Guest guest Posted December 28, 2003 Report Share Posted December 28, 2003 In a message dated 12/28/03 12:26:57 PM, Graduate-OSSG writes: << I had a therapist pre-op and shortly post op until she terminated me when I needed her the most via letter because of " alliance issues " (her words)..I still do not know what that means.. ...PLEASE HELP! >> I would like to respond to this part of your letter. " Alliance issues " is not common jargon that most patients would understand without an explanation. If your therapist did not refer you to another therapist, if they terminated via letter without aftercare til you were settled again, they may have violated both ethical and legal standards. It is REQUIRED ethically, to speak to a patient about termination if either party feels the relationship is not 'a good fit,' or if either one thinks after careful evaluation they cannot handle what are called' transference and counter-transference' issues--this may have been what your past therapist meant by 'alliance issues' --how one becomes an ally of the other. Transference and counter-transference means how the patient feels about and what they imagine about the therapist, often based on past disappointments and triumphs. Counter-transference is the term used to describe the therapist's thoughts and feelings toward the patient-- also based on past experiences. Normally, these are to be resolved within the therapy, come to terms with, so the patient can work on what is real, so reality is the container instead of fantasy, and with the best support possible. I truly suggest if you do not understand the termination letter, that you write a letter to the thera pist asking for clarification so that you can understand. If you do not receive a reply within 30 days, I suggest strongly that you contact your State Board that regulates the therapists in your state, and make a formal complaint about the therapists' " abandonment of patient, " " no forthcoming referral to guard the mental health of the patient during or after the therapist's decision to suddenly terminate the patient. " If these are present, they are all considered 'sub-standard practices.' Therapists are held to 'a standard of practice' by state law as well as to the ethics of their own particular specialty group. Even when a patient is very difficult, they still have a right to a proper termination wherein both have a chance to say what they think and feel, and to have a referral for another therapist, and for the therapist to make sure the patient is in adequate care before final termination. I am sorry to have gone on about this when your wueastion is really about ways of dealing with weight. However, many, many, many people who have been heavy for a long time do not expect to be treated with respect, and sometimes hardly register disrespect when it is present, for they have put up with it for so long it seems normal to them. But it is a new day now.... I hope I have been clear. This is just ceep's two cent's worth. Psychoanalyst, 35 years of clinical practice as of 2004 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.