Guest guest Posted August 7, 2003 Report Share Posted August 7, 2003 One disturing aspect of HIPPA is that doctors are federally (this over rides state laws) not required to keep confidentiality; the entire document which I received at the hospital was 19 pages long and stated that any physician could contact any other person (not just physician) in my family, including those whom I had in writing requested NOT be contacted. This had previously been California law more or less anyway, such that any physician who had knowledge from any source of a family member, could telephone that person against the wishes of the patient. The crowning punch being years ago when some nutty rheumatologist called one of my " kids " to request that I live with same. " Kid " was smart and advised the physician to discuss this with me! HIPPA literally removes all confidentiality, despite superficial at tempts to convince patients that it does not. It might be wise in many cases to have a notarized, witnessed document authorizing another adult to accompany one to physicians' visits and during hospital stays, as can be arranged. Few know of this. When I find the entire HIPPA statement as it affects patients on a website, I will forward it to all the medical lists I am on. What I have here is hard copy and my printer is not up, so I cannot turn it into a document--which may be merciful. Cheers! as always, n Rojas, who just plain got up to early this morning! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.