Guest guest Posted January 9, 2006 Report Share Posted January 9, 2006 I was 23, 25 and 37, when I had mine. It took me a bit longer physically to get back together even though the last one was the shortest labour (23/4 hours) but I felt like I had been run over by a truck, then I got an infection, Plus Connor was quite big and hungry and I had to feed him really frequently. I have to say it has been harder with this last one with the not sleeping because when my girls were little they both slept really well, I worked evenings when my husband came home from work then. Now I work part-time days. Connor has only started sleeping through a couple of months ago. I also go to college 2 nights a week and do some book work at home and I also have to find time to do the homework from college plus the housework - so this time round it definately has been harder but I have to say I am glad I got my boy!!!! He is just so funny!!!! Rach, Steve & Connor -- Re: ot- oops correcting myself, just to be accurate, I was 35, 36 and 39! > > , > > I had my three at 36, 37 and 39 (Claire, just a couple months before > turning 40), and all three were easy conceptions, pregnancies, > deliveries, recoveries, no problems at all. In fact I would've had > more without hesitation! > From my perspective now, the short months (in the grand scheme of > things) of pregnancy and those early days with a baby.. even the > awakenings, even the challenges (but joys) toddler and preschool > years.. are SO fleeting. Everyone tells you so, but looking back I > see it's true. I loved every bit of it, and it went by way too fast. > (My 'baby' now is 5 1/2..) =) > Of course that's just me and my experience.. > but passing it along for what it's worth to hear! > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.