Re: Recommending surgeons on this forum

[Guest guest]

I agree, Bob. And if I'd been a bit braver, or in different

circumstances, I might have tried to blow these guys out of the

water, legally.

I do think, though, that there are times when one must first protect

oneself and one's family. This was one of those times.

I don't know that what either of these docs did was actually illegal.

I do believe both of them were out of line with their professional

codes of ethics.

If I were seeking to put a stop to someone's practice, though, I

would first talk with him/her, the appropriate authorities (medical

licensers, police, DA, whoever), and/or a lawyer, depending on the

dangers and risks involved. I think that would be a better route, and

one more likely to get the results desired than posting my thoughts

on an open board for the world to see. I'll bet you do, too.

Perhaps I wrote too strongly, before. I just don't want anybody to

get burned.

c.

>

> Cammie,

>

> I believe there is a difference between second guessing a

> professional and bringing to light serious criminal activities.

> Second guessing is usually done without appropriate knowledge of

the

> situation. Criminal activity should always be brought to light.

>

> CPT Bob

[Guest guest]

Scary!!

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Not the best idea ever offered, posting

specifically

> > > about

> > > > > > docs,

> > > > > > > with

> > > > > > > > > names.

> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > Most of us do indeed think our surgeons were quite

> > > > wonderful.

> > > > > > And

> > > > > > > some

> > > > > > > > > of those have been named. But someone who succumbs

to

> > the

> > > > yen

> > > > > > to

> > > > > > > vent

> > > > > > > > > negative blasts, for whatever reason, about a doc

(or

> > > > anyone

> > > > > > else

> > > > > > > > > named) opens him or herself to legal liabilities.

I

> > > think.