Guest guest Posted August 19, 2004 Report Share Posted August 19, 2004 When I had the acute attack that landed me in St. Joes, they did an ERCP and found absolutely nothing. My enzyme levels were sky high and they knew what was wrong...they just couldn't see anything. When I finally had an ERCP at U of IC the doctor found a stone larger than a marble. How did St. Joe's miss it? Well, the doctor there did not shoot the contrast in hard enough to show it. We were shown the two films side by side and informed of the difference. Even my non-medical eye could see clearly what Dr. Brown was talking about. I don't know how they can find anything without the contrast. I am not recommending it. I just am quizzical about it. Planet Carol growing inside me did not show up without it. Anyone? Carol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2004 Report Share Posted August 19, 2004 Hi Carol, Well, my enzymes..by enzymes I assume you mean lipase and I forget the other one...they are not elevated according to the doctor. And I didn't have an ERCP, I had an MRCP which is just like a cat scan more or less. I don't have a fever or nausea or vomiting. Just mild to moderate pain, pulsating and some bloating and gas. So when you say acute attack, you must have had acute symptoms and the elevated enzymes to indicate there was a problem, and I don't have those. Therefore, they are not inclined to do any further testing and are suggesting that the pain may be unrelated to the gallbladder attack. When you had an acute attack, were you seen in the hospital the same day the symptoms started? Did they keep you in the hospital and on IV with nothing by mouth? If so, for how long? Once you got the positive ERCP, were they able to dislodge the gallstone while doing the test? Was that the one and only attack you had and did you recover afterward or did it become chronic? Well, my doc is away until Monday and the earliest I can see the surgeon is Tuesday, so I don't know what to do for myself in the mean ime. I tried just a few spoonfuls of tomato soup and it started it up again. I can't go 5 days on water. I was thinking of trying to get by with mostly gatorade, but I have to get ready for surgery and if I am not able to eat, then by the time I have the surgery I am going to be in bad shape as I have some other underlying medical conditions. Adam > > When I had the acute attack that landed me in St. Joes, they did an > ERCP and found absolutely nothing. My enzyme levels were sky high > and they knew what was wrong...they just couldn't see anything. > > When I finally had an ERCP at U of IC the doctor found a stone > larger than a marble. How did St. Joe's miss it? Well, the doctor > there did not shoot the contrast in hard enough to show it. We were > shown the two films side by side and informed of the difference. > Even my non-medical eye could see clearly what Dr. Brown was talking > about. > > I don't know how they can find anything without the contrast. I am > not recommending it. I just am quizzical about it. Planet Carol > growing inside me did not show up without it. > > Anyone? > > Carol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2004 Report Share Posted August 19, 2004 Hi Adam, The answer to your question is yes and no. Theoretically, you cannot have an acute pancreatitis attack without the doctors figuring it out. But in reality it does happen (I was one of those). In chronic pancreatitis it is very easy for the doctors to miss it and basically it is because there are no or few labs tests to detect it and all the imaging tests are not sensitive enough to find early stages of CP. Most of the time the diagnosis of CP is one of exclusion and part of the exclusion criteria is to eliminate the gall bladder as a source of abdominal problem. And I think that is where you are at, from what you wrote. The only way to implicate or exclude your gallbladder as the source is to remove it. And if after removal you get better, then it is presumed that that was the cause. If you stay the same or get worse, then they go to the next level of diagnosis which means looking more closely at the pancreas. Your symptoms are general enough that they are consistent with either gallbladder disease or pancreas disease but statistically, it is more likely to be gallbladder disease than pancreas so it is more efficient to treat that first. The HIDA scan (for the functioning of the gallbladder) is another good diagnostic tool for when the gallbladder is greatly impaired but again, it has limitations for a only slightly impaired gallbladder. And even then there are " false negatives " that is, the HIDA shows no problem with the gallbladder but upon surgery the surgeon finds a highly diseased gland. So a negative HIDA scan doesn't always mean a healthy gallbladder. The only sure way is to do the surgery. Drastic but that is the way it is done. Unfortunately, you are right in that because you are not an emergency (you are not feverish, or show signs of an infection) they are not going to rush you into surgery. The best way to handle the wait is to get some pain pills so you can eat with reduced pain. Basically it took them 6 months from my initial symptoms to do the gall bladder surgery...than another two years after that surgery for them to investigate the pancreas and find that this was the source all along. And during that first year I lost 50lbs from not eating or only eating simple foods. However, during that time, I was supplied with pain meds to help the eating discomfort. It wasn't the perfect solution but it did get me by. Personally, from my experience, I think that you are on the right track for getting to the bottom of the problem and the fact that you are limited by not using contrast in the CT scans, etc may be hindering the whole diagnostic process. And depending on what type of MRCP they did, pancreatic problems may have been missed. I had a regular MRCP done, no CCK stimulation or Secretin and that came up normal; however two years later when they did the MRCP-CCK to stimulate the ducts the pancreas problem became evident. And it was something that had been there my whole life, a birth defect. So they couldn't explain it away as a new development that arose after my first MRCP. Basically the diagnosis for biliary and pancreas diseases are not easy, clear cut or simple. Try to eat higher calorie food that is low in fat....or spread it out over the day. That is the only suggestion I have from the eating standpoint. I drank lots of ensure. If you can mix it with icecream to make a shake, that will help. Again, going without food isn't as drastic as you think. Physicians are not concerned about not eating until the patient goes about 7 days without food. However, not getting liquids is a big concern. In the hospital, if you will be without food for less than seven days and are otherwise healthy they only suplement with IV fluids. If on the otherhand you will be without food for more than seven days, or have a medical condition that puts you at risk, they will give you TPN or other food supplements. So although we may think that not eating is critical, the body seems to get through it. I hope this helps somewhat.......... Laurie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2004 Report Share Posted August 19, 2004 Hi Laurie, Yes, you are right. That is about the path I am on. It has been decided to do just that. Have the surgery, take out the gallbladder and see if that takes care of all the symptoms and go from there. I was able to get a surgical date for 11 days from now. I know that is pretty quick considering he was booking into October. I had the HIDA scan in the ER last Friday. It showed that the " bile " is able to go from the liver into the gallbladder and from there into the small intestine, so it is not completely blocked or nonfunctional. The second part of the test showed what they call an ejection fraction, which measures the force of contractions. Since it is known I have a large gallstone, the test results did indicate a low number which they termed " sluggish gallbladder " . So I know it doesn't mean my gallbladder is healthy, and could show surprises, but I do know there has been a large gallstone there for a long time which has been symptomatic and needs to be taken out. But at least it didn't show a complete blockage and a back up of bile to whereever it goes when there is a blockage. Sounds like you have had an awful time of it. I am sorry to hear that. 50 pounds is a lot to lose. I find it hard to believe that under a doctor's care, they would watch you lose that much weight and not figure a way to diagnose it quicker than that. Geez! As for the MRCP..I didn't know they could do a CCK stimulating test with that. I haven't read that anywhere I have been looking. Thanks for that info. Hopefully the gallbladder surgery will take care of it and I won't have to go that route and more. As for going without food...unfortunately, for me going without food is very detrimental. I have an underlying condition that is made worse by fasting. I also am not in the best physical condition and had surgery a year and a half ago, that I had a very difficult recovery time from. The condition I am in, when I have the surgery, will be important. Otherwise, I would just tough it out, no problem. Over the past week, I have eaten and did ok and then not done ok. So I have kept trying, whenever it would calm down. It just seems to be worse today after eating more yesterday. I have been eating no fat for quite awhile and when it is at it's worse, I just go back to liquids, but even that today is a problem. I did try a shake last night before bed and I think that is what made things worse. Yes, I realize that they could put me on TPN and I am going to talk to my doc about that today. If it wasn't such a cost and inconvenience to be put into the hospital just to be put on TPN, I would think that would be a pretty good solution. Quicker surgery would be better, but that would be pretty good. I wonder if they could put me on it outpatient at his office? I am going to ask anyway. Well, thanks for all that input. You have helped me to think through where I am at. I will let you know how it works out. :-) Adam > Hi Adam, > > The answer to your question is yes and no. Theoretically, you > cannot have an acute pancreatitis attack without the doctors > figuring it out. But in reality it does happen (I was one of those). > In chronic pancreatitis it is very easy for the doctors to miss it and > basically it is because there are no or few labs tests to detect it > and all the imaging tests are not sensitive enough to find early > stages of CP. Most of the time the diagnosis of CP is one of > exclusion and part of the exclusion criteria is to eliminate the gall > bladder as a source of abdominal problem. And I think that is > where you are at, from what you wrote. The only way to implicate > or exclude your gallbladder as the source is to remove it. And if > after removal you get better, then it is presumed that that was the > cause. If you stay the same or get worse, then they go to the next > level of diagnosis which means looking more closely at the > pancreas. Your symptoms are general enough that they are > consistent with either gallbladder disease or pancreas disease > but statistically, it is more likely to be gallbladder disease than > pancreas so it is more efficient to treat that first. > > The HIDA scan (for the functioning of the gallbladder) is another > good diagnostic tool for when the gallbladder is greatly impaired > but again, it has limitations for a only slightly impaired > gallbladder. And even then there are " false negatives " that is, the > HIDA shows no problem with the gallbladder but upon surgery > the surgeon finds a highly diseased gland. So a negative HIDA > scan doesn't always mean a healthy gallbladder. The only sure > way is to do the surgery. Drastic but that is the way it is done. > > Unfortunately, you are right in that because you are not an > emergency (you are not feverish, or show signs of an infection) > they are not going to rush you into surgery. The best way to > handle the wait is to get some pain pills so you can eat with > reduced pain. Basically it took them 6 months from my initial > symptoms to do the gall bladder surgery...than another two years > after that surgery for them to investigate the pancreas and find > that this was the source all along. And during that first year I lost > 50lbs from not eating or only eating simple foods. However, > during that time, I was supplied with pain meds to help the > eating discomfort. It wasn't the perfect solution but it did get me > by. > > Personally, from my experience, I think that you are on the right > track for getting to the bottom of the problem and the fact that you > are limited by not using contrast in the CT scans, etc may be > hindering the whole diagnostic process. And depending on > what type of MRCP they did, pancreatic problems may have been > missed. I had a regular MRCP done, no CCK stimulation or > Secretin and that came up normal; however two years later when > they did the MRCP-CCK to stimulate the ducts the pancreas > problem became evident. And it was something that had been > there my whole life, a birth defect. So they couldn't explain it away > as a new development that arose after my first MRCP. Basically > the diagnosis for biliary and pancreas diseases are not easy, > clear cut or simple. > > Try to eat higher calorie food that is low in fat....or spread it out > over the day. That is the only suggestion I have from the eating > standpoint. I drank lots of ensure. If you can mix it with icecream > to make a shake, that will help. Again, going without food isn't as > drastic as you think. Physicians are not concerned about not > eating until the patient goes about 7 days without food. However, > not getting liquids is a big concern. In the hospital, if you will be > without food for less than seven days and are otherwise healthy > they only suplement with IV fluids. If on the otherhand you will be > without food for more than seven days, or have a medical > condition that puts you at risk, they will give you TPN or other food > supplements. So although we may think that not eating is > critical, the body seems to get through it. > > I hope this helps somewhat.......... > > Laurie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2004 Report Share Posted August 19, 2004 " When you had an acute attack, were you seen in the hospital the same day the symptoms started? " I actually was stupid enough to stay home during the first two attacks. They hit hard and were one right after the other. They were really awful but I figured I was failing of advanced cancer and did not want to die in the hospital. What a relief to hear I only LOL had pancreatitus. My doctor bullied me into going into the hospital as he lectured me about acute turning into chronic. I hate it when they are right. My symptoms were quite clear and obvious to the doctor. Wish I had known about this last year. I would be good deal further along the recovery path. I still blame my mother's pumpkin pie at Thanksgiving even though I know what really caused it. That yummy custard pie was the last straw for the good old panky. Keep reading the forum. I saw some awesome responses to your post. This group is the best thing that has happened to me since my first attack. That, a good guy in my life, a medical plan that is being great and private disability keep me going. Just keep fighting for your health. With sincerity, Carol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2004 Report Share Posted August 20, 2004 Laurie wrote, The answer to your question is yes and no.(snip) Most of the time the diagnosis of CP is one of exclusion and part of the exclusion criteria is to eliminate the gall bladder as a source of abdominal problem. (snip) The only way to implicate or exclude your gallbladder as the source is to remove it. And if after removal you get better, then it is presumed that that was the cause. If you stay the same or get worse, then they go to the next level of diagnosis (snip) Physicians are not concerned about not eating until the patient goes about 7 days without food. However, not getting liquids is a big concern. Laurie, What an excellent and thoughful answer. You summed it up thoroughly. Great job! With love, hope and prayers, Heidi Heidi H. Griffeth South Carolina SC & SE Regional Rep. PAI Note: All comments or advice are based on personal experience or opinion only, and should not be subsituted for consultation with a medical professional. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.