Guest guest Posted September 3, 2004 Report Share Posted September 3, 2004 percy wrote: I talked to my doctor about antioxidant treatments as I have learned that s= ome of people w/CP had success with adding them to their regeim for pain contro= l. > Has anyone else heard about this? (snip) heard some where that some 22% had success with antioxidants (thats= not bad odds). Percy, I've been taking the antioxidants listed below for nearly three years now, = and do believe they help with my overall health and with my pain situations wit= h CP. I'm printing a copy of an article I recently sent in to the message bo= ard on this very subject. Drug Watch: Antioxidant Therapy for Recurrent Pancreatitis There is little to offer patients with recurrent pancreatitis in way of tre= atment. Thesepatients suffer considerable pain, and about the only measure that wil= l guarantee long-term pain relief is near-total pancreatectomy - which carrie= s the penalties of malabsorption and brittle diabetes. Though the number of patients with chronic pancreatitis will be small across the UK, there may b= e pockets of relatively high prevalence, largely in deprived areas. These patients will consume significant amounts of health service resources - eve= n more if near-total pancreatectomy is carried out. Any therapy which can be = shown to be effective in chronic pancreatitis will therefore have an impact on healthcare provision. Causes of pancreatitis There is accumulating evidence that oxidant stress resulting from an excess= of pro-oxidant over antioxidant has a key role in acute oedematous pancreatitis aswell as painful exacerbations of chronic disease. Cytokines = like platelet activation factor (PAF) have also been shown to be involved with development of the acute disease in animal models, but it is likely that th= e prime insult which triggers pancreatitis is oxidant stress. Antioxidant therapy? From this, it would seem likely that therapy with antioxidants should help = to prevent pancreatitis - especially recurrent pancreatitis. A randomised, controlled,= double-blind, double dummy, crossover study from the Manchester Royal Infirmary has shown this to be the case. Twenty patients with chronic pancreatitis (8 idiopathic, 7 alcoholic and 5 idiopathic acute) entered the= study in which micronutrient antioxidant therapy was compared with placebo,= each for a 20-week period. Patients took six tablets of selenium Ace (Wasse= n International) and eight tablets of methionine ( Medical Ltd) in divid= ed doses, giving a daily total of: 600 µg organic selenium 9000 IU beta-carotene 0.54 g vitamin C 270 IU vitamin E 2 g methionine Results This was a thorough and detailed study. The bare-bones of the results werth= at while six patients had an attack while on placebo, not one had an attack wh= ile on active medication. Pain scores were significantly lower on active treatment than on placebo an= d at baseline. The blood concentrations of a free radical 'marker' - the percentage molar ratio of 9,11-linoleic acid to 9,12-linoleic acid - were elevated at baseline and in patients on placebo, but was normalised by acti= ve treatment. Benefits and costs Treatment would entail a maximum cost of about £15 a month (1990 prices), with possibly a 50% reduction after six months. This financial outlay is sm= all compared with the cost in terms of the mortality, morbidity, narcotic use, = malnutrition and brittle diabetes of near-total pancreatectomy. Reference: S Uden et al. Antioxidant therapy for recurrent pancreatitis: placebo contr= olled trial. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 1990 4: 357-71. Questions to be Answered Q: What need is met by this therapy? A: Treatment of patients with chronic or recurrent acute pancreatitis. Q: What happens now? A: Patients are treated with analgesics, or may go on to near-total pancreatectomy resulting in malabsorption and diabetes. Q: Is quality improved? A: Yes - patients on this treatment do not have pain. Q: What does the treatment cost? A: Less than £15 per month per patient. Q: Can cost savings be made? A: Yes - though not quantified, the cost of treatment with antioxidants is = = likely to be much less than present treatments. Advice to Health Authorities and GPFHs Will increase quality and effectiveness. May result in reduced costs. Worth considering in specification. I hope this helps. With love, hope and prayers, Heidi Heidi H. Griffeth South Carolina SC & SE Regional Rep PAI Note: All comments or advice are based on personal experience or opinion only, and shoud not be substitued for professional medical consultation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.