Guest guest Posted July 26, 2001 Report Share Posted July 26, 2001 : Murray: balanced reflections re Truehope Synergy vitamins for bipolar 7.26.1 rmforall Subject: Re: Rich Murray: Ross: Woeckner: facts re Truehope Synergy hype re pig vitamins for bipolar 7.25.1 rmforall Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 14:41:20 -0700 From: aelewis@... To: Rich Murray Rich Murray wrote: > I want to apologize for my gullibility and carelessness in promoting > cheap and potentially dangerous PR hype about treating serious mental > illnesses with simple vitamins. Now, now, don't be too quick to fall on your sword here, Rich. Yes, it would seem that Truehope is winging-it, and making claims (or rather issuing some claimy-sounding verbiage) before they can properly be made, but let's keep things in perspective. More than anything else they seem to be suggesting that people with bipolar disorder (and etc.) should be taking a good, complete multi-vitamin/mineral -- an obviously sensible idea, and one that could possibly yield some benefits for some users. An adequately-formulated multiple would yield goodly amounts of magnesium and chromium -- elements with some apparent value in depression or manic-depression (see abstracts below). > I firmly commit myself to respectfully studying > points of view that are opposed to mine, for no mortal can > claim any monopoly on truth. I can hardly demand that others > listen to me, if I do not listen, really listen, to them! Now THAT is a great idea! " The only way in which a human being can make some approach to knowing the whole of a subject is by hearing what can be said about it by persons of every variety of opinion and studying all modes in which it can be looked at by every character of mind. No wise man ever acquired his wisdom in any mode but this. " -- J S Mill > I should have known better, as I have studied much false and > misleading " research " about the safety of aspartame, MSG.... Are you really sure that the Truehope research is " false and misleading " ? someone else [ Liz Woeckner ] wrote: > Scientific conclusions about the efficacy of drugs are drawn > from double-blind placebo studies published in peer-reviewed > journals. Yes. And we cannot forget that prior to those 2x-blind/etc. studies in peer-reviewed journals come anecdotes, followed by more anecdotes, followed by more anecdotes, followed by (maybe) someone getting interested in why there are so many anecdotes regarding whatever-it-is, and perhaps also developing some hypothesis as to why whatever-it-is is happening, followed by very informal, non-blinded clinical trials (scarcely better than anecdotes), which may or may not be published, along with anecdotal info, in non-peer-reviewed journals (and/or published as convention abstracts or presentations, and/or published as letters, etc., etc.), followed by...... pant, pant! See? It is a long path to that golden end of unassailable blinded, controlled, randomized [blah-blah] trials published in top journals. *Ignoring* things (or casually dismissing things) that have not reached that level is about as foolish as becoming wildly enthusiastic about them. It is important to remember, when it comes to human health, that the goal (for most of us, at least) is not clearcut " scientific conclusions " , but rather what works -- and " what works " at any given moment could well be years or decades away from anything resembling scientific verification. Vitamin E worked for heart disease no less well back in the days when JAMA and most of the medical establishment denounced it as quackery (or was that " dangerous " quackery?); the fact that that establishment has come around to a mature view does not change the efficacy of the substance -- nor does it change the beneficial results that many millions secured even *as* the substance was denounced. > But other sorts of studies are possible and if they provided > suggestive data, interest would support a larger conventional study. > I've seen studies on a single patient, and I've seen studies on small > numbers and for limited periods of time. Absolutely. Truehope should proceed with studies larger and better than that one little 10-patient one, and post haste... if they are in fact sincere and committed to scientific verification (which they may very well NOT be, for all I know). > These are not the reasons why Truehope has no literature > to support their claims. These are my objections to Truehope: > 1] no scientific literature or currently understood biological > processes or even theoretical paradigms give any evidence that > the regime of vitamins they sell would have any therapeutic > benefit in depression, bipolar disorder, > autism, schizophrenia, ADHD, and TS. Well, not quite. I cite some literature for chromium and magnesium effects in depression below. That is not to mention the lit on vitamin D and brain function, and vitamin D as a mood-elevating substance. Nor does it mention the role of folic acid and pyridoxine and B12 in neurotransmitter metabolism, and the frequency of insufficiency of those vitamins in psychiatric populations. There is also an interesting literature developing on calcium therapy for the depression of PMS (and possibly other depressions? who knows?) Etcetera. Much more could be said, but time is limiting. Did Truehope mention schizophrenia or Tourettes? Not on the literature I have. The only mention they made of autism was in the context of mentioning that a study was in the process of being designed to test their supplement in that condition, and (from their lit): " The idea is not that the supplement would cure the disorder, but would allow the child to function better at home or at school. " Fair enough. Let the trial proceed. > 2] Inexperience and questionable marketing tactics: > if Synergy has a bona fide product to test for > therapeutic benefit they must find an experienced researcher or > clinician to work with. Good idea. > In the same fashion that I do not expect a librarian to > perform surgery, I do not accept medical and pharmacological > pronouncements from untrained lay persons. How about *trained* lay persons? Clinical trials (especially of harmless vitamin tabs) are not rocket science, nor are they surgery. > Last November when I visited their web site [the URL you provided > in your post] Truehope's " protocol " told patients to stop all their > medications abruptly -- with no warnings to work with their physician > or taper medication. Bad idea. > They have since changed this somewhat, but this points up how > dangerous inexperience can be: no clinician would ever give > such potentially lethal advice. Welllll... as a matter of fact clinicians do much more than just give " potentially lethal advice " , as the figure for iatrogenic deaths (around 170,000 per year, if memory serves me) indicates. [Murray: The news this week is that some experts claim the correct estimate is about 5,000 to 15,000 iatrogenic deaths in the USA.] The medical profession as a whole is not in a very good position to be lecturing about the " dangers " of manifestly innocuous stuff like low-potency vitamin tabs (like the Truehope formulation). Now, if said low-potency tabs are dispensed to certain individuals in, say, a fragile, suicidally-depressed state along with the advice to abruptly cease whatever antidepressants they may be on, then... then that is a somewhat different story. But even then, only somewhat. There appears to be a subpop of SSRI users who become *more* suicidal when they take SSRIs. So the situation is hardly clearcut. > I find it alarming that Truehope would offer their customers the > support of untrained and uncredentialed company representatives. > I have corresponded with Stephan, a Synergy principal, and he > lied to me. This does not bespeak a man who is honestly trying to > market a beneficial product. Lies are unprofessional and inexcusable, to be sure, and clueless company reps are an annoyance. But nothing to get panicked or alarmed about (provided we are still talking about vitamin tablets). Sounds like the Truehope people are hucksters... who are reminding us to do the obvious: provide good, broad-spectrum nutritional support to people with neuropsychiatric problems, and do so routinely. Also sounds like Truehope is charging a semi-ripoff price for what looks like a conventional multiple: $120 per month, or so; should probably be 1/4 of that, or thereabouts. > I am entirely convinced that Truehope is perpetrating > a dangerous scam. Dangerous? How? > As for reaction with psychotropic drugs, if memory serves, at least > one of the ingredients, inositol, can do nasty things to people > with bipolar disorders, meds or no. ONE letter suggested the possibility of manic reactions to inositol. > Inositol: requires expert clinical management if used by bipolars; Why? > some evidence that it causes mania; I would be concerned about > triggering serotonin syndrome, based on inositol's role in > serotonin production -- in combination with SSRI meds, frequently > used in bipolar and depression. Serotonin syndrome, very doubtful, but possible. Darn near anything is possible. In the amounts in the Truehope product, probably impossible. (Amount not specified, but run the numbers, roughly, on the other ingredients and figure it out, relative to the 10-20 GRAMS/day that have been used in the inositol studies.) ************************************************** http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query_old?uid=10699232 & form=6 & db=m\ & Dopt=b Psychiatry Res 2000 Feb 14;93(1):83-7 Magnesium oxide augmentation of verapamil maintenance therapy in mania. Giannini AJ, Nakoneczie AM, Melemis SM, Ventresco J, Condon M Chemical Abuse Centers Inc. 721 Boardman-Poland Road, Suite 200, Boardman, OH 44512-5105, USA. The authors compared the antimanic effects of a verapamil-magnesium oxide (V-M) combination with a verapamil-placebo combination (V-P) in patients pretreated with verapamil. BPRS scores and serum magnesium levels were compared. The V-M combination was found to be significantly more effective than V-P in reducing manic symptoms (P=0.015). Serum magnesium levels were significantly higher in the V-M group (P<0.04). These data suggest that magnesium may increase antimanic efficacy of verapamil by mechanisms which may operate at the intracellular level. The magnesium-verapamil combination may have clinical application as an adjunct to verapamil in the maintenance therapy of mania. Publication Types: Clinical trial Randomized controlled trial PMID: 10699232, UI: 20165007 ************************************************** http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query_old?uid=2309035 & form=6 & db=m & \ Dopt=b Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 1990;14(2):171-80 A pilot study of magnesium aspartate hydrochloride (Magnesiocard) as a mood stabilizer for rapid cycling bipolar affective disorder patients. Chouinard G, Beauclair L, Geiser R, Etienne P Research Centre, Louis-H. Lafontaine Hospital University of Montreal, Canada. Nine severe rapid cycling manic-depressive patients were treated with a magnesium preparation, Magnesiocard 40 mEq/day in an open label study for a period up to 32 weeks.. Magnesiocard was found to have clinical results at least equivalent to those of lithium in about 50% of these patients. These results were obtained in an exploratory study and should be interpreted with caution. The possibility that Magnesiocard could replace or improve the efficacy of lithium as a preventive treatment of manic-depressive illness merits further clinical investigation. PMID: 2309035, UI: 90175917 ******************************************************* Chromium Useful in Dysthymia [Nurses' Drug Alert 23(6):45,46, 1999 .. © 1999 M.J. Powers & Co. Publishers] Chromium picolinate supplementation was effective in 5 patients with dysthymia (chronic mild depression, often treatment-resistant). A 50-year-old man with a 25-year history of dysthymic disorder, had only partial response with sertraline. He began taking a vitamin-mineral supplement, and within days his dysthymia resolved completely. After informing his psychiatrist, the patient agreed to stop taking the supplement and undergo separate, single-blind re-introductions of each of its 5 major ingredients. His symptoms returned during the supplement washout and disappeared again during administration of chromium picolinate, 200 mcg/day. The patient ended the trial prematurely on his own initiative, and insisted on knowing which supplement ingredient was responsible for his dramatic remission. He then began taking chromium picolinate and eventually discontinued sertraline. He switched to another preparation, chromium polynicotinate, and remained euthymic after 15 months of chromium monotherapy. Single-blind trials of chromium were then instituted in 4 other patients with antidepressant-resistant dysthymia. Each had an inadequate response to either sertraline, fluoxetine, nortriptyline, or bupropion with lithium. Chromium was added to ongoing medication in 3 patients, and was used as monotherapy in the fourth. In all cases, at least 1 other disguised nutritional supplement was used as a control; in some cases, chromium was withdrawn and re-introduced multiple times. Without exception, mood symptoms resolved during use of chromium and returned upon its discontinuation. One patient reported side effects of insomnia and increased dreaming, which resolved when the supplement was taken in the afternoon. Two other patients also reported increased dreaming, which resolved spontaneously within 2 weeks in both cases. Chromium, which enhances peripheral glucose metabolism, may improve mood by increasing glucose utilization in the CNS. Evidence suggests that chromium may also enhance monoaminergic neurotransmission and serotonin synthesis. Chromium picolinate supplementation has been studied for 3 decades and appears to be safe at dosages up to 1 mg/day, higher than the 200-400 mcg dosages used in these 5 patients. A test for chromium deficiency does not exist at present. References McLeod M, et al: Chromium potentiation of antidepressant pharmacotherapy for dysthymic disorder in 5 patients. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 1999;60 (April):237-240. From the University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill. *********************************************************8 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query_old?uid=10221284 & form=6 & db=m\ & Dopt=b J Clin Psychiatry 1999 Apr;60(4):237-40 Chromium potentiation of antidepressant pharmacotherapy for dysthymic disorder in 5 patients. McLeod MN, Gaynes BN, Golden RN Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill 27599-7160, USA. BACKGROUND: Dysthymic disorder is a relatively common illness that is often treated with antidepressants. Compared with the study of major depression, there has been little systematic study of potentiation strategies for antidepressant-refractory dysthymic disorder. METHOD: Following a patient's report of dramatic response to the addition of chromium supplementation to sertraline pharmacotherapy for dysthymic disorder (DSM-IV), the authors initiated a series of single-blind and open-label trials of chromium picolinate or chromium polynicotinate in the treatment of antidepressant-refractory dysthymic disorder. RESULTS: In a series of 5 patients, chromium supplementation led to remission of dysthymic symptoms. Single-blind substitution of other dietary supplements in each of the patients demonstrated specificity of response to chromium supplementation. CONCLUSION: Preliminary observations suggest that chromium may potentiate antidepressant pharmacotherapy for dysthymic disorder. Controlled studies are indicated to test the validity of these initial observations. Publication Types: Clinical trial PMID: 10221284, UI: 99236473 ****************************************************** http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query_old?uid=11343609 & form=6 & db=m\ & Dopt=b Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2000 Dec;3(4):311-314 Chromium treatment of depression. McLeod MN, Golden RN Eight patients with refractory mood disorders received chromium supplements and described dramatic improvements in their symptoms and functioning. In several instances, single-blind trials confirmed specificity of response to chromium. Side-effects were rare and mild, and most commonly included enhanced dreaming and mild psychomotor activation. To our knowledge, this is the first case series describing the response to chromium monotherapy. The putative antidepressant effects of chromium could be accounted for by enhancement of insulin utilization and related increases in tryptophan availability in the central nervous system, and/or by chromium's effects on norepinephrine release. PMID: 11343609 ********************************************************** Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.