Guest guest Posted December 6, 2004 Report Share Posted December 6, 2004 Debby, I believe that the study is not considered to be valid because those Japanese children were given gh as a result of lack of growth due to chemo. They already had cancer, so the likelihood of those children developing another form of cancer was greater. The pharma. companies have to report the possibility, however, so they do, but little weight is given to the " risk. " Jodi Z Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 7, 2004 Report Share Posted December 7, 2004 The same was told to us my Dr. geneticist and dwarfism specialist at AI Dupont. Dr. is not a proponent of GH, he deals mostly with skeletal dysplasia where GH is not an option anyway. We took our daughter to him for possible diagnosis (she is yet undiagnosed short stature, not just SGA). Even though he did not seem too enthusiastic about GH (but correctly advised us to talk to an endocrinologist instead) he did mention cancer effect of GH is now disregarded because the Japan study was done on children who whose growth was stunted due to chemotherapy. Sabina mother of Naomi > > Debby, > > I believe that the study is not considered to be valid because those > Japanese children were given gh as a result of lack of growth due to > chemo. They already had cancer, so the likelihood of those children > developing another form of cancer was greater. The pharma. > companies have to report the possibility, however, so they do, but > little weight is given to the " risk. " > > Jodi Z Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 7, 2004 Report Share Posted December 7, 2004 Does anyone know where I can locate this study? Jill > > > > Debby, > > > > I believe that the study is not considered to be valid because > those > > Japanese children were given gh as a result of lack of growth due > to > > chemo. They already had cancer, so the likelihood of those > children > > developing another form of cancer was greater. The pharma. > > companies have to report the possibility, however, so they do, but > > little weight is given to the " risk. " > > > > Jodi Z Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.