Guest guest Posted November 22, 2001 Report Share Posted November 22, 2001 Well, my husband and I rode with my parents to my aunt and uncle's house for Thanksgiving. My Mom (who has not been supportive of my wanting the DS) and I sat in the back seat and we talked about the surgery. I was thrilled when my mom said that she thought the surgery would be good for me. I was shocked at her change of opinion and asked her why, and she said that she didn't realize it was reversible if I had problems later. Apparently, my Dad told her it was because he asked me that question the other day. So now she is supportive. I am so relieved. I know it doesn't matter what my mom thinks but I still want her approval. I don't feel as scared about having knowing that she will be there to support me. Thank to all of you for your help in beginning to talk about my decision to have WLS with others, which can be so scary. On the other end of the spectrum we have my mother-in-law who said she'd pay for me to go to Weight Watchers if I wouldn't have the surgery. LOL! She doesn't realize that I've done WW several times and always gained the weight back plus some. She is not overweight, but still diets sometimes to loose 5 pounds here and there, so cannot relate to someone who would need do have surgery to loose weight. I may have already said this, but at my consult with Dr. last week he told me that people with morbid obesity are different than people without it. He said that he has lost weight over his life, but has never faced MO. He said that when a person becomes MO there is only a 2% chance of loosing all the excess weight and keeping it off for more than a year. That statement really put things in perspective for me, and I have held on to it since the consult. It's not my fault!!!!!!!!!!! Anyone else in my shoes would have the same experience. We just can't do it on our own, we need medical help. That is such a comfort to me, as I have always beat myself up and been so ashamed of myself and my appearance. Thanks for reading. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 22, 2001 Report Share Posted November 22, 2001 DS should not be considered reversable. You really should clear this up with your surgeon. > Well, my husband and I rode with my parents to my aunt and uncle's house for > Thanksgiving. My Mom (who has not been supportive of my wanting the DS) and I > sat in the back seat and we talked about the surgery. I was thrilled when my > mom said that she thought the surgery would be good for me. I was shocked at > her change of opinion and asked her why, and she said that she didn't realize it > was reversible if I had problems later. Apparently, my Dad told her it was > because he asked me that question the other day. > > Thanks for reading. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 22, 2001 Report Share Posted November 22, 2001 DS should not be considered reversable. You really should clear this > up with your surgeon.>>>>>>. It is considered reversable if something goes wrong down the road.....if someone has a terrible protein deficency the common channel can be lenghtened to allow more absorption of proteins, for example. The only thing that they cant reverse is the stomach but even then the stomach will double in size within a year. But the bowels are reversable and they can put them back where they were before. Judie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 23, 2001 Report Share Posted November 23, 2001 In a message dated 11/23/01 6:17:42 AM, duodenalswitch writes: << DS should not be considered reversable. You really should clear this up with your surgeon. >> I think that ANY WLS surgery is not to be entered into lightly as if one could just 'reverse' it if they didn't like it, etc. It is only if one experiences severe difficulties that a surgeon would even consider a reversal. There's a guy on the AMOS boards who had an RNY reversal and has experienced SEVERE problems as a result (he had serious reactions to the surgery and this was the reason for the reversal). I'm sure that, even though the stomach portion would not be an issue as with the RNY, 'rehooking' the intestines after they had been cut and rearranged wouldn't be an easy task and there may be side effects to the bodies healing after this. That being said, it is possible to 'reverse' the BPD intestinal portion of the surgery (or adjust it as necessary - making a common channel longer or shorter, etc.). The stomach involves a sleeve gastrectomy so it is NOT reversable but the stomach retains 'normal' functionality and purpose so I don't see where this would be an issue... So, I think that patients who are concerned that (especially in their later years) the malapsorption issues could present health problems, etc. this would be a possibility. I often wondered if I developed cancer or something and required chemo or had some other unfortunate event in which the malapsorption would be a detriment to my health whether I would be able to address these issues to maintain my health. I'm sure other things would be tried before 'reversing' the surgery (i.e. - parental feedings, etc.) but it IS a fact that the intestinal portion CAN be 'reversed' although it is debatable as to the necessity for this and/or surgeon's willingness to do it. all the best, lap ds with gallbladder removal January 25, 2001 Dr. Gagner/Mt. Sinai/NYC almost 10 months post-op and still feelin' fabu preop: 307 lbs/bmi 45 now: 204 lbs/size sweet 16/large in normal people's clothing! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 23, 2001 Report Share Posted November 23, 2001 In a message dated 11/23/2001 9:46:33 AM Central Standard Time, ruisha@... writes: > I often wondered if I developed cancer or something and required chemo or > had > some other unfortunate event in which the malapsorption would be a > detriment > to my health whether I would be able to address these issues to maintain my > health No one would want it. But they could always put a feeding tube into the bilio limb if you were in quick need of added nutrition. The intestinal portion (in my non medical humble opinion) has numerous ways they can work with it to overcome any of these problems. Dawn--South Suburban Chicago area Dr. Hess, Bowling Green, OH BPD/DS 4/27/00 www.duodenalswitch.com 267 to 165 5' 4 " size 22 to size 10 have made size goal no more high blood pressure, sore feet, or dieting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 23, 2001 Report Share Posted November 23, 2001 They cannot undo the stomach portion, as they actually remove part of it. However, if the wt loss is too great, and there is malnutrition happening--they can put the intestines back to normal---or do as they did for Joe Frost, they lengthened the CC and ailementary limb. But this surgery has evolved and has been tweaked since Scoparino's inception, that there is little chance of this being needed. My doc in spain had to reverse one patient because of excessive alcohol use-- which the liver couldn't cope with. I have heard or read of very few who had to be revised longer. Technically, it is " reversable " . But --- it is a " rarity " . Pammi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 23, 2001 Report Share Posted November 23, 2001 I specifically asked Dr.Hess is my stomach would stretch back to original size and he said definately not. Dawn--South Suburban Chicago area Dr. Hess, Bowling Green, OH BPD/DS 4/27/00 www.duodenalswitch.com 267 to 165 5' 4 " size 22 to size 10 have made size goal no more high blood pressure, sore feet, or dieting Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 23, 2001 Report Share Posted November 23, 2001 In a message dated 11/23/01 5:12:39 PM, duodenalswitch writes: << This is very interesting, as when I had my revision at almost 19 months out, my stomach was only 5.5oz. as it was measured at that time. It was made to 3 oz, at the time of my original DS. I don't think it is a standard rule that we all stretch back, and I also thought we will never get back to the original size. >> Hi, there Patti: I would have to agree on this -- I think the stomach does 'stretch' but not back to 'normal' pre-op size. OUr stomachs will always be a 'banana shape' and be missing the 'fundus' or storage area that was removed..... The intestines also adapt, creating more surface receptors for absorption and elongating (the process is set at about 12-18 months post-op and this is part of the reason why our bodies 'regulate' and 'maintain' a regular weight at that point). I have always been able to eat about 4 oz (from the first days post-op) and my stomach was made the 'standard' size (I think Dr. G mentioned 200 or 250 cc? I can't remember). I think my ability to hold this was due to my lack of stomach irritation and lack of nausea after surgery. I eat about 8-10 oz now at a meal and am totally satisfied. all the best, lap ds with gallbladder removal January 25, 2001 Dr. Gagner/Mt. Sinai/NYC almost 10 months post-op and still feelin' fabu! preop: 307 lbs/bmi 45 now: 204 (gained 3 lbs, bummer man!)/size sweet 16/large in normal people's clothing! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 23, 2001 Report Share Posted November 23, 2001 In a message dated 11/23/01 5:12:39 PM, duodenalswitch writes: << We will have normal sized tummys after 12-18 months post-op. Yea!!!!!!! >> Well, whatever the size I can assure ya that we can definately eat NORMALLY as a post-op! I'm 10 months post-op and I can finally eat as a normal person does -- In decent amounts that provide my body with enough nutrition as well as a variety of foods that satisfy my tastes. :) It really is WONDERFUL!!! Child sized portions are usually just right or I'll get an adult portion, eat most of it (protein first), save some for home/share with the kids and/or finish it if I'm really famished! LOL all the best, lap ds with gallbladder removal January 25, 2001 Dr. Gagner/Mt. Sinai/NYC almost 10 months post-op and still feelin' fabu preop: 307 lbs/bmi 45 now: 204 lbs (gained 3 lbs - yikes!)/size sweet 16/large in normal people's clothing! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 23, 2001 Report Share Posted November 23, 2001 In a message dated 11/23/01 5:12:32 PM Eastern Standard Time, duodenalswitch writes: << MY SURGEON IS WHO TOLD ME IT WAS REVERSIBLE. At my consult he said that the tummy would stretch back to near normal size within a year and that the intestines could be put back the way they were to start with if it became neessay. I don't appreciate your raining on my parade. >> - I wasn't the one you wrote the above to.......Dr. Hess also says the surgery is reversible in his letter to insurance companies. And Dr. Hess is the one who developed this surgery. I don't think anyone was trying to make you feel like you didn't know what you were saying (I certainly didn't think that), so please don't feel upset. We are all rooting for each other here! Your surgeon was right! Carole Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 23, 2001 Report Share Posted November 23, 2001 MY SURGEON IS WHO TOLD ME IT WAS REVERSIBLE. At my consult he said that the tummy would stretch back to near normal size within a year and that the intestines could be put back the way they were to start with if it became neessay. I don't appreciate your raining on my parade. You should get your facts straight before bashing what someone says. It's not like they open you up, rip out your guts, and throw them in the trashcan. Because they leave all of your intestines in, but just shorten the length where food travels, it could be reversed if there became a problem. > DS should not be considered reversable. You really should clear this > up with your surgeon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 23, 2001 Report Share Posted November 23, 2001 I'm sure other things would be tried before 'reversing' the surgery > (i.e. - parental feedings, etc.) but it IS a fact that the intestinal portion > CAN be 'reversed' THANK YOU. although it is debatable as to the necessity for this > and/or surgeon's willingness to do it. Yes, I'm sure that is true, but my particular surgeon told me point blank that he could and would reverse it if that became necessary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 23, 2001 Report Share Posted November 23, 2001 .. At my consult he said > that the tummy would stretch back to near normal size within a year This is very interesting, as when I had my revision at almost 19 months out, my stomach was only 5.5oz. as it was measured at that time. It was made to 3 oz, at the time of my original DS. I don't think it is a standard rule that we all stretch back, and I also thought we will never get back to the original size. Patti Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 23, 2001 Report Share Posted November 23, 2001 Was Dr. your surgeon? He definitely told me that my stomach would strtch back to *near* normal size after a year, to where I could eat a normal sized meal, but with just a little bit smaller portions than pre-op. I don't remember if he gave me the exact number of ounces that it would hold. He said all of this with a fair amount of certainty. Perhaps when he does the surgery he makes the stomach a larger size than other doctors do? I don't know, but I'm just telling you all what he told me. > This is very interesting, as when I had my revision at almost 19 months out, > my stomach was only 5.5oz. as it was measured at that time. It was made to > 3 oz, at the time of my original DS. I don't think it is a standard rule > that we all stretch back, and I also thought we will never get back to the > original size. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 23, 2001 Report Share Posted November 23, 2001 > > > > . At my consult he said > > a standard rule I also thought we will never get back to the > original size. > Patti > > we dont stretch back to the origional size....we stretch out to a " normal size " a normal sized thin persons stomach! Im already eating 2000 calories a day or more and to eat that much it had to have stretched from a 3-5 ounce stomach to greater than that! You should see what we ate for Thanksgiving yesterday LOL Judie > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 23, 2001 Report Share Posted November 23, 2001 > Go Judy....exactely! Dan > > > > > > > > > . At my consult he said > > > > a standard rule > I also thought we will never get back to the > > original size. > > Patti > > > > we dont stretch back to the origional size....we stretch out to a " normal > size " a normal sized thin persons stomach! > Im already eating 2000 calories a day or more and to eat that much it had to > have stretched from a 3-5 ounce stomach to greater than that! You should > see what we ate for Thanksgiving yesterday LOL > > Judie > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 23, 2001 Report Share Posted November 23, 2001 > Go Judy....exactely! Dan>>>>>> Dan, I cant believe what I ate yesterday becuz I lost a pound today! I had turkey, stuffing, mashed potatoes with gravy, corn, 3 kinds of salads (very small amounts...about a spoonful each) candied yams, homemade rolls, creamed onions, cranberry sauce, butter on potatoes and roll, cinnamon pickles and there were 7 different kinds of pies but I only had one small sliver of pumpkin an hour later after dinner as I had no room for that! Of course, I did leave food on the plate as I could not finish it if I tried! To lose a pound was a dream come true! Judie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 23, 2001 Report Share Posted November 23, 2001 > > we dont stretch back to the origional size....we stretch out to a " normal > size " a normal sized thin persons stomach! Yep, you're right . . . I stand corrected. Now that you mention it I do remember that he did say that my stomach would stretch back to a " normal " size, rather than that it would stretch back to it's " original " size. My tummy is too big right now for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 23, 2001 Report Share Posted November 23, 2001 > --- In duodenalswitch@y..., " B. Standard " <hbstandard@p...> > > > I > > We will have normal sized > tummys after 12-18 months post-op. Yea!!!!!!! > > > Yep! I think I got my normal sized tummy at about 7 months as that is when I began eating alot more! Im guessing Im eating around 2,000 to 2500 calories a day now and only absorbing half of that. How wonderful to have a " normal sized tummy " like the skinny people do! It even has a built in " stop gap " as if you pass that point you get mighty uncomfortable! Hugs, Judie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 23, 2001 Report Share Posted November 23, 2001 --- In duodenalswitch@y..., " B. Standard " <hbstandard@p...> > Yep, you're right . . . I stand corrected. Now that you mention it I > do remember that he did say that my stomach would stretch back to > a " normal " size, rather than that it would stretch back to > it's " original " size. My tummy is too big right now for sure. Actually in re-reading my original post I did use the correct word " normal " not " original " so I didn't need to stand corrected, but I am glad that we have cleared this up. We will have normal sized tummys after 12-18 months post-op. Yea!!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 23, 2001 Report Share Posted November 23, 2001 , I am 14 months out and I can definately eat a normal sized meal. Granted not as much as pre-op...but pre-op I could eat WAY too much. Now I look at the amount I can eat as normal in comparison with my friends who are of average weight. I'm sure it is an individual thing, but in my case by stomach definately did stretch back out. Brynn Surgery 9/12/00 then 299.5, size 3X now 157, size 10-12 5'7 " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 23, 2001 Report Share Posted November 23, 2001 Judie, I ate more than I have in the last 5 months go figure today I weigh myself and I am down 3 lbs I guess Dan is right the more I eat the more I lose and let me tell you I ate LOL Lisbeth Judie Hensel wrote: > Go Judy....exactely! Dan>>>>>> Dan, I cant believe what I ate yesterday becuz I lost a pound today! I had turkey, stuffing, mashed potatoes with gravy, corn, 3 kinds of salads (very small amounts...about a spoonful each) candied yams, homemade rolls, creamed onions, cranberry sauce, butter on potatoes and roll, cinnamon pickles and there were 7 different kinds of pies but I only had one small sliver of pumpkin an hour later after dinner as I had no room for that! Of course, I did leave food on the plate as I could not finish it if I tried! To lose a pound was a dream come true! Judie ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 23, 2001 Report Share Posted November 23, 2001 The issue is not the reversibility of the surgery. The issue is your mother's support. She wanted to be reassured that you will not be permanently altered in a way that would be detrimental to you. It is part of the protective nature of every mother. You have reassured her enough for her to support your surgery and THAT is the true victory. I didn't have my mothers support before I had surgery but she is so happy for me now. I hope that your mother's support puts the wind in your sails and you are able to move quickly through surgery and on to a new life that will be so brilliant and happy that you wont have to worry about getting anything reversed. Congratulation. Machelle Surgery 5-8-01 Dr. Rabkin Loss 93 lbs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 23, 2001 Report Share Posted November 23, 2001 Patti - The intestinal part of the surgery is reversible - no question about it! The stomach part cannot. That make no difference, anyway, because the stomach stretches back to near normal size. We're not talking philosophy here, we're talking facts. Case closed! Nick in Sage Re: A small victory! > Was Dr. your surgeon? He definitely told me that my stomach > would strtch back to *near* normal size after a year, to where I > could eat a normal sized meal, but with just a little bit smaller > portions than pre-op. I don't remember if he gave me the exact number > of ounces that it would hold. He said all of this with a fair amount > of certainty. Perhaps when he does the surgery he makes the stomach > a larger size than other doctors do? I don't know, but I'm just > telling you all what he told me. > > > > > > > > This is very interesting, as when I had my revision at almost 19 > months out, > > my stomach was only 5.5oz. as it was measured at that time. It was > made to > > 3 oz, at the time of my original DS. I don't think it is a > standard rule > > that we all stretch back, and I also thought we will never get back > to the > > original size. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 23, 2001 Report Share Posted November 23, 2001 Nick, I KNOW the intestinal part is reversible, I didn't say it wasn't, I merely stated that my stomach was still only 5.5 ounces after being 19 months out, and after almost 2 years I can still only eat under 6 oz., and that my dear is a fact. It states it in my operative report. I don't consider this even near pre-operative size. I am just stating that it does vary. I think I do have the right to state the truth about myself even if it is not the normal for what Doctors are telling their patients. Patti Re: A small victory! > > > > Was Dr. your surgeon? He definitely told me that my stomach > > would strtch back to *near* normal size after a year, to where I > > could eat a normal sized meal, but with just a little bit smaller > > portions than pre-op. I don't remember if he gave me the exact number > > of ounces that it would hold. He said all of this with a fair amount > > of certainty. Perhaps when he does the surgery he makes the stomach > > a larger size than other doctors do? I don't know, but I'm just > > telling you all what he told me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is very interesting, as when I had my revision at almost 19 > > months out, > > > my stomach was only 5.5oz. as it was measured at that time. It was > > made to > > > 3 oz, at the time of my original DS. I don't think it is a > > standard rule > > > that we all stretch back, and I also thought we will never get back > > to the > > > original size. > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.