Guest guest Posted March 4, 2005 Report Share Posted March 4, 2005 xxxxxxx JENNIFER xxxxxxxxxx You said: >Beth's postings are a bit too scientific and lack any true >statistical studies using control groups against pediatric groups, >and especially pediatric groups that include either RSS or SGA >children……I encourage parents not to make decisions without >at least one study that uses more than 20 subjects and uses a >control group, and ideally is a blind study (not always found). I believe that you are accurate there have been no pediatric controlled studies. However, there was a major double blind adult study conducted by Duke University a little over a year ago involving the Atkin's diet which supports this protocol. Unfortunately, alternative medicine does not have the million dollar budgets funded by the drug industry (with its strings attached) to fall back on. This is exactly how the drug companies keep a monopoly lock on the market. The drug companies typically criticize alternative medicines approaches because of the lack of a large double blind studies. They know all too well that any study of reasonable size will cost at least a half million dollars which is a great barrier to entry into a market they want to keep to themselves. Just look at the rise in medicine costs over the past 15 years, drug companies are almost like a little club, they have a monopoly over the medical industry. This is further evidenced by the past 25 years of scandals now just coming to light involving corrupted clinical trials, expert advisors with multiple conflicts of interest and drug industry's control over the supposed FDA " watch dog " , whose major funding is supplied by the very industry they oversee. Many of the medicines that RSS children are taking today are based on studies that where originally conducted solely on adults and not even with FDA approval, but the drugs were given to children anyway. I am not trying to say that this approach was wrong, but to first find large controlled studies of adults using alternative medicine is difficult, but then for you to ask for ones on infants is next to impossible. Why should my doctor's approach be singled out as not appropriate? What I have provided this group with are the success stories of my family and many relatives and friends. Furthermore, I have asked that you read Life Without Bread which contains 40 years of controlled studies that support my doctor's position. Granted these are smaller studies, but you need to start somewhere in an industry controlled by the drug companies. I am curious, have you had a chance to read Life Without Bread? You had mentioned you were buying the book. Do you have an opinion about it and its application to RSS? >However, regardless of what information is correct or not, I do >caution parents not to suddenly go out and let your RSS/SGA child >eat tons of saturated fats My doctor is not advocating eating just any old type of saturated fat. He is very specific about the types of saturated fats that are appropriate. For example, he recommends code liver oil, coconut oil (actually it's not a saturated fat, maybe wrong here), raw butter, other raw dairy products and specific meats. And there are specific brands that he suggests. Ideally the dairy products and meats need to come from animals raised solely on open pastures where they can feed on only their natural food supply of " grass " . This results in animals that are very healthy and not in need of anti-biotics or growth hormones. More importantly, their meat is very high in Omega-3 fatty acids, which is a key component in this healthy diet equation. Today over 99% of all meat and dairy animals are raised on unnatural foods that are " grain " based. The sole reason for this is to fatten them up rapidly and produce the highest profit margin as possible with little concern for the animal's health or the quality of the end product. To accomplish this, their food supply is not natural, it is grain based, and most of them become sick needing anti-biotics. These types of improperly feed meat animals have abnormal levels of Omega-3 fatty acids (actually virtually none), this is one reason of many reasons why they are not part of my doctor's diet. >The reason I caution parents is that because there are statistical >and published studies using blind/control groups showing that RSS >and short children born SGA have higher lipid levels than AGA >children. Total cholesterol, LDL and HDL levels are significantly >higher (I believe at the highest significance level). This may be >just one part of the complicated metabolic consequences of an SGA- >born child; we simply don't know yet. I agree with your statement about the higher lipid levels, this is what had. In our doctor's opinion and that of Atkin's, the higher lipid levels are caused by excessive carbohydrates and trans fatty acids, not fats. Much of the details as to why this is are explained in great detail in Life Without Bread. Both my husband and 's lipid levels declined on this diet. This was also the case with many of my other relatives and friends who have migrated to our doctor's diet. In addition to the above, there is more supporting research material on the THINCS web site (www.thincs.org/ ), along with documentation by Enig, who is a world recognized expert on fats. Enig, a biochemist and nutritionist, single handedly was able to get Congress to pass legislation that requires food manufactures to place those lipid causing trans fatty acids on food labels beginning 2006. xxxxxxxx ADRIANNE xxxxxxxxxxx All I can say is that I trust our doctor and his opinion that cholesterol and saturated fats are not the culprits that conventional medicine has made them out to be for the past 40+ years. This is also the conclusion I have come to after reading numerous expert opinions of those having no ties to special interest groups (food manufacturers, drug companies, etc.). Some of which are contained on the THINCS web site (www.thincs.org/ ). I look at my family over the past year, is growing, my husband's blood pressure, weight and cholesterol are way down, and I am feeling great. All of my relatives and friends who have switched to higher fat and protein are doing very well. Also I should add that this is not any regular higher fat and protein diet, it should be overseen by a qualified expert knowledgeable in this particular area. A couple of whom I mentioned in the past is Cowan MD of San Francisco and Ron Schmid ND of Middleburry, CT. After reading the Oct. 2004 Associated Press article (http://www.thestate.com/mld/thestate/news/nation/9940619.htm? template=contentModules/printstory.jsp ), I wonder about the accuracy of these so called boards of experts, who have monumental conflicts of interest with the drug industry, advising the government on very import health issues. The " experts " who designed the Food Pyramid 30+ years ago are the made from the same cloth. The Food Pyramid is so faulty that the government found it necessary to appoint a new panel of " experts " to make major changes which should be announced within the next nine months. Then you have the drug companies and all the scandals involving adulterated clinical tests and influence peddling at the FDA coming to light over the past six months that cover a 25 year span. I can't imagine why I may be apprehensive about these so called " experts " . I know what has worked for my family and believe that it will work for many other RSS kids. The treatment that has been so successful for us involves eating saturated fats and I want parents to be aware that new credible research is available, research not tainted by special interest groups looking to sell more products at the highest possible price. xxxxxxxxx JODY, CARA, and JODIE xxxxxxxxxxx I'm sorry that you feel this way. I believe I am providing relevant information that directly affects our children's diets and also growth levels. Hence, to increase parent's knowledge base and reduce anxiety levels over cholesterol and saturated fats, I have taken the time to find what our doctor considers to be appropriate information and pass it on. I feel that over the past year we have been blessed with 's achievements, so I feel an obligation to explain them to those who are interested. A number of other parents have expressed to me privately that they like this information but are afraid to express it openly on the list for fear of criticism by others who happen to be more in line with conventional medicine. This is unfortunate. As Jean just posted, if this is something that is not of interest then delete it and move on to the next post. xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Ken, thank you for allowing me to respond. For those of you who have privately asked for my assistance, I plan on continuing to do so in the future. For those skeptics, I can only hope that you take the time to analysis this information carefully with an open mind. I do feel it is unfortunate that this web site focuses almost entirely on one doctor's approach, while many times being intolerant or ignoring differing treatment modalities. My best to all in which ever diet root you choose to take. Beth xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.