Guest guest Posted October 22, 2001 Report Share Posted October 22, 2001 Pam, First of all the Pancreatic Cancer thing is way overblown. Second we should understand that the BPD is actually a part of a procedure not a procedure unto itself. BPD stands for Biliopancreatic Diversion, and is a malabsorptive technique where the bile combines with the food further downstream rather than at the top of the intestinal tract. This causes fats to be malabsorbed while keeping the absorption of protien and carbohydrates relatively good. What Scopinaro refered to as " BPD " was a BPD with diatal gastrectomy. The bottom part of the stomach was removed (including the pylorus) and the lower part of the intestine was hooked up to the top part of the stomach. The procedure we know as " DS " is actually a BPD with sleve gastrectomy and duodenal switch. The " sleve gastrectom " cuts the stomach along the greter curvature and maintains the pyloric valve. Just below the pyloric valve the duodenum is cut. The lower intestine is then attached to the duodenum, and the upper intestine is detached from the lower intestine and then re-attached further downstream. I have access to ample information on the BPD and BPD/DS. The abstracts can be found in my folder. Look under the Files section and then " Hull's Folder " and you will find journal abstracts and articles. Hull > This talk is scaring me. I am trying to do research on the Scopinaro > without much success. My surgeon said the px. would be the gastric > sleeve part of the procedure, then a pyoloroplasty instead of the > DS. I thought that the Scop and the BPD were the same thing. With > what I was told, the pyelorus is still there, but the nerves have > been cut so it remains wide open. Are these two different pxs? If > the pt. has a sleeve gastrectomy and the pyelorus is not dissected > free from the stomach, would one be more prone to the pancreatic > cancer? > Pam in PA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 26, 2001 Report Share Posted October 26, 2001 In a message dated 10/22/01 2:30:38 PM, duodenalswitch writes: << First of all the Pancreatic Cancer thing is way overblown. >> Chris: I don't think mentioning that it is a risk of lower antrectomy removal is 'overblowing it'. I have mentioned several times that the risk wasn't huge and that not every person who had this type of surgery would end up with pancreatic cancer. However, what DOES bother me is that not one surgeon seems to be informing his/her patients of this when presenting info about the traditional BPD (by this, I am not referring to the intestinal arrangement but the type of gastrectomy used in the traditional 'bpd' surgery). Yes, the fact that there is a risk for pancreatic surgery can be taken with extreme fear by some, but if people would actually READ the sources I posted way back when (and these are all in the archives), they could be better informed and able to decide whether this is a a risk they would be willing to take. It is also crucial for those with family history of pancreatic cancer to know this information. I have repeatedly stated that this risk was associated with lower antrectomy removal (and hence the BPD gastrectomy) but NOT the DS sleeve gastrectomy or RNY. all the best, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2001 Report Share Posted October 27, 2001 In a message dated 10/27/01 2:39:44 PM, duodenalswitch writes: << I have to agree with you wholeheartedly. My father died of pancreatic cancer which may or may not leave me with a predisposition for getting this disease. He was the son of an extremely diabetic mother, (not obesity related). My doctor says there is a connection between a familial history of diabetes and pancreatic cancer. So, anything that might put me at a greater risk for developing this cancer, ie, diabetes in the family, or surgery that could increase my risks should be evaluated very carefully!>>>> Theresa: Sorry to hear about your father. I think that for anyone with a family history of pancreatic cancer, this information about slight increased risk after a BPD is crucial, although perhaps not as important to those who do not have a history. Even for myself, I would seriously consider ANYTHING that raises my risk of pancreatic cancer with great concern since it is often not caught immediately and is quite fatal. The symptoms mimic what a post-op DSer may experience so I think it would be quite difficult to diagnose and might be ignored early on. I think that ANY BPD patient should be informed of these studies (done on peptic ulcer patients) and also be given a comprehensive aftercare with testing/etc. for increased pancreatic cancer risk. This way, they could be monitored more closely and the cancer could be caught in it's earliest stages if indeed the patient developed it. <<<<<<<Oh, and in talking with my DS surgeon, he feels that lactose intolerance really may now NOT be considered a side affect of WLS. He is finding that immediately post op, many folks have a sensitivity to lactose that they are losing within a healing timeframe post op. So for those of you who feel that you became lactose intolerant post surgically, or even pre surgically, you might try to reintroduce lactose every couple of months and see if this has reversed for you! >>>>>> Wow - that's great news! The former nutritionist at Mt. Sinai also believed that many post-ops may not have 'true' lactose intolerance but an aversion to milk products immediately post-op that will dissipate in time. Pretty interesting! Thank God, I didn't experience this side affect after surgery (hope I don't develop it,e ither) but I can imagine the extreme discomfort it would bring, especially right after surgery. all the best, lap ds with gallbladder removal January 25, 2001 Dr. Gagner/Mt. Sinai/NYC nine months post-op and still feelin' fabu! preop: 307 lbs/bmi 45 now: 207 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2001 Report Share Posted October 27, 2001 My father died of pancreatic cancer which may or may not leave me with a predisposition for getting this disease>>>>>> Theresa...... My moms sister just died last Sat from pancreatic cancer and she also was diabetic but type 2 for the last 20 yrs but had it under good control all that time. She was diagnosed with cancer just 3 weeks before she died so it was very fast and she was in NO pain at all. After reading that thread about pancreatic cancer it made me kind of nervous that she died from this almost a year after my own surgery but Im understanding that preventing diabetes in the first place helps in making our risk alot lower in getting this disease, am I right? I hope so! She was the very first one in my family to have that type of cancer. My mother is never sick! Hugs, Judie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2001 Report Share Posted October 27, 2001 The symptoms mimic what a post-op DSer may experience so I think it would be quite difficult to diagnose and might be ignored early on>>> what are the symptoms??? Judie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2001 Report Share Posted October 27, 2001 Sheryl, You can't live without a pancrease. Did perhaps she receive a transplant? Theresa P.S. The issue is post surgical risks, meaning that should one develop pancreatic cancer post op, at the point one becomes symptomatic, it is too late. My dad was diagnosed as having diabetes. He did not respond to any medications or diet adjustments. When he became jaundiced, they did exploratory surgery and found he had pancreatic cancer. It often disguises itself as diabetes. At that point, the cancer was so invasive, he died within a month of discovery. > In a message dated 10/27/01 7:05:06 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > jhensel@c... writes: > > << The symptoms mimic what a post-op > DSer may experience so I think it would be quite difficult to diagnose and > might be ignored early on>>> >> > > But wouldn't pancreatic cancer be caught at the time of surgery by the > surgeon? When they're in there it's normal practice to look around and feel > around. I know my aunt went in for a gall bladder removal and was diagnosed > with pancreatic cancer in an early stage. Her pancreas was later removed, > making her a diabetic but removing all cancer thus saving her life. > Sheryl Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 27, 2001 Report Share Posted October 27, 2001 Theresa.. Sure you can.. what would our pancreas transplant patients do post rejection if that were so? Yes, they need an insulin pump to try and keep blood glucose under control.. but yeah.. its possible. Just not fun. Hugs, Liane > Sheryl, > > You can't live without a pancrease. Did perhaps she receive a > transplant? > > Theresa > > P.S. The issue is post surgical risks, meaning that should one > develop pancreatic cancer post op, at the point one becomes > symptomatic, it is too late. My dad was diagnosed as having > diabetes. He did not respond to any medications or diet adjustments. > When he became jaundiced, they did exploratory surgery and found he > had pancreatic cancer. It often disguises itself as diabetes. At > that point, the cancer was so invasive, he died within a month of > discovery. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.