Guest guest Posted December 22, 2001 Report Share Posted December 22, 2001 Deb, I have been laid off since June and am hoping (expecting) to have the surgery in February (provided all goes well with my insurance.) I think being laid off is the perfect opportunity to have the full surgery for all the reasons you mentioned especially since it's really not a good idea to have to take off for an extended period of time after recently starting a new job when you need the rest of the surgery. I'm looking at this time as a gift of time to take care of myself for a change. Best of luck in whatever you decide. Good luck in your journey. ann Questions regarding VG portion versus full DS Hello, all - Part of me wants to just do the VG part of the procedure first, see how much weight I lose over a year, then decide on the malabsorption part. The quality of life issues and risks that can be a big negative after WLS are primarily linked to malabsorption. The doctor I plan to use in VA prefers to do this two-part surgery with patients weighing over 350 lbs, but since I carry most of my weight in my hips rather than my belly, it may be an option to do the entire DS. By just doing the VG portion, I could also see if I have an acceptable weight loss result before continuing with the more life changing malabsorption. Weight loss is considerably slower this way, however. Any thoughts, comments, feedback from people who have done either the VG alone or the DS? I think the most relevant experiences would be from people who started with a high BMI over 50 like me (57). Thank you! Deb C. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 22, 2001 Report Share Posted December 22, 2001 Hi Deb! The people you mentioned who have lots of problems, have they had the DS or the RNY? I'd be surprised if you know a lot of people with the DS who are having those problems long term. There's pleny of helpful info on this at www.duodenalswitch.com. That may help you make a decision. I'm a recent postie so I can't speak for long terms but I have no problem getting in my vitamins or meds so far. Good luck in whatever you decide! Tracey in Santee (San Diego) I'm tempted to ask to do the whole DS in light of these risks, but really *really* worried about the malabsorption effect. I know lots of people who have had WLS with ongoing problems... pains, inability to take meds, vitamin deficiencies, etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 23, 2001 Report Share Posted December 23, 2001 Hello Deb C.: If I were considering undergoing the vertical gastroplasty or " sleeve gastrectomy " instead of the full BPD/DS, I think I'd try to get a second opinion from a BPD/DS surgeon who's done plenty of revisions (perhaps Dr. Hess or Dr. Maguire)? I'd be interested in such a surgeon's opinion as to the likelihood that I'd reach goal weight, or near it, by having the second half of the BPD/DS done after having regained all the weight I'd lost with the stomach-only portion. The reason I'd state the scenario so pessimistically is that I suspect that many or most of Hazem Elariny's patients who have had or will be having what they call the " sleeve " will not be seeking the second half of the operation until they've regained most or all of what they lose after having the first half done. That's because the surgeon himself is encouraging his patients to believe that they can and should learn better eating habits via behavior modification, etc., that should make getting the second half unnecessary. A " you can do it with just the sleeve " culture is developing among Elariny's patients, and that atmosphere, combined with the memory of the unpleasantness of the recovery period after abdominal surgery and the possibility that " sleevers " will have difficulty getting insurance approval for the second half after their BMI's have fallen below the morbidly-obese range, is likely to keep such patients trying valiantly to keep the weight off with the sleeve alone until their weight nears or exceeds its previous high. And the weight is likely to come back, because the sleeve gastrectomy, like all purely restrictive surgeries, provides one with nothing more than assistance in dieting. And most diets fail, which is why we're all here. Until this year, when Elariny began pitching the sleeve gastrectomy as a stand-alone operation, weight regain after the first half wasn't much of an issue because surgeons were performing the BPD/DS in two parts only on patients whose very high BMI's made prolonged anesthesia risky. The second part of the BPD/DS was always done, and it was always done while the weight loss with the sleeve portion was still proceeding. My understanding is that a revision to the BPD/DS is less likely to bring a patient close to goal weight after most or all of the original weight has been regained. Yes, I suppose the second half of the BPD/DS wouldn't constitute a revision, strictly speaking, but it does seem that the " sleever " would be in an analogous situation. You will lose weight perforce in the first couple of months after a sleeve gastrectomy, and probably lots of it, because your healing stomach won't hold much and you'll want less than it can hold. As the months go on, you'll be able to eat more food and more types of food, just as we BPD/DS'ers can, but unlike us, you will find yourself relying more and more on willpower to keep the pounds coming off. Nearly ten months after my BPD/DS, my stomach is still much smaller than it used to be, but, were it not for my malabsorption, could I easily eat enough through the day, in small meals and " grazing, " to put back on every one of the well over 100 pounds that I've lost? Absolutely. The very qualities of the sleeve gastrectomy that make post-op life so pleasant for us BPD/DS'ers are those that make it a lame assistant in weight loss for those who've undergone the stomach modification alone. I do respect your fears of malabsorption. If you're determined to stick with a purely restrictive surgery, why not consider the adjustable gastric band (LapBand)? It's much less invasive than the sleeve gastrectomy, and, unlike that operation, was designed to stand alone. It can also be easily adjusted to make your stomach smaller after the early post-op months of easy weight loss have passed. I have read that Elariny either is now offering the LapBand or that he soon will be. Best of luck. Kay B. Lap BPD/DS - 3/01 Dr. Ren Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.