interferes with antibiotic so he had to avoid calcium at meals that were within two hours of the dose). > > I have heard of many children who lose their phenol and salycilate > intolerance after being on SCD for several months. However,there are > exceptions. It is not difficult to combine SCD with a phenol or a > salycilate free diet. > That would be great! Does this ever happen in any kids who have ADD/ADHD issues? I ask because the Feingold diet for AD(H)D avoids salicylates. If SCD heals in such a way that one wouldn't have to combine it with Feingold that is not only good news but also an indication that guy dysbiosis underlies a great many conditions. mother of Adam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 1, 2006 Report Share Posted July 1, 2006 Dear , This is why I started this thread. It is important for all of us to realize that gut dysbiosis and a visious cycle in contrbuting to many of these strange sensitivites. Plus many more illnesses other than just GI issues. In time more research is bound to be done to prove this EVEN better. But for now Elaine is helping more people that she expected. From what I am told, this just thrilled her! We are all slowly realizing the uses for SCDiet. It will be a very good day when the medical community wakes up! Many things can cause sore lips. Vitamin B12 and B defeciency is another one. My son had them too in the beginning. I can't guess why your son has them, you have to be the detective just like all of us have learned here. Regardless I suspect that they will vanish if you are doing SCD by the book. We had so many sensitivites to foods when we started SCD it almost made it impossible to eat balanced. Salicylates/phenols where just one of them! I am glad that we didn't follow other ways of eating anymore. I am so grateful that we trust SCDiet and did it by the BTVC book with fanatical adherance (to the best of our ability). We didn't need the enzymes or anything. WE tried and for us they caused more complications. WE used just good SCD food, rotating, common sense and throwing away fear and simply going for it. Knock on wood that is all we will continue to need. We pray for your SCD success. Antoinette and family of five SCD 2/06 (celiac, malabsorption, leaky gut, add, adhd, asd/pdd and more, healing when no other way worked) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 1, 2006 Report Share Posted July 1, 2006 Carol said: What also happens is a compromised immune system regards even friendly things as dangerous sometimes and when it reacts to something we are not allergic to, we start trying to chase down sensitivities and start eliminating foods. The problem is that the results can be inconsistent. It becomes the needle-in-the haystack search. Example: Junior is suspected of being allergic to eggs. After a short time on SCD, he is able to tolerate them. later he has a setback or a cold and a little relapse and suddenly eggs are again a problem food. Weeks later the eggs are OK. > Overall as healing progresses many sensitivities lessen and some disappear (with me it happened to be eggs).Occasionally I am " off " with dairy or nuts and give them a short rest. __________ God Bless you Carol for telling us this. This explains so much to what is happening in this house wiht our food sensitivities. This is also why Elaine told us to try again in two weeks. I get it now! Antoinette and family of five 2/06 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 1, 2006 Report Share Posted July 1, 2006 Dear SCD pals who are having multiple food intolerances, sensitivites and allergies to foods and chemicals. Research has demonstrated that under the age of five, the child has a greater chance of healing out of sensitivites, allergies, and intolerances. Especialy if SCDiet is implimented Elaine's guidelines. With no additions or subtractions that keep SCDiet from working right. So if you are older, some allergies, sensitivites and intolerances could be permanent also. Yet you don't know until you try. Thousands of people of all ages have healed thier intestines and immune systems on SCDiet. Also under the age of FIVE a child has a greater chance of loosing their diagnosis of ASD with the use of SCDiet and 100% adherance. Thanks to brain intergration not being completed until the age of five, the younger the child, the more lucky they are. After this age, one may be dealing with permanent disability and permanent damage, but still CAN BENEFIT GREATLY from SCDiet! No matter what the age! Hope this helps to clarify things a bit. Antoinette and family of five SCD 2/06 (celiac, malabsorption, leaky gut, add, adhd, asd/pdd and more) > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 1, 2006 Report Share Posted July 1, 2006 Hey guys I never once said that you can't try enzymes or other alternatives. I just said that we don't, that we " just " practice 100% SCD. I realize that Elaine said that other things are OK to use. And the " under the age of five " came from the success that those had with the Beach Island List Serve. I am looking for my links to give you. Mimi gave them to me. Antoinette (celiac) 2/06 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 1, 2006 Report Share Posted July 1, 2006 Dear Carol and to all, I have never implied to anybody who is already having success with alternatives to stop them. I just want the newbie to know that they may not be needed for all of us. It is often assumed that they are needed before the person truly knows. This was the case with us. Caused us much grief, cost us much money and created un-needed complications in the beginning of our recovery with SCDiet, that could have been avoided if I had known to try SCD by the BTVC book first. Yes, I meant Long Island List Serve. The owner of Pecan Bread, Mimi shared their success with me and I was filled with hope! I am tired and not feeling well and I got the name wrong and called it Beach Island!...oops. Those testionies from the Long Island list serve gave us so much inspiration to try JUST 100% SCD, with our asd/pdd daughter, that we took back all those alternatives and never paid for expensive testing or chelation treatments! Thanks to those kids that where cured on this list serve I realized that we didn't have to try enzyems or things such as chelation or all that expensive testing that our DAN! recommeneded. So far " just " SCD is working. We are fortunate. This doesn't mean that others are less fortunate if they use alternatives!! Everyone has to pick thier road. I try not to judge anyone. And expect the same respect. Antoinette and family of five SCD 2/06 (celiac, add, adhd, autism/pdd, and more) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 3, 2006 Report Share Posted July 3, 2006 Carol, can you tell me if the same thing takes place with chemical sensitivities? Once the immune system heals and the gut is strong do you think some of the chemical problems aren't as critical, like going swimming in a pool? Just hoping I guess. Sandy M. > > Carol said: What also happens is a compromised immune system > regards even friendly things as dangerous sometimes and when it > reacts to something we are not allergic to, we start trying to chase > down sensitivities and start eliminating foods. The problem is that > the results can be inconsistent. It becomes the needle-in-the > haystack search. > > Example: Junior is suspected of being allergic to eggs. After a > short time on SCD, he is able to tolerate them. later he has a > setback or a cold and a little relapse and suddenly eggs are again a > problem food. Weeks later the eggs are OK. > > > Overall as healing progresses many sensitivities lessen and some > disappear (with me it happened to be eggs).Occasionally I am " off " > with dairy or nuts and give them a short rest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.