Guest guest Posted October 26, 2001 Report Share Posted October 26, 2001 Hi, all. I see there's been some discussion since I posted earlier this week. I'm sorry -- I don't read the list regularly at all and when I do, I just search for my name, so I miss out on a lot. But I want to be clear on a few points: 1. I consider my BPD to have had an *excellent* outcome. I have excellent health and am pleased with my maintained weight loss of 125 lbs -- and I'm 10.5 years out. I'm fitter than many of my non-op friends who have never been heavy. 2. I had no ill effects after my surgery -- no nausea, easy and fast recovery (and my surgery was done " open " since lap bariatric surgery wasn't done 10 years ago. Though my surgeon was one of the pioneers of lap gastric bypass surgery). No leaks, no need for re-operations. I've never had a problem with protein intake and have never used protein supplements. 3. While I wonder if I would have had to deal with occasional halitosis if I had the DS instead of the BPD, I have no assurances that my outcome would have been any *better* with the DS. Every single complaint that I've ever heard from a BPD patient (halitosis, nausea, vomiting, gas, diarrhea, anal leakage, excessive or not enough weight loss, weight regain, micronutrient deficiences) I have ALSO heard from DS patients. I have also known DS patients to complain of not reaching satiety easily. I think that my outcome and my experiences in the short-term post-op and long-term post-op are excellent and would not necessarily have been better with the DS and I think my outcome has been better than some who did have the DS. Why? I never needed a revision or any follow-up surgeries; I don't experience nausea or pain. I don't experience gas or diarrhea (except on rare occasions when I ingest dairy -- lactose intolerance which I would also have had with the DS). Honestly, in all my research and reading and experiences, the BPD and the DS are NOT lightyears apart. The DS is a *modification* to the original BPD. It's a very complex modification to perform surgically. I can understand a surgeon looking at the Scopinaro BPD and at the BPD/DS and deciding that the differences between them are not worth the cost-benefit difference to the surgeon *or* to the patient. Patients may feel differently. They may not. Admittedly, I have a bias. I don't like to see the BPD put down or surgeons or patients who feel that the DS is automatically and comprehensively superior to the BPD. They are VERY similar surgeries with very similar average outcomes. Sharon BPD April 17, 1991, Dr. Wittgrove, Alvarado Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.