Guest guest Posted August 28, 1999 Report Share Posted August 28, 1999 http://www.tcpalm.com/stuart/v05scour.html Courthouse builder sues subcontractor August 5, 1998 By Alan Barton of the News staff STUART - As County officials near a multimillion-dollar settlement over the " sick " courthouse complex, the buildings' contractor wants to shift blame to the company it paid to install the ventilation ducts. Centex-Rooney, the company County paid to build a courthouse complex that was later found to be sickening employees with toxic mold, filed a lawsuit Tuesday asking a judge to place blame on subcontractor J. Kirlin. County attorneys are still working with Fort Lauderdale-based Centex-Rooney on a deal to reimburse the county about $20 million for its troubles and costs while the courthouse was cleaned, County Attorney Oldehoff has said. The settlement would still fall short of fully compensating the county for the $28 million spent to clean and rebuild the courthouse complex, and it's also about $2.2 million less than what officials had sought. If comissioners approve a settlement, Centex-Rooney is hoping its new lawsuit will shift ultimate responsibility to Kirlin, which put in air, heating and ventilation systems. " You could say this suit reassigns responsibility, " said Jaffe, the Washington attorney for the contractor. But Jaffe added that it is not directly a result of the settlement talks with the county. Shane , the chief executive officer of Kirlin, said from the company's headquarters in land that he was not aware of the problems with the courthouse. He referred questions to the firm's Fort Lauderdale office, where a senior projects manager said he hadn't heard of the County courthouse. The courthouse and constitutional office buildings on East Ocean Boulevard, which opened in 1989, were evacuated three years later when county officials found two forms of toxic mold that employees said made them sick. The $12 million project doubled in cost after the county found the toxic mold more widespread than first thought. The two buildings were gutted, rebuilt and reopened in 1996. The county sued Centex-Rooney, and in April 1997 a jury awarded the county $11.5 million. A judge then adjusted the verdict to $14.2 million and added $3.1 million in attorneys' fees. Interest has increased the award to more than $20 million. In addition, several contractors that worked on the courthouse agreed to pay the county $2.9 million in settlements for their part in the faulty construction project. But the largest portion of the award, from Centex-Rooney, has been tied up in an appeal that upheld the judgment in December. The contractor has taken the case to the state Supreme Court, which has not indicated whether it will hear it. A settlement could end the case if Centex-Rooney agrees, probably for a lower amount than the judgment plus interest. It could take years for the county to get the money if an agreement is not reached, because the company is still appealing the judge's ruling on attorneys' fees. Centex-Rooney's lawsuit against the subcontractor also lists several insurance companies as plaintiffs because they insured Kirlin for construction glitches. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.