Guest guest Posted October 6, 2001 Report Share Posted October 6, 2001 so I let him > have wheat that morning. I know, very risky, but I > was in a bad state of mind. I let him eat half a > package of Ritz crackers! Here's the wierd part: NO > REACTION. Why??? I can't figure it out. I may be the person Wendi referred to in her message, so I will reply to you here. My son is celiac in addition to being autistic. At the time I began using enzymes, I did not know he was also celiac. I gave gluten infractions with the enzymes, and I did not see any reaction for about two weeks, but then I did. If your child is also celiac in addition to autistic, his intestine may have healed now, but you might see reaction within the next two weeks if you continue to give gluten. But, see below, your son may not be celiac and it may be that he can have gluten again. Personally, if you want to challenge gluten, I would recommend using enzymes from this url, which I use now for occasional infractions and also for the other foods my kids do not tolerate. http://www.houstonni.com/ So with these enzymes, I do allow my son to have gluten occasionally, and I see no reactions, but I have to be careful how I do it, because it does do slight damage to his intestines every time I allow an infraction, and if I allow more than 1-2 infractions every month or so, then he will start to show signs. But other people whose children are not also celiac, have been able to resume eating gluten with these enzymes with no problems. It depends on the child. Could it > have something to do with removing all sources of > antimony and arsenic? We did that in the early > summer. Removing metals has allowed many kids to resume eating gluten and casein, but not for other children. Perhaps your child is one who can now eat gluten/casein. He's getting allergy shots 2x per week from > his DAN allergist. Could that make any difference? I > wouldn't think so. If your son has an allergy to wheat, and these shots have cleared that, then I would think this may also have been a contributing factor to him being able to eat wheat again. This may or may not also impact other gluten grains, depending on which allergy shots your DAN was providing. You might want to ask your DAN this question. Dana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 6, 2001 Report Share Posted October 6, 2001 I think you may have bveen gfcf long enough that it may be that it would not have effect unless cumlative-or maybe the rasction is not as before and it not bieng noticed-like less concentration- Just my guess.f Gluten Confession > Help!!! I'm totally confused!!! > , who is 20 months old, has been GFCF for a > year now. He tested positive for both gluten and > casein peptides both in September of last year and > also again this summer. I have been dealing with > family members who refuse to believe in the diet, and > that he has any problems at all. They think I'm nuts, > but we have had infringements with pretzels once, and > one other time, it was wheat but I don't remember what > it was, and have always seen severe reactions to wheat > within a few hours. He became really aggressive, > stimmy, and was in a lot of intestinal pain. > Now to my confession: > Thursday, I was at the end of my rope with my mother. > I knew we were meeting her for lunch, so I let him > have wheat that morning. I know, very risky, but I > was in a bad state of mind. I let him eat half a > package of Ritz crackers! Here's the wierd part: NO > REACTION. Why??? I can't figure it out. Could it > have something to do with removing all sources of > antimony and arsenic? We did that in the early > summer. He's getting allergy shots 2x per week from > his DAN allergist. Could that make any difference? I > wouldn't think so. I just now got up the nerve to > confess to my husband. We're both stunned. Any > ideas, anyone? > , Confused in Missouri > > ===== > > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 6, 2001 Report Share Posted October 6, 2001 * Dana, I am concerned and confused. If you know it is doing slight damage then why is gluten allowed to be eaten? (LJs mom) in New York * On Sat, 06 Oct 2001 20:40:37 -0000 danaatty@... writes: I do allow my son to have gluten > occasionally, > and I see no reactions, but I have to be careful how I do it, > because > it does do slight damage to his intestines every time I allow an , > Dana * * \l/ * * * ( @ @ ) * * ---------o00--( _____ ) --00o--------- * * HAVE A GREAT DAY !!!!!!!!!!!! ________________________________________________________________ GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 6, 2001 Report Share Posted October 6, 2001 I have a son who went without g and c for about a year. Then, because I assumed this was an allergy and because he hated this diet, I let him begin eating both again. He was able to eat these foods for close to a year without a re occurrence of his symptoms (which was diarrhea and several " accidents " a day). Though I had not put him on this diet for AS, I've seen a lot of these type behaviors since he's been off the diet. I've finally got him back on the diet and his diarrhea and " accidents " have stopped, not so his AS type behavior, yet. Lolita >. Any > > ideas, anyone? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 6, 2001 Report Share Posted October 6, 2001 You invite my opinion, so I have decided to give it to you along with a soap box. You are free to stop reading now if you don't want to read the soap box. I will include my disclaimer that it is a statement of my opinion, and it is not intended to be offensive, but then knowing my history with this group, I am sure it will attract flames from at least one person, either here on the forum or as private email. Remember a thread a few weeks ago about Mc's french fries? Someone posted an opinion that all those additives seemed like poison to that person, but then others flamed her for having that opinion, like she was saying that people who allowed their child to eat those fries were intentionally poisoning their child. Apparently, people here on this forum do not tolerate other people who believe that gluten is not necessarily a poison for an autistic child, but the on the other side, they also do not tolerate people who might believe that other things ARE a poison for a child. People can have this sort of " extreme " opinion regarding ABA, gfcf diet, enzymes, nutrasweet, caffeine, artificial additives, alcohol, cracking knuckles, choosing to vaccinate, and choosing to use medication, among other things. And other people have no problems with those things, or disagree completely on the importance of those things. And some people, like me, are in the middle. I am not 100% gluten free, even tho I am also celiac. I choose to accept whatever consequences of the occasional infraction, because I see the benefits of an occasional infraction as worth the costs. It is the same with my son. He is basically a typical kid of a younger developmental age than chronological age. He knows he is different. He knows he cannot eat everything that other kids eat. He knows he has difficulty playing with other kids. He knows they tease him. I try to be realistic. If I can give him some measure of " normality " at parties and holidays and special events, then I will do that. He knows he can have allowable infractions for special things. It helps restrain his rebellion at other times. He knows I care about him, and I will listen to him if he wants something special for a special time. I do not see any regression for these infractions, altho intellectually I know some physical injury is occurring. So I see the benefits outweigh the detriments. I choose to support parents in whatever is their decision regarding the best interest of their own child. Some parents wish to vaccinate, albeit as safely as currently possible. So I have my vaccination recommendations. Some parents choose to use enzymes *instead* of gfcf diet, and I will give my information regarding that. Some parents choose medications to help with their child's issues, and I will provide information on that. I do not necessarily agree with these decisions, but it is not my child, and the parent knows his/her own child best. I do not believe my opinion is necessarily the correct opinion for a child who is not my own child. I give my son occasional gluten with enzymes because I have no guilt in doing so. I believe it is best for my own child and our situation here. And other parents withhold all gluten because they believe it is best for their own child and situation. And I know of other parents who know that gluten does have an effect on their child, but they have not removed it at all, because for their own child and situation they have determined that removing it would have greater detriment than benefit. This group here, I have generally found to be rather judgmental concerning the opinions of parents which may be different than the " established " opinion. I guess it is the " gfcfdiet zealot " forum. Other message forums, even tho for the support of the gfcfdiet, are not nearly so judgmental as this one is. I am not saying that I believe you yourself are judgmental, but that in general the people here seem more judgmental than on other forums. I posted my differing opinion here a few weeks ago regarding the use of chew tubes for children who want/need to chew. I received quite a few flames over that. And even tho I asked for suggestions on how to word my opinion so that it would not be inflammatory, noone offered any suggestions. Does this mean that there is no way to word my different opinion to not be inflammatory? Or that my different opinion is not welcome here? I don't know, but that was not the first time I have been flamed by people in this group for my different opinion. On most of my other forums, I would have receive a reply indicating something like " I disagree with this opinion because ... " , but not the flames I receive here. I personally know of several other parents who do not use this forum for just that reason, that their different opinion is flamed here and not welcome. I am not saying that people here who disagree should not state that disagreeing opinion to this group, just that it appears that those disagreeing opinions are either 1. stated in a very judgmental manner or 2. not welcome at all. Sometimes this forum is worse than a few of my AS forums where very socially deficient people such as myself get into very heated arguments using less than socially-appropriate language, over issues which would make most of the parents on this forum cower and hide. When I first joined this group, I lurked for quite a while before posting here, because the messages I read were in my opinion very judgmental of differing opinions, and not nearly as supportive as I would expect from a group of parents and others who were theoretically in similar situations regarding their children. Every time I relax my philosophy of only replying here when I think I have something specific to contribute, I regret it because I receive flames. So every time that happens, I restrict my messages here. I have done so again, I now have returned to waiting for quite a while before replying to a message, to see what others may say which may make my reply not necessary, and only posting when I have something specific to offer. And if I ever do want to post a different opinion again, I will think very long and hard about whether or not it is worth the flames. So now I will answer your specific questions. > * > Dana, > I am concerned and confused. Why are you concerned and confused? It does sound like you are trying to NOT be judgmental, but then it does sound like you ARE judgmental. > If you know it is doing slight damage then > why is gluten allowed to be eaten? Because I have determined that for my child, the benefits of occasional infractions are worth any detriment incurred. Dana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 6, 2001 Report Share Posted October 6, 2001 " I choose to support parents in whatever is their decision regarding the best interest of their own child " Amen! I'm new to this group, so haven't come across the issues you brought up, but my belief is that we are all " experts " on our own children. Who else could love them, hope for them, work for them and sacrifice happily for them with our enthusiasm? Valeri Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 7, 2001 Report Share Posted October 7, 2001 Dana- We are in the middle of round 4 infraction/ infringement testing, because I want to believe that this diet will not be permanent. Expense, and cooking aside, my son was a normal baby until 18 months, until the " shut down (we are sure vaccination related) If he was able to eat these foods for 8 months prior to the vaccination, we are hoping he will some day be able to eat these foods again. I want to believe this diet is a bandaid, and not a permanent treatment. My husband and I believe that the longer you keep your children off of the food, the more likely they will never be likely to digest it. I have no problem with the expense,or baking, or inconvenience...Our infractions come because my son (who was TOTALLY out to lunch at 3), by 6 was pretty high functioning, and was able to remember the food we took away. MANY when they start this diet, have non-verbal, or lower functioning, or young children. My son SINCE we have put this diet in place, has constanly asked for food he couldn't have. Not for the high, I have to say, I am a good baker, my cookies are good, the pizza (with soy cheese) is as close as you can get, but the taste does not cut it. I have been on this diet as well, and I found myself craving foods, that when I ate them did not feel any worse for the wear....Autism is hard enough, there should never be any rivalry to opinions, but I think often people are verhy tense and comments are misunderstood. I have been " flamed " several times (some were not intentional, but I just misread the " emotion " behind the words " , and some were quite intentional, but knowing everyone typing has a child like mine, I give them the benefit of the doubt that they are strung out. I agree with you that even if opinions differ, we should all learn from difference, we all, may learn something new -Shari Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 7, 2001 Report Share Posted October 7, 2001 Hi , Sometimes when you are on the diet for an extended period, an infraction will not cause any affects. You probably gave the intestines adequate time to heal-temporarily-so 1 time doesn't hurt much. Removing arsenic and antinomy are important, but have you taken steps to remove these materials from his body? I think you got lucky, and could again, but I wouldn't push my luck. Sometimes it takes a while for reactions to begin again. I know someone who felt that enzymes were successful, when in actuality, symptoms began resurfacing after about 2 weeks when damage was done. It just took that long to show up again. Take Care, Wendi Gluten Confession > Help!!! I'm totally confused!!! > , who is 20 months old, has been GFCF for a > year now. He tested positive for both gluten and > casein peptides both in September of last year and > also again this summer. I have been dealing with > family members who refuse to believe in the diet, and > that he has any problems at all. They think I'm nuts, > but we have had infringements with pretzels once, and > one other time, it was wheat but I don't remember what > it was, and have always seen severe reactions to wheat > within a few hours. He became really aggressive, > stimmy, and was in a lot of intestinal pain. > Now to my confession: > Thursday, I was at the end of my rope with my mother. > I knew we were meeting her for lunch, so I let him > have wheat that morning. I know, very risky, but I > was in a bad state of mind. I let him eat half a > package of Ritz crackers! Here's the wierd part: NO > REACTION. Why??? I can't figure it out. Could it > have something to do with removing all sources of > antimony and arsenic? We did that in the early > summer. He's getting allergy shots 2x per week from > his DAN allergist. Could that make any difference? I > wouldn't think so. I just now got up the nerve to > confess to my husband. We're both stunned. Any > ideas, anyone? > , Confused in Missouri > > ===== > > > __________________________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.