Re: RE: editing replies - mandatory

[Guest guest]

I presently receive this list in digest form, but I was thinking of going to

individual emails .... has anyone found the individual email form to be faster

to read through?

Lucille

In a message dated 12/15/2003 1:28:33 AM Eastern Standard Time,

Graduate-OSSG writes:

>

>

> You know, some of us don't get the original posts so having it attached

> is quite helpful. Yahoo can be quite arbitrary in who receives which

> posts some times. JMO

> Amber/FL

>

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 12/15/03 7:11:38 AM Central Standard Time, DisDog@...

writes:

> has anyone found the individual email form to be faster to read through?

> ------------

OMG YES!!! I used to get digest and it drove me CRAZY!!! You'd frequently

get " digests " embedded in digests -- and frequently, it would be so large that

it would come as a file that I had to download to read.

Getting 75 individual messages isn't bad at all... I pull them up and keep my

hand on the delete key.. many messages are only a line or two... I then hit

delete and the next message in my inbox pops up. It saves a bunch of

frustration.

Beth

Houston, TX

VBG - Dr. Srungaram

05/31/00 - 314 lbs.

11/01/02 - Abdominoplasty

11/29/02 - 160 lbs.

5'10 "

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 12/15/03 7:11:38 AM Central Standard Time, DisDog@...

writes:

> has anyone found the individual email form to be faster to read through?

> ------------

OMG YES!!! I used to get digest and it drove me CRAZY!!! You'd frequently

get " digests " embedded in digests -- and frequently, it would be so large that

it would come as a file that I had to download to read.

Getting 75 individual messages isn't bad at all... I pull them up and keep my

hand on the delete key.. many messages are only a line or two... I then hit

delete and the next message in my inbox pops up. It saves a bunch of

frustration.

Beth

Houston, TX

VBG - Dr. Srungaram

05/31/00 - 314 lbs.

11/01/02 - Abdominoplasty

11/29/02 - 160 lbs.

5'10 "

[Guest guest]

MUCH faster Lucille!

Rev. Pam

Open RNY 12/11/02

318.5/184

Re: RE: editing replies - mandatory

> I presently receive this list in digest form, but I was thinking of going

to

> individual emails .... has anyone found the individual email form to be

faster

> to read through?

>

> Lucille

>

>

> In a message dated 12/15/2003 1:28:33 AM Eastern Standard Time,

> Graduate-OSSG writes:

>

> >

> >

> > You know, some of us don't get the original posts so having it attached

> > is quite helpful. Yahoo can be quite arbitrary in who receives which

> > posts some times. JMO

> > Amber/FL

> >

>

>

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Yes because I can delete a message I don't feel like would interest me.

I don't have to wade through a bunch of stuff to figure out what would

interest me or not.

Lori Owen - Denton, Texas

SRVG 7/16/01

Dr. Ritter/Dr. Bryce

479/356/hoping for close to 200

On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 08:09:23 EST DisDog@... writes:

> I presently receive this list in digest form, but I was thinking of

> going to individual emails .... has anyone found the individual email

form to

> be faster to read through?

> Lucille

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 12/15/2003 8:52:56 AM Eastern Standard Time,

BethVBG@... writes:

Getting 75 individual messages isn't bad at all... I pull them up and keep my

hand on the delete key.. many messages are only a line or two... I then hit

delete and the next message in my inbox pops up. It saves a bunch of

frustration.

================================

Exactly, people who want their digests edited by others, should try this. I

just don't understand the fuss.

Fay Bayuk

**300/168

10/23/01

Dr.

Open RNY 150 cm

Click for My Profile

http://obesityhelp.com/morbidobesity/profile.phtml?N=Bayuk951061008

[Guest guest]

Lucille, individual emails are MUCH easier to deal with. Don't have to

scroll through EVERY email to read the ones you want. You can just delete

what doesn't interest you, or just skim and go on. I don't always read every

single email......sorry guys... Like many others I have MANY other lists. No

time to read things that don't interest me. Give the individual emails a

try. You might find you like it.

Debbie &

in Gig Harbor

(170cm medial)

ladybostons@...

http://www.cafeshops.com/copsstore

http://www.marykay.com/debbiemcneice

-----Original Message-----

From: DisDog@...

I presently receive this list in digest form, but I was thinking of going to

individual emails .... has anyone found the individual email form to be

faster

to read through?

Lucille

[Guest guest]

I agree Lori - individual e-mails are much faster!! Amber/FL

Re: Re: RE: editing replies - mandatory

Yes because I can delete a message I don't feel like would interest me.

I don't have to wade through a bunch of stuff to figure out what would

interest me or not. Lori Owen - Denton, Texas SRVG 7/16/01 Dr.

Ritter/Dr. Bryce 479/356/hoping for close to 200

On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 08:09:23 EST DisDog@... writes:

> I presently receive this list in digest form, but I was thinking of

> going to individual emails .... has anyone found the individual email

form to

> be faster to read through?

> Lucille

Homepage: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Graduate-OSSG

Unsubscribe: mailto:Graduate-OSSG-unsubscribe

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 12/15/2003 8:52:45 AM Eastern Standard Time,

Graduate-OSSG writes:

> > has anyone found the individual email form to be faster to read through?

> Me

Thanks to everyone who responded to my query. I think I will change off the

digests after I am settled down from my upcoming plastics. I think it makes

more sense to stay in digest form for that time just not to flood out my

mailbox while I'm recovering. Thanks again kids!

Lucille

[Guest guest]

Lucille,

I am no mail all the time. I come to the website to read my

messages. This way I don't clutter up my email addy until I can get

a spare moment to read. I just jot down the last message number I

read and start there the next time. Has been great for me. You do

have to put up with some ads, but I'm used to it now and it doesn't

bother me.

Reba

*****************************

> From: DisDog@a... [mailto:DisDog@a...]

>

> I presently receive this list in digest form, but I was thinking

of going to

>

> individual emails .... has anyone found the individual email form

to be

> faster

> to read through?

>

> Lucille

[Guest guest]

That's exactly why we ask people to clean up their replies,

those " imbedded digests. " I sometimes used to get 300-400 emails a

day, which is just a tad much, so the digests worked much better for

me and others.

There's no reason people should get upset or take this request

personally. If your not familiar with the digest method, how would

you know? And, if you don't know how to highlight & delete all the

extra stuff, just ask.

in NJ

**********************

> >

> OMG YES!!! I used to get digest and it drove me CRAZY!!! You'd

frequently get " digests " embedded in digests -- and frequently, it

would be so large that it would come as a file that I had to download

to read.

> Getting 75 individual messages isn't bad at all... I pull them up

and keep my hand on the delete key.. many messages are only a line or

two... I then hit delete and the next message in my inbox pops up.

It saves a bunch of frustration.

>

>

> Beth

[Guest guest]

10 times faster. 100 times faster.

Thanks,

Vitalady, Inc. T

www.vitalady.com

If you are interested in PayPal, please click here:

https://www.paypal.com/affil/pal=orders%40vitalady.com

Re: RE: editing replies - mandatory

> I presently receive this list in digest form, but I was thinking of

going to

> individual emails .... has anyone found the individual email form to

be faster

> to read through?

>

> Lucille

>

>

> In a message dated 12/15/2003 1:28:33 AM Eastern Standard Time,

> Graduate-OSSG writes:

>

> >

> >

> > You know, some of us don't get the original posts so having it

attached

> > is quite helpful. Yahoo can be quite arbitrary in who receives

which

> > posts some times. JMO

> > Amber/FL

> >

>

>

>

>

>