Guest guest Posted April 8, 2011 Report Share Posted April 8, 2011 Dynamic Head shape change is based in a number of factors these include the following. As I read the plagio list I see the same questions again and again. Below I've listed 6 points that are critical in order to have success with a cranial remolding helmet. My involvement with cranial remolding helmets started in the early 1990s 1. Childs age and head circumference is a major factor to the effectiveness of the helmet. Where they fall on a standard CDC 0–36 month growth chart will determine how successful the helmet will be. Initially it is very dynamic in the 0-9 month range with rapid changes seen about 8mm per month in circumference. Less radical changes are seen in children 10 to 17 months - and for children in the 18 to 21 month range circumferential growth slow. Beyond 21 months growth is very slow; hence cranial molding is less effective in older children. 2. What are the child's activities - Is the child sleeping in the same position but with a helmet on? Is there a change? Is there active play time on their belly as this encourages neck strength and balance? These skills are all part of the developmental process. This is part of the head up pre-crawl pattern. 3. Are the care givers (parents) diligent about following the wearing schedule and not making excuses? Time in the helmet is what creates change in head shape combined with activities on their bellies. 4. When the child was seen for a helmet was the cast or scan the best possible? The quality of the data is the most important factor to good outcomes. 5. Follow up visits are a time to document dynamic changes. Are diagonal numbers getting closer to each other (showing less variance)? With dynamic growth a change in head circumference appears. 6. When manufactured, was shrinkage of plastic and foam sub straights compensated for, or did the helmet fit tight and they ground material away to make it fit initially? 7. It is extremely important that whomever you see is truly interested in a good outcome and not looking at your child's head shape as a corporate billing opportunity. > > Does anyone know if one works quicker than the other? we went for both consults and they told us that my baby would need a doc band for 8-12 weeks (and probably not a second one). we were told he would need the starband for 4-5 months. we went for both consults on the same day. was anyone else told something similar? does anyone know why it's so conflicting? > > thanks. i'm new the group, so your help is much appreciated! > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 8, 2011 Report Share Posted April 8, 2011 Well both numbers are guesses. It does seem that docbands work faster, but I don't know if this is a fact. Docbands are usually a bit closer fitting and adjustments are made more frequently, which means you might be able to direct new growth slightly better. However there is no guarantee of how long either band type will take and it depends on how good the fit and adjustments are as well as how fast your child's head grows. -christine sydney, 5 yrs, starband grad > > Does anyone know if one works quicker than the other? we went for both consults and they told us that my baby would need a doc band for 8-12 weeks (and probably not a second one). we were told he would need the starband for 4-5 months. we went for both consults on the same day. was anyone else told something similar? does anyone know why it's so conflicting? > > thanks. i'm new the group, so your help is much appreciated! > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.