Guest guest Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 , As I said, I do hope to get to read it in the near future.Once found out the root cause of my son's Apraxia, I found the answer I needed, which is finding alternate pathways to learn to talk. I am aware that Doman Sr. is a physical therapit; however, I am aware that a brain surgeon was also on the original team. But none of that matters, as on my own (before Doman/Delacato) I discovered the miraculous wonders of neural pathways. This how how people break addictions, change habits, recover from strokes, and just plain out change the brain. It took Doman's team 20 years, lol, it took me 5 years to discover this. I was actually very greatful t have stumbled upon these readings and the NACD, for this is what I believe. Their methods do work, as I have been using them somewhat in a lay sense. I learned more from reading their materials than I have learned from all my son's doctors including a pediatric neurologist in five years. I am not knocking your book, as I am a writer, and I believe in writing wholeheartedly. I never said anything bad about your book. I am sure it is a great book. Unknowledgeable specialized doctors misdiagnosed my son at birth, labeled him, and then told us he would be severely mentally retarded due to their diagnosis, and they were wrong.I found out they were wrong about a lot of things. > > you may not be aware that this group is owned by me -and I co authored The Late Talker book. I was mearly asking you that if you did extensive research why you wouldn't have read the book that has been one of the best selling books for apraxia since it came out in 2003 -and it doesn't take any searching at all to learn that if you do a quick search for books on apraxia in children! > > We named the book The Late Talker because most don't know what apraxia is and one only knows that their child isn't speaking yet. Children that are not speaking yet as a whole are all in fact " late talkers " whether their diagnosis of why they aren't speaking is accurate or not. As we know -there are many autistic children that are misdiagnosed and are actually apraxic. But apraxia asides-the book is geared not only for apraxia but for any child who is not talking yet...which is why the full name of the book is 'The Late Talker What to Do If Your Child Isn't Talking Yet " There are strategies for both the child as well as the parent. > > You speak much about medical references. Again my one co author is a neurodevelopmental pediatrician and from memory right now I don't recall any other book on verbal apraxia written by a medical doctor. In addition there was this article > http://contemporarypediatrics.modernmedicine.com/contpeds/author/authorInfo.jsp?\ id=18406 > > I wrote the parent " to do at home part for this " > http://www.contemporarypediatrics.com/contpeds/data/articlestandard/contpeds/492\ 004/136315/article.pdf > > But then you also make me wonder why you bring up Doman when from what I read he's the last person a medical person would recommend. > As you probably know he's also not a doctor - in the 50s he was a physical therapist. In regards to apraxia I know many professionals I'd recommend before him; actually unless there's something about him other than what I just posted I'd probably never recommend him. The Late Talker does cover multisensory therapies and approaches to apraxia in addition to the traditional -but we only included those that we know to have worked in this group over the years. > > We all are here to help our child diagnosed with whatever communication impairment or delay they may have and I'm here to help whether you ever find the time to read my book or not -whether you like it or not. I'm just saying if I were you I'd find the time to read it -and read it before Doman's. Good luck with your son. > > ===== > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 Hi again Nikunj! The one SLP I always highly recommend from India is Vani Rupela. I have her information below as well as information from another therapist who recently sent information to me. But first BTW does this list help you (Vani is part of it too) http://www.rehabcouncil.nic.in/professionals_search/search_main.php?type=search & \ state= & field=AS%20AN%20AUDIOLOGIST%20AND%20SPEECH%20PATHOLOGIST & name= & exp= & quali\ = & lowerlimit=420 (cut from an archive) I'm not sure where everybody is in India -but I know someone who will know that can help you: I 'highly' suggest you contact Vani Rupela CCC SLP from All India Institute of Speech and Hearing. Vani is a member of this group who reaches out to help here -but not all are able to read every message so may have missed yours. Vani just wrote a paper for her PhD " EFFICACY OF NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTATION ON SPEECH AND LANGUAGE SKILLS OF CHILDREN WITH DEVELOPMENTAL APRAXIA OF SPEECH " Rupela, Vani Junior Research Fellow All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Mysore - 570 006 ISHA life member-L-707 Email: vavaoka@... (her other email is vanirupela@... ) ~~~~~~~end of archive I believe this is more recent contact info for Vani but I copied her on here just in case. Regardless I googled Vani and it appears she'll be easy enough for you to find. Now if she's close to you -that I wouldn't know. But I'd contact her either way as she may be better able to direct you if she is too far to help -and...she's knowledgeable about not only apraxia -but on the EFAs effect on it! I don't know anything about this professional -but here's a message I posted recently that was sent to me: A stammering free India Need To Understand Stammering First of all, I would like to introduce myself. I am Bhoop Singh Yadav, director of India Speech Therapy Centre, Amer- Jaipur (Rajasthan) - India. I was an acute stammerer since the early days of my childhood. Therefore, I kept on trying to find the causes of stammering and their cure. At the age of 20, I completely cured myself of stammering. After this, I further continued my research on this subject and developed a foolproof technique to cure the problem of stammering. Although stammering is not a physical disorder, a stammerer has to suffer a lot due to this problem as vocal fluency is the most important aspect of the personality of a person. Knowing the gravity of this problem, I decided to open an institution with an objective to cure the speech disorders. India Speech Therapy Centre was established by me during the year 1979 at Jaipur (India). Since then, I have cured thousands of persons suffering from stammering, misarticulation and other speech disorders. With my experience of more than 28 years, I observed that the root cause of this problem can be understood only by a speech therapist who suffered from stammering and cured himself by his own experience. Hence, its successful treatment can be undertaken only by such a speech therapist as he can very well understand and relate to the weaknesses of a stammerer. I therefore, conclude that the treatment of stammering cannot be undertaken successfully in any hospital worldwide by any other doctor and that no medicine or surgery can help cure it. For more details; Visit our website www.indiaspeechtherapy.org Contact me at (E-mail):- info@... Bhoop Singh Yadav India Speech Therapy Centre Amer, Jaipur (RAJASTHAN) INDIA > > > > Hi Nikunj and thank you so much for taking the time to answer my questions so comprehensibly. Based on some of your reported symptoms to me it does sound like you need to seek diagnosis at least of suspected apraxia to secure appropriate therapies. Over the years we've had a few wonderful professionals from India post however I'm not sure what facilities you are near to take your child for evaluations. The lack of some of the sounds may still be developmental at this point as she's only 2.3 years old -but here are the warning signs of apraxia that stand out to me: > > > > 1. She can say a word correct -but inconsistently. > > 2. She has said a few words once never to say them again. > > 3. She has some signs of oral apraxia (which can be diagnosed much earlier than verbal apraxia and if there almost guarantees verbal apraxia) Even though she is starting to learn some of the actions this is a huge red flag. > > 4. She has some signs of sensory issues (touch/auditory) keep in mind if she does have a diagnosis of sensory dysfunction something that means nothing to us can actually be painful for her- so it's good to know. > > > > You don't mention anything to make me think there are any tonal issues. > > > > I know I posted the links for you prior -but here they are again. > > > > Signs of oral apraxia > > http://www.cherab.org/information/speechlanguage/oralapraxia.html > > > > Signs of " soft signs " > > http://www.cherab.org/information/speechlanguage/parentfriendlysoftsigns.html > > > > > > Now we need to help you find a professional/s in your area for neuromedical exam. No harm in a second opinion by a speech pathologist in your area who is very knowledgeable about apraxia as well. > > > > Also thought the following may be helpful for you. Below is a " Late Talker " handout which we put together to raise awareness about warning signs for any " late talker " : > > > > Is Your Child A Late Talker? > > > > · Are they quiet? · Seem shy? · Not talking like their peers? > > > > · Allow you or siblings to speak for them? · Do you wonder why? > > > > > > Your baby's babbling and toddlers first words can be music to your ears. When faced with a child who doesn't speak or seems to have difficulty with words parents are often told that their child is " just a late-talker. " Unfortunately, all too often, that is not the case. The American Speech and Hearing Association (ASHA) estimates that 16 million Americans under the age of eighteen have a chronic speech-language disorder and that some 45 million Americans are affected by communication disorders of one kind or another which was announded by Congresswoman Carolyn McCarthy during the kick-off of the Better Hearing and Speech Month Health Fair in Washington, DC on May 8, 2002 . > > > > Most parents, and even most pediatricians, are not concerned when faced with a two-year-old who passes all of his developmental milestones on time - except speech and language. However, they should be. It is vitally important to identify and treat speech and language challenges as early as possible in a child's life, with a strong emphasis on the early intervention years of birth to three. At this age the brain is undergoing the most rapid development. No harm will come from therapeutic services. " Early intervention services are benign in their delivery but can be extremely beneficial. Don't wait. Six months for a 2 year old is equivalent to a quarter of their lifetime developmentally " as Dr. Judy Flax says, who is a Research Coordinator of the Tallal Lab and a Senior Research Speech Pathologist for the Infancy Studies Laboratory at the Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience (CMBN) of Rutgers University, Newark, NJ > > > > To find out about your nearest Early Intervention program you should call your local school district, they will be able to refer you to the program appropriate for your child's age. Waiting to refer is a loss of precious time that may impact on the child's learning ability and social-emotional well being in later years. Pediatricians and parents should insist on a speech and hearing evaluation as soon as there is a real concern about a child's early language development. Early referral is endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the American Academy of Neurology. In addition, " any child with a severe speech/language delay should have a comprehensive health and neurologic assessment to look for medical conditions that may be causing or contributing to the delay " as Dr.Marilyn Agin says, a developmental pediatrician who is the Medical Director for Early Intervention for NYC. > > > > CHERAB is a non-profit foundation that focuses on raising awareness of Apraxia and other speech and language delays, and the importance of early intervention. Working with developmental pediatricians, speech pathologists, neuroscientists and major hospitals the CHERAB Foundation is working towards research on therapies which may help late talkers with Apraxia, Dysarthria, delayed language development, Autism and other speech and language impairments. A list-serv overseen by pediatricians, speech-language pathologists, and educational consultants is run by CHERAB and can be found at their web-site. Through the list you can connect to many other parents who have children who have speech or language delays, and find out what they have been able to do to help their child. > > > > Some speech disorders can overlap, or be misdiagnosed. For example, " Verbal apraxia, a disorder of central nervous system (CNS) processing, and dysarthria, a disorder of output, are commonly confused " , says Dr. , chief of child development at the Chicago College of Medicine. " Experts are able to differentiate between these two disorders by listening carefully to a child's speech and by identifying certain physical clues " , says Dr. , but adds, " These disorders are poorly understood by physicians and by a lot of speech therapists as well. " It is possible for phonological disorders, apraxia and dysarthria to all occur together in the same child. Speech Language Impairments, which is connected to language based learning difficulties may also be present. And the severity of each may vary. > > > > Apraxia is perhaps the most misunderstood of all the speech disorders. So, what is apraxia? Verbal Apraxia is a neurological motor speech impairment that involves a breakdown in the transmission of messages from the brain to the muscles in the jaw, cheeks, lips, tongue and palate that facilitate speech. There is no obvious weakness in these muscles and the child may well be able to move them quite happily when not trying to speak. Apraxic children, who are usually seen as " just late talkers " when young, are able to comprehend language at an age appropriate level, however have difficulty expressing themselves using speech. With apraxia, a child knows what he wants to say but there is a road block obstructing the signal from the brain to the mouth. For any child with a speech disorder, but especially with apraxia, the earlier therapy is begun, the better the results for your child and their social-emotional development. > > > > Your Child's Language Development > > > > So how do you know when your child is having problems with speaking? When is a good time to seek out help? Being aware of average speech milestones can also help you decide whether or not to speak to your doctor. Some guidelines are provided here for your information, but if you have concerns about your child's speech or language development, or any other developmental issue, make an appointment with your pediatrician so you can discuss these issues. While the average milestones are a good way to measure development, every child develops at their own pace, and this overview should not be used to diagnose a specific problem. > > > > Normal Language Milestones - Clues of a Possible Problem > > > > > > Typically seen in first 6 months > > · Responds to name by looking for voice · Can regularly find speaker or source of sound · Cooing, gurgling, chuckling, laughing ·Imitates sounds and actions · Enjoys social games (peek-a-boo, pat-a-cake) · Babbling (bababa, mamama) > > > > Cause for concern in first 6 months > > · Cannot focus, easily over-stimulated · Seems unaware of sound, Cannot find source of sound · Seems unaware of people and objects in environment · Does not seem to understand or enjoy imitating · Lack of connection (eye contact, vocal turn-taking) > > · No babbling, or babbling with few consonants > > > > Typically seen in first 9-12 months > > · Attracts attention by vocalizing · Waves bye · Vocalizations that sound like first words (mama,dada) · Clearly indicates desire for objects · Imitates new sounds and actions > > > > Cause for concern in first 9-12 months > > · Easily upset by sounds that would not upset others · Lack of response indicating comprehension of words · Lack of consistent patterns of babbling · Does not clearly indicate desire for objects > > > > Typically seen in first 12-18 months > > · Single word production begins · Requests objects: points, vocalizes, word approximations · Gets attention vocally or physically (mommy) · Knows adult can do things for them (wind up a toy) · Uses " ritual " words (bye, hi, please, thank-you) > > Protests: Says no, shakes head, moves away etc) · Comments: Points and vocalizes or uses word approximations) · Acknowledges: Eye contact, vocal response, repetition of word > > > > Cause for concern in first 12-18 months > > · Lack of communicative gestures · Does not attempt to imitate or produce single words > > · Does not persist in communication (may hold hand up for help, but gives up if adult does not respond immediately) · Limited comprehension (understands less than 50 words) · Limited vocabulary (speaks less than 10 words) · Lack of new words between the age of 12-18 months > > > > Typically seen in first 18-24 months > > · Uses mostly words to communicate · Begins to use two word combinations (more cookie etc) · By 24 months has more than 50 words, or word approximations > > > > Cause for concern in first 18-24 months > > · Relies on gestures to communicate · Limited vocabulary (speaks less than 50 words) > > · Does not use any two word combinations · Limited consonant production · Mostly unintelligible speech · Regresses in language development: Stops talking, repeats phrases inappropriately > > > > Typically seen in first 24-36 months > > · Engages in short dialogues · Expresses emotions · Begins using language in imaginative ways · Begins providing descriptive details when speaking · Begins to use articles and word endings (a, the, ing,) uses plurals (cats) > > > > Cause for concern in first 24-36 months > > · Words limited to single syllable and no final consonants · Few or no multiword utterances · Does not demand a response from a listener · Asks no questions · Speech difficult to understand · Tantrums when frustrated · Echoing of speech without communicative intent > > > > Adapted from Clinical Practice Guidelines Communication Disorders III 22-25 > > In addition, the policy statement from the neurology journal Neurology, (August, 2000), states that Absolute Indications for Immediate Evaluation include, > > · No babbling or pointing or other gestures by twelve months · No single words by sixteen months · No two-word spontaneous phrases by twenty-four months · Any loss of any language or social skills at any age. > > > > Oral-Motor Problems > > > > Early feeding problems could be a sign of later speech challenges. The same muscles that are used for eating are used for speaking. A baby that has trouble nursing could be a early sign that the baby has muscle weakness in the oral motor area for example. If oral-motor difficulties are present your child should have an evaluation by a pediatric medical and oral motor speech expert to determine the cause and best therapy to possibly prevent some future speech problems. A few possible signs of oral-motor problems are outlined next. > > > > Does your child have difficulties with any of the following? > > · Blowing (unable to blow out birthday candles, or blow bubbles by one year) · Kissing or making a kiss face · Licking his lips · Imitating facial expressions such as smiling · Chewing or transitioning to solid foods · Excessive drooling > > > > When trying to speak does your child? > > · Display groping behaviors, searching for proper mouth position, silent posturing, dysfluencies · Show expressive language disturbances: limited vocabulary, grammatical > > errors, disordered syntax · Make up sign language, or show frustrations when not understood? > > > > It is important to note that some children have no difficulty with oral-motor movements, and may also pronounce speech clearly, but still may have difficulty learning language. There are many different types of speech and language problems, which together represent the number one learning disabiltiy in schools today. That is why again it is important to seek an assessment if a child is not attaining the language milestones at the expected age. Early intervention is key to your child's development. If you have any concerns about your child's speech or language development be sure to express them to your child's doctor. If you want to find out more about early speech and language development and CHERAB's efforts to help children with speech and language delays you can contact the group or visit the web-site at: > > > > > > > > Cherab Foundation, Inc., > > Communication Help, Education, Research, Apraxia Base > > Web: http://www.cherab.org > > Grouplist: > > PO Box 8524 > > PSL, Florida 34952 > > 772-335-5135 > > > > Speechville Express > > Web: http://www.speechville.com > > > > To find a Speech Language Pathologist near you: > > > > American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) > > 10801 Rockville Pike > > Rockville, MD 20852 > > Phone: 1-900-638-8255 > > 301-897-8682 (Voice or TTY) > > Web: www.asha.org > > > > Acknowledgements: > > > > Marilyn Agin MD > > Medical Director NYC Early Intervention, Advisor CherabFoundation > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 The brain affects everything we do as humans. Apraxia's root problem is in the brain because there is an interruption in the neural pathway(s) and therefore, the child cannot speak. Why wouldn't it help? As with all apraxia, ne must develop new neural pathways for language. > > > > you may not be aware that this group is owned by me -and I co authored The Late Talker book. I was mearly asking you that if you did extensive research why you wouldn't have read the book that has been one of the best selling books for apraxia since it came out in 2003 -and it doesn't take any searching at all to learn that if you do a quick search for books on apraxia in children! > > > > We named the book The Late Talker because most don't know what apraxia is and one only knows that their child isn't speaking yet. Children that are not speaking yet as a whole are all in fact " late talkers " whether their diagnosis of why they aren't speaking is accurate or not. As we know -there are many autistic children that are misdiagnosed and are actually apraxic. But apraxia asides-the book is geared not only for apraxia but for any child who is not talking yet...which is why the full name of the book is 'The Late Talker What to Do If Your Child Isn't Talking Yet " There are strategies for both the child as well as the parent. > > > > You speak much about medical references. Again my one co author is a neurodevelopmental pediatrician and from memory right now I don't recall any other book on verbal apraxia written by a medical doctor. In addition there was this article > > http://contemporarypediatrics.modernmedicine.com/contpeds/author/authorInfo.jsp?\ id=18406 > > > > I wrote the parent " to do at home part for this " > > http://www.contemporarypediatrics.com/contpeds/data/articlestandard/contpeds/492\ 004/136315/article.pdf > > > > But then you also make me wonder why you bring up Doman when from what I read he's the last person a medical person would recommend. > > As you probably know he's also not a doctor - in the 50s he was a physical therapist. In regards to apraxia I know many professionals I'd recommend before him; actually unless there's something about him other than what I just posted I'd probably never recommend him. The Late Talker does cover multisensory therapies and approaches to apraxia in addition to the traditional -but we only included those that we know to have worked in this group over the years. > > > > We all are here to help our child diagnosed with whatever communication impairment or delay they may have and I'm here to help whether you ever find the time to read my book or not -whether you like it or not. I'm just saying if I were you I'd find the time to read it -and read it before Doman's. Good luck with your son. > > > > ===== > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 I think Nikunj was looking for answers and honesty. I do not think Nikunj wants to be " placated " . I was by no means being rude or sending Nikunj away from the group at all. I am giving Nikunj encouragement that the situation may be completely normal. Isn't that what one wishes for anyway? Again, I am not giving any " false hope " to Nikunj either. Also, I was not putting him off for a " year " to " wait and see " . I think in a few months time, Nikunj might see a marked improvement. If Nikunj looks at a developmental chart, I think Nikunj may be relieved to find that what has been mentioned is a developmental progression. I was simply giving " my " view and " my " honest opinion, which may differ from yours. I do have somewhat of an " idea " what is going on with this child because Nikunj was very clear in the postings. To say I have no idea also puts down Nikunj that the postings were not clear and explained well, which they were. I paid close attention and I really feel like you are insulting me, as well, by saying I " have no idea " . I must have offended you in some way because of your remarks; if I have offended you, then I am sorry I did. Placating people is not my thing. I waste little time getting to the point because time is not on my side. In my opinion, I really think it is rotten for you to say that what I said was " just awful " . Your opinion may be different than mine, but I did not say that to you. > > People visit this group looking for encouragement, support, and reassurance. We all know parents of apraxic children battle insurance companies, schools, medical community, and even other family members. Please do not make this group another place to have to defend out children. You have no idea what is going on with this child and it is irresponsible (and just plain awful) of you to say this. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 yes there appears to be an interruption in the neural pathway that causes the apraxia -but there is still much we don't know about apraxia in regards to it's cause. We do however fortunately know what works. Children with apraxia appear to need specific and at this point pretty well validated motor planning therapies to stimulate speech. Some of the therapies such as Prompt have been clinically validated as effective for apraxia. https://promptinstitute.com/index.php?page=prompt-research and others such a Kaufman's technique are being studied now but have been found successful over time by the majority. These multisensory speech therapies do appear to stimulate new pathways for speech in theory -but in reality which is what (I suspect should) matter to us as parents (and professionals) - they work -they bring words to children that were previously unable to put sounds together. The brain does respond to multiple stimuli, however the word appropriate can't be used enough. While all multisensory therapies may stimulate various areas of the brain -that does not appear to mean that just any multisensory therapy will stimulate speech to a child who has verbal apraxia. The fish oils for example are just one aspect to a multiple stimuli approach that have been found to be appropriate. If one is a researcher who has theory over individual child's success one may be open to explore something that may or may not work. As a mother it is our choice as to what type of therapy/therapies we wish to pursue because we are all well aware that we have precious little time to get our children up to speed prior to kindergarten which is the goal for most of us. However no matter what alternative therapies we try -apraxia still requires appropriate and traditional speech therapies developed to address motor planning impairments. We all can try anything we want in regards to therapy with the limits of safety, money and time, however I'd stick to what has worked very well for the past decade in this group as parents report what does and doesn't work. -the methods that we found effective are not broken -and you won't know what they are until you read The Late Talker since much of them are in there. The methods we as parents try are those that are recommended to us by professionals or even experts in the field of apraxia who we respect. The methods we as parents try are also those that have positive reports in this group. The method you wish to try has to my best knowledge -neither. ===== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 My mother was a CCU Nurse -coronary care- for 30 years. my sister is a NICU nurse that can put an IV in a baby that weighs 1-3lbs---but none of that qualifies them to diagnose any of the issues that the doctors have confirmed in my daughter, and they dont use their job title to sound more authoritative.I can bet that the wife of my neurosurgeon does not diagnose hydrocephalus simply because she lives with a doctor!! reading medical textbooks does not qualify anyone here to dissuade any parent here from asking for help.A diagnosis of Apraxia is not necessary in this group when looking for tips and ideas as to where to get help for a child. on the dynavox---I would not take no for an answer to a rep who said the distance was too much to come and help me learn to use an $8000 device that was purchased for MY child. they are a rep for a specific area- than that is what they should be covering!! I have not the slightest clue what Kiddos means? this is a big country and names of agencies that we dont have here should be clarified. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 In using the mulitsensory approach, you are using the methods of Doman/Delacato. Are you offended? (That is the way I took it.) I never said one method was better than another. It is a combination of the right methods that work for each child is what works. I appears that those I have offended in some way, by my expressing a " like " for the NACD ad The Institutes methods do not know what methds we are using for my son or what we have tried. If you are interested, then I will tell you. But please do not attack me, as I have attacked none of you. I have only offered responses to questions posed. I expect that Nikunj will absorb " all " the answers given and not just one. > > yes there appears to be an interruption in the neural pathway that causes the apraxia -but there is still much we don't know about apraxia in regards to it's cause. We do however fortunately know what works. > > Children with apraxia appear to need specific and at this point pretty well validated motor planning therapies to stimulate speech. Some of the therapies such as Prompt have been clinically validated as effective for apraxia. > https://promptinstitute.com/index.php?page=prompt-research and others such a Kaufman's technique are being studied now but have been found successful over time by the majority. > > These multisensory speech therapies do appear to stimulate new pathways for speech in theory -but in reality which is what (I suspect should) matter to us as parents (and professionals) - they work -they bring words to children that were previously unable to put sounds together. > > The brain does respond to multiple stimuli, however the word appropriate can't be used enough. While all multisensory therapies may stimulate various areas of the brain -that does not appear to mean that just any multisensory therapy will stimulate speech to a child who has verbal apraxia. The fish oils for example are just one aspect to a multiple stimuli approach that have been found to be appropriate. > > If one is a researcher who has theory over individual child's success one may be open to explore something that may or may not work. As a mother it is our choice as to what type of therapy/therapies we wish to pursue because we are all well aware that we have precious little time to get our children up to speed prior to kindergarten which is the goal for most of us. > > However no matter what alternative therapies we try -apraxia still requires appropriate and traditional speech therapies developed to address motor planning impairments. > > We all can try anything we want in regards to therapy with the limits of safety, money and time, however I'd stick to what has worked very well for the past decade in this group as parents report what does and doesn't work. -the methods that we found effective are not broken -and you won't know what they are until you read The Late Talker since much of them are in there. The methods we as parents try are those that are recommended to us by professionals or even experts in the field of apraxia who we respect. The methods we as parents try are also those that have positive reports in this group. The method you wish to try has to my best knowledge -neither. > > ===== > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 I do not diagnose, and I do not use my " title " as an authoritative figure, by no means. I have learned much aboutApraxia in a very little time due to necessity. Someone asked the group for answers and I gave my opinion (just as every else does on a forum) based on what I know, what I have learned, and my experience as a mom. Why is everyone so mad? I have 5 kids. One talked in complete intelligible sentences at one year (now 11), one talked little at 4 and half years old (now 10), one will be two tomorrow and talks less than Nikunj's child, one is apraxic (5), and the eldest I truly cannot recall without looking at her 22 year-old baby journal. Carson is the rep for my area and he won't come to Toccoa. I can locate the e-mail and post it if you like or if there are disbelievers. I have no reason to lie about it. For me, DynaVox was a wrong choice (insurance paid $10,580)and I do not think they offer good follow-up care for everyone. Someone else may have a differing opinion. I am in the country, not the in town Metro area and it makes a difference. We having online streaming problems and repeated efforts to take the courses online for free were fatal and I did this during the months I was waitng for approval from insurance, contacting DynaVox every step of the way. My son is homebound per dr. order and needs homebound services for this item, among other tings he needs like therapyists in home. Sorry for the abbreviation on Kiddos' Clubhouse Foundation. That is where my son won a scholarship for in-home therapy supplies; he was able to get vestibular equipment like swings, Kaufman Praxis materials, z-vibe and other speech stuff. I just cannot understand why everyone is so angry about what I said to Nikunj? My thought (opinion) is that his kid, at this point, is developing somewhat normally (in a progressive sequence); every kid is different. Your opinion differs and I am not mad at you. > > Hi Nikunj and thank you so much for taking the time to answer my questions so comprehensibly. Based on some of your reported symptoms to me it does sound like you need to seek diagnosis at least of suspected apraxia to secure appropriate therapies. Over the years we've had a few wonderful professionals from India post however I'm not sure what facilities you are near to take your child for evaluations. The lack of some of the sounds may still be developmental at this point as she's only 2.3 years old -but here are the warning signs of apraxia that stand out to me: > > 1. She can say a word correct -but inconsistently. > 2. She has said a few words once never to say them again. > 3. She has some signs of oral apraxia (which can be diagnosed much earlier than verbal apraxia and if there almost guarantees verbal apraxia) Even though she is starting to learn some of the actions this is a huge red flag. > 4. She has some signs of sensory issues (touch/auditory) keep in mind if she does have a diagnosis of sensory dysfunction something that means nothing to us can actually be painful for her- so it's good to know. > > You don't mention anything to make me think there are any tonal issues. > > I know I posted the links for you prior -but here they are again. > > Signs of oral apraxia > http://www.cherab.org/information/speechlanguage/oralapraxia.html > > Signs of " soft signs " > http://www.cherab.org/information/speechlanguage/parentfriendlysoftsigns.html > > > Now we need to help you find a professional/s in your area for neuromedical exam. No harm in a second opinion by a speech pathologist in your area who is very knowledgeable about apraxia as well. > > Also thought the following may be helpful for you. Below is a " Late Talker " handout which we put together to raise awareness about warning signs for any " late talker " : > > Is Your Child A Late Talker? > > · Are they quiet? · Seem shy? · Not talking like their peers? > > · Allow you or siblings to speak for them? · Do you wonder why? > > > Your baby's babbling and toddlers first words can be music to your ears. When faced with a child who doesn't speak or seems to have difficulty with words parents are often told that their child is " just a late-talker. " Unfortunately, all too often, that is not the case. The American Speech and Hearing Association (ASHA) estimates that 16 million Americans under the age of eighteen have a chronic speech-language disorder and that some 45 million Americans are affected by communication disorders of one kind or another which was announded by Congresswoman Carolyn McCarthy during the kick-off of the Better Hearing and Speech Month Health Fair in Washington, DC on May 8, 2002 . > > Most parents, and even most pediatricians, are not concerned when faced with a two-year-old who passes all of his developmental milestones on time - except speech and language. However, they should be. It is vitally important to identify and treat speech and language challenges as early as possible in a child's life, with a strong emphasis on the early intervention years of birth to three. At this age the brain is undergoing the most rapid development. No harm will come from therapeutic services. " Early intervention services are benign in their delivery but can be extremely beneficial. Don't wait. Six months for a 2 year old is equivalent to a quarter of their lifetime developmentally " as Dr. Judy Flax says, who is a Research Coordinator of the Tallal Lab and a Senior Research Speech Pathologist for the Infancy Studies Laboratory at the Center for Molecular and Behavioral Neuroscience (CMBN) of Rutgers University, Newark, NJ > > To find out about your nearest Early Intervention program you should call your local school district, they will be able to refer you to the program appropriate for your child's age. Waiting to refer is a loss of precious time that may impact on the child's learning ability and social-emotional well being in later years. Pediatricians and parents should insist on a speech and hearing evaluation as soon as there is a real concern about a child's early language development. Early referral is endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the American Academy of Neurology. In addition, " any child with a severe speech/language delay should have a comprehensive health and neurologic assessment to look for medical conditions that may be causing or contributing to the delay " as Dr.Marilyn Agin says, a developmental pediatrician who is the Medical Director for Early Intervention for NYC. > > CHERAB is a non-profit foundation that focuses on raising awareness of Apraxia and other speech and language delays, and the importance of early intervention. Working with developmental pediatricians, speech pathologists, neuroscientists and major hospitals the CHERAB Foundation is working towards research on therapies which may help late talkers with Apraxia, Dysarthria, delayed language development, Autism and other speech and language impairments. A list-serv overseen by pediatricians, speech-language pathologists, and educational consultants is run by CHERAB and can be found at their web-site. Through the list you can connect to many other parents who have children who have speech or language delays, and find out what they have been able to do to help their child. > > Some speech disorders can overlap, or be misdiagnosed. For example, " Verbal apraxia, a disorder of central nervous system (CNS) processing, and dysarthria, a disorder of output, are commonly confused " , says Dr. , chief of child development at the Chicago College of Medicine. " Experts are able to differentiate between these two disorders by listening carefully to a child's speech and by identifying certain physical clues " , says Dr. , but adds, " These disorders are poorly understood by physicians and by a lot of speech therapists as well. " It is possible for phonological disorders, apraxia and dysarthria to all occur together in the same child. Speech Language Impairments, which is connected to language based learning difficulties may also be present. And the severity of each may vary. > > Apraxia is perhaps the most misunderstood of all the speech disorders. So, what is apraxia? Verbal Apraxia is a neurological motor speech impairment that involves a breakdown in the transmission of messages from the brain to the muscles in the jaw, cheeks, lips, tongue and palate that facilitate speech. There is no obvious weakness in these muscles and the child may well be able to move them quite happily when not trying to speak. Apraxic children, who are usually seen as " just late talkers " when young, are able to comprehend language at an age appropriate level, however have difficulty expressing themselves using speech. With apraxia, a child knows what he wants to say but there is a road block obstructing the signal from the brain to the mouth. For any child with a speech disorder, but especially with apraxia, the earlier therapy is begun, the better the results for your child and their social-emotional development. > > Your Child's Language Development > > So how do you know when your child is having problems with speaking? When is a good time to seek out help? Being aware of average speech milestones can also help you decide whether or not to speak to your doctor. Some guidelines are provided here for your information, but if you have concerns about your child's speech or language development, or any other developmental issue, make an appointment with your pediatrician so you can discuss these issues. While the average milestones are a good way to measure development, every child develops at their own pace, and this overview should not be used to diagnose a specific problem. > > Normal Language Milestones - Clues of a Possible Problem > > > Typically seen in first 6 months > · Responds to name by looking for voice · Can regularly find speaker or source of sound · Cooing, gurgling, chuckling, laughing ·Imitates sounds and actions · Enjoys social games (peek-a-boo, pat-a-cake) · Babbling (bababa, mamama) > > Cause for concern in first 6 months > · Cannot focus, easily over-stimulated · Seems unaware of sound, Cannot find source of sound · Seems unaware of people and objects in environment · Does not seem to understand or enjoy imitating · Lack of connection (eye contact, vocal turn-taking) > · No babbling, or babbling with few consonants > > Typically seen in first 9-12 months > · Attracts attention by vocalizing · Waves bye · Vocalizations that sound like first words (mama,dada) · Clearly indicates desire for objects · Imitates new sounds and actions > > Cause for concern in first 9-12 months > · Easily upset by sounds that would not upset others · Lack of response indicating comprehension of words · Lack of consistent patterns of babbling · Does not clearly indicate desire for objects > > Typically seen in first 12-18 months > · Single word production begins · Requests objects: points, vocalizes, word approximations · Gets attention vocally or physically (mommy) · Knows adult can do things for them (wind up a toy) · Uses " ritual " words (bye, hi, please, thank-you) > Protests: Says no, shakes head, moves away etc) · Comments: Points and vocalizes or uses word approximations) · Acknowledges: Eye contact, vocal response, repetition of word > > Cause for concern in first 12-18 months > · Lack of communicative gestures · Does not attempt to imitate or produce single words > · Does not persist in communication (may hold hand up for help, but gives up if adult does not respond immediately) · Limited comprehension (understands less than 50 words) · Limited vocabulary (speaks less than 10 words) · Lack of new words between the age of 12-18 months > > Typically seen in first 18-24 months > · Uses mostly words to communicate · Begins to use two word combinations (more cookie etc) · By 24 months has more than 50 words, or word approximations > > Cause for concern in first 18-24 months > · Relies on gestures to communicate · Limited vocabulary (speaks less than 50 words) > · Does not use any two word combinations · Limited consonant production · Mostly unintelligible speech · Regresses in language development: Stops talking, repeats phrases inappropriately > > Typically seen in first 24-36 months > · Engages in short dialogues · Expresses emotions · Begins using language in imaginative ways · Begins providing descriptive details when speaking · Begins to use articles and word endings (a, the, ing,) uses plurals (cats) > > Cause for concern in first 24-36 months > · Words limited to single syllable and no final consonants · Few or no multiword utterances · Does not demand a response from a listener · Asks no questions · Speech difficult to understand · Tantrums when frustrated · Echoing of speech without communicative intent > > Adapted from Clinical Practice Guidelines Communication Disorders III 22-25 > In addition, the policy statement from the neurology journal Neurology, (August, 2000), states that Absolute Indications for Immediate Evaluation include, > · No babbling or pointing or other gestures by twelve months · No single words by sixteen months · No two-word spontaneous phrases by twenty-four months · Any loss of any language or social skills at any age. > > Oral-Motor Problems > > Early feeding problems could be a sign of later speech challenges. The same muscles that are used for eating are used for speaking. A baby that has trouble nursing could be a early sign that the baby has muscle weakness in the oral motor area for example. If oral-motor difficulties are present your child should have an evaluation by a pediatric medical and oral motor speech expert to determine the cause and best therapy to possibly prevent some future speech problems. A few possible signs of oral-motor problems are outlined next. > > Does your child have difficulties with any of the following? > · Blowing (unable to blow out birthday candles, or blow bubbles by one year) · Kissing or making a kiss face · Licking his lips · Imitating facial expressions such as smiling · Chewing or transitioning to solid foods · Excessive drooling > > When trying to speak does your child? > · Display groping behaviors, searching for proper mouth position, silent posturing, dysfluencies · Show expressive language disturbances: limited vocabulary, grammatical > errors, disordered syntax · Make up sign language, or show frustrations when not understood? > > It is important to note that some children have no difficulty with oral-motor movements, and may also pronounce speech clearly, but still may have difficulty learning language. There are many different types of speech and language problems, which together represent the number one learning disabiltiy in schools today. That is why again it is important to seek an assessment if a child is not attaining the language milestones at the expected age. Early intervention is key to your child's development. If you have any concerns about your child's speech or language development be sure to express them to your child's doctor. If you want to find out more about early speech and language development and CHERAB's efforts to help children with speech and language delays you can contact the group or visit the web-site at: > > > > Cherab Foundation, Inc., > Communication Help, Education, Research, Apraxia Base > Web: http://www.cherab.org > Grouplist: > PO Box 8524 > PSL, Florida 34952 > 772-335-5135 > > Speechville Express > Web: http://www.speechville.com > > To find a Speech Language Pathologist near you: > > American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) > 10801 Rockville Pike > Rockville, MD 20852 > Phone: 1-900-638-8255 > 301-897-8682 (Voice or TTY) > Web: www.asha.org > > Acknowledgements: > > Marilyn Agin MD > Medical Director NYC Early Intervention, Advisor CherabFoundation > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 I can remember the only sentence my son has ever said. It was, " Dar (Star), get up pweez. " That was around age 2. Yes, children with apraxia often lose words or may say a word spontaneously, never to say it again. :0( But most of the time, the speech sounds like a jumbled mess with inconsistent errors and omissions. (I often say to people that my son speaks like one of those signs with blown-off letters reads.) And an apraxic child cannot say words on command. It is the nature of Apraxia. > > > > Hi Nikunj and welcome! > > > > I'm one of the co authors of The Late Talker and hope I can answer some of your questions. > > > > I do agree with in that it is possible that your little one has a simple delay in speech since she is just 2 years old and already has 50 words -however I don't agree with 's statement " As long as there is a " progression " of sorts, there is no apraxia " (and -with your extensive research on speech impairments -just curious why you haven't read The Late Talker book as it's written by a neurodevelopmental pediatrician and parent of 2 " late talkers " perspective. Not just because I wrote it -but it's received recommendations from medical, speech and educational professionals as well as parents and may help answer more questions about apraxia for your older son) > > > > Like any condition there are degrees of severity with apraxia as well. There are also subjective ways of looking at the " words " our 2 year old has. So the question to you is how clear are your daughter's 50 words and are they understandable to strangers? > > > > Can you provide some examples of her current vocabulary (try to write out exactly how she says some of the words) > > > > Do you notice if she breaks down the more she tries to say? > > > > Does she " lose " language? > > > > Do you notice any " soft signs " such as low tone, motor planning issues in the body or any signs of oral apraxia? > > > > Here's some parent friendly signs of verbal and oral apraxia -as well as " soft signs " > > Verbal apraxia signs > > http://www.cherab.org/information/speechlanguage/verbalapraxia.html > > Oral apraxia signs > > http://www.cherab.org/information/speechlanguage/oralapraxia.html > > Soft signs > > http://www.cherab.org/information/speechlanguage/parentfriendlysoftsigns.html > > > > If you notice any of the " soft signs " it would be a good idea to make an appointment with either a neurodevelopmental medical doctor (such as a pediatric neurologist or developmental pediatrician) to confirm or rule out. > > > > About the fish oils (also known as EFAs or PUFAs) Most find that the fish oils jump start and accelerate the progress. Many of us continue with this " therapy " for years however in some cases parents were able to stop after a year or so and the child was speaking fine. It is possible of course that some children were not apraxic and were misdiagnosed. The other thought is that fish oil supplementation is probably healthy for all children -all adults- speech impaired or not. > > > > You can look for a high quality oil that has the following dosage > > Around 100 DHA, 150 to 250 of EPA, 30-50 of GLA to start. > > > > The DHA and EPA are from the fish oils and they are the Omega 3 and the GLA is from either primrose or borage seed oil and it's the small amount of Omega 6. You can mix oils together to create the above formula if you can't find one near you that has it. > > > > You can order from some sites that ship internationally like http://www.speech411.com however with shipping costs US to India it's probably best to see if you can find it locally somewhere. Did you check in your stores for the brand Eye Q? It's a UK brand that is similar to the ProEFA and also a good starting formula. > > > > As far as is it hype? I'd say no way- but fish oil formulas are not all the same and some researchers don't seem to appreciate that. If you use the wrong formula -we have found in this group for the past decade with thousands that it didn't work. > > > > To bad nobody has yet wanted to test the basic formula we know to work > > http://www.cherab.org/news/scientific.html > > (and no thanks to those that want to " fix " the formula!!!!!) > > > > Please get back with any answers. We are all here to help! > > > > ===== > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 Hi , Sometimes in email things don't come across the way we'd like and I believe that's what is going on here. I'm not sure exactly what from my message made you feel that I was offended either in this message or the last. I am stating what I consider to be valuable therapies have been proven best to pursue for apraxia. Statistically over the past decade in this group I can tell you that by kindergarten (which many here start their children at 6) most member's children do not require an augmentative devices and are able to be in a mainstream class - understandable to others. I'd like new parents to know that and to know what we've done -and you're a new parent, right? For any new member I recommend you do share what you know and learn, while you listen to what others share and learn as well. We can all learn -and while learning from medical journals is wonderful -unfortunately in regards to apraxia in children you will probably have to wait a few years or decades to do much of that. Right now you are pretty much stuck with parental and professional anecdotal feedback -nothing wrong with that. So yes we all need to respect each other including advice that comes from other parents too. To me, while I try to respect what everyone says, in regards to parents, I've always most respected advice from those who have children older than mine who are mainstreamed in school and in life and doing well over say a new parent who happens to also be a medical doctor. I have a great deal of respect for all medical professionals-I have quite a few friends that are doctors; my best friend who is like my sister practices internal medicine. And I have a great deal of respect for nurses as my (genius member of Mensa)out of the box thinker Aunt Leona has her PhD in nursing, used to teach nursing at LIU, and has been a wealth of information to me and my family over the years. However like Maureen says -even very competent nurses (or some doctors) are not necessarily capable of diagnosing or even knowing how to best treat verbal apraxia and the fun that comes with it. ===== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 31, 2009 Report Share Posted March 31, 2009 - I personally did not take offense by anything that's been said. Personally speaking-- we have not started NACD, but will in the near future. I wholeheartedly believe in the brain's plasticity and I believe that Doman's patterning has been greatly misunderstood. I've seen excellent outcome for our older son with techniques that the Neuro Chiro used-- and he used MANY of Doman's techniques. Truly- my son is becoming a new creature altogether due to much of what this guy has been doing with him, and I know that is in part, from the Doman techniques. I think that people need to be careful in saying what works and what doesn't work, unless THEY themselves have at least TRIED it and found it not to work. If a person has tried and not seen success, THEN they can say that it didn't work for them. Bek Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 1, 2009 Report Share Posted April 1, 2009 Hi, It seems like there is quite a debate raging over my questions so I just wanted to say this.. I got on this group to hear differing opinions and learn from everyone's experiences. I definitely will not consider anything said here as a definite diagnosis because of the fact that no one on the group has actually observed and evaluated my daughter. The aim is to do an exchange of ideas and thoughts and possibly, gather some info in the process that will help me help my daughter. Thanks, Nikunj Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 1, 2009 Report Share Posted April 1, 2009 + One would think that neurodevelopmental therapy would have helped my son to talk, but after doing this therapy for a year it has not. I definitely believe it helped him in many other areas. My son is doing speech therapy now with someone who is trained in apraxia. She actually knows the Kaufmann method well. (I live in MI where the Kaufmann institute is located.) My son is already making progress in his speech. Literally, my son was not talking. There seems to be a specific targeted therapy for these apraxic kiddos. I wish I had known this 3 years ago. Hope this helps. Jane www.KidsHealthNaturally.com www.HealthyChatter.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2009 Report Share Posted April 2, 2009 A friend of mine went to the National Apraxia Conference a couple years ago....she learned a lot there. what she learned is Apraxia children need to hear a word 3000 times before they can repeat it! - does that sound correct to you? It makes perfect sense to me---all the words that my daughter heard most in her early years are the ones she said first- like typical babies- only four years late-- mama, dada...so be careful what you tell other parents. Now she can repeat words on command that she has heard before...as long as they are common, every day words. and she will try new words- they dont sound right to anyone-but she will try. You are still a new mom to all this--it takes time to get there but they do!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! > > > > > > > ________________________________ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2009 Report Share Posted April 2, 2009 What if all the signs of apraxia are there, and the child has been in speech for three years, and can now say words on command, does that mean they never had apraxia or they heard the word 3000 times?? Jen In a message dated 4/2/2009 7:07:57 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, mosense@... writes: A friend of mine went to the National Apraxia Conference a couple years ago....she learned a lot there. what she learned is Apraxia children need to hear a word 3000 times before they can repeat it! - does that sound correct to you? It makes perfect sense to me---all the words that my daughter heard most in her early years are the ones she said first- like typical babies- only four years late-- mama, dada...so be careful what you tell other parents. Now she can repeat words on command that she has heard before...as long as they are common, every day words. and she will try new words- they dont sound right to anyone-but she will try. You are still a new mom to all this--it takes time to get there but they do!!!!!!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2009 Report Share Posted April 2, 2009 Btu how do you know that it HASN'T helped with his talking? I believe that *ALL* Neuro Dev Therapies-- because they work with the brain, DO help in all aspects. Whether we SEE those aspects, or whether we SEE evidence, doesn't mean that it hasn't helped. NDT help tremendously with neuro issues, so I believe that it's helping even if we don't see it at the time. For instance-- NDT help improve motor planning. That's a given-- that's obviously one of the biggest " draws " to do NDT. So if it's helping the overall motor planning,that *IS* helping with the Apraxia, since Apraxia *IS* a motor planning disorder. So you see, even if people will believe that it's not helping a child " talk " , I tend to disagree 100% on that thought. A person may not HEAR the difference with the child and in how the child speaks, but is that more of an ARTICULATION issue or Apraxic issue? What I think people forget about Apraxic kids, is that they *ALSO* have articulation and phonemic issues, so there are more things behind the scenes overall with these kids. If the NDT is helping the motor planning (which it always does), then without a doubt, you're helping the Apraxia. It may just take more DILIGENCE, however, to HEAR a difference with most Apraxic kids. that's just my two cents worth--0 bek In a message dated 4/1/2009 5:00:05 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, jmj4life83@... writes: One would think that neurodevelopmental therapy would have helped my son to talk, but after doing this therapy for a year it has not. I definitely believe it helped him in many other areas. My son is doing speech therapy now with someone who is trained in apraxia. She actually knows the Kaufmann method well. (I live in MI where the Kaufmann institute is located.) My son is already making progress in his speech. Literally, my son was not talking. There seems to be a specific targeted therapy for these apraxic kiddos. I wish I had known this 3 years ago. Hope this helps. **************Feeling the pinch at the grocery store? Make dinner for $10 or less. (http://food.aol.com/frugal-feasts?ncid=emlcntusfood00000001) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2009 Report Share Posted April 2, 2009 I'm not --- but this does NOT sound correct to me. Every child is different and every APRAXIC child is different. some of these kids will hear something 25 times and will be able to have that word there. There might be others who hear something 5000 times and STILL don't get it. I don't believe there's a " set amount " of times for these kids, but rather the key that maybe the person was trying to point out is that REPETITON is the key-- BIG TIME!! REPEAT REPEAT REPEAT etc. But to say that a child needs to hear it 3000 before they can repeat doesn't sound correct to me at all. Becky In a message dated 4/2/2009 1:59:54 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, jennyjudy@... writes: she learned a lot there. what she learned is Apraxia children need to hear a word 3000 times before they can repeat it! - does that sound correct to you? **************Feeling the pinch at the grocery store? Make dinner for $10 or less. (http://food.aol.com/frugal-feasts?ncid=emlcntusfood00000001) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2009 Report Share Posted April 2, 2009 But one of the reasons WHY she would say these words first, is because they typically come first developmentally speaking. It's the natural progression with sounds and words-- and the ma ma, da da, wa wa, ba ba, etc-- those all will " come first " in the speaking hierarchy, so it makes perfect sense that she would say these things first. I don't see it as being due to the fact that she would have heard it 3000x and that's why she said it. Know what I mean? A perfect example would be the hundreds of Apraxic kids who are OLDER than your daughter and who may have heard those words 7,000x in 5 yrs, but haven't quite been able to say them until something connects for them both neurologically and physically (and for some, I'd even add in emotionally) Becky In a message dated 4/2/2009 7:07:37 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, mosense@... writes: It makes perfect sense to me---all the words that my daughter heard most in her early years are the ones she said first- like typical babies- only four years late-- mama, dada... **************Feeling the pinch at the grocery store? Make dinner for $10 or less. (http://food.aol.com/frugal-feasts?ncid=emlcntusfood00000001) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2009 Report Share Posted April 2, 2009 hmmmm not sure about this one. I've seen otherwise. I've seen a child who is severely Apraxic be able to repeat the word-- but not always able to RETAIN it. While I'm sure that this is the case for MOST Apraxic kids, I can't say that I believe it's the case for all. A big thing to remember with Apraxia, is that there are INCONSISTENCIES with the words and word recollection and articulation. Apraxics can't always get that consistency in the beginning, but I do think that it *eventually* comes. In fact-- when dxing these kids, what most SLPs will look for to determine whether the child is Apraxic or just has other speech issues-- they look for the consistency in errors. Apraxics just don't have that. Becky In a message dated 4/2/2009 4:25:30 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, agirlnamedsuess@... writes: Again, a truly apraxic child is UNABLE to repeat a word, which is new to them, on command. Once the word sticks and is used spontaneously, it can be asked for and repeated, but there is no need to have them repeat it then, as they use it spontaneously anyway. **************Feeling the pinch at the grocery store? Make dinner for $10 or less. (http://food.aol.com/frugal-feasts?ncid=emlcntusfood00000001) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2009 Report Share Posted April 2, 2009 Helping a child's neurological development in any one area of the brain also helps other areas of the brain. It is called transference. The neuro training undoubtedly helped as well. Perhaps the Kaufman method should have been included in the neuro trg? Beckman is also a good one to include in neuro training. Once the brain learns a skill or beefs up on a skill already learned in one area of the brain, then that information can be utilized by another area of the brain as well in order to improve areas that are lacking. It sounds like that is what happened here. There is not one person on this earth, disabled or not, that cannot benefit from neurodevelopmental training. I am not out to " sell " anyone on improving their brain....you have to make your own choices with that one. One would think that neurodevelopmental therapy would have helped my son to talk, but after doing this therapy for a year it has not. I definitely believe it helped him in many other areas. My son is doing speech therapy now with someone who is trained in apraxia. She actually knows the Kaufmann method well. (I live in MI where the Kaufmann institute is located.) My son is already making progress in his speech. Literally, my son was not talking. > There seems to be a specific targeted therapy for these apraxic kiddos. I wish I had known this 3 years ago. > Hope this helps. > > Jane > www.KidsHealthNaturally.com > www.HealthyChatter.com > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2009 Report Share Posted April 2, 2009 Again, a truly apraxic child is UNABLE to repeat a word, which is new to them, on command. Once the word sticks and is used spontaneously, it can be asked for and repeated, but there is no need to have them repeat it then, as they use it spontaneously anyway. I agree with that 3,000 word thing. My son went trick-or-treating last October. My husband actually got lost with the kids and so it was hours before they returned. The first thing my apraxic son said when he barrelled thru the door was " Tick uh Teat " . I was shocked. Here I had been sitting face-to-face sounding out words and even using the Kaufman method to get him to talk and afer a few hours of trick or treat, he says an unfamiliar word. I knew he faced the backs of other children and they did not sit and enunciate " Tuh-RI--Cuh-Tuh-Ree-TT " to him. It was the repitition of him " hearing " these kids over and over and over for hours saying " trick or treat " . BUT I want to add smething else I learned. Repitition in itself is not enough. It is the combination of " repetitiion AND 'experience' " that is the key. Whatever the repetitive activity, it has to 'spark' feeling/emotion (not necessarily good feeling and emotion). Repetition in itself is not good enough. (Just proves the " neuro " activation theory a little more also.) :0) Ciao. > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2009 Report Share Posted April 2, 2009 ROTFL...my apologies, but that was funny.(Not sure if it was meant to be.) On a more serious note, children with apraxia wholearn to talk still have apraxia. > > What if all the signs of apraxia are there, and the child has been in speech > for three years, and can now say words on command, does that mean they never > had apraxia or they heard the word 3000 times?? Jen > > > In a message dated 4/2/2009 7:07:57 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > mosense@... writes: > > > > > A friend of mine went to the National Apraxia Conference a couple years > ago....she learned a lot there. what she learned is Apraxia children need to hear > a word 3000 times before they can repeat it! - does that sound correct > to you? It makes perfect sense to me---all the words that my daughter heard > most in her early years are the ones she said first- like typical babies- only > four years late-- mama, dada...so be careful what you tell other parents. Now > she can repeat words on command that she has heard before...as long as they > are common, every day words. and she will try new words- they dont sound > right to anyone-but she will try. You are still a new mom to all this--it takes > time to get there but they do!!!!!!!!!! > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2009 Report Share Posted April 2, 2009 I do help that some of the things that all have told you in response to your inquiries have helped somewhat. Have we helped at all? > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2009 Report Share Posted April 2, 2009 -The apraxia still exists even when the child with apraxia learns to talk. Apraxia is a lifelong condition. -- In , jennyjudy@... wrote: > > What if all the signs of apraxia are there, and the child has been in speech > for three years, and can now say words on command, does that mean they never > had apraxia or they heard the word 3000 times?? Jen > > > In a message dated 4/2/2009 7:07:57 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > mosense@... writes: > > > > > A friend of mine went to the National Apraxia Conference a couple years > ago....she learned a lot there. what she learned is Apraxia children need to hear > a word 3000 times before they can repeat it! - does that sound correct > to you? It makes perfect sense to me---all the words that my daughter heard > most in her early years are the ones she said first- like typical babies- only > four years late-- mama, dada...so be careful what you tell other parents. Now > she can repeat words on command that she has heard before...as long as they > are common, every day words. and she will try new words- they dont sound > right to anyone-but she will try. You are still a new mom to all this--it takes > time to get there but they do!!!!!!!!!! > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2009 Report Share Posted April 2, 2009 I completely agree with you! I've heard Apraxic kids repeat only after a few things. Honestly-- in our own walk with Apraxia, the REPEATING isn't the problem-- it's the SPONTANEOUS saying of the word that has given us issues more so bek In a message dated 4/2/2009 6:42:22 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, mosense@... writes: but to tell new parents that --sorry- Apraxia children can never, ever repeat a word that they've heard not on command is wrong and misinformation!but to tell new parents that --sorry- Apraxia children can never, ever repeat a word that they've heard no **************Feeling the pinch at the grocery store? Make dinner for $10 or less. (http://food.aol.com/frugal-feasts?ncid=emlcntusfood00000001) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.