Guest guest Posted October 9, 2009 Report Share Posted October 9, 2009 Thanks everybody for looking at the scans!  I feel a little bit better now that people say his scans look good. This whole head thing has been too traumatic. Before this I paid no attention to head shapes, and now I examine everybody's head. My husband talked with our ortho. I don't have all the details, but here is the secondhand account. Sounds like he is open to keeping in the helmet for a while. He made a joke that at the rate is growing, he can keep wearing the helmet until he is 3. He thinks is still improving, but very slowly. He says the material on the helmet will hold up awhile. They sometimes make a second helmet if the head shape has changed much, but 's hasn't changed enough that a new helmet would do any better. The helmet is designed to restrict growth on the right side of the forehead, and there is nothing more he can do for that. He said 's forehead asymmetries are mild enough that they could actually even out on their own as the pediatricians claim. So, looks like we keep the helmet on and keep waiting and watching. I'm still not sure that partially what I'm seeing on the forehead is not swelling from the helmet. That would be good news since then it wouldn't all be permanent. It would seem there would be more swelling on the right since the helmet has more pressure there. The forehead bulge was first noted on day 2 of the helmet, so that would support the swelling theory. had minor surgery that day (his 1st birthday) and the intake nurse pointed it out right after we took the helmet off. I'll talk with my husband about taking back to CT in San Diego during the holidays if Alyssa will agree to a follow up evaluation. My older son would enjoy a vacation there. In the meantime, will be in the Starband. I completely agree that more evidence of the effective of these alternative treatments would be nice. One thing I've noticed is that all of these practitioners have their own individual style. Thanks again, Kathy, mom to , 16 months wrote:  and Kathy,  ,  Level 3 refers to the area where the circumferance measurement is taken. Level five is further up on the head. I've attached 's scan and there's a reference to the levels on the top right side of the scan.  Kathy and ,  I have to agree with that I think 's head looks great. Okay, I see very small asymmetries at level 5, but I don't really see anything at all at level 3. Maybe I'm just used to looking for brachy that I can't spot mild plagio, but his head looks extremely mild to me.   I've attached 's scan to give you a comparison. It compares her beginning and ending scans. You can clearly see where there is a flat area at the back of the head on her scan. It is this flat area that has been bothering me for the last few months. You can also see that her head looks a little like a triangle - less so than when we first started, but it is still there. That's the brachy. It's the flat spot that I keep hoping will round out a little. It's not even so much her width because her head is small compared to her peers and so it doesn't look any wider from the front - it just looks shorter from the side. To be honest, the only times I really see her problem is either from the back or top or her head.  In terms of how to proceed - what makes you believe that the helmet is making things worse? Do you believe that the head would respond better to the other treatments if it was out of the helmet? Personally, I think I would leave him in it for another couple of months to see what it does. Then, relook at the decision. I wouldn't want to miss my opportunity for getting improvement from the band. Now, if the next scan shows that it definately is getting worse, then I might take him out. Of course, with no option of a Doc band, you'd be looking at either asking for another STARband or just trusting in the alternative treatments alone. One question to ask is why CT felt that wouldn't be able to get the band right. Do you think that's what happened with the STARband.  As you know, we are doing both CST and chiro for , but if she were 's age, we'd have her in a band also. I really wish that there was some concrete evidence of improvement using these other methods. Actually, our cranial doctor did tell me that there was research on the effectiveness of CST in addressing both plagio and brachy so that's why we initially went ahead with that at the same time as the helmet. She didn't know anything about the chiro.  So, I'm thinking that I probably haven't said anything that's helped, but I thought I'd at least let you know how great his head looks in the scans. I'm actually quite jealous.         Re: 's latest scan  Let me first preface this by saying that I am not an expert on StarScan reports at all. My son wore 2 DOCBands, so I really don't get what level 3, level 5, etc is all about. But I have to say that I think your son's head looks really good. I don't see anything really wrong with his forehead and I have a very sensitive eye for the forehead. Just to be perfectly honest, if my son's head looked like yours, I would be thrilled. He had severe forehead bossing and yet we were told over and over that it would round out on it's own. It was his forehead alone (and yet his flat spot was bad too) that prompted me to pursue banding at the late age of 16-17 months. We saw significant improvement in his forehead and yet he still has some bossing and I am occasionally still bothered by it. And his flat spot is still visible to me, though no one else notices it. Maybe your son looks different in person, maybe the scan is not showing his forehead the way you are seeing it, maybe I'm just looking at it wrong, but I personally don't see the forehead as a problem. And maybe that's because my son's forehead was so severe (I really don't feel I'm exaggerating it, you can see his pictures under Jake W. in the Older Plagio Kids folder). Having said all that, he is your son and not mine. So you need to do whatever you feel is necessary. This is just one mom's opinion. Take it for what it's worth. Jake-3 (DOCBand Grad 9/08) > > All, > I'm attaching 's latest scan (level 3 and level 5). We're worried about > the forehead growth, especially on the right side. But, it could be error > or swelling. The level 5 scan showed flattening in the back but that was > definitely an error, probably his head was pressed against the scanner. > > The brachia index went down, but the asymmetry actually went up at level 3. > Any advice or suggestions on how to proceed? > > (on behalf of Kathy) > Parents of (16mo, in Starband 4 mos) > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.