Guest guest Posted February 6, 2009 Report Share Posted February 6, 2009 I am so sorry to hear that someone would say that. I am an invitro mom myself. I made 5 attempts and had 2 kids. It cost 30 thousand. It was worth every dime. It changed my life. The people I know who have gone what we went through are amazingly resourceful people. Many of them have traveled to Canada because the insurance would not pay for the medication they were taking. Some of the people I know had tubal ligation revearsals done because the insurance would not pay for their fertility treatments since they had a voluntary procedure at 18. The stories are heartbreaking sometimes, second mortgages for 40 thousand dollars to pay for the medical costs participating in a test study to cover part of the costs, donating some of the eggs because that was the only way to pay for it and amazingly unselfish people who offered to give of themselves in ways that most people would not ever consider. We have gone through a lot more than most people have to have children. We have had psychological evaluations, counseling, we have got up at 3am and driven to another state to have a test done and driven home to go to work for a 10 hour shift the same day. I have given myself over 300 shots endured hot flashes morning sickness been accused of being selfish when invitro is probably the most unselfish thing a person could do. My medication has traveled from a lab by a sherriff to the airport then by bus where a pharmacist picked it up in the middle of the night. People really stand up and take notice of you when you pick up your 7 thousand dollar fertinex order at costco. Every time I went to the drugstore they met the weekly quota just from me. I received a handwritten letter on parchment paper from Grassley a few years ago after I sent him a letter explaining my surprise that Principal would pay for Viagra but they will not pay for fertility drugs. They consider it experimental. Well... I have 2 kids to prove that it was not an experiment. Life is precious. Do not let the fact that 1 person who may have done this for the wrong reason ruin it for the rest of us who are responsible. Most of our doctors were fabulous. Every positive thing you have ever heard about the Mayo Clinic is true. I would do it again 10 times over. Did she do this for the wrong reason? Was she irresponsible? Should her Dr have transferred 8 eggs? I can tell you that there are thousands of people who do act responsibly compared to this 1 person. I can introduce you to the Dr who made me take a break. For some of us it is worth giving up every last penny to have what others take for granted...life. May God Bless and Keep You. > > http://www.trusera.com/health/stories/trusera_on_autism/octuplets-mom-has-son-wi\ th-autism > > It turns out the mom who had 8 kids at one time, and who has six others at home, has a son with autism, according to MSNBC. > Here is a quote from a woman who babysat: > Yolanda , 49, of Whittier, said she helped care for the mother's autistic son three years ago. > " From what I could tell back then, she was pretty happy with herself, saying she liked having kids and she wanted 12 kids in all, " told the Long Beach Press-Telegram. > " She told me that all of her kids were through in vitro, and I said 'Gosh, how can you afford that and go to school at the same time? " ' she added. " And she said it's because she got paid for it. " > said she did not ask for details. > Do you think she is irresponsible? > > > > Love, Gabby. :0) > http://stemcellforautism.blogspot.com/ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2009 Report Share Posted February 7, 2009 I think that Gabby was using that as a conversational piece or informational piece. I don't believe that the comment about " Was she being selfish " was in regards to the fact that she had in-vitro done, but rather that she has 6 kids at home and now another 8 on TOP of those 6, AND the fact that she's a single mom. She may want a large family-- I totally get that being a mom of 8 children. Do I care HOW she got those14 kids or if it was from In-Vitro? Absolutely not! If this were a MARRIED COUPLE I would say-- GOOD FOR THEM. The very fact that she is a SINGLE WOMAN and that these children have no father to help raise them, THIS is where she loses me entirely. This is where I would absolutely agree that she's a selfish person. We all know that even TWO people raising 14 kids is extraordinarily difficult, but ONE person? That's a bit over the top, even for ME, a Totally big family supporter!!! (One of my all time favorite families is the Duggar family just for the record) And the PRIMARY reason she stated that she wanted a large family was " because I was an only child and was lonely " . If that's not selfishness-- I'm not sure what is?? But-- I am positive that Gabby wasn't referring to this woman receiving In-Vitro that was irresponsible, but I'm pretty sure it was the fact that she's a single woman, and she also HAS NO JOB! Becky In a message dated 2/7/2009 9:36:02 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, stehn4@... writes: I am so sorry to hear that someone would say that. I am an invitro mom myself. I made 5 attempts and had 2 kids. It cost 30 thousand. It was worth every dime. It changed my life. The people I know who have gone what we went through are amazingly resourceful people. Many of them have traveled to Canada because the insurance would not pay for the medication they were taking. Some of the people I know had tubal ligation revearsals done because the insurance would not pay for their fertility treatments since they had a voluntary procedure at 18. The stories are heartbreaking sometimes, second mortgages for 40 thousand dollars to pay for the medical costs participating in a test study to cover part of the costs, donating some of the eggs because that was the only way to pay for it and amazingly unselfish people who offered to give of themselves in ways that most people would not ever consider. We have gone through a lot more than most people have to have children. We have had psychological evaluations, counseling, we have got up at 3am and driven to another state to have a test done and driven home to go to work for a 10 hour shift the same day. I have given myself over 300 shots endured hot flashes morning sickness been accused of being selfish when invitro is probably the most unselfish thing a person could do. My medication has traveled from a lab by a sherriff to the airport then by bus where a pharmacist picked it up in the middle of the night. People really stand up and take notice of you when you pick up your 7 thousand dollar fertinex order at costco. Every time I went to the drugstore they met the weekly quota just from me. I received a handwritten letter on parchment paper from Grassley a few years ago after I sent him a letter explaining my surprise that Principal would pay for Viagra but they will not pay for fertility drugs. They consider it experimental. Well... I have 2 kids to prove that it was not an experiment. Life is precious. Do not let the fact that 1 person who may have done this for the wrong reason ruin it for the rest of us who are responsible. Most of our doctors were fabulous. Every positive thing you have ever heard about the Mayo Clinic is true. I would do it again 10 times over. Did she do this for the wrong reason? Was she irresponsible? Should her Dr have transferred 8 eggs? I can tell you that there are thousands of people who do act responsibly compared to this 1 person. I can introduce you to the Dr who made me take a break. For some of us it is worth giving up every last penny to have what others take for granted...life. May God Bless and Keep You. > > _http://www.trusera.http://www.http://www.trusehttp://wwwhttp://wwwhttp://www.th\ ttp://www._ (http://www.trusera.com/health/stories/trusera_on_autism/octuplets-mom-has-son-w\ ith-autism) > > It turns out the mom who had 8 kids at one time, and who has six others at home, has a son with autism, according to MSNBC. > Here is a quote from a woman who babysat: > Yolanda , 49, of Whittier, said she helped care for the mother's autistic son three years ago. > " From what I could tell back then, she was pretty happy with herself, saying she liked having kids and she wanted 12 kids in all, " told the Long Beach Press-Telegram. > " She told me that all of her kids were through in vitro, and I said 'Gosh, how can you afford that and go to school at the same time? " ' she added. " And she said it's because she got paid for it. " > said she did not ask for details. > Do you think she is irresponsible? > > > > Love, Gabby. :0) > _http://stemcellforahttp://stemcellhttp_ (http://stemcellforautism.blogspot.com/) > **************Who's never won? Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music. (http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?ncid=emlcntusmusi00000\ 003) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2009 Report Share Posted February 7, 2009 Hi Charlotte, I'm not sure what was said from Gabby's MSNBC interview that you are sorry to hear someone say. In my opinion whether or not this single young mother has a special needs child or not makes no difference in the fact that she already had 6 children (SIX YOUNG CHILDREN!) and got implanted with 6 more (SIX MORE) and 2 divided and now she has 8 more. (that's what I heard the mother claim -others report 8 were implanted) In my opinion she is completely irresponsible, her mother if she backed her up on this is irresponsible, her doctors if they did this knowing her situation are irresponsible...and I felt bad about this story since I heard it prior to knowing one of the children is autistic. Yes that makes it even more tragic because we here know how much more time for therapy and advocating a special needs child takes. I have a sister in law who is an OT, very intelligent woman. She went through invitro as well and the first time had my one niece and when Jess was 3 years old she had invitro again and this time had my niece and nephew (twins) I can't even tell you that my sister in law with 2 babies and a 3 year old almost became a recluse as she said it was too hard to leave to go anywhere by herself with the 2 babies and the 3 year old. I'm sure there are others here that would be no problem for....but even a day care center won't allow the ratio of 1 adult to 14 babies!!!! I think for babies it needs to be 1/4? When Palin was running this group was in a debate about whether you can have " one " special needs baby and run the country. I was on the side of yes she can -because in my opinion that baby not only had his mother, but his much older loving sisters and brothers, his father, and probably the best of the best quality care given the situation. Now we have an unemployed young mother with a special needs child and 13 other babies. At least 8 babies -perhaps the rest are toddlers now (as if that makes it easier!!!) So to me this isn't about a mother's love for her children, nor is it about invitro, to me it's about a very selfish woman who has just brought 14 babies into this world and is probably going to leave it up to the rest of the world to help care and raise them. According to the article below you are talking one million dollars for neonatal units alone! Ellen Goodman: Fertility mistreatment By Ellen Goodman Published: February 6, 2009 BOSTON: Maybe we owe an apology to the doctors who made the birth announcement with such pride and excitement. The delivery of eight babies in five minutes was, they exhaled, " amazing. " The mom was " incredibly courageous. " All in all it was a " very exciting day, " a feat for which the 46-member medical team at the California hospital expected kudos and high fives. But instead of smiles, they saw jaws drop. Attention turned from the doctors to the mom, from her courage to her judgment, from the medical success of this delivery team to the ethical failures of fertility treatment. It turned out that Nadya Suleman already had six kids at home. The Suleman Fourteen don't have a father, they have a sperm donor. They were apparently all conceived by in vitro fertilization with the last eight presumably implanted en masse. For good measure, their mother doesn't have a job. And her family recently filed for bankruptcy. Before she left the hospital, before the babies left intensive care, the whole country had gone from " gee whiz " to " are you kidding? " Everything that we don't really want to talk about in terms of pregnancy and child rearing - marital status, money, individual choice, responsibility and technology - had converged in the shouting and blogging over Nadya Suleman's womb mates. Does anyone have a right to tell anyone else how many kids to have? Can only people who can afford them bear children? Do you need a husband to have a baby? These are questions that make us feel queasy when we are talking about old-fashioned families. But they take on a new flavor in the unregulated wild west of fertility technology. Need we review exactly what's happened since Baby Louise came out of a petri dish and reproduction became a family business? We now have tens of thousands of healthy children born every year through fertility drugs and IVF to delighted families. Fertility doctors don't say no - nor should they - to single or gay patients or those who already have children. Doctors do not do home visits or psychological evaluations or socio-economic profiles on patients who want children. At most, doctors do what bioethicist Arthur Caplan calls " a wallet biopsy " to see if they can pay the bill. We are far more rigorous about accepting people for adoption or foster care than for fertility treatments. But shouldn't there be limits? Suleman's mother now famously describes her daughter as " obsessed with children, " and wishes that she'd chosen to be a kindergarten teacher. But it turns out that you can have six children and still be treated for " infertility. " And, here we get to the heart of this case, it turns out there are no laws in the country limiting the number of embryos that can be implanted in one womb. As bioethicist Lori s says, " Women's bodies are not large enough to hold a litter. " If, as we are told so far, Nadya Suleman was implanted with eight embryos left over from her earlier treatments, it is something akin to malpractice. If she wanted all eight implanted knowing she would refuse to terminate any, it's close to mal-mothering. The reason why we haven't seen Nadya's fertility doctor on " Larry King Live " (yet) is that it's against all guidelines to implant more than one or two embryos in a woman under 35. Given our experience with the extraordinary high risk of multiple pregnancies for mothers and babies, anyone who endangers patients ought to lose their license. This is more than an individual decision. Suleman's babies weighed between 1 pound 8 ounces and 3 pounds 4 ounces. They will cost at least $1 million in neonatal care and more if they have the typical range of disabilities for premature babies. The meter is running at the neonatal unit. I wish these eight little people well. I tip my hat to the delivery team for dealing with an octuplet of problems they didn't create. If Suleman's brand new publicist succeeds in selling her as a " smart, " " joyful " mother with a " wonderful sense of humor " who is grateful " for the miracle of life, " maybe this mother will be able to roll her degree in child development into a reality program that supports them all. But right now, a reproductive business that generates so much controversy has produced a remarkable consensus. Infertility treatment for an unemployed, single mother of six? Eight embryos in one womb? There must be a proper word in the medical literature to describe this achievement. I think the word is " nuts. " http://www.iht.com/articles/2009/02/06/opinion/edgoodman.1-424180.php ===== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2009 Report Share Posted February 7, 2009 If I were a member of the American Medical Association I would take a second look. I do know of someone who had 21 eggs and donated 7 each to 2 other couples because it would cover her fertility treatment and she then had 7 eggs implanted and ended up with triplets. I told her right out that I thought implanting 7 embryos was crazy. You have to look at the research. The lady from Iowa Mrs. Mc Cough did not have invitro. With invitro you can limit the risk of multiple births. The Mc Coughs had 7 and they had the record for along time. You are right about the risks of birth defects being a lot higher for multiple births. Two of the kids have a form of CP. I bought there book. It might help them a little to know that people do care. I do not know if we should talk about who should and who should not have kids anyway. I would not want to take care of 14 kids. I do know that there are people who have kids for the wrong reasons. I know that it was not so long ago that women did not have a choice about the number of children they could have and the kids somehow survived. It is not the life that you or I would have probably chosen but it is someone life. The county in which I live in has a rule that a registered childcare provider can only take care of 4 children under the age of 4 and out of the 4 only 3 can be under 18 months. I have taken care of 2 kids that were 2 years old and 3 kids from the age of 2 months old until they were 1 year old. It was not terrible. They were all in diapers. So now I have made the mistake of disclosing something that was deeply personal to someone that I do not know and for that I am sorry. I should also have not taken it so personally. My comments were very harsh to say the least and for that I am sorry if it was taken the wrong way but the point I am trying to get across here is that we need to take a long hard look at why we have to spend all this money for insurance only to be told that the insurance company does not want to cover all these things. People resort to taking these chances because they are desperate to have children and it is such a hardship to pay for these medical procedures. We drive to Canada because our medication is at least 1 third less and it is safe. It makes all of us look bad when 1 person acts irresponsibly and it should not be that way. It is not the clinics place to say who can and cannot get 8 eggs implanted but they did have the opportunity to get help for people who act irresponsibly. They could have and should have simply said, 'NO' the risks are too high. We do not want to put you in the position where you either 'risk losing the pregnancy' or have to make the choice of 'selective reduction' We will not do it. They can refuse. It is not illegal. The doctors and the medical team should be proud that they were able to deliver 8 healthy babies. Charlotte **************Who's never won? Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music. (http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?ncid=emlcntusmusi00000\ 003) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2009 Report Share Posted February 7, 2009 Parents filed bankrupcy? Unemployed? Single? How many of my hard earned tax dollars are paying for this selfish, irresponsible woman's obsession? Sent from my iPhone On Feb 7, 2009, at 9:23 AM, " kiddietalk " <kiddietalk@...> wrote: Hi Charlotte, I'm not sure what was said from Gabby's MSNBC interview that you are sorry to hear someone say. In my opinion whether or not this single young mother has a special needs child or not makes no difference in the fact that she already had 6 children (SIX YOUNG CHILDREN!) and got implanted with 6 more (SIX MORE) and 2 divided and now she has 8 more. (that's what I heard the mother claim -others report 8 were implanted) In my opinion she is completely irresponsible, her mother if she backed her up on this is irresponsible, her doctors if they did this knowing her situation are irresponsible...and I felt bad about this story since I heard it prior to knowing one of the children is autistic. Yes that makes it even more tragic because we here know how much more time for therapy and advocating a special needs child takes. I have a sister in law who is an OT, very intelligent woman. She went through invitro as well and the first time had my one niece and when Jess was 3 years old she had invitro again and this time had my niece and nephew (twins) I can't even tell you that my sister in law with 2 babies and a 3 year old almost became a recluse as she said it was too hard to leave to go anywhere by herself with the 2 babies and the 3 year old. I'm sure there are others here that would be no problem for....but even a day care center won't allow the ratio of 1 adult to 14 babies!!!! I think for babies it needs to be 1/4? When Palin was running this group was in a debate about whether you can have " one " special needs baby and run the country. I was on the side of yes she can -because in my opinion that baby not only had his mother, but his much older loving sisters and brothers, his father, and probably the best of the best quality care given the situation. Now we have an unemployed young mother with a special needs child and 13 other babies. At least 8 babies -perhaps the rest are toddlers now (as if that makes it easier!!!) So to me this isn't about a mother's love for her children, nor is it about invitro, to me it's about a very selfish woman who has just brought 14 babies into this world and is probably going to leave it up to the rest of the world to help care and raise them. According to the article below you are talking one million dollars for neonatal units alone! Ellen Goodman: Fertility mistreatment By Ellen Goodman Published: February 6, 2009 BOSTON: Maybe we owe an apology to the doctors who made the birth announcement with such pride and excitement. The delivery of eight babies in five minutes was, they exhaled, " amazing. " The mom was " incredibly courageous. " All in all it was a " very exciting day, " a feat for which the 46-member medical team at the California hospital expected kudos and high fives. But instead of smiles, they saw jaws drop. Attention turned from the doctors to the mom, from her courage to her judgment, from the medical success of this delivery team to the ethical failures of fertility treatment. It turned out that Nadya Suleman already had six kids at home. The Suleman Fourteen don't have a father, they have a sperm donor. They were apparently all conceived by in vitro fertilization with the last eight presumably implanted en masse. For good measure, their mother doesn't have a job. And her family recently filed for bankruptcy. Before she left the hospital, before the babies left intensive care, the whole country had gone from " gee whiz " to " are you kidding? " Everything that we don't really want to talk about in terms of pregnancy and child rearing - marital status, money, individual choice, responsibility and technology - had converged in the shouting and blogging over Nadya Suleman's womb mates. Does anyone have a right to tell anyone else how many kids to have? Can only people who can afford them bear children? Do you need a husband to have a baby? These are questions that make us feel queasy when we are talking about old-fashioned families. But they take on a new flavor in the unregulated wild west of fertility technology. Need we review exactly what's happened since Baby Louise came out of a petri dish and reproduction became a family business? We now have tens of thousands of healthy children born every year through fertility drugs and IVF to delighted families. Fertility doctors don't say no - nor should they - to single or gay patients or those who already have children. Doctors do not do home visits or psychological evaluations or socio-economic profiles on patients who want children. At most, doctors do what bioethicist Arthur Caplan calls " a wallet biopsy " to see if they can pay the bill. We are far more rigorous about accepting people for adoption or foster care than for fertility treatments. But shouldn't there be limits? Suleman's mother now famously describes her daughter as " obsessed with children, " and wishes that she'd chosen to be a kindergarten teacher. But it turns out that you can have six children and still be treated for " infertility. " And, here we get to the heart of this case, it turns out there are no laws in the country limiting the number of embryos that can be implanted in one womb. As bioethicist Lori s says, " Women's bodies are not large enough to hold a litter. " If, as we are told so far, Nadya Suleman was implanted with eight embryos left over from her earlier treatments, it is something akin to malpractice. If she wanted all eight implanted knowing she would refuse to terminate any, it's close to mal-mothering. The reason why we haven't seen Nadya's fertility doctor on " Larry King Live " (yet) is that it's against all guidelines to implant more than one or two embryos in a woman under 35. Given our experience with the extraordinary high risk of multiple pregnancies for mothers and babies, anyone who endangers patients ought to lose their license. This is more than an individual decision. Suleman's babies weighed between 1 pound 8 ounces and 3 pounds 4 ounces. They will cost at least $1 million in neonatal care and more if they have the typical range of disabilities for premature babies. The meter is running at the neonatal unit. I wish these eight little people well. I tip my hat to the delivery team for dealing with an octuplet of problems they didn't create. If Suleman's brand new publicist succeeds in selling her as a " smart, " " joyful " mother with a " wonderful sense of humor " who is grateful " for the miracle of life, " maybe this mother will be able to roll her degree in child development into a reality program that supports them all. But right now, a reproductive business that generates so much controversy has produced a remarkable consensus. Infertility treatment for an unemployed, single mother of six? Eight embryos in one womb? There must be a proper word in the medical literature to describe this achievement. I think the word is " nuts. " http://www.iht.com/articles/2009/02/06/opinion/edgoodman.1-424180.php ===== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2009 Report Share Posted February 7, 2009 I have heard that she just got a 270,000 dollar settlement but housing is so expensive in California that 270,000 is not a lot of money at least if you are going to buy a house. There are some clinics I have heard of that will implant as many eggs as you want. The lady that I met with triplets was from Florida and usually the 1st transfer is included in the costs. I had to see a perinatologist the last time I got pregnant because I had a history of preeclampsia. I was told that there is a 20% increased chance of getting preeclampsia which can be life threatening. I also had to wait. It took me 9 months to have so they asked that I wait until was 9 months old to try again. They also thought I should consider having them farther than 1 grade apart in school, Josh has a birthday sept 29 so they are 2 years apart. Our insurance covered about 60% of the cost because ADM had an inclusion in their policies that they pay for fertility costs and they are the only company I have ever heard of that does that but our out of pocket expenses were still 30 thou over a 3 year period. We both had to have a psychiatric evaluation and be tested for some genetic things and see a counselor a couple times. They offered to have me participate in a test study for a drug company and the drug company would have covered all the costs but I did not go for it because there were other drugs that were stronger. Fertinex is the drug I took. They have classes to show you how to give your own shots too. People from all over the world go there. **************Who's never won? Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music. (http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?ncid=emlcntusmusi00000\ 003) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2009 Report Share Posted February 7, 2009 I think that the Dr. should have to pay for all these kids and not our taxes. What was the Dr. thinking when he helped her. I really feel sorry for her parents. From what I have read and heard on tv they are raising the other kids. This is very selfish on lots of people. But the all the kids will be the one hurting in the long run. I thing we all need to say some prayers for the family. Rita **************Great Deals on Dell Laptops. Starting at $499. (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1217883258x1201191827/aol?redir=http://\ ad.doubleclick. net/clk;211531132;33070124;e) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2009 Report Share Posted February 7, 2009 another thing to think about with the infertility issues and implanting how many embryos, etc-- some people have serious issues and if you implant 6 healthy embryos, those won't all survive most of the time. While I believe that implanting 6 at one time is a bit much (that was how many they implanted with the Octuplet lady) I can totally understand why someone would WANT to be implanted with that many if they know that there's a great chance that not even half will survive. Becky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2009 Report Share Posted February 7, 2009 I think IVF is a huge blessing for people who have been unable to have children using conventional methods. I would not pass judgment on those who have used IVF to have babies, based on one fool's bad judgment! I'd like to say I don't pass judgment at all, but that's just not the case. On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 4:38 PM, <stehn4@...> wrote: > If I were a member of the American Medical Association I would take a > second > look. I do know of someone who had 21 eggs and donated 7 each to 2 other > couples because it would cover her fertility treatment and she then had 7 > eggs > implanted and ended up with triplets. I told her right out that I thought > implanting 7 embryos was crazy. You have to look at the research. > The lady from Iowa Mrs. Mc Cough did not have invitro. With invitro you can > > limit the risk of multiple births. The Mc Coughs had 7 and they had the > record > for along time. You are right about the risks of birth defects being a lot > higher for multiple births. Two of the kids have a form of CP. I bought > there > book. It might help them a little to know that people do care. > I do not know if we should talk about who should and who should not have > kids anyway. I would not want to take care of 14 kids. I do know that there > are > people who have kids for the wrong reasons. I know that it was not so long > ago that women did not have a choice about the number of children they > could > have and the kids somehow survived. It is not the life that you or I would > have > probably chosen but it is someone life. > The county in which I live in has a rule that a registered childcare > provider can only take care of 4 children under the age of 4 and out of the > 4 only 3 > can be under 18 months. I have taken care of 2 kids that were 2 years old > and 3 kids from the age of 2 months old until they were 1 year old. It was > not > terrible. They were all in diapers. > So now I have made the mistake of disclosing something that was deeply > personal to someone that I do not know and for that I am sorry. I should > also have > not taken it so personally. > My comments were very harsh to say the least and for that I am sorry if it > was taken the wrong way but the point I am trying to get across here is > that we > need to take a long hard look at why we have to spend all this money for > insurance only to be told that the insurance company does not want to cover > all > these things. People resort to taking these chances because they are > desperate to have children and it is such a hardship to pay for these > medical > procedures. We drive to Canada because our medication is at least 1 third > less and > it is safe. > It makes all of us look bad when 1 person acts irresponsibly and it should > not be that way. It is not the clinics place to say who can and cannot get > 8 > eggs implanted but they did have the opportunity to get help for people who > act > irresponsibly. They could have and should have simply said, 'NO' the risks > are too high. We do not want to put you in the position where you either > 'risk > losing the pregnancy' or have to make the choice of 'selective reduction' > We > will not do it. They can refuse. It is not illegal. > The doctors and the medical team should be proud that they were able to > deliver 8 healthy babies. > Charlotte > > **************Who's never won? Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time > on > AOL Music. > ( > http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?ncid=emlcntusmusi000000\ 03 > ) > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 7, 2009 Report Share Posted February 7, 2009 I would not want to take the chance. If you examine all the statistics you will find that most people do 3 unless they are a candidate for selective reduction. Most women her age can successfully carry 3 or perhaps 4 without serious complications and I might add that it is very difficult to carry that many babies. There is a great amount of bedrest involved and not everyone can be on bedrest for such a long time. I was 43 when we tried our 1st attempt and they did not think I could carry triplets. I took a chance that 1 would not survive. The truth of the matter is that with 3 embryos my chance of having a multiple pregnancy was about 20 percent and that usually results in twins. The majority of ivf pregnancies are singular (around 40% the last time I checked). The odds are the same no matter how may times you try. The odds of getting pregnant at all go down as we get older so those were the odds if I did get pregnant. There is no magic number as far as your age goes but we know that women of color usually age slower than women who are white so they usually stay fertile about a year longer. The other thing to consider is that many women lose a pregnancy before they even know that they are pregnant. The odds of carrying 8 babies and having all of them survive would be incredible. Ivf is so expensive that some people implant more embryos hoping that they will be lucky and have at least 1 pregnancy. There can be psychological effects. People do feel badly when there is a misscarriage but once the embryo or embryos are implanted it is as if you are pregnant. There are 2 quantitative hcg's done. I think the 1st one was at 12 days and the second one was at 14 days. The numbers can tell you if it took. If the second test is lower maybe it did not take. You can still lose the pregnancy. You can also get a false positive with a home pregnancy test because you get an hcg shot during the process. One of the movies that I really like because I think that this movie is very empathetic is called " a smile like yours' Although it is not very realistic I think it really stresses the importance of how people feel when they want to start a family and it has a happy ending. " There were 11 different women at work that got pregnant before I did and I made most of them quilts for their babies, I got pretty depressed at times. Waiting for that 1st test is very nerve wracking to say the least. I did the home pregnancy test 8 times with Josh. I took it everyday after day 8 and then took it every day for 8 days to see if the color was darker each time I took it. I would take it 1st thing in the morning because that is the best time to take it I have heard. The hcg level with was double with the second hcg. At 21 days you can hear the heartbeat and I think that was the 1st ultrasound but I am not sure. I was wondering if there was more than 1. Twins would have been ok. I know of 4 ivf attempts that worked on the 1st and the 4th try. The fertility drugs are what cost the most money in our case. The drugs are stronger today probably. Cyropreservation can be used and the embryos can be thawed and used later. Maybe they are sort of like twins in a way. 2 of the dixie chix, Celine Dionne. Angelina Jolie. It is getting more and more common. People are more open about it than they use to be. Times are changing and women are establishing their careers, buying houses and getting some money saved more and more and put off starting a family. Then they find it difficult to conceive and look to professionals for help. There are some women who feel that we are being unfair to other women if we do not disclose our difficulties because it leads people to believe we can wait as long as we want to have a family which is simply not true of course. The spotlight was on the McCoughs for awhile but now that the kids are older Good Housekeeping did not want to do a cover story this year. The people from the community got together and built them a beautiful house that they let people come to see before they moved into it and they had a lot of volunteers from their church who helped. They had a pattern of children's clothing sold ( Mrs Mccough was a seamstress) and they wrote a book called ' 7 from Heaven' They live in Carlisle. I have never met them personally. It was quite a secret to keep. I wish that more insurance companies would cover the costs. The problem is that it is an elective procedure. There are support groups for people going through fertility problems. There are a lot of online support groups now. Ivf well probably be less controversial as time goes on but some things will always be controversial. **************Who's never won? Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music. (http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?ncid=emlcntusmusi00000\ 003) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 She could get a real nice house here for that price. I live in West Des Moines in Iowa. Housing is still affordable here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 yes... let's pray for those children. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 I think it was because of a chemical in the skin. The skin is the largest organ in the body. > > Can I ask what the science behind women of color aging slower is? I > never knew that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 I think the mother needs to figure a way to raise these kids properly, not us, not the dr. > > I think that the Dr. should have to pay for all these kids and not our > taxes. What was the Dr. thinking when he helped her. I really feel sorry for her > parents. From what I have read and heard on tv they are raising the other > kids. This is very selfish on lots of people. But the all the kids will be > the one hurting in the long run. I thing we all need to say some prayers for > the family. > > Rita > **************Great Deals on Dell Laptops. Starting at $499. > (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1217883258x1201191827/aol? redir=http://ad.doubleclick. > net/clk;211531132;33070124;e) > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 If 270 is not enough then it is time to move. > > I have heard that she just got a 270,000 dollar settlement but housing is so > expensive in California that 270,000 is not a lot of money at least if you > are going to buy a house. There are some clinics I have heard of that will > implant as many eggs as you want. The lady that I met with triplets was from > Florida and usually the 1st transfer is included in the costs. I had to see a > perinatologist the last time I got pregnant because I had a history of > preeclampsia. I was told that there is a 20% increased chance of getting preeclampsia > which can be life threatening. I also had to wait. It took me 9 months to > have so they asked that I wait until was 9 months old to try > again. They also thought I should consider having them farther than 1 grade apart > in school, Josh has a birthday sept 29 so they are 2 years apart. Our > insurance covered about 60% of the cost because ADM had an inclusion in their > policies that they pay for fertility costs and they are the only company I have > ever heard of that does that but our out of pocket expenses were still 30 thou > over a 3 year period. We both had to have a psychiatric evaluation and be > tested for some genetic things and see a counselor a couple times. They offered to > have me participate in a test study for a drug company and the drug company > would have covered all the costs but I did not go for it because there were > other drugs that were stronger. Fertinex is the drug I took. They have classes > to show you how to give your own shots too. People from all over the world > go there. > **************Who's never won? Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on > AOL Music. > (http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy? ncid=emlcntusmusi00000003) > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 Can I ask what the science behind women of color aging slower is? I never knew that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 In the best possible world Liz. That's not reality. She just filed bankruptcy and the bill for neonatal alone they say will be around a million dollars. We are the ones paying for those poor children. I know this is a horrible thing to say -but I wish she was deemed to be an unfit mother and those poor children (at least the 8 preemies) could go to loving parents who aren't mentally unstable. I mean how can anyone think of her as anything but mentally unstable? And she may not have enough money to pay for her poor little preemies -but guess she did have enough to hire a publicist! (so perhaps not mentally unstable -perhaps she saw this as a way for fame?) " The children are still hospitalized and their mother has not spoken publicly, but she hired a public relations expert. The flack, Joann Killeen, said her client has been deluged with offers for books, TV shows and other deals, but has not made any decisions. Killeen is doing her best to counter portrayals of the woman - an unemployed single mom - as unstable and irresponsible. " She's very joyful. Nadya is a very balanced and together woman, " she said. " She's smart, she's bright, she's articulate, she's well-educated and she has a wonderful sense of humor. " Good thing. She's gonna need it. " http://www.nydailynews.com/news/us_world/2009/02/03/2009-02-03_octuplet_mom_driv\ en_by_lonely_childhood_.html ===== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 I guess the best possible world is indeed one where selfishness remains uncelebrated. We do not have that. > > In the best possible world Liz. That's not reality. She just filed > bankruptcy and the bill for neonatal alone they say will be around a > million dollars. We are the ones paying for those poor children. I > know this is a horrible thing to say -but I wish she was deemed to be > an unfit mother and those poor children (at least the 8 preemies) > could go to loving parents who aren't mentally unstable. > > I mean how can anyone think of her as anything but mentally unstable? > > And she may not have enough money to pay for her poor little preemies > -but guess she did have enough to hire a publicist! > (so perhaps not mentally unstable -perhaps she saw this as a way for fame?) > > " The children are still hospitalized and their mother has not spoken > publicly, but she hired a public relations expert. > > The flack, Joann Killeen, said her client has been deluged with offers > for books, TV shows and other deals, but has not made any decisions. > > Killeen is doing her best to counter portrayals of the woman - an > unemployed single mom - as unstable and irresponsible. > > " She's very joyful. Nadya is a very balanced and together woman, " she > said. > > " She's smart, she's bright, she's articulate, she's well-educated and > she has a wonderful sense of humor. " > > Good thing. She's gonna need it. " > http://www.nydailynews.com/news/us_world/2009/02/03/2009-02- 03_octuplet_mom_driven_by_lonely_childhood_.html > > ===== > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 Sorry- I hope I did not offend you or anyone else. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and the medical costs and risk of birth defects is such a personal choice that it can strike a nerve. Sometimes when one door closes a window opens. People who love kids can become teachers, nurses, adopt, join big brothers and sisters, volunteer at a nursing home, do respite work. Having kids is the hardest job we will ever do. I think Bill Clinton said that. Maybe the octuplet story will bring attention to people being responsible when doing these types of procedures. **************Who's never won? Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music. (http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?ncid=emlcntusmusi00000\ 003) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 The doctor planted 6 eggs before and most of the times she tried only 1 took. That would explain why they used 6 then. I am glad to hear that she plans to support them. We should not jump to conclusions I guess. I still want people to know that it is highly unusual to have 6 embryos implanted. The clinics are required to report their success rates. You ought to google ivf success rates. In 1997 0r 1998 Hopkins in Baltimore had the highest success rate and the Mayo Clinic in Rodchester, Minnesota I believe was number 2. **************Who's never won? Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music. (http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?ncid=emlcntusmusi00000\ 003) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 That is terrible. Boy, I do not know how people do it. When I was a little kid about 45 years ago my parents were worried about making their 101 dollar a month housepayment on our brand new 900 square foot ranch in Ankeny, Iowa. I know what you mean. I almost moved to Hunnington Beach California in the 70's but I never could have afforded to buy a house there. Iowa is cold but it is a nice quiet place to live, the schools are good. I have never been to New York and maybe someday I will get there. **************Who's never won? Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music. (http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?ncid=emlcntusmusi00000\ 003) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 I NY Hudson valley it would get you a slanted over garage. No joke. From: stehn4@... <stehn4@...> Subject: Re: [ ] Re: Octuplets mom has son with autism Date: Sunday, February 8, 2009, 3:24 PM She could get a real nice house here for that price. I live in West Des Moines in Iowa. Housing is still affordable here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 I read in the paper yesterday that the mom had 6 embryos for each of her first 6 pregnancies, she had singletons except for one pregnancy that resulted in twins....it is possible that with this most recent pregenancy, the doctors had no idea that all 6 would take, including two that would spilt into identical twins. Also, people are stating our tax dollars paying for these kids, however, do we know for a fact if the mother has her own insurance or she is on medicaid? She claims in the newspaper that she has never been on welfare and she will find a way to make this work...so maybe she has private insurance that has paid for her preemies' healthcare? Lori > > I think that the Dr. should have to pay for all these kids and not our > taxes. What was the Dr. thinking when he helped her. I really feel sorry for her > parents. From what I have read and heard on tv they are raising the other > kids. This is very selfish on lots of people. But the all the kids will be > the one hurting in the long run. I thing we all need to say some prayers for > the family. > > Rita > **************Great Deals on Dell Laptops. Starting at $499. > (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1217883258x1201191827/aol?redir=http://\ ad.doubleclick. > net/clk;211531132;33070124;e) > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2009 Report Share Posted February 8, 2009 Sorry for the confusion, I only posted this because it stated she had one ASD child... I in no way would call her or anyone names or even judge for that mater... And yes all of this is an article not my opinion!!! That is why I add to my posts the link so you can verify the article!!!  I believe she has caused quite a controversy since she had sextuplets (one of them ASD) and now opted to have 8 more and being a single mom ( The father wants nothing to do with it)... The concerns are she will have to rely on the taxpayer's money to be able to raise them all... again not my opinion just pointing out why she has upset some people... NOT ME THOUGH... More power to her, I am going nuts with 2 ASD boys, I could never dream of having all this kids... I know I could not do it at all!!!  Love, Gabby. :0) http://stemcellforautism.blogspot.com/  " I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin. " ~ Jerry Newport   Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 9, 2009 Report Share Posted February 9, 2009 LOL you're kidding? $270,000 wouldn't buy a closet here in NJ either. And if a person has their work and family and Dr's and all their support in one area, is it really all that wise for them to move? Becky In a message dated 2/8/2009 12:07:39 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, lizlaw@... writes: If 270 is not enough then it is time to move. **************Who's never won? Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music. (http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?ncid=emlcntusmusi00000\ 003) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.