Guest guest Posted September 14, 2001 Report Share Posted September 14, 2001 , It was either Balsigger or Sugerman that reported very poor results with 50cm and good resutls with 150cm for the distal RNY. I can check Friday. Hull > > Dawn, > > > > This is quite true. In fact the common channel length for a distal > > RNY is required to be 150cm to avoid nutritonal problems. So the > > distal RNY is not quite as malabsorptive as the DS. They tried > 50cm > > common channel with the distal RNY, and had terrible results! > > > > Hull Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.