Guest guest Posted November 18, 2001 Report Share Posted November 18, 2001 , Because of the rapid weight loss induced by the DS, gallstones are almost inevitable. Therefore, if you do not have the gallbladder removed during surgery, it is likely that you will need to have it removed later. Most DS surgeons remove it at the time of surgery. A few DS surgeons (mostly lap) do not remove it. If you really are uncomfortable with loosing your gallbladder you can speak with your surgeon. I think there are some medications that can help prevent the formation of gallstones. Keep in mind that you gallbladder may already be deseased from yo-yo diets of the past. Hull > I forgot to mention that during Dr. 's lecture he said it is mandatory to > remove the Gallbladder with the DS . This alarms me. I know that the function > of the gallbladder is to store bile until it is needed in the digestive process, > and I would prefer to keep it. It scares me to remove one of my organs, as it > was obviously put there for a reason and it seems dangerous to remove it. Where > will my bile be stored if I no longer have a gallbladder? I forgot to ask Dr. > why it is imperative to remove the gallbladder. Can anyone shed any light > on this for me? Particularly why it is necessary, and why it is not considered > dangerous to remove it. > > Thanks! > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2001 Report Share Posted November 18, 2001 At 6:57 PM +0000 11/18/01, chull1@... wrote: >, > >Because of the rapid weight loss induced by the DS, gallstones are >almost inevitable. I thought the incidence was between 25 and 40%. Maybe that qualifies as " almost inevitable. " >... If you really are >uncomfortable with loosing your gallbladder you can speak with your >surgeon. I think there are some medications that can help prevent >the formation of gallstones. Actigall (ursidiol = generic name). Dr. Elariny has us take it for the first six months if we still have our gall bladders. Mine was clear to ultrasound prior to lap surgery, so he left it in. BTW, as to NASH for fatty liver, why not say it as the French do: " foie gras? " --Steve -- Steve Goldstein, age 61 Lap BPD/DS on May 2, 2001 Dr. Elariny, INOVA Fairfax Hospital, Virginia Starting (05/02/01) BMI = 51 BMI on 11/14 = 39 (-80 lb.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2001 Report Share Posted November 18, 2001 The complications of stones--impacted stones--and infection aren't worth keeping it. Remember--there is no need to store bile--as the bile and enzymes are diverted to meet up so much later at the common channel. The intestinal rerouting essentially take over the role of the gallbladder. Just like the appendix--it is really rendered uselees by the surgery. Having to go through another surgery 6mo to a year later isn't worth it. Pammi > I forgot to mention that during Dr. 's lecture he said it is mandatory to > remove the Gallbladder with the DS . This alarms me. I know that the function > of the gallbladder is to store bile until it is needed in the digestive process, > and I would prefer to keep it. It scares me to remove one of my organs, as it > was obviously put there for a reason and it seems dangerous to remove it. Where > will my bile be stored if I no longer have a gallbladder? I forgot to ask Dr. > why it is imperative to remove the gallbladder. Can anyone shed any light > on this for me? Particularly why it is necessary, and why it is not considered > dangerous to remove it. > > Thanks! > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2001 Report Share Posted November 18, 2001 , I'm pre-op DS and I had my gallbladder removed last year. It was essentially a bag of stones after my last diet. My gallbladder attacks were the most painful things I've ever had to live through...I really wanted to die several times right there curled up on the bathroom floor!!! The gallbladder functions to hold bile until it is needed for the digestion of fats, but it isn't an essential organ. I asked my surgeon what dietary changes I needed to make after having it removed and he said there were none. Dr. Rabkin removes both the gallbladder and the appendix during DS surgery. With rapid weight loss, it is very likely that patients will develop gallstones and nobody needs the appendix anyway. Part of the reason for removing them during DS surgery is to rule out the gallbladder or appendix as sources of post-operative abdominal pain. My gallbladder attacks FELT like a blockage. I thought I was going to explode on the inside. That is NOT a feeling I want post-op and I wouldn't want to waste time trying to figure out if it is anything other than DS-related. -- K pre-op Rabkin Jan 28, 2002 YM: mariak415 ICQ: 129363427 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2001 Report Share Posted November 18, 2001 > , > I'm pre-op DS and I had my gallbladder removed last year. It was > essentially a bag of stones after my last diet. Warning: not for the faint of heart! If you want to see a remarkable picture of a gallstone filled gallbladder, go here and click the " prev " arrow one time: http://www.pacificsurgery.com/Newsletter/Other_Views/other_views.html This was the gb of a Rabkin patient who was operated last year. EGADS, huh? :-) M. --- in Valrico, FL, age 39 Lap DGB/DS by Dr. Rabkin 10/19/99 Starting weight 299, now 153 Starting BMI 49.7, now 25.5 Starting size 26/28, now 10/12 http://www.duodenalswitch.com/Patients/M/melaniem.html Direct replies: mailto:melanie@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2001 Report Share Posted November 18, 2001 OMG ! Ugh! Mine looked just like that! Pain pain pain! Ew...thanks for posting! heheh -maria At 1:09 PM -0800 11/18/01, Magruder wrote: >Warning: not for the faint of heart! If you want to see a remarkable >picture of a gallstone filled gallbladder, go here and click the " prev " >arrow one time: > >http://www.pacificsurgery.com/Newsletter/Other_Views/other_views.html > >This was the gb of a Rabkin patient who was operated last year. EGADS, >huh? :-) > > M. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 18, 2001 Report Share Posted November 18, 2001 Something else to consider about Gallbladder removal..My insurance co would only pay up to $3000 per lifetime for treatment for obesity.When I was preapproved for this surgery I was assuming that they were agreeing to pay for the surgery. In fact, they would only pay up to that cap amount and after they reached that they started sending back the explanation of benefits saying they denied the charge and would not pay because it exceeded the amt ...blah blah blah...(you know...insurance jargon) I had a hospital bill of over $21,000.00 and they were NOT going to pay it. I had my doctor write them a letter stating that all elements of the surgery were not for treatment of obesity...Such as the gall bladder removal. That was the KEY to getting them to pay the hospital bill. They sent a check out that week. I was looking at near financial ruin and that darn gallbladder removal saved me! I dont even notice its gone either! How bout that! a Dr.Hess 4/11/01 Can anyone shed any light > on this for me? Particularly why it is necessary, and why it is not considered > dangerous to remove it. > > Thanks! > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.