Guest guest Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 Jen, I don't mean to step on toes here or second guess any one or any thing because certainly even after 7 years in the world of clubbed feet I continue to learn more new stuff here........ .............but my question about your doctor's " modifications " is this: What is the advantage to 12 weeks of castings vs. the typical (average?) 5 weeks of casting? He is more than doubling your child's time in casts (and gee, more than doubling his income in the process?) How can being casted longer be actually better for their growth? In the casting phase of the treatment there is only so much to do, and either the doctor does it swiftly and accurately (aka correctly), or he doesn't. Prolonging the treatment seems absurd to me. Logically speaking a cast is a very restrictive thing to wear. Most Ponseti children finish their casting before they are 2 months old, yours will still be wearing them when he is 3 and I do believe this could potentially cause developmental delays as 3 months is a pretty key age in infant-land developmentally speaking. As I say all this, please keep in mind that Dr. Ponseti has been working on this method for dang near 60 years with tons of follow up studies proving it works so why does a dr. with 3 years of using it think he knows how to do it better? The real question is this: What are HIS follow up studies? I mean, what are YOUR doctor's follow up studies? By all rights, his first patients should still be wearing their FAB's right now (unless he has modified that too, in which case I say RUN!) , therefore there would be no significant proof that his " modifications " are successful because he has no long-term proof it works. He's just been " getting by " with it for now, but the proof is in the long term results and he doesn't have any to back up his claims. However there are half a century worth of studies proving the majority of cf children only need an average of 5 weeks worth of casts and generally a maximum of 9 weeks worth for more complex cases. This is just my opinion as an old timer here. Just a side note, myself (and many, many others here) drive way more than four hours for treatment. Shoot, four hours would be a cake walk, it's more like a 3 day trip for us. I guess my whole point is don't be fooled by a spiffy sales pitch and a few glossy photographs. ee, mother of two bcf boys: - NON Ponseti Method Club Foot Disaster Everett - Dr. Ponseti Success Story -----He told me that he has been practicing the Ponseti method for 3 years and found that making modifications to the Ponseti method has produced better results for infants. Changing the cast every week for 12 weeks is better for their growth. I have also spoken to another woman about her daughter that was treated by this same Dr. and she said you would never know she ever had clubfeet. I also saw photo documentation of his work and the little girl's foot looks beautiful. At this point I'm not going to change Dr., but I will keep in mind all that everyone has told me. Cam's foot looks better already I think it was that asked me how far Charlotte is from Wilmington and it's about 4 1/2 hours. We are in Charlotte several times a year so I think we would definitely try to co-ordinate a visit with another Ponseti Dr. for a second opinion. Thank you for the names and the advice. Take care everyone!! Jen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 First of all I really want to thank everyone for your words of encouragment and sharing your experiences with me. I no longer feel alone in this journey and I truly feel like this is going to be something to remember and learn from instead of a memory to try and forget. I feel so lucky to have met a group of people like all of you. I apologize that I can't email all of you personally to thank you for your kind wishes. There are so many of you to write back to . It's amazing what can happen when people get together to support each other. I'm greatful for this and I feel priveledged to be a part of it. Well, some of you have asked me about my Dr. and his method of treatment. I asked him questions today about the number of casts and why there are so many. He told me that he has been practicing the Ponseti method for 3 years and found that making modifications to the Ponseti method has produced better results for infants. Changing the cast every week for 12 weeks is better for their growth. I have also spoken to another woman about her daughter that was treated by this same Dr. and she said you would never know she ever had clubfeet. I also saw photo documentation of his work and the little girl's foot looks beautiful. At this point I'm not going to change Dr., but I will keep in mind all that everyone has told me. Cam's foot looks better already I think it was that asked me how far Charlotte is from Wilmington and it's about 4 1/2 hours. We are in Charlotte several times a year so I think we would definitely try to co-ordinate a visit with another Ponseti Dr. for a second opinion. Thank you for the names and the advice. Take care everyone!! Jen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 I have to agree with ee in that the length of time for casts seems long. Before I finally went to a properly trained Ponseti doctor, I was told initially by the Orthopedic Surgeon we were seeing that my son would have 8 casts and one injection of Botox in each tendon - her own " modifications " on the Ponseti method. Hayden ended up having twelve casts and two Botox injections in each tendon and the results were poor. The casts slipped constantly, he had terrible skin issues due to thick casts and the Botox did absolutely nothing for him. Anyway, we are just at the beginning of the Ponseti treatment, but already things are going very well! Good luck to you! --- number23 wrote: --------------------------------- Jen, I don't mean to step on toes here or second guess any one or any thing because certainly even after 7 years in the world of clubbed feet I continue to learn more new stuff here........ .............but my question about your doctor's " modifications " is this: What is the advantage to 12 weeks of castings vs. the typical (average?) 5 weeks of casting? He is more than doubling your child's time in casts (and gee, more than doubling his income in the process?) How can being casted longer be actually better for their growth? In the casting phase of the treatment there is only so much to do, and either the doctor does it swiftly and accurately (aka correctly), or he doesn't. Prolonging the treatment seems absurd to me. Logically speaking a cast is a very restrictive thing to wear. Most Ponseti children finish their casting before they are 2 months old, yours will still be wearing them when he is 3 and I do believe this could potentially cause developmental delays as 3 months is a pretty key age in infant-land developmentally speaking. As I say all this, please keep in mind that Dr. Ponseti has been working on this method for dang near 60 years with tons of follow up studies proving it works so why does a dr. with 3 years of using it think he knows how to do it better? The real question is this: What are HIS follow up studies? I mean, what are YOUR doctor's follow up studies? By all rights, his first patients should still be wearing their FAB's right now (unless he has modified that too, in which case I say RUN!) , therefore there would be no significant proof that his " modifications " are successful because he has no long-term proof it works. He's just been " getting by " with it for now, but the proof is in the long term results and he doesn't have any to back up his claims. However there are half a century worth of studies proving the majority of cf children only need an average of 5 weeks worth of casts and generally a maximum of 9 weeks worth for more complex cases. This is just my opinion as an old timer here. Just a side note, myself (and many, many others here) drive way more than four hours for treatment. Shoot, four hours would be a cake walk, it's more like a 3 day trip for us. I guess my whole point is don't be fooled by a spiffy sales pitch and a few glossy photographs. ee, mother of two bcf boys: - NON Ponseti Method Club Foot Disaster Everett - Dr. Ponseti Success Story -----He told me that he has been practicing the Ponseti method for 3 years and found that making modifications to the Ponseti method has produced better results for infants. Changing the cast every week for 12 weeks is better for their growth. I have also spoken to another woman about her daughter that was treated by this same Dr. and she said you would never know she ever had clubfeet. I also saw photo documentation of his work and the little girl's foot looks beautiful. At this point I'm not going to change Dr., but I will keep in mind all that everyone has told me. Cam's foot looks better already I think it was that asked me how far Charlotte is from Wilmington and it's about 4 1/2 hours. We are in Charlotte several times a year so I think we would definitely try to co-ordinate a visit with another Ponseti Dr. for a second opinion. Thank you for the names and the advice. Take care everyone!! Jen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 9, 2005 Report Share Posted November 9, 2005 In some atypical clubfeet they could apply 7-12 casts. My daugther for instance had a total of 9 casts (plus 3 that slipped off and were replaced). andra > > > --------------------------------- > Jen, > I don't mean to step on toes here or second guess any > one or any thing because certainly even after 7 years > in the world of clubbed feet I continue to learn more > new stuff here........ > > ............but my question about your doctor's > " modifications " is this: What is the advantage to 12 > weeks of castings vs. the typical (average?) 5 weeks > of casting? He is more than doubling your child's > time in casts (and gee, more than doubling his income > in the process?) How can being casted longer be > actually better for their growth? In the casting > phase of the treatment there is only so much to do, > and either the doctor does it swiftly and accurately > (aka correctly), or he doesn't. Prolonging the > treatment seems absurd to me. > > Logically speaking a cast is a very restrictive thing > to wear. Most Ponseti children finish their casting > before they are 2 months old, yours will still be > wearing them when he is 3 and I do believe this could > potentially cause developmental delays as 3 months is > a pretty key age in infant-land developmentally > speaking. > > > As I say all this, please keep in mind that Dr. > Ponseti has been working on this method for dang near > 60 years with tons of follow up studies proving it > works so why does a dr. with 3 years of using it think > he knows how to do it better? > > The real question is this: What are HIS follow up > studies? I mean, what are YOUR doctor's follow up > studies? By all rights, his first patients should > still be wearing their FAB's right now (unless he has > modified that too, in which case I say RUN!) , > therefore there would be no significant proof that his > " modifications " are successful because he has no > long-term proof it works. He's just been " getting by " > with it for now, but the proof is in the long term > results and he doesn't have any to back up his claims. > However there are half a century worth of studies > proving the majority of cf children only need an > average of 5 weeks worth of casts and generally a > maximum of 9 weeks worth for more complex cases. > > This is just my opinion as an old timer here. > > Just a side note, myself (and many, many others here) > drive way more than four hours for treatment. Shoot, > four hours would be a cake walk, it's more like a 3 > day trip for us. > > I guess my whole point is don't be fooled by a spiffy > sales pitch and a few glossy photographs. > > ee, mother of two bcf boys: > - NON Ponseti Method Club Foot Disaster > Everett - Dr. Ponseti Success Story > > -----He told me that he has been practicing the > Ponseti method for 3 years and found that making > modifications to the > Ponseti method has produced better results for > infants. Changing the > cast every week for 12 weeks is better for their > growth. I have also > spoken to another woman about her daughter that was > treated by this > same Dr. and she said you would never know she ever > had clubfeet. I > also saw photo documentation of his work and the > little girl's foot > looks beautiful. At this point I'm not going to > change Dr., but I > will keep in mind all that everyone has told me. > Cam's foot looks > better already > I think it was that asked me how far Charlotte > is from > Wilmington and it's about 4 1/2 hours. We are in > Charlotte several > times a year so I think we would definitely try to > co-ordinate a visit > with another Ponseti Dr. for a second opinion. Thank > you for the > names and the advice. > > Take care everyone!! > > Jen > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 10, 2005 Report Share Posted November 10, 2005 Jen, Casts SHOULD be toe to groin, and SHOULD be changed every 5 to 7 days, this isn't something different your doctor is doing, that is the standard procedure to change them that often. If they were not changed that often, I would definately worry! I think our sticking point is why he wants to do 12 weeks instead of the typical 5 weeks. MY sticking point, and not to beat you half to death about it, is why he wants the 12 weeks...when 50 years of experience prove time and again the average is 5 and worst case is 9. In some cases as few as 3 do the trick. Tons of studies have proven this to be completely effective and way less invasive to the child being treated. I would be really bugging this doctor to know why he thinks he needs to more than double the casting phase to achieve the same results that Dr. Ponseti (and the Ponseti Method) achieve in less than half that time. What does " better growth " and " more permanent " results really mean? Again, my opinion is your dr. doesn't have the follow up studies nor the cilent base to prove his modification is " better " ......the only reason I have ever heard of more casts is a doctor not achieving the results in the typical amount of time due to his lack of ability / understanding of the method....so that does sort of make me raise my eye brows at it all. I'd also just like to say my 1st son's cf doctor came highly recommended by other doctors yet he spent 20 months totally f*******ing up my kid's feet because I didn't know any better. Sink or swim in this deal, the ultimate outcome of your kid's treatment rests on YOU as his parent, not on any doctor. And i think that is really the main point I try to make to any new cf parent. I cannot blame Brain's doc for being ignorant - I was the ignorant one who didn't look further, ask more or seek alternatives sooner. 's messed up feet are MY fault, not some doctor's fault. His brother's perfect feet are MY fault too, thankfully! Well my Dr. is pretty firm that having 12 casts over 12 weeks ensures proper (and more permanent) correction and yet allows the baby's leg to grow. For now, I'm comfortable with this Dr. and I will keep asking questions as well as ask for more names of people with success stories. As for the 4 hour drive - I realize it's not as far as most other people drive to get to their Dr., but when we found out that Cam had clubfoot our pediatrician recommended this Dr. We think extremely highly of our pediatrician and never questioned his referral. As well we were in such a fog over this whole thing and wanted to start treatment as soon as possible. I don't feel that Cam's development is in any immediate danger at this point, and I hope to get more info. on my Dr. success. I'll keep people posted... Jen number23 wrote: Jen, I don't mean to step on toes here or second guess any one or any thing because certainly even after 7 years in the world of clubbed feet I continue to learn more new stuff here........ .............but my question about your doctor's " modifications " is this: What is the advantage to 12 weeks of castings vs. the typical (average?) 5 weeks of casting? He is more than doubling your child's time in casts (and gee, more than doubling his income in the process?) How can being casted longer be actually better for their growth? In the casting phase of the treatment there is only so much to do, and either the doctor does it swiftly and accurately (aka correctly), or he doesn't. Prolonging the treatment seems absurd to me. Logically speaking a cast is a very restrictive thing to wear. Most Ponseti children finish their casting before they are 2 months old, yours will still be wearing them when he is 3 and I do believe this could potentially cause developmental delays as 3 months is a pretty key age in infant-land developmentally speaking. As I say all this, please keep in mind that Dr. Ponseti has been working on this method for dang near 60 years with tons of follow up studies proving it works so why does a dr. with 3 years of using it think he knows how to do it better? The real question is this: What are HIS follow up studies? I mean, what are YOUR doctor's follow up studies? By all rights, his first patients should still be wearing their FAB's right now (unless he has modified that too, in which case I say RUN!) , therefore there would be no significant proof that his " modifications " are successful because he has no long-term proof it works. He's just been " getting by " with it for now, but the proof is in the long term results and he doesn't have any to back up his claims. However there are half a century worth of studies proving the majority of cf children only need an average of 5 weeks worth of casts and generally a maximum of 9 weeks worth for more complex cases. This is just my opinion as an old timer here. Just a side note, myself (and many, many others here) drive way more than four hours for treatment. Shoot, four hours would be a cake walk, it's more like a 3 day trip for us. I guess my whole point is don't be fooled by a spiffy sales pitch and a few glossy photographs. ee, mother of two bcf boys: - NON Ponseti Method Club Foot Disaster Everett - Dr. Ponseti Success Story -----He told me that he has been practicing the Ponseti method for 3 years and found that making modifications to the Ponseti method has produced better results for infants. Changing the cast every week for 12 weeks is better for their growth. I have also spoken to another woman about her daughter that was treated by this same Dr. and she said you would never know she ever had clubfeet. I also saw photo documentation of his work and the little girl's foot looks beautiful. At this point I'm not going to change Dr., but I will keep in mind all that everyone has told me. Cam's foot looks better already I think it was that asked me how far Charlotte is from Wilmington and it's about 4 1/2 hours. We are in Charlotte several times a year so I think we would definitely try to co-ordinate a visit with another Ponseti Dr. for a second opinion. Thank you for the names and the advice. Take care everyone!! Jen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 10, 2005 Report Share Posted November 10, 2005 Well my Dr. is pretty firm that having 12 casts over 12 weeks ensures proper (and more permanent) correction and yet allows the baby's leg to grow. His casts go up to his groin (not quite but just about) and they are very light (around 5 oz.). I actually don't mind changing the cast every week because I'm sure you remember with newborns how often an " unexpected waterfall " occurs with boys:). It's almost impossible not to hit the cast. I keep it as clean as possible but I can only do so much. His skin isn't too bad, but he's only had it on for 2 weeks so I'm sure it's just a matter of time before the irritation gets worse. For now, I'm comfortable with this Dr. and I will keep asking questions as well as ask for more names of people with success stories. As for the 4 hour drive - I realize it's not as far as most other people drive to get to their Dr., but when we found out that Cam had clubfoot our pediatrician recommended this Dr. We think extremely highly of our pediatrician and never questioned his referral. As well we were in such a fog over this whole thing and wanted to start treatment as soon as possible. I don't feel that Cam's development is in any immediate danger at this point, and I hope to get more info. on my Dr. success. I'll keep people posted... Jen number23 wrote: Jen, I don't mean to step on toes here or second guess any one or any thing because certainly even after 7 years in the world of clubbed feet I continue to learn more new stuff here........ .............but my question about your doctor's " modifications " is this: What is the advantage to 12 weeks of castings vs. the typical (average?) 5 weeks of casting? He is more than doubling your child's time in casts (and gee, more than doubling his income in the process?) How can being casted longer be actually better for their growth? In the casting phase of the treatment there is only so much to do, and either the doctor does it swiftly and accurately (aka correctly), or he doesn't. Prolonging the treatment seems absurd to me. Logically speaking a cast is a very restrictive thing to wear. Most Ponseti children finish their casting before they are 2 months old, yours will still be wearing them when he is 3 and I do believe this could potentially cause developmental delays as 3 months is a pretty key age in infant-land developmentally speaking. As I say all this, please keep in mind that Dr. Ponseti has been working on this method for dang near 60 years with tons of follow up studies proving it works so why does a dr. with 3 years of using it think he knows how to do it better? The real question is this: What are HIS follow up studies? I mean, what are YOUR doctor's follow up studies? By all rights, his first patients should still be wearing their FAB's right now (unless he has modified that too, in which case I say RUN!) , therefore there would be no significant proof that his " modifications " are successful because he has no long-term proof it works. He's just been " getting by " with it for now, but the proof is in the long term results and he doesn't have any to back up his claims. However there are half a century worth of studies proving the majority of cf children only need an average of 5 weeks worth of casts and generally a maximum of 9 weeks worth for more complex cases. This is just my opinion as an old timer here. Just a side note, myself (and many, many others here) drive way more than four hours for treatment. Shoot, four hours would be a cake walk, it's more like a 3 day trip for us. I guess my whole point is don't be fooled by a spiffy sales pitch and a few glossy photographs. ee, mother of two bcf boys: - NON Ponseti Method Club Foot Disaster Everett - Dr. Ponseti Success Story -----He told me that he has been practicing the Ponseti method for 3 years and found that making modifications to the Ponseti method has produced better results for infants. Changing the cast every week for 12 weeks is better for their growth. I have also spoken to another woman about her daughter that was treated by this same Dr. and she said you would never know she ever had clubfeet. I also saw photo documentation of his work and the little girl's foot looks beautiful. At this point I'm not going to change Dr., but I will keep in mind all that everyone has told me. Cam's foot looks better already I think it was that asked me how far Charlotte is from Wilmington and it's about 4 1/2 hours. We are in Charlotte several times a year so I think we would definitely try to co-ordinate a visit with another Ponseti Dr. for a second opinion. Thank you for the names and the advice. Take care everyone!! Jen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 10, 2005 Report Share Posted November 10, 2005 Jen, Perhaps your doctor has had issues with the babies' feet being too small and not fitting properly into the shoes and that is why he prefers to cast for a few additional weeks in order to obtain that growth. Although this is an unusual modification in the fact that he's doing it for all babies as general practice, I don't see a major problem with this if he is following the method correctly otherwise. In order to determine this, you would need to observe/know the following: The shape of the casts at the end of correction, just before the tenotomy, the toes would kind of point down and outward. There is a good picture of the succession of the casts in that Global HELP booklet so you can see what the casts should look like each step of the way. The foot should be abducted outward to 70 degrees at the last post-tenotomy cast. Does your doctor abduct the foot to 70°? Did he tell you that the casts after the tenotomy are just to maintain correction? After the tenotomy, the foot should be completely corrected. If he says that the last 5-6 weeks are to get more correction after the tenotomy, then he is not using the proper casting and manipulation techniques per Ponseti. I guess my take on what you've told us thus far is that if your doctor is just using more casts in order to get the foot a little bigger for better results in the transition to the brace, that is not as big of a deal to me as if he says that he needs those additional casts are needed in order to get better results for the correction of the foot. We have read statements to the effect of if the doctor needs more than 9 casts to achieve correction (barring any unusual circumstances), then they are not grasping the method properly. Most kids need only 5-7 casts- up to 9 for the most severe. You could always print off that Global HELP booklet and ask your doctor to review it to see if that is the manipulation/casting/bracing protocol that he follows. I hope this helps a little bit. Maybe I'm reading too much into your letter. I know how hard it is understand everything the doctor is telling you at the appointment and remember to ask all the questions you wanted to, much less try to go back and communicate it with the group here. Regards, & (3-16-00, lcf) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 10, 2005 Report Share Posted November 10, 2005 Hi Jen, I just wanted to pipe up on this conversation. I really don't want to make you feel like I am questioning you but I am still not sure I follow your doctor's approach. In the normal Ponseti method the casts ARE changed weekly, but unless there are problems with slipping casts (which there *usually* aren't) it should only take 5 or 6 weekly casts to obtain correction. I don't understand this philosophy of 12 weekly cast changes, how can keeping each cast on for 1 week with a total of 12 weeks be better than keeping each cast on for 1 week with a total of 6 weeks? The main thing is that the actual progression of correction does not take that long, if it does, this is a red flag that there could be something faulty in the treatment. There is one thing that your doctor may be trying to achieve, and that is having the baby's foot a bit bigger (that is by the baby being a bit older) by time they are ready to go into the brace. This in itself is possibly okay but something I would ask him about. The other issue I would question is why he is doing the tenotomy in the middle of casting instead of at the end? Again, if he is expecting to achieve full correction with the first 6 casts, do the tenotomy and then the following casts would just be kind of like " holding " casts, I can maybe see his logic. However, it is very important that the tenotomy be performed as the last step of the actual correction. The bones of the foot must actually rotate around each other to come to the corrected position -- if the tenotomy is performed too early it will allow the foot to dorsiflex, thus actually preventing the key rotation of the bones. Also, I may have missed this in a previous post, but will he be keeping the post-tenotomy cast on for 3 weeks? This is important to allow the tendon to heal in the proper stretched position. Jen, I just want to reassure you that if we ask you a lot of questions it is purely for " educational purposes " and because we have too often seen doctors who deviate from the method and actually do more harm than good - we only have your's and Cam's best interests at heart. It is ultimately the most important thing for you to be educated about your son's treatment and to know what to look for and when to ask questions, what questions to ask, and when and/or if you should seek a second opinion. Hope this is helpful! Thanks, Jenna (4/7/01) & Sammy (9/25/04, RCF, Dobbs' brace 16hrs/day --- Jen wrote: > Well my Dr. is pretty firm that having 12 casts over > 12 weeks ensures proper (and more permanent) > correction and yet allows the baby's leg to grow. > His casts go up to his groin (not quite but just > about) and they are very light (around 5 oz.). I > actually don't mind changing the cast every week > because I'm sure you remember with newborns how > often an " unexpected waterfall " occurs with boys:). > It's almost impossible not to hit the cast. I keep > it as clean as possible but I can only do so much. > His skin isn't too bad, but he's only had it on for > 2 weeks so I'm sure it's just a matter of time > before the irritation gets worse. > For now, I'm comfortable with this Dr. and I will > keep asking questions as well as ask for more names > of people with success stories. > As for the 4 hour drive - I realize it's not as far > as most other people drive to get to their Dr., but > when we found out that Cam had clubfoot our > pediatrician recommended this Dr. We think > extremely highly of our pediatrician and never > questioned his referral. As well we were in such a > fog over this whole thing and wanted to start > treatment as soon as possible. I don't feel that > Cam's development is in any immediate danger at this > point, and I hope to get more info. on my Dr. > success. I'll keep people posted... > > Jen > > > number23 wrote: > Jen, > I don't mean to step on toes here or second guess > any one or any thing because certainly even after 7 > years in the world of clubbed feet I continue to > learn more new stuff here........ > > ............but my question about your doctor's > " modifications " is this: What is the advantage to > 12 weeks of castings vs. the typical (average?) 5 > weeks of casting? He is more than doubling your > child's time in casts (and gee, more than doubling > his income in the process?) How can being casted > longer be actually better for their growth? In the > casting phase of the treatment there is only so much > to do, and either the doctor does it swiftly and > accurately (aka correctly), or he doesn't. > Prolonging the treatment seems absurd to me. > > Logically speaking a cast is a very restrictive > thing to wear. Most Ponseti children finish their > casting before they are 2 months old, yours will > still be wearing them when he is 3 and I do believe > this could potentially cause developmental delays as > 3 months is a pretty key age in infant-land > developmentally speaking. > > > As I say all this, please keep in mind that Dr. > Ponseti has been working on this method for dang > near 60 years with tons of follow up studies proving > it works so why does a dr. with 3 years of using it > think he knows how to do it better? > > The real question is this: What are HIS follow up > studies? I mean, what are YOUR doctor's follow up > studies? By all rights, his first patients should > still be wearing their FAB's right now (unless he > has modified that too, in which case I say RUN!) , > therefore there would be no significant proof that > his " modifications " are successful because he has no > long-term proof it works. He's just been " getting > by " with it for now, but the proof is in the long > term results and he doesn't have any to back up his > claims. However there are half a century worth of > studies proving the majority of cf children only > need an average of 5 weeks worth of casts and > generally a maximum of 9 weeks worth for more > complex cases. > > This is just my opinion as an old timer here. > > Just a side note, myself (and many, many others > here) drive way more than four hours for treatment. > Shoot, four hours would be a cake walk, it's more > like a 3 day trip for us. > > I guess my whole point is don't be fooled by a > spiffy sales pitch and a few glossy photographs. > > ee, mother of two bcf boys: > - NON Ponseti Method Club Foot Disaster > Everett - Dr. Ponseti Success Story > > -----He told me that he has been practicing the > Ponseti method for 3 years and found that making > modifications to the > Ponseti method has produced better results for > infants. Changing the > cast every week for 12 weeks is better for their > growth. I have also > spoken to another woman about her daughter that was > treated by this > same Dr. and she said you would never know she ever > had clubfeet. I > also saw photo documentation of his work and the > little girl's foot > looks beautiful. At this point I'm not going to > change Dr., but I > will keep in mind all that everyone has told me. > Cam's foot looks > better already > I think it was that asked me how far > Charlotte is from > Wilmington and it's about 4 1/2 hours. We are in > Charlotte several > times a year so I think we would definitely try to > co-ordinate a visit > with another Ponseti Dr. for a second opinion. > Thank you for the > names and the advice. > > Take care everyone!! > > Jen > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 10, 2005 Report Share Posted November 10, 2005 Hi Jen. Please be careful with your doctor and continue to ask 100 questions. My pediatrician and gyn highly recommended by daughters first doctor as well. It turns out, he was modifying the method, but we didn't know better, and because he was so 'highly recommended' we stuck with him longer than we should have. Finally, with the intelligent people and education I learned from this site, we finally switched when my daughter was 5 months old. We had to start treatment over from the beginning. Luckily it was still early enough where the damage wasn't too bad, but I am one of the lucky ones as compared to so many others on this site. I am not trying to come down hard on you, and neither are the others. We just want to make sure you get the absolute best treatment for your little one. It could be possible your doctor is great. We just want you to be aware that just because they are highly recommended, doesn't necessarily mean they know the best way to treat the Ponseti Method. Modifying the method in any way whatsoever is always a red flag. Please learn about your doctor and please be cautious and keep asking a lot of questions. Good luck and keep asking away........ Jen wrote: Well my Dr. is pretty firm that having 12 casts over 12 weeks ensures proper (and more permanent) correction and yet allows the baby's leg to grow. His casts go up to his groin (not quite but just about) and they are very light (around 5 oz.). I actually don't mind changing the cast every week because I'm sure you remember with newborns how often an " unexpected waterfall " occurs with boys:). It's almost impossible not to hit the cast. I keep it as clean as possible but I can only do so much. His skin isn't too bad, but he's only had it on for 2 weeks so I'm sure it's just a matter of time before the irritation gets worse. For now, I'm comfortable with this Dr. and I will keep asking questions as well as ask for more names of people with success stories. As for the 4 hour drive - I realize it's not as far as most other people drive to get to their Dr., but when we found out that Cam had clubfoot our pediatrician recommended this Dr. We think extremely highly of our pediatrician and never questioned his referral. As well we were in such a fog over this whole thing and wanted to start treatment as soon as possible. I don't feel that Cam's development is in any immediate danger at this point, and I hope to get more info. on my Dr. success. I'll keep people posted... Jen number23 wrote: Jen, I don't mean to step on toes here or second guess any one or any thing because certainly even after 7 years in the world of clubbed feet I continue to learn more new stuff here........ .............but my question about your doctor's " modifications " is this: What is the advantage to 12 weeks of castings vs. the typical (average?) 5 weeks of casting? He is more than doubling your child's time in casts (and gee, more than doubling his income in the process?) How can being casted longer be actually better for their growth? In the casting phase of the treatment there is only so much to do, and either the doctor does it swiftly and accurately (aka correctly), or he doesn't. Prolonging the treatment seems absurd to me. Logically speaking a cast is a very restrictive thing to wear. Most Ponseti children finish their casting before they are 2 months old, yours will still be wearing them when he is 3 and I do believe this could potentially cause developmental delays as 3 months is a pretty key age in infant-land developmentally speaking. As I say all this, please keep in mind that Dr. Ponseti has been working on this method for dang near 60 years with tons of follow up studies proving it works so why does a dr. with 3 years of using it think he knows how to do it better? The real question is this: What are HIS follow up studies? I mean, what are YOUR doctor's follow up studies? By all rights, his first patients should still be wearing their FAB's right now (unless he has modified that too, in which case I say RUN!) , therefore there would be no significant proof that his " modifications " are successful because he has no long-term proof it works. He's just been " getting by " with it for now, but the proof is in the long term results and he doesn't have any to back up his claims. However there are half a century worth of studies proving the majority of cf children only need an average of 5 weeks worth of casts and generally a maximum of 9 weeks worth for more complex cases. This is just my opinion as an old timer here. Just a side note, myself (and many, many others here) drive way more than four hours for treatment. Shoot, four hours would be a cake walk, it's more like a 3 day trip for us. I guess my whole point is don't be fooled by a spiffy sales pitch and a few glossy photographs. ee, mother of two bcf boys: - NON Ponseti Method Club Foot Disaster Everett - Dr. Ponseti Success Story -----He told me that he has been practicing the Ponseti method for 3 years and found that making modifications to the Ponseti method has produced better results for infants. Changing the cast every week for 12 weeks is better for their growth. I have also spoken to another woman about her daughter that was treated by this same Dr. and she said you would never know she ever had clubfeet. I also saw photo documentation of his work and the little girl's foot looks beautiful. At this point I'm not going to change Dr., but I will keep in mind all that everyone has told me. Cam's foot looks better already I think it was that asked me how far Charlotte is from Wilmington and it's about 4 1/2 hours. We are in Charlotte several times a year so I think we would definitely try to co-ordinate a visit with another Ponseti Dr. for a second opinion. Thank you for the names and the advice. Take care everyone!! Jen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 10, 2005 Report Share Posted November 10, 2005 Jen, I know it's easy to be overwhelmed. Especially when there's all kinds of new (and complicated) information to absorb and lots of opinions and advice thrown in the mix. Many of us here have read hundreds of stories over the years from families like yours- and it's hard to give advice based on just snippets of information about the child and the doctor- but everyone is very concerned about the baby getting the best care possible, so the folks just try to give you as much info as they can so that you can educate yourself on different scenarios and different aspects of clubfoot treatment. We have had *many* families think they were getting the Ponseti method, when they in fact were not, and usually it's not too late to turn around and get another opinion or switch doctors- but it's always best to figure this out as quickly as possible since a well-intended doctor can actually damage a foot by casting it incorrectly or cause unnecessary scar tissue by operating before the foot is ready which complicates the additional surgeries (tendon lengthening) that might be needed later on. Unfortunately, many of us (myself included) have been burned by blindly trusting a doctor- and we don't want that to happen to other families. Most of us don't need to hang out on this board, but we do because we're a tight knit group that is passionate about helping clubfoot babies just like our own- and we know that our older kids are role models and beacons of hope for those just starting out on their journey. Things will be okay and life will be " normal " eventually. So I hope you'll read this into all the well-meaning posts here. We want to give you the info you need to sort out the treatment journey for your little boy. About the tenotomy- the procedure used for the lengthening of the Achilles tendon (required for about 80% of the kids) using the Ponseti approach is called a percutaneous tenotomy. It can be done under local anesthesia or general anesthesia. It is a quick (15-20 min or less including casting) procedure in which the scalpel is inserted into the heel. There are no stitches required to close the puncture wound because it's very tiny. The cast is applied and left on for 3 weeks. Once this cast comes off- that's it- the foot is corrected and ready to go into the brace. Now, maybe what your doctor uses is a different form of a tenotomy- there are open-incision tenotomies where a large incision is used which requires stitches to close the wound. One procedure in this category is called " Z-lengthening " . If this is what your doctor is using- perhaps this is why he indicated that he needed more casts to allow healing since it's a more involved procedure. Sometimes doctors refer to a procedure as a " release " . This can mean that they go in and lengthen the tendon- but while they're " in there " they can also release additional components of the foot. This would be more extensive surgery and would commonly require 5-6 weeks of post-op casting. Is this what your doctor is describing? It's hard to know the difference between the procedures that doctors talk about. Tendon lengthening surgery, tenotomy, tendon release.....they can all mean the same thing- just different ways to say it..... or they could be completely different as there are vastly different procedures that fall under those " general terms " . The easiest way to know what your doctor is expecting to do is to have him describe the procedure to you in detail. Sorry this is a lot to take in- just keep reading and asking questions- eventually it will all fall into place and you'll end up being able to hold in-depth medical conversations with the doctors. I've had over 5 years to practice already....it's like learning a new language sometimes. Hang in there- ('s mom) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 11, 2005 Report Share Posted November 11, 2005 One thing to add to this discussion.. My daughter had 13 casts total, between her first ultimately unsuccessful treatment and then the casts she had in Iowa. Recently, at a checkup, Dr. Ponseti and a visiting doctor noted that her calf is thinner than average. And then Dr. Ponseti said that the difference could be due to her having had so many casts. I had never heard that from him before. I had always thought that casting itself couldn't cause atrophy. But, there it is; he said it. I had wanted to switch doctors earlier, but it took us several months, including a while for me to convince my husband, that doing so was necessary. Being surprised at delivery, we had a steep learning curve. And we were tripped up, like so many, with the notion of a doctor coming highly recommended by very smart people.. so 'big name', so well thought of... surely, it's fine. Well.. it wasn't, for THIS condition. I regret those months wasted, putting my tiny infant through painful castings that didn't work, and then having to start all over again the right way. Plus her having a tenotomy done too early, which has probably has resulted in less dorsiflexion than she might otherwise have had. As ee said, I don't blame anyone but myself.. and maybe that's part of why I feeled called to be here. To help and alert those of you going through the same thing... because it happens over, and over, and over again.. in such a predicatble way. The feedback is not always well received, I know.. perhaps perceived as nosy, critical, presumptuous. But honestly, we're just trying to help other moms and dads avoid what we went through. The situations and pitfalls are SO common. As said, us 'old timers' don't need to be hanging around on the boards.. other than hoping to support and help other parents. We have nothing to gain but that.. and Claire Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.