The Flawed Theory Behind Vaccinations, and Why MMR Jabs Endanger Your Child's Health

[Guest guest]

http://www.naturalnews.com/025596.html

 

Conventional medical doctors around the world (and the drug companies that

support them) want all children to be vaccinated against measles, mumps, HPV,

chicken pox and literally over a hundred other diseases. Bill Gates even

supports the effort to " eradicate " disease from our planet by vaccinating people

in developing nations. It all sounds like a noble goal, but like any such

effort, it is based on an assumption. Upon closer inspection, that assumption

turns out to be nothing more than blatant quacksterism hidden behind the

technical jargon of modern medicine.

What assumption am I referring to? The assumption that immune system

intervention (vaccines) produces a better long-term result than immune system

adaptation (allowing the person to conquer such infections on their own).

At first, it may seem like a no-brainer: Of course it's better to not get

infected! Or, at least, that's the conclusion most doctors jump to without any

real thought on the subject. In their minds, immune system intervention is

obviously superior to immune system adaptation. And in fact they dismiss anyone

who dares question this wisdom of modern vaccines. But is this assumption really

true?

In other words, is it true from a scientific perspective? Do mass vaccinations

for non-fatal diseases actually improve the health and lives of those who

receive them?

Vaccines don't stand up to scientific scrutiny

I realize it may seem odd to invoke the laws of scientific reasoning on this

issue. Vaccinations are supposed to be accepted without reason, without question

by both medical professional and the public, right? Even daring to question

vaccines is akin to questioning Darwinism in the minds of many.

But this, of course, reveals the fatal flaw of the pro-vaccine gang: They are

afraid of being questioned. They fear scientific scrutiny so much that they have

to reframe the entire debate as one made up of " doctors vs. quacks " rather than

one of scientific evidence (which they don't have) vs. quackery (which they have

lots of).

This is the strategy of the intellectually desperate. Truth does not fear

investigation, and if vaccines are so provably useful for enhancing the health

of children, then doctors shouldn't mind people asking questions or even openly

debating the merits of vaccination programs. And yet what you see with vaccines

today is a cult-like worship of vaccines that despises scrutiny or even solid

science. Vaccines are good because they tell us so, and that should be

sufficient reason, we're told.

Is it their authority that makes vaccines " scientific, " not actually any real

science.

So much for the scientific method when it comes to medicine, huh?

Mild infections actually IMPROVE health

Meanwhile, new research is showing that human health improves when it is EXPOSED

to full-strength pathogens and infections that force the body to activate an

adaptive response.

For example, new research conducted at Nottingham University (in the UK) is

studying whether infecting patients with microscopic parasites (hookworms)

actually improves their body's ability to deal with multiple sclerosis. A

pioneering study in Argentina showed positive results for asthma patients,

demonstrating that hookworm infections invoke a healthy adaptive response in the

body that tends to tame asthma.

In fact, as this Telegraph story explains

(http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/h...), one of the primary reasons why so many

first-world citizens are getting sick with degenerative disease these days may

be that people aren't exposed to enough infections in their lives.

This " hygiene hypothesis " challenges the conventional wisdom of vaccinations,

which instead believes that the human body should be denied the experience of a

full-strength infection (and the adaptive response that follows).

It is the odd belief of vaccine promoters, in other words, that the human body

is inherently incapable of dealing with infections and must be protected through

chemical intervention. This deeply-rooted lack of faith in the technology of the

human body is a bedrock belief of western medicine, which prefers intervention

over self care (and external solutions instead of internal ones). By sheer

coincidence, this core belief also happens to maximize the profits of the drug

companies and conventional medical practitioners who thrive on the revenues

created through medical intervention.

The upshot of all this is the sobering realization that children need to play in

the dirt. Eating a piece of food you drop on the floor won't kill you (the

five-second rule!), and there IS such as thing as being " too clean. "

Are people trying to live like the Bubble Boy?

The public's strange fascination with anti-bacterial soaps (which have been

widely shown to actually promote superbug populations)

(http://www.naturalnews.com/022178.html), antibiotics and vaccines shows a

remarkable fear of the real world, as if people are seeking to hide inside

sterilized plastic bubbles, free from the scary germs of the world.

Doctors prey upon this fear by scaring parents into thinking their child might

die if they don't get them vaccinated. The germs of the world are to be feared,

doctors say, not embraced. Modern medicine's " War on Germs " is a lot like

Bush's " War on Terror. " It's a never-ending war against an imaginary opponent,

used primarily to control people into doing what you want.

But I say this theory is fundamentally flawed. It is based on what seems to be

obvious, but in truth is far more complex. It SEEMS that protecting children

from chicken pox, for example, is good for them, but in reality that

intervention deprives their immune systems of the adaptive response necessary to

protect against future, more serious infections.

An immune system, much like a musculoskeletal system, needs exercise to stay

strong. When denied exposure to real pathogens, it becomes weak and lazy,

depriving the person of the immune system experience needed to mature and adapt.

A child deprived of chicken pox today is far more likely to be stricken by other

infectious diseases in the future -- diseases for which effective vaccines will

never exist.

And thus the entire belief system upon which vaccinations are based appears to

be fundamentally flawed when considering non-fatal infections. I'm not arguing

that a person working in a biohazard facility shouldn't be vaccinated against

Ebola or Marburg or other extremely deadly virulent strains. There is no healthy

adaptive response to such aggressive, dangerous pathogens. But neither are such

deadly strains any real risk to the public: They kill their victims too quickly

to successfully spread throughout the population.. As any CDC official will tell

you, the most widespread strains of infectious disease are the weakest strains

because they can live in hosts and incubate for long enough to be transmitted to

others.

Children should not be vaccinated against these largely non-fatal pathogens that

actually serve an important function in the maturation of that child's immune

system technology.

One child, one thousand vaccines

Today, we are over-vaccinating our children to the point of utterly

ridiculousness, and some doctors are claiming the effort should be boosted to

include even as many as " one thousand vaccines. " The more, the merrier!

And yet this vaccination agenda, upon closer inspection, appears to be based

entirely on an irrational belief in vaccines rather than a scientifically-proven

benefit derived from the intervention. Science, in fact, isn't even allowed in

this debate. Opponents of vaccines are screamed right out of the room before

they can even raise a single point of objection.

The only science they can really quote concerns whether or not the child's body

develops antibodies following the vaccine injection. This is an incredibly

short-sighted view that completely disregards the long-term consequences of this

immune system intervention. Then again, such short-sighted views characterize

modern medicine, which essentially ignores the long-term effects of practically

everything it promotes: Vaccines, pharmaceuticals, chemotherapy, radiation

treatments and so on.

When science becomes gospel, it is no longer science, but just another religion

framed in a different jargon. There's nothing wrong with religion, of course,

but when vaccine-pushing scientists dismiss religion as being " unscientific " and

then resort to precisely the same strategy of faith-based pronouncements of

truth in their own work, they only demonstrate the irrational double standard

upon which their agenda is based.

Vaccines are not to be questioned, period. And anyone who questions them shall

be interrogated by the Church of Modern Medicine. I wonder if the ghosts of

Copernicus and Galileo might have a few words to say about that? Modern medicine

has become to real science what the Church of the year 1633 was to Galileo

(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galile...).

The Scientific Revolution unleashed by those great minds of human history has

now been all but abandoned by pushers of pharmaceutical profits at the expense

of human health. Vaccines fail every scientific test of long-term safety or even

efficacy, and yet they continue to be pushed as gospel by believers in the

chemical interventions of modern medicine.

To call them quacks as actually missing the point. They are not actually

knowingly committing fraud. Most of these doctors and health authorities

actually believe what they're doing is right. And therein lies the greater

danger -- they are cult-like believers in a system of treatment that defies

scientific questioning. In their minds, the vaccine theory is beyond

questioning. It is gospel. It is truth. And those who dare question it are, in

their minds, lunatics from the start.

These are the obvious signs of modern medicine's dangerous descent into medical

fanaticism. Vaccine promoters are, in every way, fanatically dedicated to their

irrational beliefs that intervening in the immune system in better than allowing

the immune system to do its job.

And if you break this down to the essential underlying concepts, here's what it

all really means:

Doctors believe that THEIR technology is superior to the technology of the human

immune system.

Arrogance, in other words. Man is smarter than Mother Nature. Chemicals are

superior to the body's own immune system nanotechnology. These beliefs

characterize the gospel of modern medicine, and they simultaneously reveal a

highly pessimistic view of Mother Nature.

Darwinism, Natural Selection and the fatal contradiction in western medical

philosophy

One reason this is all so fascinating is because virtually all vaccine pushers

also believe in Darwinism and the laws of natural selection. Those very laws

dictate that, over hundreds of thousands of years of mutation and natural

selection, nature would have chosen the most fit and most biologically advanced

members of the human race to survive and pass on their genes.

Thus, the human beings that survived to today are, by their own definition of

natural selection, the most advanced forms of life possible within the species.

We are the cream of the crop, the super-fit humans who survived while our

lesser-qualified peers died and disappeared from the gene pool.

And yet, all of a sudden, by pushing vaccines, these same doctors are admitting

they have NO faith in the technology of the very human beings they claim are

genetically superior thanks to natural selection!

This simple example exposes the flawed philosophy of western medical scientists

and doctors. Their ideas simply don't add up. Are humans genetically superior

survivors possessing top-class immune system technology derived from millennia

of natural selection? Or are they chemically-deficient, immune-suppressed

failures of immune system technology that warrant aggressive pharmaceutical

intervention?

Vaccine pushers want to have it both ways. They want you to believe your immune

system is the technical equivalent of a biological supercomputer, created by

countless mutations that selected for superior beings. But if you walk into a

doctor's office and tell them you're a superior being with a highly advanced

immune system based on hundreds of thousands of years of evolution, they'll jab

you with a vaccine anyway, because they actually don't believe human beings

possess any advanced immune system technology at all.

You cannot believe in Natural Selection and vaccines at the same time. Not

without holding a bizarre contradiction in your own head.

Then again, modern medicine is a comedy of contradiction. And why should we

expect anything different from these geniuses when it comes to the vaccine

question?

Whether doctors, or students or priests, those who do not question their own

beliefs are doomed to fanaticism in all its various forms. The vaccine-pushing

agenda of modern times is, in every way, a form of runaway medical fanaticism

full of contradiction.

My own beliefs on this issue make a lot more sense: Mother Nature produces

amazing technology, and the human immune system is one of the most advanced

biological supercomputers that has ever existed on our planet. That immune

system, when properly supported, can easily overcome common infections. Vaccines

are not merely unnecessary; they are a chemical assault that damages the immune

system and interferes with the immune technology that should be embraced, not

hijacked.

I trust Mother Nature's technology over the interventions of profit-minded

doctors and drug companies, and I dismiss modern medicine's view of the human

body as being ridiculously pessimistic. Modern doctors are, in a very real

sense, biological " doom and gloomers " who want you to believe that, without

their expensive interventions, you're doomed to die of disease.

And that's just plain bunk.

Research and sources

To support the statements in this story, I have collected over 50 quotes from

health experts, authors and researchers on the subject of vaccines and the

immune system. You can read that full list here:

http://www.naturalnews.com/025595.html

Read those quotes to learn more about the harm of vaccines.

 

 

About the author: Mike is a natural health researcher and author with a

strong interest in personal health, the environment and the power of nature to

help us all heal He has authored more than 1,500 articles and dozens of reports,

guides and interviews on natural health topics, impacting the lives of millions

of readers around the world who are experiencing phenomenal health benefits from

reading his articles. is a trusted, independent journalist who receives no

money or promotional fees whatsoever to write about other companies' products.

In 2007, launched EcoLEDs, a maker of energy efficient LED lights that

greatly reduce CO2 emissions. He also founded an environmentally-friendly online

retailer called BetterLifeGoods.com that uses retail profits to help support

consumer advocacy programs. He's also a successful software entrepreneur, having

founded a well known email marketing software company whose technology currently

powers the

NaturalNews email newsletters. is currently the executive director of the

Consumer Wellness Center, a 501©3 non-profit, and practices nature

photography, Capoeira, Pilates and organic gardening. He's also author of

numerous health books published by Truth Publishing and is the creator of

several consumer-oriented grassroots campaigns, including the Spam. Don't Buy

It! campaign, and the free downloadable Honest Food Guide. He also created the

free reference sites HerbReference.com and HealingFoodReference.com.

believes in free speech, free access to nutritional supplements and the ending

of corporate control over medicines, genes and seeds. Known as the 'Health

Ranger,' ' personal health statistics and mission statements are located at

www.HealthRanger.org

Love, Gabby. :0)

http://stemcellforautism.blogspot.com/

 

" I know of nobody who is purely Autistic or purely neurotypical. Even God had

some Autistic moments, which is why the planets all spin. " ~ Jerry Newport