Guest guest Posted October 16, 2000 Report Share Posted October 16, 2000 This statement was posted in MGB Truth and I believe it has some value for those who are researching WLS. From: Barry Fisher, MD <bfisher@m...> Date: Mon Oct 16, 2000 6:18pm Subject: My final post Unfortunately, I have neither the time nor the patience to read all the activity on this email group. Sue Widmark received a copy of one of my articles which documented the association of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and obesity. She has said that I mentioned RNY and Bile Reflux in that article. This was taken out of context. I said that I would hypothesize the cause of relief from acid reflux symptoms might be due to alkaline reflux, However, this was conjecture, and the facts have since shown that not to be the case. I am impressed with the depth of feelings exhibited by posters to this site. I am also impressed with the effect these feelings produce which closes peoples minds to other ideas. In 1962, the first Loop Gastric Bypass was performed. In 1977, bariatric surgeons observed a 12-20% incidence of alkaline reflux esophagitis in patients who had undergone Loop (Billroth II) Gastric Bypass. At the turn of the century, Dr. Roux, a french surgeon, had introduced the RNY procedure to treat reflux disease occurring following Billroth II procedures. He was not aware of the distinction between acid and alkaline reflux at that time, He only knew that conversion to the RNY following Billroth II solved the patients symptoms. Therefore, in 1977, bariatric surgeons began abandoning Loop Gastric Bypass procedures in favor of other operations, including the RNY gastric bypass. This has resulted in the practical elimination of finding esophagitis following gastric bypass surgery, as long as the gastric bypass remained intact. These are the facts, before abandoning Loop Gastric Bypass a 12-20% incidence of esophagitis, after, a virtual elimination of this finding. The MGB is a Loop gastric bypass. Finally, those who have read the site containing statements by numerous bariatric surgeons, (including Ed Mason, the inventor of the gastric bypass procedure) must ask themselves why these surgeons have made these public statements in opposition to the MGB. We have nothing to gain by doing this. I have no ax to grind with anyone. I simply fear that bariatric surgery will be besmirched by someone reviving an operation that had been abandoned in the past, because it produced no better weight control, and caused more complications that other bariatric surgery procedures. There is no reason to believe that it should cause any fewer complications than other laparoscopic gastric bypass procedures. There is some reason to believe that it will be responsible for complications not found with other laparoscopic gastric bypass procedures. Therefore, I will not be offering MGB, and I recommend against this procedure. We live in a time when people are encouraged to be involved in their medical decision making. So be it. There is a reasonable probability that over time, 10-20% of these patients will undergo revision to RNY as they develop symptoms or alkaline reflux esophagitis. There is a reasonable probability that the weight loss pattern following this operation will be close to that of other forms of gastric bypass, There is no reason to believe otherwise. There is a reasonable probability that the weight regained 2-10 years following surgery will be slightly more that following other gastric bypass procedures, because the stomach pouch is larger than in the other operations being performed today (if the segment of intestine being bypassed is the same). Therefore, if 80% of patients have no alkaline reflux, and retain 40%? excess weight loss over time, this is not a disaster. It is just that it is below the present standard of care to reintroduce an operation that has the proven potential to cause more problems without the potential to increase benefit for the patient. Good luck to you who are in search of reason and a healthy life. B Fisher, M Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.