Guest guest Posted September 26, 2000 Report Share Posted September 26, 2000 In a message dated 9/26/00 9:11:25 AM Eastern Daylight Time, lindat@... writes: > Since you are an attorney, one > would think you would certainly have some powers of deduction and reason > and at least be able to read medical studies with comprehension, but > then, maybe that's why you work from home keeping books for a couple of > companies and don't do any real lawyer work. Let's see , weren't you the queen of research BEFORE you had this procedure, aren't you the one who talked to 70 people and read every article ever written on the subject.. And as for attacks, it seems you have a pattern of attacking everyone and thing that disagrees with you. First there were the people who questioned you when you wanted to look like a BARBIE, then there were the people who questioned you eating biscuits right after surgery, then the " we shouldn't have to exercise, this is suppose to work... issue " , then there was Walter, then Dr. R and now me and anyone else who disagrees with you. God help anyone who tries to support you by offering a suggestion. They got nailed to the wall too. I am happy with my surgery. I don't think I will get cancer. I don't think you will get cancer either unless you were going to get it anyway. At least, I don't think you will get it because you had the surgery. I don't think any of the information you have is NEW information. I see on your resume that you list that you " assisted in recent abstract and journal article presented by a bariatric surgeon to the 17th Annual Conference of the American Society of Bariatric Surgeons " . Did you not READ what you assisted in? I am not going to continue to argue with you. I simply think you are wrong. You are holding Dr. R responsible for YOUR result. That is unfair. You didn't hold up YOUR end of the deal either. Maybe THAT had something to do with your result, although I really don't think so. I think you just aren't losing weight. I am sorry about that. Attack me away, I don't think you have left anyone out. BTW, I will put my career, professional reputation and general chararacter up against yours any day my dear. Who I am and what I am speaks for itself. Who you are and what you are speaks for itself, too. I make no apologies for my career. At least I have one! I know you will respond, you aren't able to NOT respond, but I will not be responding back to any more of your craziness. I hope your next physician doesn't require a psychological evaluation, if so, you're going to have to study! Safe journey, MGB 03 MAY 00 03 SEP 00 -57.5 lbs! Safely on the other side!!!! Dr. Rutledge clos.net Self-funded company plan administered by Interactive Medical Denied on appeal as an excluded benefit Self Pay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 26, 2000 Report Share Posted September 26, 2000 I am certainly beginning to believe Rutledge does lobotomies at the time of surgery in most cases. I read your post and your ad hominem attacks on me, which is a " chicken sh*t " (to use your term) tactic used by lawyers when they have no facts to support their arguments -- attack the messenger but ignore the truth, the issue and the facts. I hope you will take the time to read the medical research on the Billroth II. None of that has a thing to do with me, what I care about, where I live, or what I feed my dog. The Billroth II ( " MGB " ) has serious, very well documented side effects that do not develop for several years. The rate is 21% and a 1.5% death rate within 15 percent, all SPECIFIC to the Billroth II procedure and in addition to the ordinary risks of weight loss surgery. Your risk of cancer between 15-35 years is 30 times greater. You may have just helped kill people today by your own ignorance and urge to rush to Rutledge's defense. Since you are an attorney, one would think you would certainly have some powers of deduction and reason and at least be able to read medical studies with comprehension, but then, maybe that's why you work from home keeping books for a couple of companies and don't do any real lawyer work. You can't find a doctor who supports the Billroth II procedure for weight loss because of it's dangers. The only thing it is used for now is trauma surgery and reconstruction after cancer. As a lawyer, if you were doing any real law that is, you should be well aware of how extraordinary it is for even one doctor to speak out against another, yet there's a page full of them who have put their statements in writing and very publicly at: http://www.mini-gastricbypass.com/OtherDoctors.htm and they all denounce Rutledge and his procedure. They all saw his presentation and they can all do the procedure he does, too, but they all refuse to because of its very well known dangers. I am once again embarrassed and ashamed by someone in my profession. I have said frequently that I know a lot of lawyer jokes and unfortunately, most of them are still living. -- Kind regards, http://www.fourlane.com/lindat lindat @ mindspring.com (no spaces) --------------------------------------------- ROBERT R. RUTLEDGE, M.D., BUSTED! http://www.fourlane.com/mgb --------------------------------------------- Join MGB-TRUTH http://www.egroups.com/group/MGB-TRUTH ---------------------------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 26, 2000 Report Share Posted September 26, 2000 > In a message dated 9/26/00 9:11:25 AM Eastern Daylight Time, > lindat@m... writes: > > > Since you are an attorney, one > > would think you would certainly have some powers of deduction and reason > > and at least be able to read medical studies with comprehension, but > > then, maybe that's why you work from home keeping books for a couple of > > companies and don't do any real lawyer work. > > Let's see , weren't you the queen of research BEFORE you had this > procedure, aren't you the one who talked to 70 people and read every article > ever written on the subject.. And as for attacks, it seems you have a > pattern of attacking everyone and thing that disagrees with you. First there > were the people who questioned you when you wanted to look like a BARBIE, > then there were the people who questioned you eating biscuits right after > surgery, then the " we shouldn't have to exercise, this is suppose to work... > issue " , then there was Walter, then Dr. R and now me and anyone else who > disagrees with you. God help anyone who tries to support you by offering a > suggestion. They got nailed to the wall too. > > I am happy with my surgery. I don't think I will get cancer. I don't think > you will get cancer either unless you were going to get it anyway. At least, > I don't think you will get it because you had the surgery. I don't think any > of the information you have is NEW information. I see on your resume that you > list that you " assisted in recent abstract and journal article presented by a > bariatric surgeon to the 17th Annual Conference of the American Society of > Bariatric Surgeons " . Did you not READ what you assisted in? I am not going > to continue to argue with you. I simply think you are wrong. You are holding > Dr. R responsible for YOUR result. That is unfair. You didn't hold up YOUR > end of the deal either. Maybe THAT had something to do with your result, > although I really don't think so. I think you just aren't losing weight. I > am sorry about that. Attack me away, I don't think you have left anyone out. > > BTW, I will put my career, professional reputation and general chararacter up > against yours any day my dear. Who I am and what I am speaks for itself. Who > you are and what you are speaks for itself, too. I make no apologies for my > career. At least I have one! I know you will respond, you aren't able to > NOT respond, but I will not be responding back to any more of your craziness. > I hope your next physician doesn't require a psychological evaluation, if > so, you're going to have to study! > > Safe journey, > > > MGB 03 MAY 00 > 03 SEP 00 -57.5 lbs! > Safely on the other side!!!! > Dr. Rutledge clos.net > Self-funded company plan administered by Interactive Medical > Denied on appeal as an excluded benefit > Self Pay Well said . In light of all that is going on I think Dr. R should rethink the no psych evaluation for pre-ops. Suzanne in NC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 26, 2000 Report Share Posted September 26, 2000 why dont you just write to those who want to hear from you and that will save most of your energy. Most of us do not want to hear this anymore...Phyllis valmaboyz@... wrote: > In a message dated 9/26/00 9:11:25 AM Eastern Daylight Time, > lindat@... writes: > > > Since you are an attorney, one > > would think you would certainly have some powers of deduction and reason > > and at least be able to read medical studies with comprehension, but > > then, maybe that's why you work from home keeping books for a couple of > > companies and don't do any real lawyer work. > > Let's see , weren't you the queen of research BEFORE you had this > procedure, aren't you the one who talked to 70 people and read every article > ever written on the subject.. And as for attacks, it seems you have a > pattern of attacking everyone and thing that disagrees with you. First there > were the people who questioned you when you wanted to look like a BARBIE, > then there were the people who questioned you eating biscuits right after > surgery, then the " we shouldn't have to exercise, this is suppose to work... > issue " , then there was Walter, then Dr. R and now me and anyone else who > disagrees with you. God help anyone who tries to support you by offering a > suggestion. They got nailed to the wall too. > > I am happy with my surgery. I don't think I will get cancer. I don't think > you will get cancer either unless you were going to get it anyway. At least, > I don't think you will get it because you had the surgery. I don't think any > of the information you have is NEW information. I see on your resume that you > list that you " assisted in recent abstract and journal article presented by a > bariatric surgeon to the 17th Annual Conference of the American Society of > Bariatric Surgeons " . Did you not READ what you assisted in? I am not going > to continue to argue with you. I simply think you are wrong. You are holding > Dr. R responsible for YOUR result. That is unfair. You didn't hold up YOUR > end of the deal either. Maybe THAT had something to do with your result, > although I really don't think so. I think you just aren't losing weight. I > am sorry about that. Attack me away, I don't think you have left anyone out. > > BTW, I will put my career, professional reputation and general chararacter up > against yours any day my dear. Who I am and what I am speaks for itself. Who > you are and what you are speaks for itself, too. I make no apologies for my > career. At least I have one! I know you will respond, you aren't able to > NOT respond, but I will not be responding back to any more of your craziness. > I hope your next physician doesn't require a psychological evaluation, if > so, you're going to have to study! > > Safe journey, > > > MGB 03 MAY 00 > 03 SEP 00 -57.5 lbs! > Safely on the other side!!!! > Dr. Rutledge clos.net > Self-funded company plan administered by Interactive Medical > Denied on appeal as an excluded benefit > Self Pay > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.