Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

RE: diagnosis for cd

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

If you want a " gold " diagnosis for purposes of managing the " system " and not

having to fight as hard when you are not competent to do so, or if you need

outside verification in order to stay off the wheat then no.

There are other (blood) tests that return many false negatives, there are

saliva and stool tests that are not accepted by regular doctors, there are

gene tests that tell you if you have the genes for gluten sensitivity, there

are antibody tests and fat absorption tests and a couple of others.

If you just want to know that is wheat, rye, barley and oats that are doing

you in AND you have gut issues that you can personally identify, then just

staying very, very clear of wheat, rye, barley and oats for 2 weeks will

tell you. But stay on it until you get the biopsy if that is the test you

want, because you can cause a false negative if you are not currently really

tearing up your gut.

The biopsy is not difficult, doesn't hurt and is done under anathesia. They

take samples of your small intestine and look at it under the microscope to

find the atrophied villi.

And of course, your insurance pays and therefore knows.

Connie

-----Original Message-----

From: [mailto: ]

On Behalf Of s_setya

Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 5:55 PM

Subject: [ ] diagnosis for cd

Hi Guys,

My Doctor is pretty confident that I have celiac's disease... he has

referred me to a gastroenterologist to have a endoscopy/biopsy to

confirm the same... my question is that teh only way for a confirmed

diagnosis?? is there no other way? -S

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

That's true--have you had the bloodwork done yet?

----- Original Message -----

From: s_setya

Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 5:55 PM

Subject: [ ] diagnosis for cd

Hi Guys,My Doctor is pretty confident that I have celiac's disease... he hasreferred me to a gastroenterologist to have a endoscopy/biopsy toconfirm the same... my question is that teh only way for a confirmeddiagnosis?? is there no other way? -S

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

A positive biopsy finding is usually the most reliable diagnostic tool,

but there are also blood antigen tests which often suffice for some

doctors to make a diagnosis.

Unfortunately the blood tests are often inaccurate, so the

biopsy method is often considered most reliable.

It is probably best if you do not start the gluten free diet until

after all biopsy and blood samples have been taken.

--

Steve Rider

http://SensibleCeliac.com/

On 5/4/05, s_setya <s_setya@...> wrote:

> Hi Guys,

>

> My Doctor is pretty confident that I have celiac's disease... he has

> referred me to a gastroenterologist to have a endoscopy/biopsy to

> confirm the same... my question is that teh only way for a confirmed

> diagnosis?? is there no other way? -S

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I agree with most of what is written below EXCEPT that 2 weeks off of gluten will tell you anything. That is not long enough at all by my experience, and based on what I was told by my gastroentologist.Connie Hampton <connie@...> wrote:

If you want a "gold" diagnosis for purposes of managing the "system" and nothaving to fight as hard when you are not competent to do so, or if you needoutside verification in order to stay off the wheat then no.There are other (blood) tests that return many false negatives, there aresaliva and stool tests that are not accepted by regular doctors, there aregene tests that tell you if you have the genes for gluten sensitivity, thereare antibody tests and fat absorption tests and a couple of others.If you just want to know that is wheat, rye, barley and oats that are doingyou in AND you have gut issues that you can personally identify, then juststaying very, very clear of wheat, rye, barley and oats for 2 weeks willtell you. But stay on it until you get the biopsy if that is the test youwant, because you can cause a

false negative if you are not currently reallytearing up your gut.The biopsy is not difficult, doesn't hurt and is done under anathesia. Theytake samples of your small intestine and look at it under the microscope tofind the atrophied villi. And of course, your insurance pays and therefore knows.Connie -----Original Message-----From: [mailto: ]On Behalf Of s_setyaSent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 5:55 PM Subject: [ ] diagnosis for cdHi Guys,My Doctor is pretty confident that I have celiac's disease... he hasreferred me to a gastroenterologist to have a endoscopy/biopsy toconfirm the same... my question is that teh only way for a confirmeddiagnosis?? is there no other way? -S

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Has a tissue transglutaminase (tTG) blood test been done? It seems to

me this test is the most sensitive and specific out of the blood tests

offered to test for celiac disease. Also, since the upper endoscopy /

small bowel biopsy is considered the " gold standard " for diagnosing

celiac disease, it may be a good idea to simply get this test done to

know (almost) for sure whether or not you have the disease. That way

you don't have to deal with staying off gluten for a test period. In

particular, the biopsy works out well if your insurance covers the

test (it should). Good luck!

If you want a " gold " diagnosis

for purposes of managing the " system " and not

> having to fight as hard when you are not competent to do so, or if

you need

> outside verification in order to stay off the wheat then no.

>

> There are other (blood) tests that return many false negatives,

there are

> saliva and stool tests that are not accepted by regular doctors,

there are

> gene tests that tell you if you have the genes for gluten

sensitivity, there

> are antibody tests and fat absorption tests and a couple of others.

>

> If you just want to know that is wheat, rye, barley and oats that

are doing

> you in AND you have gut issues that you can personally identify,

then just

> staying very, very clear of wheat, rye, barley and oats for 2 weeks will

> tell you. But stay on it until you get the biopsy if that is the

test you

> want, because you can cause a false negative if you are not

currently really

> tearing up your gut.

>

> The biopsy is not difficult, doesn't hurt and is done under

anathesia. They

> take samples of your small intestine and look at it under the

microscope to

> find the atrophied villi.

>

> And of course, your insurance pays and therefore knows.

>

>

>

> Connie

>

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From:

[mailto: ]

> On Behalf Of s_setya

> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 5:55 PM

>

> Subject: [ ] diagnosis for cd

>

> Hi Guys,

>

> My Doctor is pretty confident that I have celiac's disease... he has

> referred me to a gastroenterologist to have a endoscopy/biopsy to

> confirm the same... my question is that teh only way for a confirmed

> diagnosis?? is there no other way? -S

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hey S_Setya

–They do the endoscopy outpatient now, and with the drugs they use, you’ll

likely not remember a thing about the procedure. You will want to take the whole day off and have family or

friends take you there and home.

I’m a

celiac that had negative results on all the blood tests. My biopsy/endoscopy showed lots of

inflammation and damage, hence the pain and diarrhea. It’s the way to get direct evidence of what’s going on in

your intestines. Once you know, the

diet changes can give you back your life.

It’s as simple (or as hard) as not eating gluten anymore.

To fight

the inflammation, some doctors give prednisone. It’s a powerful drug that works, but with lots of un-fun

side effects (says she who was on 60 mg/day). They now have entocort, and it has much fewer side effects. Of course, it costs more too.

At the

Stanford Celiac conference last October, they said this was one of the easier

immune diseases in that we can stop the problems by avoiding gluten. I hadn’t thought of it in those terms

before…

Good luck whatever

you choose to do.

http://www.celiac.com/st_prod.html?p_prodid=946

-

-----Original

Message-----

From:

[mailto: ]On Behalf Of Naren Wadhwani

Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005

11:03 PM

Subject: RE: [ ]

diagnosis for cd

I agree with

most of what is written below EXCEPT that 2 weeks off of gluten will tell you

anything. That is not long enough at all by my experience, and based on

what I was told by my gastroentologist.

Connie Hampton

<connie@...> wrote:

If you want a " gold " diagnosis for purposes of managing

the " system " and not

having to fight as hard when you are not competent to do so, or if you need

outside verification in order to stay off the wheat then no.

There are other (blood) tests that return many false negatives, there are

saliva and stool tests that are not accepted by regular doctors, there are

gene tests that tell you if you have the genes for gluten sensitivity,

there

are antibody tests and fat absorption tests and a couple of others.

If you just want to know that is wheat, rye, barley and oats that are doing

you in AND you have gut issues that you can personally identify, then just

staying very, very clear of wheat, rye, barley and oats for 2 weeks will

tell you. But stay on it until you get the biopsy if that is the test

you

want, because you can cau! se a false negative if you are not currently

really

tearing up your gut.

The biopsy is not difficult, doesn't hurt and is done under

anathesia. They

take samples of your small intestine and look at it under the microscope to

find the atrophied villi.

And of course, your insurance pays and therefore knows.

Connie

-----Original Message-----

From: [mailto: ]

On Behalf Of s_setya

Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 5:55 PM

Subject: [ ] diagnosis for cd

Hi Guys,

My Doctor is pretty confident that I have celiac's disease... he has

referred me to a gastroenterologist to have a endoscopy/biopsy to

confirm the same... my question is that teh only way for a confirmed

diagnosis?? is there no other way? -S

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

, after your procedures showed damage, did they then finally give you a diagnosis of celiac disease? My daughter and I are both diagnosed celiacs. My 30-year old son was "allergic" to wheat when he was a baby and "grew out of it." Recently, they did four blood tests on him because of the unbelievable gas he has after eating (my big symptom before being diagnosed). All blood tests came back negative. I'm just wondering if he should go to his doctor and demand an endoscope procedure. Thanks.

Hersom susan.hersom@...

From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of AvilesSent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 8:49 AM Subject: RE: [ ] diagnosis for cd

Hey S_Setya –They do the endoscopy outpatient now, and with the drugs they use, you’ll likely not remember a thing about the procedure. You will want to take the whole day off and have family or friends take you there and home.

I’m a celiac that had negative results on all the blood tests. My biopsy/endoscopy showed lots of inflammation and damage, hence the pain and diarrhea. It’s the way to get direct evidence of what’s going on in your intestines. Once you know, the diet changes can give you back your life. It’s as simple (or as hard) as not eating gluten anymore.

To fight the inflammation, some doctors give prednisone. It’s a powerful drug that works, but with lots of un-fun side effects (says she who was on 60 mg/day). They now have entocort, and it has much fewer side effects. Of course, it costs more too.

At the Stanford Celiac conference last October, they said this was one of the easier immune diseases in that we can stop the problems by avoiding gluten. I hadn’t thought of it in those terms before…

Good luck whatever you choose to do.

http://www.celiac.com/st_prod.html?p_prodid=946

-

-----Original Message-----From: [mailto: ]On Behalf Of Naren WadhwaniSent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 11:03 PM Subject: RE: [ ] diagnosis for cd

I agree with most of what is written below EXCEPT that 2 weeks off of gluten will tell you anything. That is not long enough at all by my experience, and based on what I was told by my gastroentologist.Connie Hampton <connie@...> wrote:

If you want a "gold" diagnosis for purposes of managing the "system" and nothaving to fight as hard when you are not competent to do so, or if you needoutside verification in order to stay off the wheat then no.There are other (blood) tests that return many false negatives, there aresaliva and stool tests that are not accepted by regular doctors, there aregene tests that tell you if you have the genes for gluten sensitivity, thereare antibody tests and fat absorption tests and a couple of others.If you just want to know that is wheat, rye, barley and oats that are doingyou in AND you have gut issues that you can personally identify, then juststaying very, very clear of wheat, rye, barley and oats for 2 weeks willtell you. But stay on it until you get the biopsy if that is the test youwant, because you can cau! se a false negative if you are not currently reallytearing up your gut.The biopsy is not difficult, doesn't hurt and is done under anathesia. Theytake samples of your small intestine and look at it under the microscope tofind the atrophied villi. And of course, your insurance pays and therefore knows.Connie -----Original Message-----From: [mailto: ]On Behalf Of s_setyaSent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 5:55 PM Subject: [ ] diagnosis for cdHi Guys,My Doctor is pretty confident that I have celiac's disease... he hasreferred me to a gastroenterologist to have a endoscopy/biopsy toconfirm the same... my question is that teh only way for a confirmeddiagnosis?? is there no other way? -S

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

It was once believed that CD was something of a pediatric disease, and that kids "grew out of it." It's now known that children with CD (as opposed to an allergy) do not get rid of the disease; the symptoms simply go away. The damage may continue, unobserved. If you have CD, you have it for life.

As you probably know, CD, along with autoimmune diseases in general, is highl

Blood tests are notorious for false negatives.

Best wishes.

Harper

In a message dated 5/5/05 9:01:35 AM, susan.hersom@... writes:

, after your procedures showed damage, did they then finally give you a diagnosis of celiac disease?  My daughter and I are both diagnosed celiacs.  My 30-year old son was "allergic" to wheat when he was a baby and "grew out of it."  Recently, they did four blood tests on him because of the unbelievable gas he has after eating (my big symptom before being diagnosed).  All blood tests came back negative.  I'm just wondering if he should go to his doctor and demand an endoscope procedure.  Thanks.

 

Hersom 

susan.hersom@...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

An endoscopy is reasonable, since it’s in your family and he’s starting

to have intestinal problems. Sadly,

many doctors aren’t up on the latest research (it’s not just the young, it’s

not just the thin, and it’s not just the anemic). Here’s a link with information your son can take to his

doctor – both making his case and helping the doctor be better prepared for the

next celiac.

http://digestive.niddk.nih.gov/ddiseases/pubs/celiac/

It was the pattern of intestinal damage and villi erosion in the

biopsies that made it clear that I am a celiac. But it didn’t show up until my mid 30’s. I could cry when I think of the years I

spent feeling sick, able to do less and less. Now that you mention it, lots of gas was the earliest sign

(that I missed at the time). The

test can show he’s fine (for now) or give him a chance to chose health instead

of having him lose years of his life to not feeling quite right.

Now that I’m feeling better, I have to constantly remind myself that a

little bit will STILL cause damage, even if it doesn’t make me run to the

bathroom like before. The Stanford

conference opened my eyes at how much silent damage I could be causing myself by

cheating and eating wheat.

Good luck to you and your family –

-----Original

Message-----

From:

[mailto: ]On Behalf Of Hersom, A.

Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 8:54

AM

Subject: RE: [ ]

diagnosis for cd

, after

your procedures showed damage, did they then finally give you a diagnosis of

celiac disease? My daughter and I are both diagnosed celiacs. My

30-year old son was " allergic " to wheat when he was a baby and

" grew out of it. " Recently, they did four blood tests on him

because of the unbelievable gas he has after eating (my big symptom before

being diagnosed). All blood tests came back negative. I'm just

wondering if he should go to his doctor and demand an endoscope procedure.

Thanks.

Hersom

susan.hersom@...

From:

[mailto: ] On

Behalf Of Aviles

Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 8:49

AM

Subject: RE: [ ]

diagnosis for cd

Hey S_Setya –They do the endoscopy outpatient now,

and with the drugs they use, you’ll likely not remember a thing about the

procedure. You will want to take

the whole day off and have family or friends take you there and home.

I’m a celiac that had negative results on all the

blood tests. My biopsy/endoscopy

showed lots of inflammation and damage, hence the pain and diarrhea. It’s the way to get direct evidence of

what’s going on in your intestines.

Once you know, the diet changes can give you back your life. It’s as simple (or as hard) as not

eating gluten anymore.

To fight the inflammation, some doctors give

prednisone. It’s a powerful drug

that works, but with lots of un-fun side effects (says she who was on 60

mg/day). They now have entocort,

and it has much fewer side effects.

Of course, it costs more too.

At the Stanford Celiac conference last October, they

said this was one of the easier immune diseases in that we can stop the

problems by avoiding gluten. I

hadn’t thought of it in those terms before…

Good luck whatever you choose to do.

http://www.celiac.com/st_prod.html?p_prodid=946

-

-----Original

Message-----

From:

[mailto: ]On Behalf Of Naren Wadhwani

Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005

11:03 PM

Subject: RE: [ ]

diagnosis for cd

I agree with

most of what is written below EXCEPT that 2 weeks off of gluten will tell you

anything. That is not long enough at all by my experience, and based on

what I was told by my gastroentologist.

Connie Hampton

<connie@...> wrote:

If you want a " gold " diagnosis for purposes of managing

the " system " and not

having to fight as hard when you are not competent to do so, or if you need

outside verification in order to stay off the wheat then no.

There are other (blood) tests that return many false negatives, there are

saliva and stool tests that are not accepted by regular doctors, there are

gene tests that tell you if you have the genes for gluten sensitivity,

there

are antibody tests and fat absorption tests and a couple of others.

If you just want to know that is wheat, rye, barley and oats that are doing

you in AND you have gut issues that you can personally identify, then just

staying very, very clear of wheat, rye, barley and oats for 2 weeks will

tell you. But stay on it until you get the biopsy if that is the test

you

want, because you can cau! se a false negative if you are not currently

really

tearing up your gut.

The biopsy is not difficult, doesn't hurt and is done under

anathesia. They

take samples of your small intestine and look at it under the microscope to

find the atrophied villi.

And of course, your insurance pays and therefore knows.

Connie

-----Original Message-----

From: [mailto: ]

On Behalf Of s_setya

Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 5:55 PM

Subject: [ ] diagnosis for cd

Hi Guys,

My Doctor is pretty confident that I have celiac's disease... he has

referred me to a gastroenterologist to have a endoscopy/biopsy to

confirm the same... my question is that teh only way for a confirmed

diagnosis?? is there no other way? -S

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...