Re: Rebaking Substitution and Honey

[Guest guest]

I've heard not to give them " pure honey " , but the stuff that's unprocessed

should be ok. Besides, if she's going to bake it in, it shouldn't cause

this, the book is referring to eating natural.

a

> I kinda remember this from the baby books and I went to check it and I

> did remember it right.

>

> In the baby book " What to expect in the first year " a baby care book,

> they caution parents about giving honey to babies under a 1 year of

> age. Honey may contain spores of Clostridium botulinum ( which is

> harmless to adults) It could cause botulism. The book points out it

> is very rare. I don't know how valid this is but it is in a baby cre

> book.

>

> It got me wondering if honey was such a good thing for our kids with

> problematic immune systems. Anyone heard anything about that?

>

> I hate to think of one more thing our kids can't have. Maybe some one

> has run into this before.

>

> Jeneane, Houston

[Guest guest]

I correct myself. It's too early for this. The stuff that's unprocessed is

considered NOT OK. I know Dr. Semon suggests using unprocessed honey and

says it rarely causes problems, but I was always too nervous about it.

a

> I've heard not to give them " pure honey " , but the stuff that's unprocessed

> should be ok. Besides, if she's going to bake it in, it shouldn't cause

> this, the book is referring to eating natural.

>

> a