Guest guest Posted June 5, 2006 Report Share Posted June 5, 2006 C'mon, folks.... > > Carol said: I have been refused membership on the Open Blooms list and will not > provide the details which were expressed privately. > > Then I do not understand why someone serving in a 'moderator-type' aspect would mention it all. There seems to be several inflammatory posts lately from MANY quarters. Carol F. is comfortable with SCD as- is (ain't-broke-don't-fix-it). Understandable if you find success with it. There is no sarcasm intended with that, just observation. > That's why I didn't bother to ask if I could join! lol I am one of the reasons they left, Since your last exchanges on this serve with both Summer and had seemed pleasant, I do not understand why this " needs " to be said. Of course they have not left if you all are 'talking' here, lol. ;-) > God help those poor kids who don't follow the SCD TM diet, who >may be suffering because of it. Antoinette. Did you not JUST say several pages ago that you had gotten a glimpse of why some people may need to look further (aeb: your daughter's hospitalization)? Didn't YOU look further from GF until you found SCD? What would you do should you need to move (even more) forward at some point - refuse because Elaine isn't here to okay it? Geez, would have happened to her daughter had she taken status quo as her only option? Since nobody really knows every little metabolic niche in their own child's body (much less someone else's), do you not see that this last remark could be construed as condscending? So why say it? I would hazard a guess that there may be a myriad of ways metabolic and gut dysfunction could play out for all sorts of people. From adult female celiacs who like crusty spinach quiche to little five year old boys who were developmentally advanced until the age of three (my kiddo :-) I am not trying to say " the diet " needs to be altered should it work. And it does, for lots of people (just like GFCF etc does, for lots of people). BUT NOT ALL. And I can understand (and appreciate) that there be cohesion of message on a board dedicated to a particular application. However the flip to that is why shoot down something someone else does THAT WORKS FOR THEM? So can't we all PLEASE get back to diet and nutritional applications? Hope little one is getting better on her home turf :-) -christine Paleo. Organic. 1/06 Glenn SCD/LOD. organic (and lotsa other stuff that works for us ;-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 8, 2006 Report Share Posted June 8, 2006 > > > > Carol said: I have been refused membership on the Open Blooms list > and will not > > provide the details which were expressed privately. > > > > > > So can't we all PLEASE get back to diet and nutritional > applications? Hope little one is getting better on her home turf :-) > > -christine > Paleo. Organic. 1/06 > Glenn > SCD/LOD. organic (and lotsa other stuff that works for us ;-) and , This matter was settled most amicably and my intent has been made clear to those concerned. Carol F. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.