Guest guest Posted March 7, 2008 Report Share Posted March 7, 2008 We have to wait a long time for some types of doctors (e.g. developmental pediatrician) and for some 'famous' doctors/hospitals (e.g. the wait is always longer for a doctor in any specialty at CHOP), but the average GI has a short wait (few weeks). Why is the wait so long in Canada? National health care? Not enough doctors? This is the unfortunate conundrum that faces the US: healthcare is so expensive and some people are not covered fully or at all, but for the insured, we have fantastic care here that we (generally) don't have to wait too long for. > > You guys seem so lucky to get into see specialists sooo fast! It takes a minimum of 8 months to see a GI doc here in Alberta! Buy the time we got close to our appointment, I had healed Mark's gut on my own...... > > Janice > > > [sPAM][ ] Re: Short transit time..what does this mean? > > > Michele and Tara - even if we were to look at " normal " kids we could > assume things are a problem that are normal. One may guess a child > that poops 3 times a day has possible malabsorption issues. I myself > tend to avoid alarmist doctors with a passion. I know not all Dan > people are alarmists -nor medical doctors -but even if some are - I'd > seek out a pediatric gastroenterologist if I had questions about my > child's bowel movements. (and I did...Dr. and thank GOD for Dr. > in Palm Beach who helped get rid of Tanner's constipation with > no drugs ever!!!) (and PS -3 x a day is in the range of normal) > > " What's Normal? > Many people think that normal means having one bowel movement every > day, but that's not always true. People are different, and so are > their bowels. Normal for one person might be three bowel movements a > day, and normal for another might be three bowel movements a week. If > your bowel movements fit somewhere in that range, then you're on a > normal schedule. " > http://www.kidshealth.org/kid/stay_healthy/body/bowel.html > > ===== > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2008 Report Share Posted March 7, 2008 The nonchop GI wait was 5 months. The CHOP GI wait was 7 months. This was why I started sish oil, initially saw what I thought was no response, then addressed diet and water. 2 weeks later the CHOP nurse, who felt we needed to get in their as daughter's history and hair loss screamed celiac, called me and told me to be there in 1/2 hour (it was 1/2 hour away) as they had a cancellation. Dropped everything, returned to gluten for testing and it changed our lives. I am happy we did not have to wait. > > > > You guys seem so lucky to get into see specialists sooo fast! It > takes a minimum of 8 months to see a GI doc here in Alberta! Buy the > time we got close to our appointment, I had healed Mark's gut on my > own...... > > > > Janice Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 This is pretty recent..... in the last 2 years. It is not too fun as it takes 3 weeks to get a plumber and no one wants to do small jobs since they can all go to work for the oil companies. Kids are getting part time jobs for $17 an hour! Drive through windows are closing due to lack of staff! I bought a new cedar roof and the contractor was 8 months behind schedule.... It's nuts. With the expected increased price of gas this summer, I expect that it will get even busier here. I won't even talk about how this is affecting schools and classroom sizes. filmed his component of Sicko in Windsor which is accross the bridge from Detroit city. Windsor is a very small city. (but smells like downtown Detroit.... gross) Janice [sPAM]Re: [sPAM][ ] WAS: Short transit time NOW: Wait for doctors So did film Sicko in old Alberta? ) ===== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 We were able to get into the first GI much faster than that -- just two or three weeks. He had never heard of the enzymes, but he did order almost every test in the book. Shortly after, CHOP called and Mascarenhas came in on her day off (the beginning of a month-long vacation!) because of our history with congestion. I guess the allergist was concerned with CF even though we are not carriers of the CF gene, and he wanted us seen immediately by the GI/CF expert. She added only one test to the ones ordered by the other GI (a sweat test for CF), and then we had her interpret them all. Her opinion: it was either " typical " toddler diarrhea or a food intolerance. (She said probably milk.) She said if it continued (it did), to try to figure out which food was the problem. She also said the Houston enzymes were perfectly safe to use. So, no firm resolution, but it did guide us in the right direction. And who doesn't want to eliminate a major problem like CF, right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 8, 2008 Report Share Posted March 8, 2008 Interesting about the enzymes. She did not know about DQ1 then though right? > > We were able to get into the first GI much faster than that -- just > two or three weeks. He had never heard of the enzymes, but he did > order almost every test in the book. Shortly after, CHOP called and > Mascarenhas came in on her day off (the beginning of a month-long > vacation!) because of our history with congestion. I guess the > allergist was concerned with CF even though we are not carriers of > the CF gene, and he wanted us seen immediately by the GI/CF expert. > She added only one test to the ones ordered by the other GI (a sweat > test for CF), and then we had her interpret them all. Her opinion: > it was either " typical " toddler diarrhea or a food intolerance. (She > said probably milk.) She said if it continued (it did), to try to > figure out which food was the problem. She also said the Houston > enzymes were perfectly safe to use. So, no firm resolution, but it > did guide us in the right direction. And who doesn't want to > eliminate a major problem like CF, right? > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 9, 2008 Report Share Posted March 9, 2008 In 2006 the American Association on Mental Retardation , the most widely known professional association in the United States whose mission is progressive policies, sound research, effective practices, and universal human rights, officially changed it's name to the American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Dissabilities. The term 'mental retardation' has been attacked as promoting stigma and negative stereotyping. 1 in 10 families in the United States are affected by intellectual dissabilities. In 2006 the US Department of Education reported that 591,440 students between the ages of 6 and 21 were labeled as having intellectual dissabilities and receiving services under IDEA. People with intellectual dissabilities make up about 3% of the population which scored below 70 on IQ tests. A score of 75 or below now qualifies as intellectually dissabled. Terms such as mild, moderate, severe, and profound replaced the old terms of trainable (IQ of 40-55) and educable (IQ 0f 55-70). Many kids labeled trainable could not get a free public education. Seven to eight million Americans have intellectual dissabilities. We can only estimate as the dissabled have never been counted. 90% are classified as mild. From an educational standpoint the most common difficulties are reading comprehension and the second highest difficulty is with mathematics.We had a conference last week and 's reading comprehension skills are improving. had a blood sugar that was too low at school Friday and he needed an intramuscular injection of glucagon and the emergency responders were called. I picked him up and took him home as soon as they got there. He is fine now. I am checking him often. I hope we can get a transplant someday so that he will not have Juvenile Diabetes. **************It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms, and advice on AOL Money & Finance. (http://money.aol.com/tax?NCID=aolprf00030000000001) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 9, 2008 Report Share Posted March 9, 2008 Yes, we haven't had the testing for DQ1, just the other two. Somewhere I have read that the enzymes will make you feel worse if you have celiac, because they can't help with that type of gluten intolerance, but I don't know why that would be. If you are already feeling sick from undiagnosed celiac, it won't change that, but I don't know why it would make it worse. Either way, I brought the enzymes, she read the labels and she said fine. I think she suggested dairy might be the problem because (a.) he didn't eat a lot of other allergenic foods at the time and (b.) lactase is one of the several enzymes in the product. > > > > We were able to get into the first GI much faster than that -- just > > two or three weeks. He had never heard of the enzymes, but he did > > order almost every test in the book. Shortly after, CHOP called and > > Mascarenhas came in on her day off (the beginning of a month-long > > vacation!) because of our history with congestion. I guess the > > allergist was concerned with CF even though we are not carriers of > > the CF gene, and he wanted us seen immediately by the GI/CF expert. > > She added only one test to the ones ordered by the other GI (a sweat > > test for CF), and then we had her interpret them all. Her opinion: > > it was either " typical " toddler diarrhea or a food intolerance. > (She > > said probably milk.) She said if it continued (it did), to try to > > figure out which food was the problem. She also said the Houston > > enzymes were perfectly safe to use. So, no firm resolution, but it > > did guide us in the right direction. And who doesn't want to > > eliminate a major problem like CF, right? > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 9, 2008 Report Share Posted March 9, 2008 Isn't it that the enzymes can't undo or prevent celiac damage if still on gluten and celiac unaddressed? I was considering them for celiac daughter if I can't get her bowels in better shape. Must talk to GI first though. > > > > > > We were able to get into the first GI much faster than that -- > just > > > two or three weeks. He had never heard of the enzymes, but he did > > > order almost every test in the book. Shortly after, CHOP called > and > > > Mascarenhas came in on her day off (the beginning of a month- long > > > vacation!) because of our history with congestion. I guess the > > > allergist was concerned with CF even though we are not carriers of > > > the CF gene, and he wanted us seen immediately by the GI/CF > expert. > > > She added only one test to the ones ordered by the other GI (a > sweat > > > test for CF), and then we had her interpret them all. Her > opinion: > > > it was either " typical " toddler diarrhea or a food intolerance. > > (She > > > said probably milk.) She said if it continued (it did), to try to > > > figure out which food was the problem. She also said the Houston > > > enzymes were perfectly safe to use. So, no firm resolution, but > it > > > did guide us in the right direction. And who doesn't want to > > > eliminate a major problem like CF, right? > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.