Guest guest Posted November 13, 2001 Report Share Posted November 13, 2001 Check this out. This is a new article published in October. I haven't gotten the article yet, but the abstract is pretty interesting. I do find it interesting that it is from a Russion hospital. I don't know much about the DS west of Spain. It might be of some help to some people when dealing with insurance approvals. If this article shows that the DS is effective in correcting a failed previous surgery - and this is not the first article to state that - then why have the other surgery in the first place? (p.s. That is a rhetorical question, but worth asking an insurance company.) ****** 1: Obes Surg 2001 Oct;11(5):635-9 Improvement of weight loss and metabolic effects of vertical banded gastroplasty by an added duodenal switch procedure. Yashkov YI, Oppel TA, Shishlo LA, Vinnitsky LI. Dept. of Liver, Bile Ducts and Pancreatic Surgery, Russian Research Center of Surgery RAMS, Moscow, Russia. yu.yashkov@... BACKGROUND: Some patients who underwent vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) need revisional operations because of poor weight loss and remaining comorbidities. The duodenal switch (DS) procedure with partial gastrectomy is known as an effective method for treatment of severe obesity and related dyslipoproteinemias and diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2). Other investigations have shown that DS without gastric resection similarly corrects hypercholesterolemia and DM2 in the " less than " morbidly obese patients. METHODS: Based on this knowledge, we performed a DS simultaneously with hernioplasty and panniculectomy in a 63-year-old woman with a fair EWL (36.4%), with remaining hypercholesterolemia and DM2 4 years after VBG. The pouch stoma diameter was 13 mm, and there was no pouch dilation nor staple-line disruption. The previously partitioned stomach was left in place. H2-blockers and polyvitamins were prescribed after operation. RESULTS: 1 year after DS there were no postoperative complications and undesirable effects except slight anemia. DS allowed improvement in weight loss, improved carbohydrate handling without need for insulin or other hypoglycemic agents, and corrected severe hypercholesterolemia. CONCLUSION: DS per se in the case presented had a decisive effect on DM2 and hypercholesterolemia. DS should be kept in mind as a second-step malabsorptive procedure after a failed purely restrictive operation. PMID: 11594110 [PubMed - in process] ****** in SF YM: mariak415 ICQ: 129363427 --------------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.