Guest guest Posted November 9, 2004 Report Share Posted November 9, 2004 I think my insurance problems have been solved...at least as far as I can tell from my current situation. So I am thinking seriously about making an appointment with Dr Lehman because of some strong encouragement from a friend. But I am deeply conflicted about this. Some of my arguments against going is that I am tired of being treated with such disdain and hostility or just as a bother to the doctor. And I am fairly stable with my pain and disability...that is, I have bad weeks interrupted by occasional good days. I have problems with food, but not as bad as last year when my minor papilla was completely closed (I have pancreas divisum). I am on 30mg of oxycodone a day and about 12 to 15mg zofran. I still have days when the pain is pretty unbearable but I can get through it by doubling up on the oxycodone. My quality of life is not that good, but then it could be lots worse too. I do not have acute attacks requiring hospitalization, I can work around my job....but I have no social life (soon as I get home it is off to bed). I also have no local doctors who are willing to treat me for this condition when I have flares that I feel are beyond my ability to manage. The reasons for seeing him is that he has a great reputation: I have not heard a bad thing about him! and in fact, he seems to do miracles. As far as personally, I currently do not have any doctor that is managing my pancreas divisum other than my pain doctor. I believe that it is in my best interest to have a GI guy that is familiar with PD and my history specifically, in case I need yearly follow-up or even urgent care in case my illness decides to progress or for those time when I believe I cannot manage my care by myself. So my questions are: is there anything that he can offer me at this time seeing that my condition is relatively stable? Will he look at my needs and history specifically or just give me a general prognosis that we all know applies to the uncertainties of CP. Will he insist on taking a look himself, as in doing an ERCP, or will he just go by my word about previous ERCPs and surgeries. If I decline an ERCP at this time, because I feel that I am relatively stable (other than a possible pseudocyst that was never positively confirmed), will it be a wasted trip and wasted time on his part? Part of me says to just ignore things, to not play with fire at this point because each time I have someone mess around with me, I end up worse off than I was before hand...but then part of me says that this is way too much for me to handle on my own...that there will come a day when I will need the expertise of a GI guy to either re-stent me, or handle a flare or heaven forbid, an acute attack and that is no time to be doctor shopping. But, is this the way to go? Is he really that good? Or will it be the standard, " there is nothing I can offer you " spiel? I hate to drive 5 hours for a half hour visit leaving me more confused and depressed than I was before leaving home......But then, if he really can address my history and present condition with any kind of special knowledge and offer advice and further care as needed.....then that would be a welcome relief! a security blanket, a load lifted off my shoulders! (you get the idea). Any thoughts? Laurie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 11, 2004 Report Share Posted November 11, 2004 Laurie, Personally, I think everyone should have a Gastroenterologist on their health team. If you were a person with a serious heart defect or heart disease, would you go to a general practitioner or a cardiologist? You have a specialised medical problem that needs to be under the care of a specialised physician. That's my personal take on the whole thing. Dr. Lehman DOES have a reputation for excellence and is nationally known throughout his field. Having him as part of your health care team would only be a benefit. While there may not be anything that he can do for you at the present time, the time may come in the future that you need experienced medical care for your chronic pancreatitis, as it is a PROGRESSIVE disease. Although you are handling it well now and you're feeling pretty good, with only typical flares and relatively few problems, that situation could change overnight. I'm not saying that it's going to, but if it did, who would you go to for specialised advice? And as you said, during the middle of a crisis is no time to be doctor shopping. As far as him " taking your word " on your previous ERCP's, I don't think he would. He would want to see the records of any previous ERCP's, procedures or tests, I imagine. The thing to do would be for you to get your copies of any previous surgery, radiology reports, CT-scans, etc. You should have a copy of ALL your records, and if you don't have one, now is the time to start collecting them. I have copies of all my records; each doctor's visit, each test, every CT-scan, ultrasound, radiologist's report, all hospitalizations, etc. from my first diagnosis of AP up until my last visit last month. No doctor worth his salt is going to just take a patient's word, they need to see documentation. As far as him wanting to do another ERCP for his own analysis, if you don't want one done, you always have the last word. It may be that at this time he WOULD just give you the " spiel " , because at this time it may be that there isn't anything more that he could do to alter your present state. Are you going to see him to ask if he CAN do something more, or just to establish a patient treatment history? If you DO want him to see if he can do more for you, well then he probably would need to do an ERCP to find out how things look right now. Otherwise, he'd probably just advise you to continue on as you have been and return again if there are any new developments or any change in your status quo. Your comment about the pseudocyst caught my eye. If it were me, I'd want to have that confirmed as a positive yes, there is one, or no, there isn't. If there is one and it's 2 cm. or less, it's no big deal and probably nothing to worry about, but if there is one, and it's more than that, you really do need to know about it. I can tell you, by experience, that larger pseudocysts can be trouble and they do need to be monitored. You really need to have this verified, one way or the other. I hope this helps answer some of your concerns. Please understand that this is just my own opinion on your situation. With love, hope and prayers, Heidi Heidi H.Griffeth South Carolina State Rep. Southeastern Rep. , PAI Note: All comments or advice are based on personl experience or opinion only, and should not be substituted for professional medical consultation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 12, 2004 Report Share Posted November 12, 2004 Dear Laurie, I so understand your reluctance at seeing another Md after your experience with your last Pancreas Md. Remember, I also saw the same jerks in Milwaukee. They told me I just had to learn to live with it and there were no treatments that could help me. I gave up for over a year after that and just lived on pain meds, liquids and tried different pain clinic ideas to stop the pain but nothing worked for long. I finally agreed to see Dr. Lehman. He will NEVER treat you with disdain or hostility. He fully understands this disease and really cares about his patients. No one can fully understand this until you meet him. I was also very leary because of my treatment by the Mds in Milwaukee. But I thank God everyday that I went to Dr. Lehman. When I went the first time, I brought no records from the Milwaukee Md. I wanted him to base his opinion himself, not by the notes of those jerks. I did tell him what happend in Milwaukee. But I also told him to go in and see whats up and if he sees a problem to try and fix it. If it means a flair to get better, then so be it. But the decision will be yours. He will tell you what options you have and the decision will be yours. My personal feeling is to let him do the ERCP so he can see where you are at now. For me, the ERCP alone does not cause a flair. I get flairs when they do something, like spicterotomies, stenting, dialation of the ducts, etc... With my last progressive stenting I only flaired bad with the first stent. The next 2 went real smooth. I guess because the duct was already opened from the first stent. But again, that decision will be yours. Can you get the films from your last ERCP? If so, then perhaps that will be enough for him to evaluate your case. But being that psuedocysts are a possibility he may want some sort of test to evaluate that? I never had psuedocysts so not sure what test they do to look at that. But what ever you decide it will NOT be a wasted trip. He will tell you what options you have. I am very blessed that he is part of my medical team. As you stated, we never know what will happen in the future and it is nice to know that I have one of the best to go to if things turn for the worse. Having an MD who knows this disease and believes me has sooo lifted a load off my shoulders. I hope you call and make your appointment. You will so kick yourself for worrying so much once you meet him. If I can answer any other questions, please ask. Love, w my questions are: is there anything that he can offer me at > this time seeing that my condition is relatively stable? Will he > look at my needs and history specifically or just give me a > general prognosis that we all know applies to the uncertainties > of CP. Will he insist on taking a look himself, as in doing an > ERCP, or will he just go by my word about previous ERCPs and > surgeries. If I decline an ERCP at this time, because I feel that I > am relatively stable (other than a possible pseudocyst that was > never positively confirmed), will it be a wasted trip and wasted > time on his part? Part of me says to just ignore things, to not > play with fire at this point because each time I have someone > mess around with me, I end up worse off than I was before > hand...but then part of me says that this is way too much for me > to handle on my own...that there will come a day when I will need > the expertise of a GI guy to either re-stent me, or handle a flare or > heaven forbid, an acute attack and that is no time to be doctor > shopping. But, is this the way to go? Is he really that good? Or > will it be the standard, " there is nothing I can offer you " spiel? I > hate to drive 5 hours for a half hour visit leaving me more > confused and depressed than I was before leaving home......But > then, if he really can address my history and present condition > with any kind of special knowledge and offer advice and further > care as needed.....then that would be a welcome relief! a security > blanket, a load lifted off my shoulders! (you get the idea). Any > thoughts? > > Laurie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.