Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Re: 100 vs 225

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

TERESA wrote:

If it is ONLY the common channel, than that length is ridiculous. I don't

know of anyone who would have that long of a common channel since it defeats

the entire DS experience! Now, if Joy had the 100 cm common channel like Dr.

Deveny stated, then it would be that her 225 cm of alimentary limb that he

was referring to....

**********************

I spoke to Dr. Welker on the phone Tuesday evening (after Joy's re-do). He TOLD

me

that the COMMON CHANNEL was 225! I said to him-- " Well, there's no way it could

have

*grown* that much since the operation, right? " He agreed. I don't remember his

exact words but he implied someone messed up.

~~Shirley in Arcata, CA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...