Guest guest Posted May 9, 2010 Report Share Posted May 9, 2010 Courtesy of Ferna, we have the following information, which she originally posted to the BTVC-SCD list on 9 March 2009: From Elaine's Website, " Elaine writes with great finality: We did a whole week on chocolate a while back and it is somewhere in my files but someone else can report on it or look it up on a search engine. I am sick and tired of chocolate - it is not permitted and until I get an accurate analysis of every ingredient in the chocolate, per se, I am too busy right now to give this illegal commodity any more time. " I can see why Elaine was a tad exasperated, considering there are about 300 chemicals in ONE cocoa bean, that she would have to find the time to analyze. According to " Chemicals in Cocoa Beans " at http://coffee-chocolate.tripod.com/chemicals.htm: Chemical Breakdown of a Cocoa Bean Fat: 40 - 50% Albuminous Matter (Protein): .06 - 18% Starch: 1.3 - 7.5% Ash: 2.0 - 4.0% Theobromine: .88 - 2.34% Caffeine: .05 - 0.36% Various Trace Materials: 17.8% - 49.77% Although chocolate, especially dark chocolate, is currently being touted as good for the general public, starch is a SCD illegal and " Theobromine (among other effects) can cause sleeplessness, tremors, restlessness, anxiety, as well as contribute to increased production of urine. Additional side effects include loss of appetite, nausea, and vomiting " (according to the site referenced above). There are probably other reasons why chocolate, even in it's most native form, is not SCD legal . . . but, this is all I had time to check out. — Marilyn New Orleans, Louisiana, USA Undiagnosed IBS since 1976, SCD since 2001 Darn Good SCD Cook No Human Children Shadow & Sunny Longhair Dachshund Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2010 Report Share Posted May 9, 2010 Theobromine is related to caffeine, it is used as a bronchodilator---my feeling that this is not why Elaine was against it. Perhaps all of the variables; starch, caffeine, theobromine and 'various trace materials' ( that bothers me more---what are they???????) all together made it too complex to ever recommend. Now that I am healed, I have tried chocolate ( ILLEGAL). It does NOT bother me. I experimented, cocoa powder (ILLEGAL) DID bother me. My theory is that the fat in the chocolate helped the digestion, whereas the plain powder didn't have any buffer in the gut. I would not have it every day, even though I am healed. I do NOT recommend this for anyone following the SCD, most especially newbies. I only tried it as I am 2.5 years out on SCD and have been symptom free, med free and in remission. It is very important to follow SCD exactly and as diligently as possible in order to obtain results that are positive. That's the way I became symptom free. And, everyone is different. Terry Proctosigmoiditis June '08 SCD July '08 med free since approx Fall'09 Total remission since I can't remember Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2010 Report Share Posted May 9, 2010 Terry, Boy did I love reading " Total remission since I can't remember " I am so full of joy reading that. WAY TO GO YOU! Jodi > Terry > Proctosigmoiditis June '08 > SCD July '08 > med free since approx Fall'09 > Total remission since I can't remember > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 9, 2010 Report Share Posted May 9, 2010 Thanks for the replies. Kathy > > Terry, > > Boy did I love reading " Total remission since I can't remember " > I am so full of joy reading that. > WAY TO GO YOU! > > Jodi > > > Terry > > Proctosigmoiditis June '08 > > SCD July '08 > > med free since approx Fall'09 > > Total remission since I can't remember > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.