Re: Denied due to pre-existing condition

November 20, 2009

has the child had the same insurance since birth?

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Natasha Thorson <natasha.thorson@...> wrote:

Hello,I was wondering if anyone has been denied from their insurance company due to pre-existing condition. If so, please share what your situation was and what you were able to do (if anything).Thank you so much!

-- Natasha Thorson

-- -mommy to Emma, Becca, , and A truly rich man is one whose children run into his arms when his hands are empty. ~Author Unknown

November 20, 2009

No... I am sure that is why they denied the claim. Although she did not have any signs until around 3 months, but the doctor said it would correct itself by 6 months. It didn't...On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Durocher <funwith4@...> wrote:

has the child had the same insurance since birth?

On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Natasha Thorson <natasha.thorson@...> wrote:

Hello,I was wondering if anyone has been denied from their insurance company due to pre-existing condition. If so, please share what your situation was and what you were able to do (if anything).Thank you so much!

-- Natasha Thorson

-- -mommy to Emma, Becca, , and A truly rich man is one whose children run into his arms when his hands are empty. ~Author Unknown

-- Natasha Thorson(480) 988-0992 Phone/Fax(480) 365-9673 MobileNtwo Enterprise, LLC

November 21, 2009

Did she have a gap in coverage? I ask this b/c they tried to deny

almost everything for my dd b/c of our gap in coverage (would have

been 3 month and you are limited to 60 days to be protected by hippa)

but we had medacaid (which is considered group coverage) during those

3 month (dh was laid off). So if he had prior group health coverage

and never had a gap in coverage greater than 60 days than it is pretty

straightforward, they can't claim any preexisting conditions due to

hippa law. However if that doesn't apply the fight may be longeer

On 11/20/09, Natasha Thorson <natasha.thorson@...> wrote:

> No... I am sure that is why they denied the claim. Although she did not have

> any signs until around 3 months, but the doctor said it would correct itself

> by 6 months. It didn't...

>

> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Durocher <funwith4@...>wrote:

>

>>

>> has the child had the same insurance since birth?

>>

>> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Natasha Thorson <

>> natasha.thorson@...> wrote:

>>

>>>

>>> Hello,

>>>

>>> I was wondering if anyone has been denied from their insurance company

>>> due

>>> to pre-existing condition. If so, please share what your situation was

>>> and

>>> what you were able to do (if anything).

>>>

>>> Thank you so much!

>>>

>>> --

>>> Natasha Thorson

>>>

>>

>> --

>> -mommy to Emma, Becca, ,

>> and

>>

>> A truly rich man is one whose children run into his arms when his hands

>> are

>> empty. ~Author Unknown

>>

>

> --

> Natasha Thorson

> (480) 988-0992 Phone/Fax

> (480) 365-9673 Mobile

> Ntwo Enterprise, LLC

>

--

Sent from my mobile device

-mommy to Emma, Becca, ,

and

A truly rich man is one whose children run into his arms when his

hands are empty. ~Author Unknown

November 24, 2009

No there was no gap in our coverage. We went and saw Cranial Technologies a couple of weeks before our insurance changed over to the new insurance company and then went again to CT to proceed with treatment. So technically, it was a pre-existing condition since we had seen CT before we changed insurance... do you know if we would have any chance to make a claim?

Thank you so much!On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 5:37 AM, Durocher <funwith4@...> wrote: