Guest guest Posted February 11, 2009 Report Share Posted February 11, 2009 Hi ! Mom's always do know best! Yes there are those kids that do better on higher DHA too. Other than you I know that Tina's son does well on just the ProEPA alone -no ProEFA at all. My son and many others here have found raising the EPA too high creates a regression. Thing about fish oils are since they work so quickly both ways -it's easy to know what the right formula is for each child. I post what works for the majority -but each of us over time will learn if our child is the exception. And who cares -as long as it works!! ===== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 12, 2009 Report Share Posted February 12, 2009 Hi : posted about my son Landon on ProEPA...I did start with the original formula and he was on 6 caps when I accidentally switched him to just ProEPA. The bottles look very similiar...it was a week later when I figured out what I was doing. At that time he was 3 1/2 and age appropriate for expressive speech. I remember him being in the boys' garden talking to the bugs...using short sentences that I hadn't heard before! It was one of those moments you just don't forget! I did try to go back to the original formula, but he lost the clarity he had gained so I switched him back to just ProEPA. Since though, I have been able to reduce his fish oil caps from 6 to 3 almost a year ago with no regression. I just recently switched him again to a different formula. For Landon this works...for some like was saying more EPA brings on a regression such as slurred speech. To keep down confusion, I don't usually post what Landon's formula is, but you saying that you have tried the other formula with no results and playing with the oils to try to find what might work is a great idea for others if the 2EFA-1EPA isn't working. Glad you found something that is bringing out your little man's voice! Tina Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 13, 2009 Report Share Posted February 13, 2009 It is wonderful when you hit on something that you *know* is helping your child. I wanted to post to make sure that parents who've not had success with the formula used on this list go ahead and experiment a little (but slowly). There is OVERWHELMING evidence that EFAs are critical for developing brains. I also think that kids with two diagnoses (autism and apraxia combo in particular) might have slightly different needs than children with just apraxia. I also think that the DAN protocol, with regard to EFAs, doesn't really address the apraxia part and has a very " one size fits all " approach. Our children are all individuals and we as moms have to figure out what their unique needs are. We have a heck of a long way to go but I'm very encouraged by these developments in my son and hope I've encouraged others to really persist with EFAs for their children. Heck, my NT son, my husband and I all take EFAs now as well (but different formulas). > > Hi : > posted about my son Landon on ProEPA...I did start with the > original formula and he was on 6 caps when I accidentally switched > him to just ProEPA. The bottles look very similiar...it was a week > later when I figured out what I was doing. At that time he was 3 1/2 > and age appropriate for expressive speech. I remember him being in > the boys' garden talking to the bugs...using short sentences that I > hadn't heard before! It was one of those moments you just don't > forget! I did try to go back to the original formula, but he lost the > clarity he had gained so I switched him back to just ProEPA. Since > though, I have been able to reduce his fish oil caps from 6 to 3 > almost a year ago with no regression. I just recently switched him > again to a different formula. For Landon this works...for some like > was saying more EPA brings on a regression such as slurred > speech. To keep down confusion, I don't usually post what Landon's > formula is, but you saying that you have tried the other formula with > no results and playing with the oils to try to find what might work > is a great idea for others if the 2EFA-1EPA isn't working. > Glad you found something that is bringing out your little man's voice! > Tina > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2009 Report Share Posted February 14, 2009 - I wanted to thank you for your post! It reminds me to always be striving for more and play around with what feels right. I have accidentally given my son more EPA on occasion, and I had noticed the same thing. I know that a lot of us are going to DAN Drs, but have to also go with our gut. Our DAN Dr. is actually impressed by the high doses of fish oil this groups uses-she says that people usually use too little and that is why they don't see a difference! This is kind of an OT question (but at least it isn't about Octomom!)- -where do you go to post questions about DAN protocols? We are just starting on that journey and there are so many options to consider. We go next month to get our test results back (we did hair, urine, and stool), but she has recommended the multi-vitamin (he didn't like the first one so we ordered other samples), zinc (which is AMAZING!), b-12 shots (but we have the oral B-12 now and haven't started that yes), probiotic (totally amazing), and of course we are on the GFCF diet (most results with that intervention, it is as dramatic as the fish oils were for my son's speech). Thanks, Penny http://twoplusoneequalsfive.blogspot.com/ > > Hello parents, > > I just thought I'd post about my past several months of experimenting > with fish oil dosages with my ASD/Apraxic son. Before I really became > an active member of this group, I followed the advice of our DAN > doctor and gave my son Cod Liver oil. Nothing much happened. > > So, I started on Nordic Naturals EFAs and, nothing much. After about > two months, I added one, then two, EPAs and thought I saw some > improvements including increased pointing, more babbling, etc. > > About three weeks ago, I upped the EPA to 3 capsules and, well, we've > had a really noticeable spurt in word approximations and clarity of > words as well as BRAND NEW sounds we've never heard before. He started > using " f " (wow) and now asks me for " fuh fries " when he's hungry. He > used to use mostly " neutral " vowel sounds (uh) so, bear, bus, beans, > etc. all sounded the same (ie, buh). He's gained dipthongs (/ai/ as in > hi! and bye; /ei/ as in say, hey; and /oi/ as in boy). This is not > just my imagination either as his teacher, both the school SLP and OT > as well as his ABA therapists have all noticed this big difference in > the last three weeks. I didn't ask anyone their opinions on his > language; their comments were all offered spontaneously. > > I've done a fair bit of reading about this and there is *some* > evidence to suggest that kids with ASD benefit from a higher ratio of > EPA to EFA. I can dig through my articles and post. > > My son just turned 5 and I was really beginning to wonder if we'd ever > get much more language out of him as his progress was painfully, > painfully slow. I now feel a lot more optimistic and am looking > forward to hearing more of what he has to say. > > If you have a child with apraxia and ASD, don't give up. The formula I > used may not be right for everyone but if you *methodically* > experiment with dosages, you might just come up with a dosage that > works for your child. FYI, I didn't change anything else in his biomed > regime during this time as I was focused on figuring out the oils (and > also I can't keep up with all the costs of DAN!) so, I'm pretty sure > the changes are due to this fish oil ratio. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2009 Report Share Posted February 14, 2009 Penny, This is a wonderful group for all things biomed.... chelatingkids2 This is another smaller group with a lot of kids with dyspraxia/apraxia which I love..... ApraxiaDyspraxiaBiomedSupport They are both biomed groups but discuss therapy too. Janice Mother of Mark, 14 [ ] Re: recent successes with fish oil dosage for kiddo with apraxia & autism - I wanted to thank you for your post! It reminds me to always be striving for more and play around with what feels right. I have accidentally given my son more EPA on occasion, and I had noticed the same thing. I know that a lot of us are going to DAN Drs, but have to also go with our gut. Our DAN Dr. is actually impressed by the high doses of fish oil this groups uses-she says that people usually use too little and that is why they don't see a difference! This is kind of an OT question (but at least it isn't about Octomom!)- -where do you go to post questions about DAN protocols? We are just starting on that journey and there are so many options to consider. We go next month to get our test results back (we did hair, urine, and stool), but she has recommended the multi-vitamin (he didn't like the first one so we ordered other samples), zinc (which is AMAZING!), b-12 shots (but we have the oral B-12 now and haven't started that yes), probiotic (totally amazing), and of course we are on the GFCF diet (most results with that intervention, it is as dramatic as the fish oils were for my son's speech). Thanks, Penny http://twoplusoneequalsfive.blogspot.com/ > > Hello parents, > > I just thought I'd post about my past several months of experimenting > with fish oil dosages with my ASD/Apraxic son. Before I really became > an active member of this group, I followed the advice of our DAN > doctor and gave my son Cod Liver oil. Nothing much happened. > > So, I started on Nordic Naturals EFAs and, nothing much. After about > two months, I added one, then two, EPAs and thought I saw some > improvements including increased pointing, more babbling, etc. > > About three weeks ago, I upped the EPA to 3 capsules and, well, we've > had a really noticeable spurt in word approximations and clarity of > words as well as BRAND NEW sounds we've never heard before. He started > using " f " (wow) and now asks me for " fuh fries " when he's hungry. He > used to use mostly " neutral " vowel sounds (uh) so, bear, bus, beans, > etc. all sounded the same (ie, buh). He's gained dipthongs (/ai/ as in > hi! and bye; /ei/ as in say, hey; and /oi/ as in boy). This is not > just my imagination either as his teacher, both the school SLP and OT > as well as his ABA therapists have all noticed this big difference in > the last three weeks. I didn't ask anyone their opinions on his > language; their comments were all offered spontaneously. > > I've done a fair bit of reading about this and there is *some* > evidence to suggest that kids with ASD benefit from a higher ratio of > EPA to EFA. I can dig through my articles and post. > > My son just turned 5 and I was really beginning to wonder if we'd ever > get much more language out of him as his progress was painfully, > painfully slow. I now feel a lot more optimistic and am looking > forward to hearing more of what he has to say. > > If you have a child with apraxia and ASD, don't give up. The formula I > used may not be right for everyone but if you *methodically* > experiment with dosages, you might just come up with a dosage that > works for your child. FYI, I didn't change anything else in his biomed > regime during this time as I was focused on figuring out the oils (and > also I can't keep up with all the costs of DAN!) so, I'm pretty sure > the changes are due to this fish oil ratio. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2009 Report Share Posted February 14, 2009 Hi Penny, I belong to a local (SF Bay area) group of parents that are using biomed to help their children. It works out really well as many of us share the same doctors, etc. If you are in the Bay Area, I can give you the name of the group. I did belong to other " DAN " or biomed type groups but I just couldn't keep up with the volume of email! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2009 Report Share Posted February 14, 2009 Dan stands for defeat autism now. Not all that practice dan are medical doctors, and even if they are not all have a background in pediatric medicine. It's not that everyone here uses it or even believes in more extreme biomedical, but those that do talk about it often. It's good to be aware of the more complex and expensive methods if the basic methods that work for the majority don't work for your child. Basic methods meaning appropriate therapy and fish oils. Have you read The Late Talker book? As far as the product you brought up -my advice; please look up the word hypovitaminosis and share the dosage of vitamin E and vitamin K with your child's doctor prior to starting it. In addition I'd share the feedback from this group with your child's doctor as well. (link below -if you can't open let us know) In my opinion I'd avoid that product and wish someone gave me that advise prior to putting my son on it. Sadly it appears to me that there is no way to know if your child will be one of the children that will have a severe negative reaction...until they do. One of our members here, , her daughter Evoni who was seizure free prior to this product is still being investigated. Since being on this product she has continued to regress and there are a huge amount of tests and experts still looking into why she continues to have seizures since. 's reports on Evoni as well as mine and many others are in the links below. Learn the easy way and read the feedback first. To me this product is a lesson in why not to take things to the extreme when the basic was working just fine. So again -please read up on the less fancy -but very effective and proven through the years basics. /links/Pharma_Omega_Spea\ k_reports_from_group_001224703760/ ===== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2009 Report Share Posted February 14, 2009 Thanks for the advice. That is alarming news. I had read that few children suffer negative consequences from taking SPEAK, but thought that they were in the minority but from reading some of the stuff on here, I'm thinking maybe not. I did have my son's pediatrician look it over and he thought itlooked fine. What supplement is safe with not asmany side affects and with positive results? My son has started talking more but I wanted to help him with supplements as well. I thought it couldn't hurt to try his speech is still unintelligible about half of the time. I have read The Late Talker book I know it suggested Efalex, is that safe? Please let me know!!  Thanks so much, Tina From: kiddietalk <kiddietalk@...> Subject: [ ] Re: recent successes with fish oil dosage for kiddo with apraxia & autism Date: Saturday, February 14, 2009, 10:45 PM Dan stands for defeat autism now. Not all that practice dan are medical doctors, and even if they are not all have a background in pediatric medicine. It's not that everyone here uses it or even believes in more extreme biomedical, but those that do talk about it often. It's good to be aware of the more complex and expensive methods if the basic methods that work for the majority don't work for your child. Basic methods meaning appropriate therapy and fish oils. Have you read The Late Talker book? As far as the product you brought up -my advice; please look up the word hypovitaminosis and share the dosage of vitamin E and vitamin K with your child's doctor prior to starting it. In addition I'd share the feedback from this group with your child's doctor as well. (link below -if you can't open let us know) In my opinion I'd avoid that product and wish someone gave me that advise prior to putting my son on it. Sadly it appears to me that there is no way to know if your child will be one of the children that will have a severe negative reaction...until they do. One of our members here, , her daughter Evoni who was seizure free prior to this product is still being investigated. Since being on this product she has continued to regress and there are a huge amount of tests and experts still looking into why she continues to have seizures since. 's reports on Evoni as well as mine and many others are in the links below. Learn the easy way and read the feedback first. To me this product is a lesson in why not to take things to the extreme when the basic was working just fine. So again -please read up on the less fancy -but very effective and proven through the years basics. /links/Pharma_Omega_Spea\ k_reports_from_group_001224703760/ ===== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 16, 2009 Report Share Posted February 16, 2009 Hi - We used to live in CA, but we moved to CO about 10 years ago. You are lucky to have found local resources! Penny Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 16, 2009 Report Share Posted February 16, 2009 Thanks Janice! I know that not everyone on this group wants to go there (and boy, do I wish we didn't need to either!), but just like fish oils were revolutionary in their time (still are), there are so many options to pursue that are as amazing. These interventions benefit the sensory integration and speech articulation issues of apraxia, and aren't just for autistic kids. We are in a place, as so many families are today, to explore these interventions and benefit from them. Penny http://twoplusoneequalsfive.blogspot.com/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 17, 2010 Report Share Posted February 17, 2010 Greetings, We have a cute 34 month-old girl that was diagnosed with FTT at about one year. Then hypotonia, but no underlying DX. She suffers from reflux. Delayed walking and speech. Genetic testing and MRI are normal. Now her docs are thinking some type of metabolic disease, but say it will be very hard to pin-point. She's been doing ST, OT, & PT since 12 months. Recently the ST suggested NourishLife Speak. I've read some of the cautions regarding that product above, but it seems fish oils are beneficial. We had her one them off and on, but didn't notice any changes. Perhaps she was too young. Can anyone point us to a good starting dosage for Omega -3, Vit. E, etc. Does anyone here supplement with Acetyl-L-Carnatine? Finally, anyone in the San Diego Area that might have some advice on docs and/or alternative therapies? Thanks! Emi's Dad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2010 Report Share Posted February 19, 2010 Hi, I think UC has a great reputation and probably is not too far away from San Diego. http://www.ucdmc.ucdavis.edu/neurology/ Also, if you suspect that you daughter has autism, the DAN doctor's HQ is in San Diego and they have list of DAN doctors that you can try to find in your area: http://www.autism.com/ Many of those DAN doctors are also pediatricians with MDs. Unlike traditional doctors, they have an more open mind towards alternative medicine. My wife just took my daughter to see a Dr. at CHOP Autism institute. Again the Dr. only wants to prescribe regular medicine, tenex, for reducing her hyperactivity and self-injury behavior. The only supplement that most mainstream neurologists and developmental pediatrician would endorse seems to be fish oil. For them, the results of all other supplements have not been substantiated by strict scientific research based on placebo comparative test on large patient population. Good luck. Xun From: KaiK <kotora8@...> Subject: [ ] Re: recent successes with fish oil dosage for kiddo with apraxia & autism Date: Wednesday, February 17, 2010, 12:14 PM  Greetings, We have a cute 34 month-old girl that was diagnosed with FTT at about one year. Then hypotonia, but no underlying DX. She suffers from reflux. Delayed walking and speech. Genetic testing and MRI are normal. Now her docs are thinking some type of metabolic disease, but say it will be very hard to pin-point. She's been doing ST, OT, & PT since 12 months. Recently the ST suggested NourishLife Speak. I've read some of the cautions regarding that product above, but it seems fish oils are beneficial. We had her one them off and on, but didn't notice any changes. Perhaps she was too young. Can anyone point us to a good starting dosage for Omega -3, Vit. E, etc. Does anyone here supplement with Acetyl-L-Carnatine? Finally, anyone in the San Diego Area that might have some advice on docs and/or alternative therapies? Thanks! Emi's Dad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2010 Report Share Posted February 19, 2010 I did not give the right web address for Mind Institute. Here it is http://www.ucdmc.ucdavis.edu/mindinstitute/ From: KaiK <kotora8 (DOT) com> Subject: [childrensapraxiane t] Re: recent successes with fish oil dosage for kiddo with apraxia & autism @groups. com Date: Wednesday, February 17, 2010, 12:14 PM  Greetings, We have a cute 34 month-old girl that was diagnosed with FTT at about one year. Then hypotonia, but no underlying DX. She suffers from reflux. Delayed walking and speech. Genetic testing and MRI are normal. Now her docs are thinking some type of metabolic disease, but say it will be very hard to pin-point. She's been doing ST, OT, & PT since 12 months. Recently the ST suggested NourishLife Speak. I've read some of the cautions regarding that product above, but it seems fish oils are beneficial. We had her one them off and on, but didn't notice any changes. Perhaps she was too young. Can anyone point us to a good starting dosage for Omega -3, Vit. E, etc. Does anyone here supplement with Acetyl-L-Carnatine? Finally, anyone in the San Diego Area that might have some advice on docs and/or alternative therapies? Thanks! Emi's Dad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 19, 2010 Report Share Posted February 19, 2010 Greetings! There is a wealth of archived information on fish oils here on this page http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=115029735601 & topic=7401 We also have a chapter about it in The Late Talker book -and after reading the above link you have any specific questions just let me know. This is what we are raising monies for the end the ignorance once and for all! We have used fish oils -just plain old fish oils with higher EPA to DHA a bit of GLA -small amount with HUGE success for over a decade- no side effects. Fish oils contain vitamin e -so you don't necessarily need to supplement higher and here is what I can share on that. With what I know now about the meta-analysis of vitamin e on median, 400 IU I think it was for an increase in sudden death in adults -keep in mind children are different dosage than adults -and that was the average dosage most of us 'were' using (eeeeeek) Meta-Analysis: High-Dosage Vitamin E Supplementation May Increase All-Cause Mortality http://annals.highwire.org/content/142/1/37.abstract -I'd think very carefully about putting a child onto daily vitamin e capsules unless it was under a medical doctor's care who knows your child has this type of deficiency which is rare. I wish I knew to look into this prior- never will I let my guard down again. I don't just check and double check =I go outside the box to check and I suggest to all of you to do the very same. I wish someone shared the word " hypervitaminosis " with me too!!! I can check my excel spreadsheet but based on memory I believe most of us used the vitamin e based on one person's theory -and not because our children tested low in vitamin e -and that theory was Dr. 's who is the one that worked with her hospital to patent the formula that is now licensed by Pharma Omega for Speak from what I remember. In my opinion we all followed this at the time because we trusted Dr. and as a group got to know her and I was if you check the archives the first to share via Dr. and try the vitamin e. many of us did see surges initially on the lower dosage of vitamin E even which could be explained because of the study that high dosages of fish oils over a period of time 'can' create a vitamin e deficiency. However that study does not answer the basic question...how often would one need to supplement? Once a year? Once a month? And it didn't answer the question of what dosage? would they be thinking 3x upper tolerable level? I highly doubt that!!! Please keep in mind that each capsule of ProEFA contains 15 IU raised up from 8 IU of vitamin e due to the study I just referred to -I'm sure much more on the links I provide below. About speak you may want to read the following messages: Intro message from Lori Rosen Message that explains the reason she's compiled all the reports from the group /message/85028 Negative reports on Speak /message/85030 Neutral reports on Speak /message/85029 Positive reports on Speak /message/85031 It is possible that your SLP recommended speak because like the one SLP who just posted she was not aware of the dramatic side effects reported in this group as you can read above from this supplements which in my opinion the company has greatly tried to downplay -but have been picked up by others. You can find info as well on this page including the following article written by an SLP: http://en.allexperts.com/q/Speech-Disorders-987/2008/11/New-patented-product-ava\ ilable.htm Expert: Rossetter, M.S., CCC-SLP - 11/19/2008 Question Hi, I have been doing some research and have come across a new product that is now available for speech disorders. The company is offering a box complimentary to anyone that has a child that could benefit from it. The product is called speak and it is offered at www.speechnutrients.com. What is your opinion on this product? THank you, Judy Answer Thank you for the question, Judy. (Sorry for the delay in answering your question. I have been ill for the past few days.) I'm so glad you asked about this product before giving it to your child. I will begin by saying that I am obviously not a physician, and I do not have first-hand experience with this product, but I do have a general knowledge of nutrition, as well as research design. Having read through the SpeechNutrients™ website, I have found some reasons I would not personally use or recommend this product. 1.) While it is true that research has shown a benefit for taking Omega-3 fatty acids, this company has mixed Omega-3 fatty acids with Vitamins E and K in VERY large quantities. The ingredients (fish oil, vitamin K, vitamin E, etc.) in speak™ are all generally known to be of benefit to humans, but there are no studies to show that exceeding recommended daily values in such large quantities is even safe—much less beneficial. Not to mention, there are no studies to show that these ingredients in such large quantities don't have adverse interactions with each other. According to the product's chart, the recommended dose of 4 capsules per day (2 capsules twice per day) has children under 4 taking 10,000% of the recommended daily allowance of vitamin E (according to their information, no allowance has been set for children under 4). People aged 4 and over would be taking 3,330 % of vitamin E and 5,750 % of vitamin K. Since they are vitamins, the doses are not as regulated as medication, so 40 pound 4-year-olds are lumped in the same category as 250 pound, 40-year-old men. Daily allowances are set for a reason… It's never a good idea to take too much of any vitamin. The research I have in front of me (1) says, " vitamin E has been thought to raise blood pressure… large doses of vitamin E may have a mild immune-suppressing effect. " " High intakes of vitamin E oil can cause nausea, diarrhea, or flatulence in some people. " " Vitamin K is necessary for normal blood clotting. " This product's web page states: " Physically, some children (and some adults) may experience loose stools… " –but they don't say why. Obviously, it is because this is a very large dose of vitamin E. Nausea, diarrhea, etc. are the least of the side effects associated with this product. It is very concerning that this is the list of side effects listed on the website: " elevated heart beat, fever, possible seizures, headaches, emotional outbursts and regressions in speech and behaviors. " The makers of this product report they, " do not know if any of these incidents are or are not a result of taking speak™. " This is because, as far as I can tell, the research has not been conducted. 2.) The makers of speak™ report, " Our initial intention was to create this formula for use in upcoming clinical trial research. However, during the process of collaboration, formulation, and observation and understanding the importance of timing, it became clear that the most responsible action we could take was to make this formula available to the public. " They intended to do research? They thought it was responsible to make this product available before they conducted the necessary research? In the scientific community, this is not the way to go about responsibly distributing a product--- especially a product meant for children. Optimally, research is done to ensure safety and effectiveness, then the product is released for the public. It is important to mention: anyone can get a patent for anything that is novel—this does not mean that studies have been conducted in any way. And since this product is only considered a " supplement, " the FDA does not play a part in regulating the safety or efficacy. The FDA website (2) says, " By law (DSHEA), the manufacturer is responsible for ensuring that its dietary supplement products are safe before they are marketed. Unlike drug products that must be proven safe and effective for their intended use before marketing, there are no provisions in the law for FDA to " approve " dietary supplements for safety or effectiveness before they reach the consumer. " Normally, products claiming this type of success should have scientific-based evidence for findings. The makers of speak™ report that they are in the process of conducting a " Virtual Focus Group " where parents keep a diary and report every couple of weeks. This is not the optimum way of going about conducting research. In order for the company to make the claims they do, they would need a speech and language professional, with an unbiased opinion, to test the child's speech and language before, during, and after taking the product… otherwise, how can they claim it increases and improves these things? Additionally, a study of this nature –one where children ingest untested products—should involve regular check-ups from a physician to closely monitor adverse physical side effects. As far as I can tell from the information they provided on their website, the makers of speak™ have provided no data in these regards for this particular formula. This opinion is based on the information given on the SpeechNutrients™ website, documented nutrition research, and my knowledge of research design. As I mentioned earlier, I do not have first-hand experience with this product. As always, you should speak with your child's physician before beginning, ending, or dismissing a supplementation regiment. If you have concerns about your child's speech and language development, I recommend you seek an evaluation by a Speech-Language Pathologist. I hope this was of some help to you. (1) Haas EM (1992) Staying Healthy with Nutrition: The Complete Guide to Diet and Nutritional Medication. Celestial Arts, Berkley, California. (2) U. S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Overview of Dietary Supplements. http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/ds-oview.html#safe ===== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.