Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

News about special ed

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

My husband just sent me this via email. I thought you'd be

interested.

Jodi Z

Court Rules Against Special Ed. Parents

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court ruled Monday that parents who demand

better special education programs for their children have the burden

of proof in the challenges.

The 6-2 decision, written by retiring Justice

Day O'Connor, said that if parents challenge a program, they

have the burden in an administrative hearing of showing that the

program is insufficient. If schools bring a complaint, the burden

rests with them, O'Connor wrote.

The ruling is a loss for a land family that contested the

special education program designed for their son with attention

deficit hyperactivity disorder.

The case required the court to interpret the Individuals With

Disabilities Act, which does not specifically say whether parents or

schools have the burden of proof in disputes.

The family's attorney, Hurd, unsuccessfully argued that when

there are disagreements between schools and parents, education

officials have better access to relevant facts and witnesses.

Chief Justice had recused himself from the case,

because attorneys from his old law firm represented the school

district.

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Breyer wrote separate

dissents

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...