Guest guest Posted September 3, 2003 Report Share Posted September 3, 2003 This is from the MSNBC web site. They are trying to help us. Maybe our children or grandchildren will benefit from this research Harnessing the dietary role of hormones in the body is an important step in developing effective weight control therapies, experts say. Click on a button above for the latest science on the so-called hunger hormones. Scientists have isolated the short-term hormone PYY3-36, which is secreted by cells lining the intestines after eating. The so-called “third helping hormone †sends signals to the feeding circuits in the brain that convey a sense of satiety, which reduces the urge to eat. In a small experiment, people who received an infusion of the hormone ate one-third less over the next 24 hours than those who received a placebo. Researchers think a medication based on boosting levels of the hormone might reduce overeating and between-meal snacking. Ghrelin, named for the Hindi word for growth, was the first hunger hormone found circulating in the blood of humans. It has been found to stimulate hunger in rats and make people so ravenous that they eat nearly a third more food than usual. Ghrelin has also been found to rise in the bloodstream after dieters lose lots of weight, possibly explaining why it’s so hard to keep weight off long-term. The hormone is considered a potential new treatment for both obese patients and those with conditions that cause a dangerous loss of appetite, such as cancer. Leptin is a hormone involved in the normal regulation of body weight. It’s supposed to signal the brain to stop eating, but the signal does not get through in some overweight people. At one point a few years ago, doctors thought leptin could be used as a breakthrough obesity drug. So far, it has not lived up to its promise, but a recent study showed that tiny doses of leptin taken after weight loss could help people keep weight off. Melanin-concentrating hormone, or MCH, is one of many compounds found to stimulate appetite. Scientists have discovered the receptor for MCH in the human brain, which could allow them to design drugs to block the hormone’s action. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2003 Report Share Posted September 4, 2003 In a message dated 9/4/2003 6:47:35 AM Eastern Standard Time, watnext@... writes: would love to be proven wrong, but knowing Dr. Phil's methods, I doubt it. He will say what is necessary to increase ratings. TV whores. Can I use that word? Fay Bayuk **300/166 10/23/01 Dr. Open RNY 150 cm Click for My Profile http://obesityhelp.com/morbidobesity/profile.phtml?N=Bayuk951061008 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2003 Report Share Posted September 4, 2003 Absolutely! Do you think they'll be tacky enough to promote his new line of supplements? in NJ **************************** In a message dated 9/4/2003 6:51:26 AM Eastern Daylight Time, FBayuk writes: > He will say what is necessary to increase ratings. TV whores. > Can I use that word? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 4, 2003 Report Share Posted September 4, 2003 If they are really trying to help us, I would hope their obesity show with Dr. Phil would concentrate on this research rather than his usual crap. Think that's possible? I don't. Although they may mention these hormones, I'll bet the show will serve to perpetuate the guilt, blame and feelings of failure for the 95% of the population who can not lose weight and keep it off. I would love to be proven wrong, but knowing Dr. Phil's methods, I doubt it. in NJ ************************** > This is from the MSNBC web site. They are trying to help us. Maybe our children or grandchildren will benefit from this research > > > Harnessing the dietary role of hormones in the body is an important step in developing effective weight control therapies, experts say. > Click on a button above for the latest science on the so-called hunger hormones. > > > Scientists have isolated the short-term hormone PYY3-36, which is secreted by cells lining the intestines after eating. The so-called third helping hormone sends signals to the feeding circuits in the brain that convey a sense of satiety, which reduces the urge to eat. In a small experiment, people who received an infusion of the hormone ate one-third less over the next 24 hours than those who received a placebo. Researchers think a medication based on boosting levels of the hormone might reduce overeating and between-meal snacking. > > > Ghrelin, named for the Hindi word for growth, was the first hunger hormone found circulating in the blood of humans. It has been found to stimulate hunger in rats and make people so ravenous that they eat nearly a third more food than usual. Ghrelin has also been found to rise in the bloodstream after dieters lose lots of weight, possibly explaining why it's so hard to keep weight off long-term. The hormone is considered a potential new treatment for both obese patients and those with conditions that cause a dangerous loss of appetite, such as cancer. > > > Leptin is a hormone involved in the normal regulation of body weight. It's supposed to signal the brain to stop eating, but the signal does not get through in some overweight people. At one point a few years ago, doctors thought leptin could be used as a breakthrough obesity drug. So far, it has not lived up to its promise, but a recent study showed that tiny doses of leptin taken after weight loss could help people keep weight off. > > > Melanin-concentrating hormone, or MCH, is one of many compounds found to stimulate appetite. Scientists have discovered the receptor for MCH in the human brain, which could allow them to design drugs to block the hormone's action. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 4, 2004 Report Share Posted January 4, 2004 In a message dated 1/4/2004 12:34:13 PM Central Standard Time, kristine.patrick@... writes: I hear ya n ! I find myself watching tv shows where the celebs give their money to charity and the charities they pick make me roll my eyes! It is hard because there are so many worthy causes but I want MY cause to be the most important! I think about how I felt regarding charities before dx, and how indifferent I was towards certain causes, especially the ones concerning health. My husband informed me that he has designated $20.00 a month be taken out of his paycheck and donated to CFF. He has also convinced six of his workmates to do the same. That amount seems so small compared to what fund raisers bring in, and I am a " bigger is better " kind of person. However, I have changed my way of thinking to " every little bit helps " . Cheers, e My niece is a very good sports player in just about everything she does and one year they did an article in the paper about her and they asked her lots of question and one question they asked her was if she won the lottery what would she do with the money and she said she would give some of it to charities and I said what charities you should have said you would give only to the Cystic Fibrosis Charities. She told me oh I never thought about that GEEZ HOW COULD SHE FORGET!!!! I had to give her a hard time!! Deb A Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 4, 2004 Report Share Posted January 4, 2004 I hear ya n ! I find myself watching tv shows where the celebs give their money to charity and the charities they pick make me roll my eyes! It is hard because there are so many worthy causes but I want MY cause to be the most important! I think about how I felt regarding charities before dx, and how indifferent I was towards certain causes, especially the ones concerning health. My husband informed me that he has designated $20.00 a month be taken out of his paycheck and donated to CFF. He has also convinced six of his workmates to do the same. That amount seems so small compared to what fund raisers bring in, and I am a " bigger is better " kind of person. However, I have changed my way of thinking to " every little bit helps " . Cheers, e Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 4, 2004 Report Share Posted January 4, 2004 You wont get an argument from me here in Texas n. We need to find a cure for this disease, I really dont care what is on Mars or Jupiter for that matter. We need to keep our cause in the spot light or we will be forgotten, because as I have been told in the past, not ENOUGH people die from CF for the government to be concerned, I bet if they had a son or daughter with CF it would get more attention. We parents and people with cf must stick together and make our voices heard. Happy New Year, Let this BE the year a CURE is found. > >Reply-To: cfparents >To: <cfparents > >CC: >Subject: science >Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 10:17:58 -0800 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >X-Sender: rojas5915@... >Received: from n11.grp.scd.yahoo.com ([66.218.66.66]) by >mc3-f29.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sun, 4 Jan 2004 >10:18:01 -0800 >Received: from [66.218.67.197] by n11.grp.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Jan >2004 18:18:00 -0000 >Received: (qmail 97243 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2004 18:17:59 -0000 >Received: from unknown (66.218.66.167) by m4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; >4 Jan 2004 18:17:59 -0000 >Received: from unknown (HELO sccrmhc11.comcast.net) (204.127.202.55) by >mta6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 4 Jan 2004 18:17:59 -0000 >Received: from rojasandassocia >(c-67-169-9-48.client.comcast.net[67.169.9.48]) by comcast.net >(sccrmhc11) with SMTP id <20040104181757011006e6cie>; Sun, 4 Jan >2004 18:17:58 +0000 >X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jEt1dwZpjNdJtOZcF6xUWKm >X-eGroups-Return: >sentto-104900-55109-1073240280-clog1760=msn.com@... >X-Apparently-To: cfparents >Message-ID: <000b01c3d2ef$1571ebb0$3009a943@inc> >Organization: rojasandassociates >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal >X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 >X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 204.127.202.55 >X-Yahoo-Profile: marionjrojas2002 >Mailing-List: list cfparents ; contact >cfparents-owner >Delivered-To: mailing list cfparents >Precedence: bulk >List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cfparents-unsubscribe > >Return-Path: >sentto-104900-55109-1073240280-clog1760=msn.com@... >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Jan 2004 18:18:01.0237 (UTC) >FILETIME=[16763C50:01C3D2EF] > >It is not that I am disappointed that they have landed a rover on Mars; >I am just MORE disappointed that they have not spent the money on >cystic fibrosis, NIH (in the usa), and related conditions. I think of >those >who have passed--and yes, NASA has lost some--but cystic fibrosis >has lost plenty. I want an international fiscal endeavor here-------oh, >well, >I can dream, can I not--it IS well into the New Year! > >With high hopes for all coping with cystic fibrosis, n Rojas > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.