Guest guest Posted January 17, 2004 Report Share Posted January 17, 2004 I joined this group pre-op but have waited nearly 2 years to voice my opinion on this procedure. I have no interest in the politics of the weight loss debate, and I have absolutely nothing to lose or gain by supporting either side. I only wish to relate my personal experience so others can judge which direction to take. I underwent open Duodenal Switch surgery in Delano California on March 29th, 2002 weighing 555 lbs. First of all, understand that I have broken nearly all the rules. (this is not a recommendation, it's my own personal failing) I ate too much too fast, I didn't exercize, and I almost never take my vitamin pills. I try, but basically ignore most dietary restrictions and had half a chicken whopper on the way home from the hospital 10 days after surgery. The claims that you can eat whatever you want with DS were confirmed, and I eat anything and everything. My stomach has returned to its pre-op size and is functioning Perfectly. The result is I've lost 230 lbs to date, am continuing to lose about 1/2 lb. every week, and all my health problems are gone. I've had no complications even with my huge starting weight. My cholesterol is 118 (a positive effect not often discussed) even though I eat pizza and fast food on a daily basis, and I feel great with lots of energy. My 1.5 year blood tests were all great even with the poor vitamin adherence. Side effects: I've probably vomited 5 times in 21 months, I have frequent loose stools, and my heartburn has returned (although less severe then before) Conclusion: DS is the gold standard in weight loss surgery. There is currently no substitute and that includes RnY. I have one close friend and several associates who have undergone RnY and the severe diet restrictions are/will affect their lives forever. They are all at risk of regaining the weight if their eating habits change, and frankly they worry all the time. I am not impressed by the claims that DS is more dangerous than the other options. My belief is that the choice of doctor is far more important than the type of surgery when discussing complications and deaths, and when statistics were presented, I found that these rates were often based on 1 or 2 individual cases out of hundreds. I will advocate DS over RnY and Lap to anyone. I have no reservations. If you're going to roll the dice, you might as well be betting on a normal post-op life with all the pleasures of eating, and without the worries of weight regain and a non-functional stomach. You cannot have this with RnY. Email me if you have further questions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2004 Report Share Posted January 18, 2004 assuming this was meant for the list...... > I want to thank all of you who predicted my future failure on this > surgery. It's inspired me to start taking my vitamins. > > DS is a vastly superior surgery to RnY. This hurts the feelings of > those who have already had RnY and I'm sorry about that, but the > differences between the two MUST be shown. Mine is just one > experience, but it's a COMMON outcome from the DS proceedure while > RnY often causes misery. We are talking quality of life, are we not? > > I'll be happy to post again in 2 more years. I hope I'll be just as > happy then. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.