Guest guest Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 Your story is so inspiring to read and I wish that all of us could have the experience! I think they should start automatically screening for clubfoot so that all parents could be prepared well in advance such as you were. My biggest regret in my son's early treatment is that we didn't have the chance to look into anything ahead of time. Thanks for sharing this. Given wrote: Our daughter Rachael turned one today and I thought some on here would appreciate an uneventful and boring update with no problems whatsoever. Rachael was born last Feb 15th with severe (but typical) bilateral clubfoot. We knew from the 20 week sonogram and were prepared going in. Like many of you, a simple web search revealed the wonders of the Ponseti method and this newsgroup. We quickly read up on the procedure and started calling trained doctors in the NYC area (we are in NJ.) We were not startled at birth and her feet came out exactly as the many pictures looked. We felt then (and now) that she was otherwise perfectly healthy and feet are pretty far down on the list of all the things that CAN go wrong with childbirth. We brought her to see Dr. Scher in NYC a few days after birth and the journey began. She had the most severe Pirani score in both feet (6?) but we were told that this should be corrected in the typical number of castings. The first cast went on much easier than I ever expected and watching the manipulations was just about the most fascinating thing I've ever seen done with the bare hand and a tender child. Rachael didn't mind a bit and off we went in the casts. She had never known anything else but the casts since she'd only been around a few days and didn't even seem to notice. The carseat still worked, the PJs still fit...and hey...no one told us diapering was easier with a handle! She went through five weeks and five casts and really never seemed to notice they were ever on. They never broke, ripped, tore or flaked. Her skin stayed baby pink the whole time. Her favorite part was getting them sawed off and the casting techs explained that many children seemed to like the soothing vibrations. Dr. Scher said the feet looked good after the five casts and we were on to the tenonotomy. This sounds much worse than it really is. A few minutes of crying and what is left is really a pin-sized dot on the back of both heels. She went into the final three week cast and there didn't seem to be any tenotomy discomfort. No swelling...not even any bleeding in the cast. At the " tenotomy " visit we did the foot impressions for the sandals. We read up and decided to go with these instead of the Markell shoes. At this point the insurance seemed to be a crapshoot with some getting reimbursed and others not, but we felt that even if we had to pay for them all that they looked to be a lot more comfortable, lighter and easier to adhere to the bracing guidelines. We sent off the impression kit and our check to the magical clubfoot state of Iowa and 2 1/2 weeks later the stylish Birkenstock-meets- babysnowboard device arrived. She went out of the final cast and into s with no problems of transition at all. Maybe it is because of her disposition or maybe because they are even lighter than the casts, but she didn't even seem to notice having them on. Her heel went all the way back and down from day one and putting them on was much easier than I ever expected. The key seems to be keeping the middle strap very tight and they don't slip at all...ever..not once. The only thing we ever had to adjust was poking extra holes in a future pair. She is on her third pair and went from 23 hours usage...to 16...to 14...to 12 today. I really can't point to anything really eventfully negative in the whole experience. She never seemed to fuss in them, she never got any blisters or open sores. The occasional reddish pressure mark caused by bunched sandal tongue (and a sleepy parent putting them on) seemed to always go away in a day or so and I'll take that for correcting feet that were pretty much sideways and backwards :-) It is really amazing how fast they learn to get around in the bar. She was cruising around on furniture at 7-8 months and actually seemed to have MUCH better standing balance than her 6 year old (non CF) sister had at that age. I don't know if bar training gave her this stability, but it seems to be the case. After a few phone calls (but nothing too bad when you're talking insurance!) we got the s and the bar approved for complete reimbursement. provided the most successful codes and they worked like a charm. This is another thing in this process that we all can't ever overlook. We can easily get communications back from the pioneer of the method AND the manufacturers of the braces just about the same day! That is pretty amazing in a red-tape medical profession normally layered with middle-people and bureaucracy. All three pairs of shoes and two bars have been completely reimbursed to the penny. The last doctor visit showed the same boring progress and complete success. Dr. Scher said her feet were totally corrected and no one looking at them would even know she had clubfoot. Our pediatrician is also pretty amazed at the outcome. Everyone who ever saw her feet the first week is pretty much in agreement that this process is a minor miracle. Of course I know that it doesn't work for everyone and we could always have a relapse, but up to this point it has been miraculous. Tonight I was looking back at delivery room pics from last Feb 15th and remembering the happiness, but also the uncertainty. Last year I could never have imagined writing this " one year update " with such a lack of drama and nightmares to tell. It is pretty boring, but boring seems to be good in this case! :-) and Suezette New Jersey, USA " Happy Birthda Rachael! " born bilateral CF on 2/15/05 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 That is absolutely wonderful. I hope next year's birthday is just as boring for Rachael. Where in New Jersey are you? We live in Bergen County. _____ From: nosurgery4clubfoot [mailto:nosurgery4clubfoot ] On Behalf Of Given Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 12:56 AM To: nosurgery4clubfoot Subject: One Year Birthday...boring update! Our daughter Rachael turned one today and I thought some on here would appreciate an uneventful and boring update with no problems whatsoever. Rachael was born last Feb 15th with severe (but typical) bilateral clubfoot. We knew from the 20 week sonogram and were prepared going in. Like many of you, a simple web search revealed the wonders of the Ponseti method and this newsgroup. We quickly read up on the procedure and started calling trained doctors in the NYC area (we are in NJ.) We were not startled at birth and her feet came out exactly as the many pictures looked. We felt then (and now) that she was otherwise perfectly healthy and feet are pretty far down on the list of all the things that CAN go wrong with childbirth. We brought her to see Dr. Scher in NYC a few days after birth and the journey began. She had the most severe Pirani score in both feet (6?) but we were told that this should be corrected in the typical number of castings. The first cast went on much easier than I ever expected and watching the manipulations was just about the most fascinating thing I've ever seen done with the bare hand and a tender child. Rachael didn't mind a bit and off we went in the casts. She had never known anything else but the casts since she'd only been around a few days and didn't even seem to notice. The carseat still worked, the PJs still fit...and hey...no one told us diapering was easier with a handle! She went through five weeks and five casts and really never seemed to notice they were ever on. They never broke, ripped, tore or flaked. Her skin stayed baby pink the whole time. Her favorite part was getting them sawed off and the casting techs explained that many children seemed to like the soothing vibrations. Dr. Scher said the feet looked good after the five casts and we were on to the tenonotomy. This sounds much worse than it really is. A few minutes of crying and what is left is really a pin-sized dot on the back of both heels. She went into the final three week cast and there didn't seem to be any tenotomy discomfort. No swelling...not even any bleeding in the cast. At the " tenotomy " visit we did the foot impressions for the sandals. We read up and decided to go with these instead of the Markell shoes. At this point the insurance seemed to be a crapshoot with some getting reimbursed and others not, but we felt that even if we had to pay for them all that they looked to be a lot more comfortable, lighter and easier to adhere to the bracing guidelines. We sent off the impression kit and our check to the magical clubfoot state of Iowa and 2 1/2 weeks later the stylish Birkenstock-meets- babysnowboard device arrived. She went out of the final cast and into s with no problems of transition at all. Maybe it is because of her disposition or maybe because they are even lighter than the casts, but she didn't even seem to notice having them on. Her heel went all the way back and down from day one and putting them on was much easier than I ever expected. The key seems to be keeping the middle strap very tight and they don't slip at all...ever..not once. The only thing we ever had to adjust was poking extra holes in a future pair. She is on her third pair and went from 23 hours usage...to 16...to 14...to 12 today. I really can't point to anything really eventfully negative in the whole experience. She never seemed to fuss in them, she never got any blisters or open sores. The occasional reddish pressure mark caused by bunched sandal tongue (and a sleepy parent putting them on) seemed to always go away in a day or so and I'll take that for correcting feet that were pretty much sideways and backwards :-) It is really amazing how fast they learn to get around in the bar. She was cruising around on furniture at 7-8 months and actually seemed to have MUCH better standing balance than her 6 year old (non CF) sister had at that age. I don't know if bar training gave her this stability, but it seems to be the case. After a few phone calls (but nothing too bad when you're talking insurance!) we got the s and the bar approved for complete reimbursement. provided the most successful codes and they worked like a charm. This is another thing in this process that we all can't ever overlook. We can easily get communications back from the pioneer of the method AND the manufacturers of the braces just about the same day! That is pretty amazing in a red-tape medical profession normally layered with middle-people and bureaucracy. All three pairs of shoes and two bars have been completely reimbursed to the penny. The last doctor visit showed the same boring progress and complete success. Dr. Scher said her feet were totally corrected and no one looking at them would even know she had clubfoot. Our pediatrician is also pretty amazed at the outcome. Everyone who ever saw her feet the first week is pretty much in agreement that this process is a minor miracle. Of course I know that it doesn't work for everyone and we could always have a relapse, but up to this point it has been miraculous. Tonight I was looking back at delivery room pics from last Feb 15th and remembering the happiness, but also the uncertainty. Last year I could never have imagined writing this " one year update " with such a lack of drama and nightmares to tell. It is pretty boring, but boring seems to be good in this case! :-) and Suezette New Jersey, USA " Happy Birthda Rachael! " born bilateral CF on 2/15/05 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 Happy Birthday !!! And thanks for that great update/story, I didn't find it the least bit boring =)!!! & Grace 18 mos urcf FAB 13hrs > > Our daughter Rachael turned one today and I thought some on here > would appreciate an uneventful and boring update with no problems > whatsoever. > > Rachael was born last Feb 15th with severe (but typical) bilateral > clubfoot. We knew from the 20 week sonogram and were prepared going > in. Like many of you, a simple web search revealed the wonders of > the Ponseti method and this newsgroup. We quickly read up on the > procedure and started calling trained doctors in the NYC area (we > are in NJ.) > > We were not startled at birth and her feet came out exactly as the > many pictures looked. We felt then (and now) that she was otherwise > perfectly healthy and feet are pretty far down on the list of all > the things that CAN go wrong with childbirth. We brought her to see > Dr. Scher in NYC a few days after birth and the journey began. > > She had the most severe Pirani score in both feet (6?) but we were > told that this should be corrected in the typical number of > castings. The first cast went on much easier than I ever expected > and watching the manipulations was just about the most fascinating > thing I've ever seen done with the bare hand and a tender child. > Rachael didn't mind a bit and off we went in the casts. She had > never known anything else but the casts since she'd only been around > a few days and didn't even seem to notice. The carseat still worked, > the PJs still fit...and hey...no one told us diapering was easier > with a handle! > > She went through five weeks and five casts and really never seemed > to notice they were ever on. They never broke, ripped, tore or > flaked. Her skin stayed baby pink the whole time. Her favorite part > was getting them sawed off and the casting techs explained that many > children seemed to like the soothing vibrations. Dr. Scher said the > feet looked good after the five casts and we were on to the > tenonotomy. This sounds much worse than it really is. A few minutes > of crying and what is left is really a pin-sized dot on the back of > both heels. She went into the final three week cast and there didn't > seem to be any tenotomy discomfort. No swelling...not even any > bleeding in the cast. > > At the " tenotomy " visit we did the foot impressions for the > sandals. We read up and decided to go with these instead of the > Markell shoes. At this point the insurance seemed to be a crapshoot > with some getting reimbursed and others not, but we felt that even > if we had to pay for them all that they looked to be a lot more > comfortable, lighter and easier to adhere to the bracing guidelines. > We sent off the impression kit and our check to the magical clubfoot > state of Iowa and 2 1/2 weeks later the stylish Birkenstock-meets- > babysnowboard device arrived. > > She went out of the final cast and into s with no problems > of transition at all. Maybe it is because of her disposition or > maybe because they are even lighter than the casts, but she didn't > even seem to notice having them on. Her heel went all the way back > and down from day one and putting them on was much easier than I > ever expected. The key seems to be keeping the middle strap very > tight and they don't slip at all...ever..not once. The only thing we > ever had to adjust was poking extra holes in a future pair. She is > on her third pair and went from 23 hours usage...to 16...to 14...to > 12 today. I really can't point to anything really eventfully > negative in the whole experience. She never seemed to fuss in them, > she never got any blisters or open sores. The occasional reddish > pressure mark caused by bunched sandal tongue (and a sleepy parent > putting them on) seemed to always go away in a day or so and I'll > take that for correcting feet that were pretty much sideways and > backwards :-) It is really amazing how fast they learn to get > around in the bar. She was cruising around on furniture at 7-8 > months and actually seemed to have MUCH better standing balance than > her 6 year old (non CF) sister had at that age. I don't know if bar > training gave her this stability, but it seems to be the case. > > After a few phone calls (but nothing too bad when you're talking > insurance!) we got the s and the bar approved for complete > reimbursement. provided the most successful codes and > they worked like a charm. This is another thing in this process that > we all can't ever overlook. We can easily get communications back > from the pioneer of the method AND the manufacturers of the braces > just about the same day! That is pretty amazing in a red-tape > medical profession normally layered with middle-people and > bureaucracy. All three pairs of shoes and two bars have been > completely reimbursed to the penny. > > The last doctor visit showed the same boring progress and complete > success. Dr. Scher said her feet were totally corrected and no one > looking at them would even know she had clubfoot. Our pediatrician > is also pretty amazed at the outcome. Everyone who ever saw her feet > the first week is pretty much in agreement that this process is a > minor miracle. Of course I know that it doesn't work for everyone > and we could always have a relapse, but up to this point it has been > miraculous. Tonight I was looking back at delivery room pics from > last Feb 15th and remembering the happiness, but also the > uncertainty. Last year I could never have imagined writing > this " one year update " with such a lack of drama and nightmares to > tell. It is pretty boring, but boring seems to be good in this > case! :-) > > > and Suezette > New Jersey, USA > " Happy Birthda Rachael! " > born bilateral CF on 2/15/05 > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 16, 2006 Report Share Posted February 16, 2006 , The " boring " update was great! In this case no news is good news I guess. Happy Birthday Rachael! Mom to Jenna (4/7/01) & Sammy (9/25/04, RCF, Dobbs' brace, 14hrs/day) > > Our daughter Rachael turned one today and I thought some on here > would appreciate an uneventful and boring update with no problems > whatsoever. > > Rachael was born last Feb 15th with severe (but typical) bilateral > clubfoot. We knew from the 20 week sonogram and were prepared going > in. Like many of you, a simple web search revealed the wonders of > the Ponseti method and this newsgroup. We quickly read up on the > procedure and started calling trained doctors in the NYC area (we > are in NJ.) > > We were not startled at birth and her feet came out exactly as the > many pictures looked. We felt then (and now) that she was otherwise > perfectly healthy and feet are pretty far down on the list of all > the things that CAN go wrong with childbirth. We brought her to see > Dr. Scher in NYC a few days after birth and the journey began. > > She had the most severe Pirani score in both feet (6?) but we were > told that this should be corrected in the typical number of > castings. The first cast went on much easier than I ever expected > and watching the manipulations was just about the most fascinating > thing I've ever seen done with the bare hand and a tender child. > Rachael didn't mind a bit and off we went in the casts. She had > never known anything else but the casts since she'd only been around > a few days and didn't even seem to notice. The carseat still worked, > the PJs still fit...and hey...no one told us diapering was easier > with a handle! > > She went through five weeks and five casts and really never seemed > to notice they were ever on. They never broke, ripped, tore or > flaked. Her skin stayed baby pink the whole time. Her favorite part > was getting them sawed off and the casting techs explained that many > children seemed to like the soothing vibrations. Dr. Scher said the > feet looked good after the five casts and we were on to the > tenonotomy. This sounds much worse than it really is. A few minutes > of crying and what is left is really a pin-sized dot on the back of > both heels. She went into the final three week cast and there didn't > seem to be any tenotomy discomfort. No swelling...not even any > bleeding in the cast. > > At the " tenotomy " visit we did the foot impressions for the > sandals. We read up and decided to go with these instead of the > Markell shoes. At this point the insurance seemed to be a crapshoot > with some getting reimbursed and others not, but we felt that even > if we had to pay for them all that they looked to be a lot more > comfortable, lighter and easier to adhere to the bracing guidelines. > We sent off the impression kit and our check to the magical clubfoot > state of Iowa and 2 1/2 weeks later the stylish Birkenstock-meets- > babysnowboard device arrived. > > She went out of the final cast and into s with no problems > of transition at all. Maybe it is because of her disposition or > maybe because they are even lighter than the casts, but she didn't > even seem to notice having them on. Her heel went all the way back > and down from day one and putting them on was much easier than I > ever expected. The key seems to be keeping the middle strap very > tight and they don't slip at all...ever..not once. The only thing we > ever had to adjust was poking extra holes in a future pair. She is > on her third pair and went from 23 hours usage...to 16...to 14...to > 12 today. I really can't point to anything really eventfully > negative in the whole experience. She never seemed to fuss in them, > she never got any blisters or open sores. The occasional reddish > pressure mark caused by bunched sandal tongue (and a sleepy parent > putting them on) seemed to always go away in a day or so and I'll > take that for correcting feet that were pretty much sideways and > backwards :-) It is really amazing how fast they learn to get > around in the bar. She was cruising around on furniture at 7-8 > months and actually seemed to have MUCH better standing balance than > her 6 year old (non CF) sister had at that age. I don't know if bar > training gave her this stability, but it seems to be the case. > > After a few phone calls (but nothing too bad when you're talking > insurance!) we got the s and the bar approved for complete > reimbursement. provided the most successful codes and > they worked like a charm. This is another thing in this process that > we all can't ever overlook. We can easily get communications back > from the pioneer of the method AND the manufacturers of the braces > just about the same day! That is pretty amazing in a red-tape > medical profession normally layered with middle-people and > bureaucracy. All three pairs of shoes and two bars have been > completely reimbursed to the penny. > > The last doctor visit showed the same boring progress and complete > success. Dr. Scher said her feet were totally corrected and no one > looking at them would even know she had clubfoot. Our pediatrician > is also pretty amazed at the outcome. Everyone who ever saw her feet > the first week is pretty much in agreement that this process is a > minor miracle. Of course I know that it doesn't work for everyone > and we could always have a relapse, but up to this point it has been > miraculous. Tonight I was looking back at delivery room pics from > last Feb 15th and remembering the happiness, but also the > uncertainty. Last year I could never have imagined writing > this " one year update " with such a lack of drama and nightmares to > tell. It is pretty boring, but boring seems to be good in this > case! :-) > > > and Suezette > New Jersey, USA > " Happy Birthda Rachael! " > born bilateral CF on 2/15/05 > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.